Thread Tools
Old August 22, 2001, 12:58   #1
techumseh
Civilization II PBEMScenario League / Civ2-Creation
Emperor
 
techumseh's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: of the frozen North.
Posts: 4,197
J'accuse!
Sorry to interupt the mounting frenzy of excitement over the approaching release of Civ3, but I've found something just a bit curious. I was checking out Firaxis' official site, and looked at the links to "fansites". http://civ3.com/fansites.cfm There were many (most really) that I hadn't seen before, so I had a look. And I found something odd.

Most of the sites were not done by anyone I've heard of in the civ community. Moreover, they were very professional looking. And they all had the same graphics, news, etc. that is available on the official site, but not much more.

Looking at them in more detail, I found: they all have legalistic copywrite notices, some claim to serve other games such as CTP, but these links don't usually lead anywhere, they are in English, French, German, and Spanish (there's also a site in Polish), some had other features, like forums, but they were usually under construction, or had a few obviously contrived posts. Almost all were established since June. Some suggest that they are the creation of a single individual, with a little testimonial to Civ2, but there's only an email or ICQ address to identify them. Not all sites listed fit the above description, however. Some are well known, legitimate FAN sites, such as Apolyton.

It looks to me that the civ community is a victim of a slick marketing campaign to promote Civ3, using fake "fan" sites as the bait. I will bet that most of these sites can be traced back to Firaxis, Hasbro or their marketing firm. And no doubt once the initial marketing campaign is over and sales targets reached, these sites will quietly disappear.

I have no problem with Firaxis or any game company using internet sites to promote their products. I do object when they create phoney "fan" sites designed to create the impression that there is a strong network of unofficial fan sites supporting their game. I think that's an insult to the real civ community!
techumseh is offline  
Old August 22, 2001, 13:04   #2
Trifna
King
 
Trifna's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: of anchovies
Posts: 1,478
...
Boy, this isn't a joke... I guess it should be looked at, but I permit myself to have some doubts about such a bad way of promotion.
Trifna is offline  
Old August 22, 2001, 13:04   #3
General Ludd
NationStates
Emperor
 
General Ludd's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Minion of the Dominion
Posts: 4,607
How does having a bunch of unused fan sites help a game sell?
General Ludd is offline  
Old August 22, 2001, 13:10   #4
Marquis de Sodaq
King
 
Marquis de Sodaq's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: ... no, a Marquis.
Posts: 2,179
People notice the numerous "fan" sites, and without following the links, assume everybody and his uncle is excited about the new game. The assumption is that it must be good for so much interest to exist. "Gotta get me a copy of that" is the next thought on the path of marketing. You'd be surprized how savvy advertising is...
__________________
The first President of the first Apolyton Democracy Game (CivII, that is)

The gift of speech is given to many,
intelligence to few.
Marquis de Sodaq is offline  
Old August 22, 2001, 13:21   #5
General Ludd
NationStates
Emperor
 
General Ludd's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Minion of the Dominion
Posts: 4,607
This is the internet, there are a million websites for every little thing that has ever existed. I don't see how having a bunch of unused websites will help sell a game, why would going to a bunch of barren websites with no content make someone want to buy a game?
General Ludd is offline  
Old August 22, 2001, 13:27   #6
Comrade Tribune
Prince
 
Comrade Tribune's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 988
Interesting. Could mean they are so disappointed with the result of their self-copying that they are resorting to desperate measures. Would be funny, if it weren´t sad.
Comrade Tribune is offline  
Old August 22, 2001, 13:33   #7
Comrade Tribune
Prince
 
Comrade Tribune's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 988
Osweld, I think what Marquis means is Firaxis is hoping for the bandwagon effect. Making people believe that others are very excited about the game. "Me, too" is, after all, an important motivator.
Comrade Tribune is offline  
Old August 22, 2001, 13:45   #8
donarumo
Warlord
 
donarumo's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Plano TX, USA
Posts: 120
Oh shut-up!
I am so sick of people taking shots at Firaxis and a game that has not been released yet! I mean, if you want to give your opinion about features or the quality of a game, that is great. But don't start spouting your unproven and sophomoric theories about what you think a company that you have no connection with is doing.

I mean, if you can't believe that any Civilization game could have enough fans (some with web talent and some without) to create dozens of web pages, then you do not deserve to even buy the game. Get the hell out of here and let people with a brain discuss important facts about the game.
donarumo is offline  
Old August 22, 2001, 14:07   #9
M. le Comte
Warlord
 
M. le Comte's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Last Aristocrat in Paris
Posts: 213
Re: Oh shut-up!
Quote:
Originally posted by donarumo
I am so sick of people taking shots at Firaxis and a game that has not been released yet! I mean, if you want to give your opinion about features or the quality of a game, that is great. But don't start spouting your unproven and sophomoric theories about what you think a company that you have no connection with is doing.

