Iraq Scientists: Lied About Nuke Weapons - Page 2

Urban Ranger · November 30, 2003, 23:58

I remember the bit that GWB was saying he was getting impatient. That was funny then, but downright hilarious now. That's right, Mr Bush can hardly wait to kill loads of Iraqi civilians and soldiers, not to mention his own men.

KrazyHorse · December 1, 2003, 00:39

Quote:

Originally posted by Sava
sigh... don't worry Ned, I have faith that one day you will see the light...

It's sort of sad to see Sava own somebody else in a discussion...

Master Zen · December 1, 2003, 00:41

Quote:

Originally posted by SlowwHand
Zen, you're a dumbass.
Fooled Hussein (if THIS is true), but fooling Bush and any other's is Bush's fault?
Dumbass.

So, let me get this straight...

Before this, you and the rest of your merry right-wingers were absolutely sure that Iraq had WMD even when there was no evidence to prove it. Absolutely no way you could have been fooled, right? That bastard had nukes!

Now when the Iraquis say they lied about the program, then it is ok to say you were in fact fooled just so you don't look like an arse?

so, who's the dumbass?

Berzerker · December 1, 2003, 01:23

UR -

Quote:

What are you trying to say? That Boosh completely disregarded the UN weapons inspectors?

When did the UN inspectors announce Iraq had no WMD?

KrazyHorse · December 1, 2003, 01:28

They did announce Iraq had no credible nuke program, as I recall...

Skyjack666 · December 1, 2003, 01:30

Edit: Crap removed

Urban Ranger · December 1, 2003, 01:57

Quote:

Originally posted by Berzerker
UR -

When did the UN inspectors announce Iraq had no WMD?

IIRC, they couldn't find any evidence for BCN weapons before GWB rudely interrupted their work.

Skyjack666 · December 1, 2003, 01:58

Urban, why did you remove my post?...Because I said it's WWIII?

Zylka · December 1, 2003, 01:58

Quote:

Originally posted by KrazyHorse
They did announce Iraq had no credible nuke program, as I recall...

Hey guys - here ya go, easier to read:

Quote:

They did announce Iraq had no credible nuke program, as I recall...

Zylka · December 1, 2003, 02:00

By the way folks, while we're picking on the dated faults of both sides - HOLY MOLY CAN YOU EVER SEE THE PIPELINES NEXT TO MY AFGHANI COUNTRYSIDE SUITE RISE QUICKLY. THAT'S IMPERIAL PROGRESS!

KrazyHorse · December 1, 2003, 02:01

Huh. I wonder why you feel my statement needs emphasising...

Skyjack666 · December 1, 2003, 02:03

URBAN RANGER removed a well-written intelligent post on the matter because he didn't agree with it.

Nice...a moderator arguing in a 'neutral forum' and using his veto power to dump well-made arguments against his point.

KrazyHorse · December 1, 2003, 02:04

I wonder who you're talking to? As I recall, I never opposed action in Afghanistan, nor our involvement in it, noe did I posit that it was all to drive an oil pipeline through. Hmmm....

Though I do enjoy the dead com picture and mindless raving on general principle...

DinoDoc · December 1, 2003, 02:05

Quote:

Originally posted by Skyjack666
Nice...a moderator arguing in a 'neutral forum' and using his veto power to dump well-made arguments against his point.

Put it back if his edit offends you so.

Zylka · December 1, 2003, 02:06

Come now Froggy you can put my posts meaning together!

KrazyHorse · December 1, 2003, 02:06

Quote:

Originally posted by Skyjack666
URBAN RANGER removed a well-written intelligent post on the matter because he didn't agree with it.

Nice...a moderator arguing in a 'neutral forum' and using his veto power to dump well-made arguments against his point.

I read that post. It was neither intelligent nor particularly well-written, although the sentences of CAPS LOCK AND EXCLAMATION POINTS!!!!!! were a nice touch.

He had enough justification due to the fact that it was a blatant threadjack...

Skyjack666 · December 1, 2003, 02:08

There was no caps lock at all..and how was it a threadjack?

In that case, I'll post in a new thread, and maybe we can let the people decide.

That is, if no one is afraid.

KrazyHorse · December 1, 2003, 02:09

Quote:

Originally posted by DinoDoc
Put it back if his edit offends you so.

A settler since Jan 2003? Has he posted in the OT before?

Jon Miller · December 1, 2003, 02:09

IT'S GOING TO BE WW3!!!!!!!!!

JON MILLER
(THIS POST BROUGHT TO YOU WITHOUT THE USE OF THE CAPSLOCK KEY)

Skyjack666 · December 1, 2003, 02:12

I see right through your agenda, krazyhore...(s)

KrazyHorse · December 1, 2003, 02:13

Indeed. How's Calgary this time of year, Skyjack?

Skyjack666 · December 1, 2003, 02:15

Wait...aren't you threadjacking? You're off topic...shouldn't this be deleted?

Urban Ranger · December 1, 2003, 02:16

Quote:

Originally posted by Skyjack666
URBAN RANGER removed a well-written intelligent post on the matter because he didn't agree with it.

I do not remove posts because I don't agree with them. Your post - if that is your post, it looks like copy-n-paste from some place else - is nothing but a blatant troll and a threadjack to boot.

Do stop spamming also.

Skyjack666 · December 1, 2003, 02:23

it "looked" like what? How can you say I cut and pasted? I just wrote that off the top of my head.

I will, however repost it as it's own thread and we'll see what happens.

KrazyHorse · December 1, 2003, 02:24

Already done, skyjack

CharlesBHoff · December 1, 2003, 04:08

Quote:

Originally posted by Ned
It is interesting how Bush is a deliberate liar, according to the left, when he said that Saddam had a nuke program when the intel that Bush was relying on was apparently the same false information being fed Saddam.

All this shows is the amazing bias and self-deception of the left.

I have my own Intelligence Department tell me Iraq have no WMD, we donot count chemical weapon as almost very nation on this planet have then with afew expection. Iran have about 300-400 nuclear weapon already as does North Korea.

Zylka · December 1, 2003, 04:11

Quote:

Originally posted by KrazyHorse
Indeed. How's Calgary this time of year, Skyjack?

Ha ha ha! So funny they said it twice! Funnie and smrart are you, mr fire crotch!

Ned · December 1, 2003, 05:54

Quote:

Originally posted by KrazyHorse

It's sort of sad to see Sava own somebody else in a discussion...

KrazyHorse, Like you, when Sava is losing an argument, he resorts to ad hominem attacks.

Oerdin · December 1, 2003, 07:27

Quote:

Originally posted by CharlesBHoff
I have my own Intelligence Department tell me Iraq have no WMD, we donot count chemical weapon as almost very nation on this planet have then with afew expection. Iran have about 300-400 nuclear weapon already as does North Korea.

Neither Iran nor North Korea have 300-400 nuclear war heads. The CIA estimates, based upon the amount of spent fuel rods the North Koreas have availible for reprocessing, that NK has 3-5 war heads. Iran most likely doesn't have any yet but they've been trying awefully hard.

Nukes are much easier to track then Biological weapons so this data should be much better then the Iraq data. Also do you mean that most nations have the ability to produce chemical weapons? That is true but it is slightly different then actually having chemical weapons.

KrazyHorse · December 1, 2003, 09:08

Quote:

Originally posted by Ned

KrazyHorse, Like you, when Sava is losing an argument, he resorts to ad hominem attacks.

And sometimes you just don't care.