Thread Tools
Old December 6, 2000, 14:09   #1
JasonL
Settler
 
Local Time: 09:08
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 8
7/10 Review in Camecenter
Gamecenter's review http://www.Gamecenter.com/Reviews/It...?st.gc.fd.pc.i by Steve Klett scores the game 7/10 overall. Given the overall positive tone of the review, the score seems rather low. It seems he's most critical of the game for being a "Civ II knockoff" rather than "its own game." Which leads me to wonder what he was expecting from a game that clearly set out to be a civ-type game.
JasonL is offline  
Old December 6, 2000, 16:28   #2
MarkG
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
quote:

Originally posted by JasonL on 12-06-2000 01:09 PM
It seems he's most critical of the game for being a "Civ II knockoff" rather than "its own game." Which leads me to wonder what he was expecting from a game that clearly set out to be a civ-type game.
i fail to understand this logic. what's wrong with a game which takes the civ1/2 format and advances it a step further? or is it that only Sid has the right to do this? i'm sorry but i cant wait until 2002....

 
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:08.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team