Thread Tools
Old December 22, 2000, 22:07   #1
Maelhavok
Settler
 
Local Time: 23:49
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Seattle,Wa. USA
Posts: 28
The Great Library -- to build or not to build
Hello Civ2 fans,

I was reading a recent post that transposed into this subject and I wanted to hear your views. GL or no GL. For me, GL. I conquer early. My tech tends to go Monarchy-Philosophy-Invention-Democracy. The GL is the only near indespensible ancient wonder for me. GL enables me to put min % in science when I get Lady Liberty and switch to Fundy. I can build hoards and amass gold and be no worse than tied for 2nd 'til ELECTRICITY. The whole time which egghead sucker civ do you think will get the brunt of my Grand Armee.
Some famous poster said that it takes longer to research your techs w/GL, I disagree. Although any specific tech may not be researched first, given that all techs are mandatory and you lose no beakers thru conquest or GL the stored beakers will eventually get your chosen tech first. This combined with attacking AI civ tech leader for me means NO ONE gets electricity at all because when I rule the world, everybody practices green simple living.

Merry Holidays,

Maelhavok

Maelhavok is offline  
Old December 22, 2000, 23:17   #2
jcarkey
Warlord
 
Local Time: 17:49
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 272
I am a nay-sayer. It doesn't make you lose beakers. With every tech that you research, it takes an increasing amount of beakers to research a tech. The AI usually picks to research bad techs, meaning you get those bad techs and a higher rate of research. So if you were to want a specific tech, then you would have to raise your science rate which in effect reduces the use of the GL signifigantly.

------------------
Save the whales, collect the whole set!!

If Al Gore invented the Internet, then I invented the spell check- Dan Quayle

If someone doesn't agree with you, you haven't explained yourself well enough-Luther Ely Smith
jcarkey is offline  
Old December 23, 2000, 03:04   #3
Ken Hinds
Prince
 
Local Time: 18:49
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 464
I'm finding more and more that what I tend to do is not build the GL. With judicious care and planning I can keep it under 10 turns/tech and rush to Metalurgy and Electricity which will kill off the two biggest headaches to deal with if someone else has them at Deity, but do very little to help except against the barbarians. I'm also leaning more toward Gunpowder then Chivelry so that I can create Barbarian knights to hassle everyone else and still have a decent defense against them myself.

Another reason for not building the GL and for killing it early is that it seems to be fairly high on the list for the AI, the same as KRC. The AI Civs will keep starting and abandoning it over and over until someone finally completes it. At that point the only value that they have to you is for score points so let them build those instead of Hover's, liberty, or SETI which are much more useful to you.

Ken
Ken Hinds is offline  
Old December 23, 2000, 08:25   #4
ChrisShaffer
Prince
 
ChrisShaffer's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:49
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America
Posts: 359
It depends on the game, but I like the Great Library. You're going to have to research every tech anyway, so while it might delay getting a specific tech, no matter how you count it you end up needing less beakers overall - thus, a gain.

If I'm on a good trade map, I don't build it. But if I'm on a low trade map, I build it every time. Try playing the Persians on Carta Incognita from Maps of Complexity - a real challenge and the Great Library made the difference for me.
[This message has been edited by ChrisShaffer (edited December 23, 2000).]
ChrisShaffer is offline  
Old December 23, 2000, 10:29   #5
Builder
 
Local Time: 23:49
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 0
It depends on how good you are.

When I play on emperor level(never won yet ) I always build it, without it I find myself far behind the other civs.

On lower levels I always far ahead of them so there is no need in wasting time and shields on the GL.
Builder is offline  
Old December 23, 2000, 12:45   #6
SilverDragon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I build it so the annoying AI doesn't get a tech every time I trade with another AI.

------------------
Go Redskins!

