Thread Tools
Old December 16, 2003, 02:15   #1
Sarxis
Rise of Nations MultiplayerAlpha Centauri PBEMCivilization III MultiplayerCivilization III PBEMCTP2 Source Code ProjectCall to Power II MultiplayerCall to Power MultiplayerCivilization IV: MultiplayerCivilization IV CreatorsGalCiv Apolyton Empire
Emperor
 
Sarxis's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:41
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,361
Absorbing initial worker
Worked out nicely playing Spain (seafaring) and with two sugar resource, river adjacent squares.

But do you do it often?
Sarxis is offline  
Old December 16, 2003, 02:48   #2
nbarclay
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering Storm
Emperor
 
nbarclay's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:41
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 6,676
The problem with absorbing the initial worker is that you lose a lot of time improving tiles. A mine can change each of those sugar tiles from producing one shield to producing two shields, but if your initial worker is added to the city, he's not mining those tiles. At size 3, you'll need additional tiles to work beyond those two sugars unless you're planning to build a settler so quickly as to make time spent at size 3 essentially irrelevant (in which case you end up with two cities early but no workers to improve tiles for either of them).

I've always been a firm believer in building enough workers to more or less keep up with city growth. With agricultural civs starting on rivers, I've even taken to making a second worker a priority most of the time (especially if some kind of food bonus is also available) before my traditional granary. What the workers cost in city size, they more than make up for by letting the city get more out of the size it does have, or at least such has always been my belief.

Nathan
nbarclay is offline  
Old December 16, 2003, 03:11   #3
Sarxis
Rise of Nations MultiplayerAlpha Centauri PBEMCivilization III MultiplayerCivilization III PBEMCTP2 Source Code ProjectCall to Power II MultiplayerCall to Power MultiplayerCivilization IV: MultiplayerCivilization IV CreatorsGalCiv Apolyton Empire
Emperor
 
Sarxis's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:41
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,361
I should add that I beelined Philosophy. The extra citizen helped in initial research, and since I had plenty of rivers in the area, I wasn't pressed for roads.
Sarxis is offline  
Old December 16, 2003, 03:24   #4
nbarclay
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering Storm
Emperor
 
nbarclay's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:41
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 6,676
With a sugar tile on a river, a road doesn't make a difference to commerce under Despotism. But once you grew past working just the sugar tiles, road+river is two gold while river only is just one. Similarly, if either sugar was not on the river, doing without a road cost a gold. So while the extra citizen helped with research in the earliest stages, the loss of the worker almost certainly hurt research later on.
nbarclay is offline  
Old December 16, 2003, 07:50   #5
DrSpike
Civilization IV: MultiplayerApolyton University
Deity
 
DrSpike's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:41
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Enthusiastic member of Apolyton
Posts: 30,342
Adding the initial worker is rarely the correct strategy for a given opening.
DrSpike is offline  
Old December 16, 2003, 08:20   #6
East Street Trader
Prince
 
East Street Trader's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:41
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 814
When do you believe it to be the right strategy, then, DrSpike?

Has anyone tried a calculation? Say, taking the two sugar on a river case and comparing resources generated after, say, 20 and 40 years?
East Street Trader is offline  
Old December 16, 2003, 08:25   #7
sabrewolf
Civilization III MultiplayerCivilization III PBEMApolyton UniversityIron CiversCivilization IV CreatorsC3CDG Desolation RowCivilization IV PBEMCivilization IV: Multiplayer
Emperor
 
sabrewolf's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:41
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: turicum, helvetistan
Posts: 9,852
i can only think of one occasion where it's worth adding the worker:

on a 1-tile-island-start

no, seriously... adding the first worker to my city was a mistake i only did in my very first games
__________________
- Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity
- Atheism is a nonprophet organization.
sabrewolf is offline  
Old December 16, 2003, 08:26   #8
DrSpike
Civilization IV: MultiplayerApolyton University
Deity
 
DrSpike's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:41
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Enthusiastic member of Apolyton
Posts: 30,342
I can't actually remember a game where I did it, though I thought about it a lot as a possibility back in 1.07. I should have said 'never', but I'm sure there is a counterexample somewhere so I wimpily said 'rarely'.

Essentially the benefit of adding is small, and the benefit of improving tiles large in comparison. Usually you are short on workers early game anyway........one of the key decisions is how much time and food to 'waste' kicking out workers. Taking one away without a very good reason is not advisable IMO.
DrSpike is offline  
Old December 16, 2003, 09:35   #9
Aeson
Emperor
 
Local Time: 08:41
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: orangesoda
Posts: 8,643
Depends on what the goal is. I remember looking at a HOF game over at Civfanatics, trying to figure out how this person had a Conquest victory on turn 9 (Chieftain, Tiny map, 2 AI). For the life of me I couldn't figure it out because the start would only allow a Jag Warrior every 4 turns in that timeframe, and the huts didn't give out any Warriors.

Then I noticed he didn't have any native Workers. By adding the first Worker, the Jag Warrior comes out in 2 turns (was working 2 Cattle on plains instead of 1), and gives just enough time to get to both the AI.

There were times with the old Industrial trait that you could come out close to even by adding the initial Worker after improving a tile or two. You end up with a bit more commerce and production at the expense of a bit less food. Now (especially considering the chop time for Forests) I don't think it would work as well.