I mean, if you can't believe that any Civilization game could have enough fans (some with web talent and some without) to create dozens of web pages, then you do not deserve to even buy the game. Get the hell out of here and let people with a brain discuss important facts about the game.
Well well well

I am not an angry person, but there are a few things that have ever gone on my nose.

- People who don't respect freedom of speech.

Quote:
Originally posted by donarumo
But don't start spouting your unproven and sophomoric theories...
- People who don't respect freedom of thinking.

Quote:
Originally posted by donarumo
if you can't believe that any Civilization game could have enough fans (...) to create dozens of web pages, then you do not deserve to even buy the game.
And yes, I know that, in a way, I either don't respect freedom of thinking.

- People who believe that agreeing with them is the same thing as being intelligent.

Quote:
Originally posted by donarumo
Get the hell out of here and let people with a brain discuss important facts about the game.
Have you noticed ? You have the right to discuss and praise the features of the game (which you can't know but only imagine with the few elements that are given), but you don't have the right to criticize Firaxis (because you can't know it).

I don't know if Techumseh goes in the right way, but I'm sure of one thing, Donarumo, you're wrong !
__________________
M. le Comte
M. le Comte is offline  
Old August 22, 2001, 14:21   #10
splangy
Prince
 
splangy's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: of my own little kingdom...
Posts: 317
Re: Oh shut-up!
Quote:
Originally posted by donarumo
I am so sick of people taking shots at Firaxis and a game that has not been released yet! I mean, if you want to give your opinion about features or the quality of a game, that is great. But don't start spouting your unproven and sophomoric theories about what you think a company that you have no connection with is doing.

I mean, if you can't believe that any Civilization game could have enough fans (some with web talent and some without) to create dozens of web pages, then you do not deserve to even buy the game. Get the hell out of here and let people with a brain discuss important facts about the game.
CALM DOWN!!

howwever i am a little tired of people taking unbased potshots at firaxis, and who cares if they are using deceit as marketing, its not like the rest of the commercial world dosn't.

also, coinsidering only recently have we began to get information, maybe those cites are real new and will be useful soon, who knows.
__________________
"Nuke em all, let god sort it out!"
splangy is offline  
Old August 22, 2001, 14:38   #11
static
Chieftain
 
static's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 39
Re: J'accuse!
Quote:
Originally posted by techumseh
Sorry to interupt the mounting frenzy of excitement over the approaching release of Civ3, but I've found something just a bit curious. I was checking out Firaxis' official site, and looked at the links to "fansites". http://civ3.com/fansites.cfm There were many (most really) that I hadn't seen before, so I had a look. And I found something odd.

Most of the sites were not done by anyone I've heard of in the civ community. Moreover, they were very professional looking. And they all had the same graphics, news, etc. that is available on the official site, but not much more.

Looking at them in more detail, I found: they all have legalistic copywrite notices, some claim to serve other games such as CTP, but these links don't usually lead anywhere, they are in English, French, German, and Spanish (there's also a site in Polish), some had other features, like forums, but they were usually under construction, or had a few obviously contrived posts. Almost all were established since June. Some suggest that they are the creation of a single individual, with a little testimonial to Civ2, but there's only an email or ICQ address to identify them. Not all sites listed fit the above description, however. Some are well known, legitimate FAN sites, such as Apolyton.

It looks to me that the civ community is a victim of a slick marketing campaign to promote Civ3, using fake "fan" sites as the bait. I will bet that most of these sites can be traced back to Firaxis, Hasbro or their marketing firm. And no doubt once the initial marketing campaign is over and sales targets reached, these sites will quietly disappear.

I have no problem with Firaxis or any game company using internet sites to promote their products. I do object when they create phoney "fan" sites designed to create the impression that there is a strong network of unofficial fan sites supporting their game. I think that's an insult to the real civ community!
I think those sites were created by different people. I used to run an ill-fated gaming search engine, and you would be amazed how many people just copy content from other sources for their site. I'm not surprised many of them are under construction considering the fact Civ 3 hasn't coming out yet, and there is A LOT we don't know about the game. You can kind of tell that many of these sites were probably the webmaster's first website by the poor designs. Then again, I could be wrong?
static is offline  
Old August 22, 2001, 14:55   #12
Kropotkin
Emperor
 
Kropotkin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ivory tower
Posts: 3,511
How very interesting is there any jewish officers involved in the conspiracy too?
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Schopenhauer
In GAIS we trust!
Kropotkin is offline  
Old August 22, 2001, 15:02   #13
kittenOFchaos
Prince
 
kittenOFchaos's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Gidea Park, Essex
Posts: 678
busy little firaxis...
...if only we could find the link between Firaxis and the Jewish officers we could have some justification!...

Stephen Jay Gould was wrong about you...you are a crackpot Kropotkin...