Email me at
SilverDragon141@aol.com
 
Old December 23, 2000, 21:36   #7
Mercantile
Settler
 
Local Time: 23:49
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Westcoast of Canada
Posts: 9
The thing is , you don't need to research every tech to win. Even with a perfectionist strategy, your going to take out some ai's at some point. The GL slows specific research and gives you techs in reality, you don't really need. I used to build it, never any more. It stalls my science growth.
Mercantile is offline  
Old December 23, 2000, 22:57   #8
Blaupanzer
lifer
Emperor
 
Blaupanzer's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:49
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 3,810
i am an advocate of the GL in most games. I always play at deity and find that the easiest way to win is to slow the whole science thing down in the middle game. As I said in another thread, if you slow your own science rate, so do the AIs. With the GL, you won't fall behind. Once I get the SOL, or using Oedo's years, I switch between democracy and fundy, depending on my goals in winning. The GL is a really powerful tool in this.

I understand that in MP, the GL is regarded as a real prize, another proof of its value.
Blaupanzer is offline  
Old December 28, 2000, 12:43   #9
Edward
Warlord
 
Local Time: 18:49
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 267
As a warning, I've only played single player, so my views will be somewhat narrow minded.

The Great Library is a wonderful, wonderful wonder if you're going to set your science rate low and concentrate on a military. It means "free" techs with no effort.

I, however, usually play to win via the space race. Here keeping ahead of the AI in research is important.

A couple comments on the "I have to research every tech anyway" view.

1) When you get a certain tech is important. The first civilization to say Monotheism is much more likely to build Michaelangelo's Cathedral than the second or third. Theology is a useless and research-impeding tech if you get it after J.S. Bach's has been built. Wonders are very potent in Civ 2 so it often becomes a game of races for the next wonder. In these races a streamlined tech path is more important than merely knowing a lot of techs. Even if you have to eventually learn a tech, learning it later rather than earlier can be a big help due to wonder building considerations.

Getting a tech for "free" from the Great Library means you don't have spend beakers to get it, so it would seem that you'll spend fewer beakers overall to get to Space Flight. However, the Great Library might make you miss out on some tech-enhancing wonders (Copernicus's Observatory being a big one with the AI). These wonders give you back "free" beakers that you can use on techs of your choosing.

2) You can sometimes skip over early techs and never research them if you get lucky with tech trading. Railroad is a pretty important tech. To get it you need Bridge Building and to get that you need Iron Working and to get that you need Warrior Code. So I guess you need all these techs, right? Not so. A friendly AI might trade you Iron Working or Bridge Building, meaning you'd never have to learn Warrior Code at all (we need railroads, not archers). That way you'd have (at least) one less tech in your bag slowing down your research.

I've only recently realized the importance of a streamlined tech path. It's easy to think of your rate of research or needed beakers as a mysterious factor out of your control and merely wait until the game sees fit to give you your next advance. On this board I've learned that I can influence my research rate in ways other than sending out more caravans.
Edward is offline  
Old December 29, 2000, 01:15   #10
Blaupanzer
lifer
Emperor
 
Blaupanzer's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:49
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 3,810
Edward, excellent observation on bypassing techs. I'm not convinced about the GL, but I do understand the "streamlined tech path" faction a little more clearly based on your observation. Note, I do not always go for world conquering. I decide the direction at Fundamentalism time. If I'm reasonably sure I can, I'll conquer. If not, I'll go to Democracy and get a huge leap on the AI, who won't change govs and science rates quite as quickly. Even in Fundy, I'll switch to Demo for a military tech or two, and in Demo to Fundy to pump out a quick set of units or improvements, before switching back in both cases.
Blaupanzer is offline  
Old December 31, 2000, 14:31   #11
Carolus Rex
Civilization II MultiplayerCivilization II PBEM
Emperor
 
Local Time: 01:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,054
In single player the GL used to be one of my favourite wonders. Now I never build it against the AI. Why? It simply is not needed to win either way (conquest or space race). All those shields can be used to build better things IMHO.

However, I see some use of it in MP. Last night I played in a 7 player simultaneous game, alliances allowed, map size 100x100 (I think). Right at the beginning of the game I decided to go for the GL, something that was even more tempting when I discovered I was somewhat isolated on a fairly small island. Why?