Certain gambles like the one I described above might pay off, but they are rather big gambles. As another example, expansionist Civs could get out faster Scouts, and if that allows the player to make contacts with the AI in time to trade starting techs, could make a very big impact on the game. Especially if the player is able to grab a couple AI Workers in those trades that otherwise wouldn't have been available.
__________________
"tout comprendre, c'est tout pardonner"
Aeson is offline  
Old December 16, 2003, 12:01   #10
East Street Trader
Prince
 
East Street Trader's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:41
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 814
Well, the example now surfacing focus on a short term increase in shields coming at a critical moment.

The downside is that after a short time the loss of early improvements to tiles kicks in and tips the balance of advantage into loss.

The examples given are of cases where the extra initial speed produces so great an advantage that this longer term loss does not matter.

But can the longer term loss itself be ameliorated?

Say the first city finds time at some point to replace the worker? Is there any sequence of builds which would keep the initial burst but manage to limit the longer term loss?
East Street Trader is offline  
Old December 16, 2003, 15:08   #11
Spaced Cowboy
Emperor
 
Spaced Cowboy's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:41
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 6,939
There was a thread a while ago where someone worked this out and determined that it was not worth it...but it was close.
__________________
We're sorry, the voices in my head are not available at this time. Please try back again soon.
Spaced Cowboy is offline  
Old December 16, 2003, 16:07   #12
Sarxis
Rise of Nations MultiplayerAlpha Centauri PBEMCivilization III MultiplayerCivilization III PBEMCTP2 Source Code ProjectCall to Power II MultiplayerCall to Power MultiplayerCivilization IV: MultiplayerCivilization IV CreatorsGalCiv Apolyton Empire
Emperor
 
Sarxis's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:41
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,361
Another factor too was that I did start building settlers after a few initial scouting warriors. Does getting your second city settled with comparable terrain make a difference?

I still think it could be advantageous especially to those civs that can easily beeline Philosophy. It also seems to help with building scouts quicker for good huts.

Spaced Cowboy, I'm gonna try to look for that thread. Any hints?
Sarxis is offline  
Old December 18, 2003, 19:51   #13
Dimension
Warlord
 
Dimension's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:41
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 234
This was discussed at length in some old threads. I did some turn-by-turn calculations in different positions on absorbing the worker, lumgerjacking a forest then absorbing the worker, etc.

The final word seemed to be that adding your initial worker back to your city is only worth it if your starting position is very bad, in which case you would've been better off moving the settler a few times before founding your initial city. You really can't justify it except in obscure situations where infrastructure is a non-issue, like essentially abandoning the city or Aeson's interesting example of making few warriors and winning immediately.

In my own analyses, I was calculating the time it would take you to have four cities, three warriors and two workers (or something like that). You were always better off keeping the worker, although if your civ is Industrious, you can pull it off and end up only being a couple turns behind in some situations.
__________________
To secure peace is to prepare for war.
Dimension is offline  
Old December 18, 2003, 19:58   #14
Dimension
Warlord
 
Dimension's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:41
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 234
Here's the thread I was talking about:
http://apolyton.net/forums/showthrea...threadid=39206
__________________
To secure peace is to prepare for war.
Dimension is offline  
Old December 18, 2003, 21:15   #15
chequita guevara
ACDG The Human HiveDiplomacyApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
chequita guevara's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:41
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Fort LOLderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Posts: 9,091
I never even considered doing it.
__________________
Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...
chequita guevara is offline  
Old December 19, 2003, 01:43   #16
MrWhereItsAt
Alpha Centauri Democracy GameCivilization II Democracy GamePtWDG RoleplayAlpha Centauri PBEMSpanish CiversCall to Power Democracy GameCivilization II Democracy Game: Red FrontPtWDG2 Latin LoversACDG The Cybernetic ConsciousnessCivilization III PBEMC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamACDG Planet University of TechnologyACDG3 GaiansC3CDG The Lost BoysCivilization III Democracy GameInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton Team
Deity
 
MrWhereItsAt's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:41
Local Date: November 3, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: That's DR WhereItsAt...
Posts: 10,157
It could be worth it if you got that first settler up and running faster, particularly if the new city included lux, great growth terrain or resources.
__________________
Consul.

Back to the ROOTS of addiction. My first missed poll!
MrWhereItsAt is offline  
Old December 23, 2003, 21:35   #17
dexters
Apolyton Storywriters' Guild
King
 
dexters's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:41
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,141
In the higher difficulty levels, adding the initial worker to the city adds nothing, just gives you a lot of headaches as your city gets too large to manage and discontent sets in.

As already noted, you want to be putting that worker to use improving tiles.
dexters is offline  
Old December 24, 2003, 01:39   #18
Sarxis
Rise of Nations MultiplayerAlpha Centauri PBEMCivilization III MultiplayerCivilization III PBEMCTP2 Source Code ProjectCall to Power II MultiplayerCall to Power MultiplayerCivilization IV: MultiplayerCivilization IV CreatorsGalCiv Apolyton Empire
Emperor
 
Sarxis's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:41
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,361
And keep in mind, I play accelerated production, so spitting out your first settler is much faster (and the growth is too).

And that thread is very good. All in all, it does seem that you could stand to gain by absorbing the first worker in very specific cases, but of course only in the short term. And delaying the absorbtion until a road or two or a key irrigation is completed could improve the tactic.

Last edited by Sarxis; December 24, 2003 at 01:48.
Sarxis is offline  
Old December 24, 2003, 02:47   #19
Inverse Icarus
Emperor
 
Inverse Icarus's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:41
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: flying too low to the ground
Posts: 4,625
when civ3 originally came out i came up with this question and someone mathematically proved it's better to improve tiles.
__________________
"I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
- Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card
Inverse Icarus is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:41.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team