December 8, 2003, 23:50
|
#31
|
|
Deity
Local Time: 09:50
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Busy increasing the population of my country.
Posts: 15,413
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Beta
Ok - my top 3:
1. Celts
2. Dutch
3. India
|
What?, your a Canuck!, what happened to Iroquois! 
__________________
*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- Beta
Last edited by conmcb25; December 9, 2003 at 00:22.
|
|
|
|
|
December 9, 2003, 01:19
|
#32
|
|
King
Local Time: 07:50
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,337
|
Personally, I like...
1. Iroquios
2. Sumeria
3. Celts
all for previously mentioned reasons. 'nuff said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 9, 2003, 02:07
|
#33
|
|
Deity
Local Time: 06:50
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 10,675
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by donegeal
You wanna hear something stupid?
I have been playing alot as the Koreans. Their trait combo is excellent (Ind/Com) but their UU has been knocked as useless on many occasions. I, however, believe that the Hawa'cha is not only very useful, but borderline unbalancing. Why? Lethal Land Bombard. Look at both the PTWDG and the ISDG. Stacks of catapults running around making HUGE differences in the game. Now imagine a Lethal bombard stack. Who needs offensive units? Imagine a stack of 15 Hawa'chas covered by 5 Muskets. A stack of 15 knights would be hesitant to attack such a stack. Additionally, we would have to remember that if a civ can't build a unit, it can't capture it. So even if someone did manage to capture the Hawacha's, they still wouldn't be able to use them against us.
Hmmm.... its just a thought.
|
Lethal bombardment sure does change a lot for me! Are we sure that captured Hawa'chas don't turn into regular cannons instead of being disbanded?
If they can't be captured, then I too pick the mighty Koreans!
So, my list is as follows:
1. Koreans
2. Dutch (for reasons Togas mentioned)
3. Scandanavians
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 9, 2003, 19:53
|
#34
|
|
King
Local Time: 07:50
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,337
|
Sooo...
Someone wanna put up a poll or something?
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 9, 2003, 20:03
|
#35
|
|
Deity
Local Time: 09:50
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Busy increasing the population of my country.
Posts: 15,413
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Octavian X
Sooo...
Someone wanna put up a poll or something?
|
Go for it 
I would list all the civs we have discussed and limit it to three votes for each person.
The highest vote count is choice one, the second highest is choice two, etc.
__________________
*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- Beta
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 9, 2003, 20:39
|
#36
|
|
Deity
Local Time: 09:50
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Land of 1000 Islands
Posts: 20,338
|
OK - doing a poll with all civs suggested to-date. (10)
__________________
Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war .... aw, forget that nonsense. Beer, please.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:50.
|
|
