Thread Tools
Old November 5, 2000, 12:48   #1
Drago Sinio
Prince
 
Drago Sinio's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:46
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 460
Incremental Caravan buying VS Science rate?
I wanted to hear some opinions on the merits of building marketplaces, banks, stock exchanges instead of library, university. And setting the tax rate high to generate high income. The caravans would be sent to other civs for the trade, science, cash bonus .

If you did that and then inc. rush built caravans with the cash, would that generate more , or fewer, science beakers than setting a high science rate and concentrating on libraries and universities?

Opinions or experience, anyone?
Drago Sinio is offline  
Old November 5, 2000, 17:54   #2
geofelt
Prince
 
Local Time: 18:46
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Neptune Beach,Florida,USA
Posts: 806
I usually only build library, etc in my science city. I spend the effort on expanding and building more cities. Early caravans don't yield much continuing trade, so I only send them from the science city. Later, under democracy, I fill out the trade routes. Early on, experiment with a higher luxury rate if you have hanging gardens. A We-love-the-leader city will produce republic level trade.
geofelt is offline  
Old November 6, 2000, 00:26   #3
Matthew
Prince
 
Local Time: 23:46
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Manhattan, Kansas . USA
Posts: 724
I almost always prioritize market places and banks over libraries and universities. Simple reasoning:

1. a market place can help keep people happy with a lower luxury rate, allowing you to increase science anyway.

2. With a market playce you can generate the same income with a lower tax rate, again giving you the option to raise science by lowering taxes.

3. A market place will allow you to celebrate to larger sizes, meaning more trade that can go into science, and more shields to build caravans (which can definitely out produce libraries and universities in science, not to mention cash), and other things, like the library I might now think about.

In short, unless I need a quick infusion of science, or have a city or two that could really take advantage of a library, I generally give science improvements a pretty low priority. An SSC is a big exception, of course.

------------------
The camel is not a part of civ.

THE CAMEL IS CIV !!!!

SAVE THE CAMEL !!!!!!
Matthew is offline  
Old November 6, 2000, 12:04   #4
Blaupanzer
lifer
Emperor
 
Blaupanzer's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:46
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 3,810
Pretty sure neither strategy will beat Xin Yu's size 5 strategy diverting citizens to scientists en masse. Personally, I favor market places and harbors over libraries, at least until I can buils Adam Smith's. If I get that, then I build any remaining 1 gold maintenance improvements.
Blaupanzer is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:46.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team