Thread Tools
Old January 9, 2004, 11:06   #31
Tingkai
Prince
 
Local Time: 23:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 888
Quote:
Originally posted by Ted Striker
today i tripped and fell

i blame george bush
Typical Republican, living in a dream world. Bushie runs up a $480 billion deficit and all the Republicans are claiming that this won't have any negative effects. It's great for the US economy to run up massive unsupportable deficits.



Yeah, right.

Basic economics will tell ya that there's a price to pay for Bush's idiotic spending and the IMF is telling ya the cost.

The funny thing is that the Japanese and Chinese now have ya by the balls. The minute they stop buying US bucks, everything will fall to pieces.

And when that happens, the Republicans will blame Clinton.
Tingkai is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 11:07   #32
SpencerH
Civilization III PBEMCivilization III MultiplayerBtS Tri-League
Emperor
 
SpencerH's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Back in BAMA full time.
Posts: 4,502
Comparisons of unemployment statistics from country to country are not valid since they use different methods to define unemployment. Sweden, for example, includes workers who are unemployed but re-training on a course as employed and they use that mechanism to adjust the unemployment stats. I doubt that the USA uses that particular trick.
__________________
We need seperate human-only games for MP/PBEM that dont include the over-simplifications required to have a good AI
If any man be thirsty, let him come unto me and drink. Vampire 7:37
Just one old soldiers opinion. E Tenebris Lux. Pax quaeritur bello.
SpencerH is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 11:11   #33
el freako
Prince
 
el freako's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Bristol, European Union
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally posted by SpencerH
Comparisons of unemployment statistics from country to country are not valid since they use different methods to define unemployment. Sweden, for example, includes workers who are unemployed but re-training on a course as employed. I doubt that the USA does that.
Fiddles happen everywhere, according to the US's survey you cannot be unemployed if you don't own a telephone - as the survey is conducted using a telephone poll, when the US changed to this method it's unemployment rate fall by 0.5%

That is why I used the OECD's Standardized Unemployment Rates
el freako is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 11:12   #34
Shi Huangdi
Emperor
 
Shi Huangdi's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 4,213
Quote:
White House officials dismissed the report as alarmist, saying that President Bush has already vowed to reduce the budget deficit by half over the next five years. The deficit reached $374 billion last year, a record in dollar terms but not as a share of the total economy, and it is expected to exceed $400 billion this year.
__________________
"I'm moving to the Left" - Lancer

"I imagine the neighbors on your right are estatic." - Slowwhand
Shi Huangdi is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 11:13   #35
SpencerH
Civilization III PBEMCivilization III MultiplayerBtS Tri-League
Emperor
 
SpencerH's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Back in BAMA full time.
Posts: 4,502
Quote:
Originally posted by Tingkai


Typical Republican, living in a dream world. Bushie runs up a $480 billion deficit and all the Republicans are claiming that this won't have any negative effects. It's great for the US economy to run up massive unsupportable deficits.



Yeah, right.

Basic economics will tell ya that there's a price to pay for Bush's idiotic spending and the IMF is telling ya the cost.

The funny thing is that the Japanese and Chinese now have ya by the balls. The minute they stop buying US bucks, everything will fall to pieces.

And when that happens, the Republicans will blame Clinton.
So, is your position that Bush should have done nothing? He should have allowed the US economy to fall deeper into recession and continue to pull down the world economy in that fashion?