First of all the GL is more useful when you play humans, because they tend to make better tech choices than the AI. Second, on a map that large early contact is, well, not so early. Trading techs with others is (possibly) delayed, increasing the importance of GL and the Embassy.

It also prevents (to some extent) allies from changing techs, or at least forces them to be more careful about when and which techs to trade. This can of course also be a disadvantage (as noted by people above) in that people can trade useless (for the moment anyway) techs to slow you down.

As an example, when I started to research construction I had a science rate of 7 or 8 turns. Techs dropped in from the GL, and when I finally got construction the rate was about 15 turns (which I got down to 11 when researching engineering by founding more cities and rearranging workers).

Another drawback is the random element mentioned in posts above. For example, I got feudalism from the GL meaning that warriors were no longer an option in the building list. The first row of shields thus vanished making rushbuilding more expensive. Also, if I build Leo's then I can't use the warrior to musketeer trick. Maybe not a big deal, but it illustrates the point.

All in all, I think I agree with the title of this thread. To build or not to build the GL, that is still the question.

Carolus
Carolus Rex is offline  
Old December 31, 2000, 14:35   #12
Carolus Rex
Civilization II MultiplayerCivilization II PBEM
Emperor
 
Local Time: 01:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,054
Oh, I forgot...

Happy New Civing Year, everybody!

Carolus
Carolus Rex is offline  
Old January 1, 2001, 21:06   #13
Smokey tha nuke man
Warlord
 
Local Time: 23:49
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: da dawg house
Posts: 231
yes, da smokes builds the GL fo two reasons. one, it lets him reaserch one thing while two, more science based civs reaserch something elese, then they trade techs, then da smokes gets the tech too. two, it keeps the other civs from getting free advaces. in the ps1 version of civ2, i build cause i like the cinema that you get when you finish it.
Smokey tha nuke man is offline  
Old January 3, 2001, 18:55   #14
inca911
Warlord
 
Local Time: 23:49
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 271
I never build the GL. I am always ahead in tech and I only play Deity. The additional (and more useless) techs obtained from the AI via the Library simply slow down the scientific progress of a civ. Remember that the more techs you have, the more beakers it takes for your next advance. If you want to concentrate on military conquest, the best thing to do is to be #1 in tech and have your Dragoons vs. their Phalanxes. I agree with CR that in multiplayer the value of the GL is debatable. But in single player, the need for a Great Library is a clue that you need to better manage the trade arrows of your civ. I'd much rather focus on building the Colossus (Trade) or the Hanging Gardens (Happiness and faster early growth) or some much more useful wonder over the shield investment the GL requires. The additional trade from the Colossus, or the ability to grow quicky gaining trade arrows, increased trade bonuses, and scientists where needed give you all the science advantage you need.
inca911 is offline  
Old January 3, 2001, 20:48   #15
Sten Sture
Emperor
 
Sten Sture's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:49
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: SF, CA don't call it frisco... Striker!!
Posts: 3,617
I hate the GL!

Okay, that is too strong, but I would only build it in a situation like C-Rex brilliantly elucidated. (had to go to the library to look that word up)

The things I don't like about it are:

Timing - early in the game I want to control my tech tree route, especially those first 19 techs
Cost - those caravans will get you four of your own techs right away
Unreliable - Dumb AIs research stuff that is not necessary and they are too slow about it
Sten Sture is offline  
Old January 3, 2001, 21:42   #16
Scouse Gits
lifer
Civilization II PBEMTrade Wars / BlackNova TradersGalCiv Apolyton EmpireApolytoners Hall of FameCivilization II Succession Games
Emperor
 
Scouse Gits's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:49
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Liverpool, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,344
Well said CR and Sten! Good to have you both around again.

---------

SG (2)
Scouse Gits is offline  
Old January 3, 2001, 22:40   #17
Smash
Emperor
 
Smash's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:49
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Civ2 Diehard
Posts: 3,838
More aimless time killing brought me a kinda sorta "challenge".

