Why the rash of moderator changes?? - Page 7

Asmodean · November 14, 2003, 07:07

Quote:

Originally posted by Lazarus and the Gimp

That might have come from a PM I received, possibly as long ago as three years. Then again, I might have just made it up. Ultimately only I know. What difference does it make to anyone else?

It'll be interesting to see if I get banned for that.

There's one thing you have missed. The person who sent the PM also knows. And if that person happens to be MarkG, then you're in trouble....as you should be

Asmodean

DrSpike · November 14, 2003, 07:36

Like the kid caught with his hand in the cookie jar, he hides his hand behind his back and squeals "I didn't do it, honest"

Come on AH........now is the time to admit you've had the cookie all along.

rah · November 14, 2003, 09:28

At least he didn't claim that rimmer was a buddy that must have used his machine, to produce the same IP for posts.
This is like that comedy routine where a guy's wife catches him in bed with another women and he still denies that he's cheating on her. "WHAT WOMAN"

Alexander's Horse · November 14, 2003, 10:13

no he just used the same Ip address as the other 20,000 or so bureacrats who use our government ISP and go through our security firewall every freaking day

Ming · November 14, 2003, 10:22

"What Woman"

rah · November 14, 2003, 10:40

That's not a woman, it's rimmer.

alva · November 14, 2003, 14:57

????
So Rimmer is a woman...???? Then AH is female too????

DrSpike · November 14, 2003, 15:02

In the sense that he wont admit his wrongdoing even years later I suppose he is.

Asmodean · November 14, 2003, 16:58

He really doesn't have to admit it, does he??

It would be like Bin Laden admitting to be behind 9/11. Everybody knows he did it, so he really doesn't have to say it

Anyhoo...I'm sure there are other DL's to choose from

Asmodean

Immortal Wombat · November 14, 2003, 20:43

Quote:

Originally posted by Ming
Don't leave out the part about the IP matches... or that he ONLY posted during AH restictions in the past, or that his first few posts back were to defend AH...

But go ahead and ignore the facts... it's a better story that way

Yeah... AH is still beating one VERY DEAD horse

1. Nobody has ever seen the IP matches

2. I mentioned this
3. Rimmer is truly an upstanding guy. Probably he knows AH from work, given the IP claim.

Ming · November 14, 2003, 20:45

probably as upstanding as AH

Immortal Wombat · November 14, 2003, 20:48

Rimmer stands up for AH, AH stands up for Rimmer. It's a back-scratching cycle of happiness and love.

Tuberski · November 14, 2003, 21:26

If one is standing, they'll both be standing........

ACK!

PLATO · November 15, 2003, 13:56

Wonder why Rimmer didn't send Ming a PM from home? That would have cleared up the IP address?

Is it possible that if two are posting through the same firewall that their IP addresses will be the same even if they are using two different machines? If this is true, what else can be done to detect a DL?

Ming · November 15, 2003, 14:02

Anything is possible... however, the EVIDENCE was VERY CLEAR. There were matches to AH's work and home

So I have to laugh everytime he brings up his "we both work for the government" crap

PLATO · November 15, 2003, 14:16

Quote:

Originally posted by Ming
matches to AH's work and home

Clearly GUILTY!

Quit whining AH

Kuciwalker · November 15, 2003, 15:35

I get the feeling AH is just joking by now, Ming

Alexander's Horse · November 15, 2003, 22:27

Quote:

Originally posted by Ming
Anything is possible... however, the EVIDENCE was VERY CLEAR. There were matches to AH's work and home

So I have to laugh everytime he brings up his "we both work for the government" crap

Stop telling porkies Ming.

There was no IP match to my home - I use a dial up remember?

The guy was just unfortunate enough to login shortly after I was banned. I was at work at the time. Case closed.

mrmitchell · November 16, 2003, 00:06

The obvious solution is to ban AH, unban Rimmer, and see if Rimmer starts posting

Tassadar500 · November 16, 2003, 01:30

I bet Ming is AH's DL

Ming · November 16, 2003, 01:32

Quote:

Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
The guy was just unfortunate enough to login shortly after I was banned. I was at work at the time. Case closed.

Yeah... and out of nowhere his first post was to defend you...

Yes... how unfortunate...

DaShi · November 16, 2003, 02:03

Unban Ming's Gay Lover!

Tassadar500 · November 16, 2003, 02:21

Who would that be?

Alexander's Horse · November 16, 2003, 02:47

The "facts" of the case change every time Ming tells it.

Ming · November 16, 2003, 04:07

The facts haven't changed from the beginning. They remain the same. Nothing has changed, either the facts, or the telling of them.

You share multiple IP's... both home and work
He hasn't posted in ages, but he posts for the first time right after you got restricted
Checking his history, the only time he ever posted was when you were restricted...
His first two posts are to defend you...

No... the facts haven't changed one bit since then. But you want to ignore those and play the "you are wrong" act...

alva · November 16, 2003, 04:11

/me thinks AH is just wondering how long he can milk this.

Ming · November 16, 2003, 04:28

He's been milking it for a long time... but to no avail.

His denials just keep making him look like a moron

Alexander's Horse · November 16, 2003, 04:51

Denials of what?

Ming, your "fact" story gets embellished with new "facts" every time you tell it, lol.

Several new "facts" have been added to your tall tale in this thread alone.

The "facts" change with every re-telling.

Ming · November 16, 2003, 04:58

If you were to go back to the earlier threads where we had this discussion... the facts remain the same. You seem to be the only one confusing things... From the very first... I've said the same story over and over again.
But you continue to ignore it and make it sound like you are right...

Your position makes you look like an idiot... but go ahead and continue... par for the course

Alexander's Horse · November 16, 2003, 05:02

Well the ad hominem attack says otherwise, as does your liberal use of smilies.

No need to be so defensive Ming. You screwed up - everyone makes mistakes.