BTW, you have noticed where the DOW is these days?
__________________
We need seperate human-only games for MP/PBEM that dont include the over-simplifications required to have a good AI
If any man be thirsty, let him come unto me and drink. Vampire 7:37
Just one old soldiers opinion. E Tenebris Lux. Pax quaeritur bello.
SpencerH is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 11:16   #36
Shi Huangdi
Emperor
 
Shi Huangdi's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 4,213
Quote:
Originally posted by el freako


United States:
Taxation: 31.0% of GDP
Unemployment: 6.1%
Employment: 70.7% of population aged 15-64

Sweden:
Taxation: 59.3% of GDP
Unemployment: 4.8%
Employment: 73.0% of population aged 15-64

Denmark:
Taxation: 57.4% of GDP
Unemployment: 5.5%
Employment: 76.3% of population aged 15-64

Austria:
Taxation: 50.4% of GDP
Unemployment: 4.5%
Employment: 74.0% of population aged 15-64

Netherlands:
Taxation: 46.2% of GDP
Unemployment: 3.7%
Employment: 64.6% of population aged 15-64
Those figures were taken as the US was recovering from recession...
__________________
"I'm moving to the Left" - Lancer

"I imagine the neighbors on your right are estatic." - Slowwhand
Shi Huangdi is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 11:18   #37
el freako
Prince
 
el freako's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Bristol, European Union
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally posted by Shi Huangdi

Those figures were taken as the US was recovering from recession...
And whilst europe was in the middle of one.

Your point?

Would you be happier with 10 year averages?
el freako is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 11:18   #38
Tingkai
Prince
 
Local Time: 23:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 888
Quote:
Originally posted by SpencerH


So, is your position that Bush should have done nothing? He should have allowed the US economy to fall deeper into recession and continue to pull down the world economy in that fashion?

BTW, you have noticed where the DOW is these days?
For starters, Bushie should have kept his mouth shut instead of screaming about how the economy was going to crash the minute he got elected, and naturally it did.

Next off, He should have boinked some interns instead of messing around with the economy with all of his stupid massive government spending. The US government has added something line 100,000 government employees under bush, and that don't come free. it costs money, which bushie boy don't understand.

Bush took a $200 billion surplus and turned it into a $480 billion deficit. Ask yourself where did $600 billion a year go? Have you seen any of it? Nope.

If he had acted responsibily, the US ecobnomy woyuld have been in much better shape.
Tingkai is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 11:22   #39
Shi Huangdi
Emperor
 
Shi Huangdi's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 4,213
http://www.cato.org/dailys/04-13-03.html

Quote:
Tax Cut Facts and Fantasies
by Richard W. Rahn

Richard W. Rahn is an adjunct scholar of the Cato Institute.

In 1980, President Carter and his supporters in the Congress and news media asked, "how can we afford" presidential candidate Ronald Reagan's proposed tax cuts?

Mr. Reagan's critics claimed the tax cuts would lead to more inflation and higher interest rates, while Mr. Reagan said tax cuts would lead to more economic growth and higher living standards. What happened? Inflation fell from 12.5 percent in 1980 to 3.9 percent in 1984, interest rates fell, and economic growth went from minus 0.2 percent in 1980 to plus 7.3 percent in 1984, and Mr. Reagan was re-elected in a landslide.

Now a quarter-century later, the same debate is being replayed, with the opponents demonstrating collective amnesia and ignorance. Those opposed to President Bush's tax proposals make two major arguments: the tax cuts will increase the deficit and benefit the rich. Those who support the tax cuts argue that such tax cuts will increase economic growth and liberty, and reduce poverty.

To have an honest debate, it is important to know the facts. Claims are made that a tax cut will "cost" $700 billion or so, over 10 years. Such numbers are almost meaningless. First, they tend to be static revenue estimates, which assume no change in behavior because of the tax cut, which is totally unrealistic. Second, gross domestic product (GDP) is expected to be approximately $140 trillion over the next 10 years, which means the proposed tax cut is approximately one-half of 1 percent of total national product (in static terms). Even though political commentators, like David Broder of The Washington Post, refer to the tax cut as "massive" (March 30, 2003), it is almost too small to be meaningfully measured.

The correct way to measure tax revenues and government outlays is as a percentage of gross domestic product, in the same way the burden of your home mortgage is directly related to your income. You may be shocked to learn that even though federal government tax revenues and spending have increased almost twentyfold in the last 40 years, they have barely budged as a percent of GDP.