Build only 1 wonder(The Library) as fast as you can and then set science to zero and see what happens.No government changes after Monarchy either.No city bribing.

Not real,real hard but different.
Smash is offline  
Old January 4, 2001, 10:13   #18
The Mad Viking
King
 
The Mad Viking's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:49
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: of the Great White North
Posts: 1,790
The GL in SP Deity, conquest, is only if you have a terrible start and get beaten to Isaac Newton. I had to resort to this once.

Otherwise, you should be in the lead in science and gold with a good science city and trade trade trade. I build the Colussus, which doesn't expire because you don't need flight.

I don't even bother with Cops Ob anymore. Those shields give me more science as trade caravans, and by the time I have artillery and cavalry, I don't need any more advances.

Multiplayer advantages as outlined by Carolus. Keep in mind also that only one player in MP can build Isaac Newton. If you don't get Ike, you should get the GL.
The Mad Viking is offline  
Old January 4, 2001, 10:53   #19
Tizzy
Warlord
 
Tizzy's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:49
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 184
My only reason for building it is to stop the AI benefiting from it.
I used to rely on it to keep my up to speed with techs, but now I've developed a better strategy, I don't bother. I only build it now to piss others off, and then only if I don't have anything more pressing to build first.
Tizzy is offline  
Old January 4, 2001, 11:04   #20
DaveV
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
King
 
DaveV's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:49
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: USA - EDT (GMT-5)
Posts: 2,051
The only times I've seen the AI really benefit from GL is when restarting civs are enabled. If you eliminate a civ under those circumstances, they have a 50% chance of restarting with any one of your techs. This gives that tech to the GL holder, who usually rushes to share it with his AI friends. The easy way to work around that is to capture, obsolete, or destroy the GL before you kill off any civs.
DaveV is offline  
Old January 8, 2001, 09:12   #21
East Street Trader
Prince
 
East Street Trader's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:49
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 814
I'm another non library builder but I have used it a few times to try to recover from a bad start or early setbacks.

I seem to remember one game where I got something like 20 techs from the library in the space of five or six turns.

You have to be lucky with the timing though. If you are so far behind that it gets finished late the pace at which the other civs are researching has slowed down, on top of which several of the critical techs will have already been researched by everyone so the library will never provide those techs.
East Street Trader is offline  
Old January 8, 2001, 15:59   #22
Everyman
Civilization II Multiplayer
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 23:49
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Honolulu, HI USA
Posts: 60
I don't build the Great Library because it slows my progress through the tech tree.

The Great Library is one of several key wonders available in the early game. Other key wonders available at about the same time include Colossus, Hanging Gardens, Great Wall, Pyramids, Marco Polo. At the higher levels, it's nearly impossible to build all of them so you have to prioritize the wonders. I generally prioritize Hanging Gardens and Colossus and try to build them in the same city. I also prioritize Pyramids. Taking into account your limited resources in the early game, the act of prioritizing certain wonders in effect causes you to surrender the other wonders to the AI.

In the early game my main wonder goals are (1) all wonders associated with a Super Science City - HG, Colossus, Copernicus, Isaac Newton, (2) Michaelangelo, and (3) Leonardo's Workshop. Not having the Great Library allows me to research the associated tech goals single-mindedly without having other techs slow my progress. If I accomplish my goals of a SSC and Michaelangelo, then I find, paradoxically, that not having the Great Library has actually sped up my research.

Of course, there are certain techs that are outside my streamlined tech tree that I find desirable. For example, I find Feudalism desirable because it enables me to build Sun Tzu. To obtain these techs, I build Marco Polo and try to obtain desired techs through trade offs. I can also find out which civilizations have certain desired techs and obtain them through conquest or theft.

My final argument in favor of not having the Great Library is that is allows you to play a more active role in managing your tech path. That is, instead of passively receiving certain techs, you become more involved in choosing which techs you want and when. Since this enhances gameplay, I feel that this in itself is justification for surrendering the Great Library to the AI.
Everyman is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:49.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team