For instance, federal tax revenues were 17.5 percent of GDP in 1962 and were an almost identical 17.9 percent of GDP last year. Over this 40-year period federal tax revenues have never been lower than 17 percent (1965) or higher than 20.8 percent (2000) of GDP. Likewise, federal expenditures have ranged from a low of 17.2 percent (1965) to a high of 23.5 percent (1983) of GDP over this same 40-year period.

Despite the fact that federal revenues have varied little (as a percentage of GDP) over the last 40 years, there has been an enormous variation in top tax rates. When Ronald Reagan took office, the top individual tax rate was 70 percent and by 1986 it was down to only 28 percent. All Americans received at least a 30 percent tax rate cut; yet federal tax revenues as a percent of GDP were almost unchanged during the Reagan presidency (from 18.9 percent in 1980 to 18.1 percent in 1988).

What did change, however, was the rate of economic growth, which was more than 50 percent higher for the seven years after the Reagan tax cuts compared with the previous seven years. This increase in economic growth, plus some reductions in tax credits and deductions, almost entirely offset the effect of the rate reductions. Rapid economic growth, unlike government spending programs, proved to be the most effective way to reduce unemployment and poverty, and create opportunity for the disadvantaged.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has just released its analysis of the effects of the President Bush's tax and spending package. They found that without the president's tax cut, federal tax revenues will rise to 20.6 percent of GDP, up from last year's 17.9 percent; but even with the president's tax cut, taxes will still rise as a percentage of GDP to 18.8 percent in 2012. As we get wealthier, tax revenues increase as a percentage of GDP because of our progressive tax system. In order to keep the tax burden constant, we need to have periodic tax cuts even larger than the ones the president has proposed.

Some of the critics of the proposed tax cut claim the planned deficit spending will increase interest rates. Here again, the facts do not support the criticism. What is important is the total federal debt burden, not year-to-year changes in the deficit.

If the total debt burden rises as a percentage of GDP, it can crowd out private investment thus causing a reduction in investment or a rise in interest rates. However, again according to CBO, the total debt burden will actually shrink as a percent of GDP under the president's plan (from 34.3 percent in 2002 to 33.1 percent of GDP in 2012). The fact is the U.S. could run a small deficit forever and still reduce the debt burden, in the same way as an individual can take on more debt each year provided that the cost of servicing this additional debt is smaller than the rise in the individual's income.

At current levels, the debt is not a problem. At the end of WW II it was more than 100 percent of GDP and as late as 1995 is was almost 50 percent of GDP, and we did just fine. Ironically, the only time our debt burden was less than 30 percent in the last 60 years was in the 1970s, which were characterized by high inflation and interest rates and low growth.

What kind of tax cut should we have? Nobel Prize-winning economist Robert Lucas presented an important paper in January of this year, in which he says: "There remain important gains in welfare from better fiscal policies, but I argue that these are gains from providing people with better incentives to work and to save, not from better fine tuning of spending flows." Mr. Lucas found that reducing capital income taxation from its current level to zero (using other taxes to support an unchanged rate of government spending) would result in overall welfare gains of "perhaps 2 to 4 percent of annual consumption, in perpetuity."

President Bush's proposal to eliminate the double tax on dividends is a good first step but, if we would remove all taxes from productive savings and investment, such as taxes on interest and capital gains, almost all Americans including the poorest would see their real incomes grow at roughly twice the present rate -- forever. Those who oppose tax cuts on savings and investment because they think the rich would benefit are in fact punishing the poor. President Reagan understood that one wins a war, the Cold War, by being resolute; and he understood that one strengthens the economy not only by having good policies, but also by educating the press and the American people every day as to why those policies are right and necessary. President Bush is being resolute on the war on terrorism, but he also should create an army of knowledgeable supporters to educate the press and people about the needed growth-enhancing tax policy to avoid losing the economic war.
__________________
"I'm moving to the Left" - Lancer

"I imagine the neighbors on your right are estatic." - Slowwhand
Shi Huangdi is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 11:22   #40
el freako
Prince
 
el freako's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Bristol, European Union
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally posted by SpencerH

So, is your position that Bush should have done nothing? He should have allowed the US economy to fall deeper into recession and continue to pull down the world economy in that fashion?
Yes he should, as it is he is storing up an even worse recession in the future.

Quote:
Originally posted by SpencerH
BTW, you have noticed where the DOW is these days?
Yes, at a higher price/earnings ratio than in 1929.
el freako is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 11:24   #41
Kidicious
Deity
 
Kidicious's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,628
Quote:
Originally posted by el freako
United States:
Taxation: 31.0% of GDP
Unemployment: 6.1%
Employment: 70.7% of population aged 15-64

Sweden:
Taxation: 59.3% of GDP
Unemployment: 4.8%
Employment: 73.0% of population aged 15-64
Are you honestly saying that if the US taxation was 59.3% that 73% of our working age population would be employed? The tax cuts have increased employment in the US, or at least slowed the loss in employment. So has the loose monetary policy.
__________________
Obedience unlocks understanding. - Rick Warren
1 John 2:3 - ... we know Christ if we obey his commandments. (GWT)
John 14:6 - Jesus said to him, "I am ... the truth." (NKJV)
Kidicious is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 11:26   #42
SpencerH
Civilization III PBEMCivilization III MultiplayerBtS Tri-League
Emperor
 
SpencerH's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Back in BAMA full time.
Posts: 4,502
Quote:
Originally posted by el freako


Fiddles happen everywhere, according to the US's survey you cannot be unemployed if you don't own a telephone - as the survey is conducted using a telephone poll, when the US changed to this method it's unemployment rate fall by 0.5%

That is why I used the OECD's Standardized Unemployment Rates
Which doesnt state how they arrived at the figures.
__________________
We need seperate human-only games for MP/PBEM that dont include the over-simplifications required to have a good AI
If any man be thirsty, let him come unto me and drink. Vampire 7:37
Just one old soldiers opinion. E Tenebris Lux. Pax quaeritur bello.
SpencerH is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 11:29   #43
SpencerH
Civilization III PBEMCivilization III MultiplayerBtS Tri-League
Emperor
 
SpencerH's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Back in BAMA full time.
Posts: 4,502
Quote:
Originally posted by el freako


Yes he should, as it is he is storing up an even worse recession in the future.



Yes, at a higher price/earnings ratio than in 1929.
But lower than during the golden days of the clinton bubble.
__________________
We need seperate human-only games for MP/PBEM that dont include the over-simplifications required to have a good AI
If any man be thirsty, let him come unto me and drink. Vampire 7:37
Just one old soldiers opinion. E Tenebris Lux. Pax quaeritur bello.
SpencerH is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 11:32   #44
Kidicious
Deity
 
Kidicious's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,628
Quote:
Originally posted by el freako
Yes he should, as it is he is storing up an even worse recession in the future.
That depression can not be avoided, certainly not by standy by and letting it happen sooner.
__________________
Obedience unlocks understanding. - Rick Warren
1 John 2:3 - ... we know Christ if we obey his commandments. (GWT)
John 14:6 - Jesus said to him, "I am ... the truth." (NKJV)
Kidicious is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 11:44   #45
el freako
Prince
 
el freako's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Bristol, European Union
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally posted by Shi Huangdi

Mr. Reagan's critics claimed the tax cuts would lead to more inflation and higher interest rates
What they said was that 'other things being equal' - as there was a general fall in inflation worldwide how much was attributable to Reagan's economic policy and how much to a reversal of the cost-push factors of the 1970's?

Quote:
Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
while Mr. Reagan said tax cuts would lead to more economic growth and higher living standards. What happened? Inflation fell from 12.5 percent in 1980 to 3.9 percent in 1984, interest rates fell, and economic growth went from minus 0.2 percent in 1980 to plus 7.3 percent in 1984, and Mr. Reagan was re-elected in a landslide.
Real interest rates, however, rose substatially (from nearly nothing to over 5%)

Quote:
Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
What did change, however, was the rate of economic growth, which was more than 50 percent higher for the seven years after the Reagan tax cuts compared with the previous seven years.
He is 'torturing the data untill it confesses' here.
The 7 years before the tax cuts included both oil shocks, the 7 years after included the oil price collapse of 1986.

A better way would be to look at the underlying growth rate of both periods, that fell from 3.5% to 3.0% (and continued to fall to 2.5% by the early 1990's, before recovering)


Quote:
Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has just released its analysis of the effects of the President Bush's tax and spending package.
The CBo might be nonpartisan, but it has to use the administration's estimates of growth etc when preparing it's forecasts.


Quote:
Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
They found that without the president's tax cut, federal tax revenues will rise to 20.6 percent of GDP, up from last year's 17.9 percent; but even with the president's tax cut, taxes will still rise as a percentage of GDP to 18.8 percent in 2012.
A period which handily included the so-called 'sunset clause' when almost all of the tax cuts now enacted will 'expire' (this is due in 2011)
I must hand it to Mr Rhan he is good at using statistics for partisan purposes.


Quote:
Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
If the total debt burden rises as a percentage of GDP, it can crowd out private investment thus causing a reduction in investment or a rise in interest rates. However, again according to CBO, the total debt burden will actually shrink as a percent of GDP under the president's plan (from 34.3 percent in 2002 to 33.1 percent of GDP in 2012).
Remember what I said about the CBO having to use administration estimates for growth etc?

The OECD thinks that the US's net debt will rise from 43% of GDP in 2000 to 52% in 2005 (in contrast the EU's whilst it will also be at 52% in 2005 will have risen by less, with the level in 2000 being 48%)


Quote:
Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
The fact is the U.S. could run a small deficit forever and still reduce the debt burden, in the same way as an individual can take on more debt each year provided that the cost of servicing this additional debt is smaller than the rise in the individual's income.
True, however the level of that deficit is 2.5% of GDP - the current structural deficit (i.e. that which the US would have if the economy was running at trend) is twice that level, that means that there need to be tax increases/spending reductions of nearly $300bn to just stop the debt burden rising.


Quote:
Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
At current levels, the debt is not a problem. At the end of WW II it was more than 100 percent of GDP and as late as 1995 is was almost 50 percent of GDP, and we did just fine.
The debt burden would not be worrying if it were not for the fact that in a decade's time the baby boomers are going to start to retire - meaning that mandatory government spending is going to soar.
Is it really sensible to spend like there's no tomorrow when tomorrow is bringing a big bill?
el freako is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 11:49   #46
el freako
Prince
 
el freako's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Bristol, European Union
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally posted by SpencerH

Which doesnt state how they arrived at the figures.
Blimey you're lazy, why not try looking around their site?

Quote:
Originally posted by Kidicious
Are you honestly saying that if the US taxation was 59.3% that 73% of our working age population would be employed?
No, my quoting of those statistics was in response to Diplomat saying that bringing US taxes to european levels "would devastate our economy causing huge unemployment."

I was just showing that high taxes need not lead to mass unemployment.

Last edited by el freako; January 9, 2004 at 12:00.
el freako is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 12:00   #47
Kidicious
Deity
 
Kidicious's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,628
Quote:
Originally posted by el freako
No, my quoting of those statistics was in response to this Diplomat saying that bringing US taxes to european levels "would devastate our economy causing huge unemployment."

I was just showing that high taxes need not lead to mass unemployment.
But the US already has high unemployment. Raising taxes or even doing nothing about it certainly would cause mass unemployment.
__________________
Obedience unlocks understanding. - Rick Warren
1 John 2:3 - ... we know Christ if we obey his commandments. (GWT)
John 14:6 - Jesus said to him, "I am ... the truth." (NKJV)
Kidicious is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 12:04   #48
el freako
Prince
 
el freako's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Bristol, European Union
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally posted by Kidicious


But the US already has high unemployment. Raising taxes or even doing nothing about it certainly would cause mass unemployment.
I'm surprised at you Kidicious!

'certainly cause' ?

Between 1990 and 2000 the US tax burden rose from 32% to 35% but unemployment fell from 5.6% to 4%
el freako is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 12:05   #49
SpencerH
Civilization III PBEMCivilization III MultiplayerBtS Tri-League
Emperor
 
SpencerH's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Back in BAMA full time.
Posts: 4,502
Quote:
Originally posted by el freako


Blimey you're lazy, why not try looking around their site?
No I merely followed the link that you provided. The essence of the second link is that the figures originate from the source country and dont appear to be standardized in any way. As we've already discussed, everyone uses there own definitions. Therefore, comparisons between countries are meaningless and the variations in the unemployment rates between the USA and the Euro countries (that were posted) insignificant.
__________________
We need seperate human-only games for MP/PBEM that dont include the over-simplifications required to have a good AI
If any man be thirsty, let him come unto me and drink. Vampire 7:37
Just one old soldiers opinion. E Tenebris Lux. Pax quaeritur bello.
SpencerH is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 12:06   #50
Spiffor
Civilization III Democracy GamePtWDG LegolandApolytoners Hall of Fame
 
Spiffor's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: jihadding against Danish Feta
Posts: 6,182
The American deficit-spending is doing more for international growth than a conservative fiscal policy. You don't imagine all these missiles, ships, planes etc. have a production process 100% American, don't you?

The increasing weakness of the dollar is only quickening the structural change in the world economy, that will end up with both the Euro and the Dollar as competitive reserve money. The restrictive monetary policy of the EU (and the fact that we keep to it despite a completely unadequate weather) is indeed solely intended at making the Euro a money as trustworthy as the dollar.

As such, yes, the massive deficit spending threatens the world economy as it is today. But it's very possible tommorrow's world economy will be better.

And lastly, the IMF talks out of its rump: a 40% debt has nothing exceptional. EU's stability pact considers 60% to be acceptable.
__________________
"I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
"I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
"I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis
Spiffor is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 12:08   #51
SpencerH
Civilization III PBEMCivilization III MultiplayerBtS Tri-League
Emperor
 
SpencerH's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Back in BAMA full time.
Posts: 4,502
Quote:
Originally posted by el freako

I was just showing that high taxes need not lead to mass unemployment.
The critical phrase there being "need not"
__________________
We need seperate human-only games for MP/PBEM that dont include the over-simplifications required to have a good AI
If any man be thirsty, let him come unto me and drink. Vampire 7:37
Just one old soldiers opinion. E Tenebris Lux. Pax quaeritur bello.
SpencerH is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 12:10   #52
Kidicious
Deity
 
Kidicious's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,628
Quote:
Originally posted by el freako


I'm surprised at you Kidicious!

'certainly cause' ?

Between 1990 and 2000 the US tax burden rose from 32% to 35% but unemployment fell from 5.6% to 4%
That is a different case. The tax burden could be increased because of the increase in private investment and consumption. A growing economy allowed it. Now that private spending and confidence has fallen the economy needs stimulus.
__________________
Obedience unlocks understanding. - Rick Warren
1 John 2:3 - ... we know Christ if we obey his commandments. (GWT)
John 14:6 - Jesus said to him, "I am ... the truth." (NKJV)
Kidicious is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 12:17   #53
el freako
Prince
 
el freako's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Bristol, European Union
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally posted by SpencerH

No I merely followed the link that you provided. The essence of the second link is that the figures originate from the source country and dont appear to be standardized in any way.
I apologize, the old edition of that file had the definiation of the standardized rates as well.

The OECD uses the International Labour Organization's definition of unemployment that a person is unemployed if "they have actively sought work in the last four weeks, or if they are waiting for a job to start"


Quote:
Originally posted by SpencerH
The critical phrase there being "need not".
Precisely, all those assuming that higher taxes always lead to higher unemployment are therefore incorrect.
el freako is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 12:19   #54
el freako
Prince
 
el freako's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Bristol, European Union
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally posted by Kidicious


That is a different case. The tax burden could be increased because of the increase in private investment and consumption. A growing economy allowed it. Now that private spending and confidence has fallen the economy needs stimulus.

How is it a different case? has the US economy stopped growing now?
el freako is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 12:22   #55
Kidicious
Deity
 
Kidicious's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,628
It's monetary policy, not fiscal policy, that truly determines the value of the currency. In the 80s the Fed tightened the money supply to counteract the fiscal stimulus. That's what prevented the inflation of the 70s. The Fed will do the same thing in this decade if the value of the dollar becomes a problem.
__________________
Obedience unlocks understanding. - Rick Warren
1 John 2:3 - ... we know Christ if we obey his commandments. (GWT)
John 14:6 - Jesus said to him, "I am ... the truth." (NKJV)
Kidicious is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 12:25   #56
Kidicious
Deity
 
Kidicious's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,628
Quote:
Originally posted by el freako



How is it a different case? has the US economy stopped growing now?
The economy isn't growing fast enough to reach full employment on it's own. The 90s were a special case. New products and technologies increased consumer and business spending. We can't expect that to happen in this decade. It will only happen by chance.
__________________
Obedience unlocks understanding. - Rick Warren
1 John 2:3 - ... we know Christ if we obey his commandments. (GWT)
John 14:6 - Jesus said to him, "I am ... the truth." (NKJV)
Kidicious is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 12:28   #57
el freako
Prince
 
el freako's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Bristol, European Union
Posts: 573
I disagree.

I think that growth above trend (3% to 3.5% for the US) will happen for a good few years in the US.

I think that it will be mainly export-led and that taxes will have to rise in the late 2000's.

As such the recovery will feel less like a boom than the statistics show.
el freako is offline  
Old January 9, 2004, 12:32   #58
Kidicious
Deity
 
Kidicious's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,628
Quote:
Originally posted by el freako
I disagree.

I think that growth above trend (3% to 3.5% for the US) will happen for a good few years in the US.

I think that it will be mainly export-led and that taxes will have to rise in the late 2000's.

As such the recovery will feel less like a boom than the statistics show.
If this happens it will be due to fiscal and monetary stimulus and a weak dollar. Still the growth rate that you mention will not create full employment in the short run, because of the improvements in productivity and increase in capacity of the 90s.
__________________
Obedience unlocks understanding. - Rick Warren
1 John 2:3 - ... we know Christ if we obey his commandments. (GWT)
John 14:6 - Jesus said to him, "I am ... the truth." (NKJV)
Kidicious is offline  
Old January 10, 2004, 08:06   #59
Urban Ranger
NationStatesApolyton Storywriters' GuildNever Ending Stories
Deity
 
Urban Ranger's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
Posts: 14,606
Quote:
Originally posted by Spiffor
And lastly, the IMF talks out of its rump: a 40% debt has nothing exceptional. EU's stability pact considers 60% to be acceptable.
But the US also has an gigantic national debt.
__________________
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
Urban Ranger is offline  
Old January 10, 2004, 09:11   #60
Spiffor
Civilization III Democracy GamePtWDG LegolandApolytoners Hall of Fame
 
Spiffor's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:51
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: jihadding against Danish Feta
Posts: 6,182
Quote:
Originally posted by Urban Ranger
But the US also has an gigantic national debt.
Indeed, that's what the US economy should really worry about. When the State itself has a huge debt, there are always possible workarounds. When the whole society is strongly indebted, any significant crisis can become a panic, similar to the 1929 one.
__________________
"I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
"I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
"I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis
Spiffor is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:51.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team