Wasn't one of the sites polish? well they HAD to do it for them, isn't it obvious (enough trolling kitten, goats coming in at 12 o'clock). :banned:

kittenOFchaos is offline  
Old August 22, 2001, 16:22   #14
donarumo
Warlord
 
donarumo's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Plano TX, USA
Posts: 120
Re: Re: Oh shut-up!
Quote:
Originally posted by M. le Comte


I don't know if Techumseh goes in the right way, but I'm sure of one thing, Donarumo, you're wrong !
Yes, I agree with you M., it does sound like I am attacking a freedom of speech here. I'm not, I am attacking the speech itself not the right to say it.

Anybody can say whatever they want here (within moral bounds) and that is a very good thing. I guess this post is sort of like the straw on the camel's back for me. I am just very tired of people railing on a game because it doesn't have the features they exactly want.

It happens in almost every forum for a game about to come out, no matter how great that game turns out to be. I know, I know, this post atually does not do that but it just heated my fustration level. I may be showing my age here but I remember a time when we bought a game and we were happy for what it was not angry for what it was not.
donarumo is offline  
Old August 22, 2001, 17:25   #15
Dan Magaha FIRAXIS
Firaxis Games
 
Dan Magaha FIRAXIS's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: The Metropolis known as Hunt Valley
Posts: 612
Re: J'accuse!
Quote:
Originally posted by techumseh
Sorry to interupt the mounting frenzy of excitement over the approaching release of Civ3, but I've found something just a bit curious. I was checking out Firaxis' official site, and looked at the links to "fansites". http://civ3.com/fansites.cfm There were many (most really) that I hadn't seen before, so I had a look. And I found something odd.

Most of the sites were not done by anyone I've heard of in the civ community. Moreover, they were very professional looking. And they all had the same graphics, news, etc. that is available on the official site, but not much more.

Looking at them in more detail, I found: they all have legalistic copywrite notices, some claim to serve other games such as CTP, but these links don't usually lead anywhere, they are in English, French, German, and Spanish (there's also a site in Polish), some had other features, like forums, but they were usually under construction, or had a few obviously contrived posts. Almost all were established since June. Some suggest that they are the creation of a single individual, with a little testimonial to Civ2, but there's only an email or ICQ address to identify them. Not all sites listed fit the above description, however. Some are well known, legitimate FAN sites, such as Apolyton.

It looks to me that the civ community is a victim of a slick marketing campaign to promote Civ3, using fake "fan" sites as the bait. I will bet that most of these sites can be traced back to Firaxis, Hasbro or their marketing firm. And no doubt once the initial marketing campaign is over and sales targets reached, these sites will quietly disappear.

I have no problem with Firaxis or any game company using internet sites to promote their products. I do object when they create phoney "fan" sites designed to create the impression that there is a strong network of unofficial fan sites supporting their game. I think that's an insult to the real civ community!

NONE of the sites on that list were created by anyone at Firaxis, they are on that list because the webmasters of those sites e-mailed me and asked to be added to our list. Most of them do not have a great deal of content yet, but then the majority of them don't have a thriving forum community like this site (some don't even have forums at all), and as a result they are limited to posting the same news and screenshots that everyone else has.

Having run a fansite before, I know how much work it takes just to get a site off the ground, and I respect those who put in the work to do so. Not everyone can run a site as comprehensive as Apolyton, but that doesn't mean the "smaller" sites are any less worthy of being on the community list.

That said, in the coming weeks, I will start contacting sites that have not updated their content and ask them to do so, or be removed from the list. No one wants to click through to sites that haven't been updated in months.

As for similar copyright notices, these are standard procedure for us; we generally ask that sites who use materials from our games or sites post a notice stating that the images, sounds, or other assets displayed are copyrighted by Firaxis and are used by permission.

As a footnote on all of this, I don't know who would have the time to coordinate such an elaborate hoax anyway. Everyone here is fully loaded with work, and my free time is about to be claimed by Arcanum starting tonight (just as soon as I finish laying down my nightly crop circles)

Dan
__________________
Dan Magaha
Firaxis Games, Inc.
--------------------------

Last edited by Dan Magaha FIRAXIS; August 22, 2001 at 17:33.
Dan Magaha FIRAXIS is offline  
Old August 22, 2001, 17:32   #16
KrazyHorse
Deity
 
KrazyHorse's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 138% of your RDA of Irony
Posts: 18,577
Really? Did you do this one?

__________________
04-06-04 Killdozer NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
In Memoriam Adam Smith: a brilliant man, taken too soon
Get Rich or Die Tryin'
KrazyHorse is offline  
Old August 22, 2001, 18:15   #17
MarkG
Apolytoners Hall of FameApolyCon 06 Participants
Apolyton CS Co-Founder
 
MarkG's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Macedonia, Greece
Posts: 24,480
Quote:
Most of the sites were not done by anyone I've heard of in the civ community. Moreover, they were very professional looking. And they all had the same graphics, news, etc. that is available on the official site, but not much more.

Looking at them in more detail, I found: they all have legalistic copywrite notices, some claim to serve other games such as CTP, but these links don't usually lead anywhere, they are in English, French, German, and Spanish (there's also a site in Polish), some had other features, like forums, but they were usually under construction, or had a few obviously contrived posts. Almost all were established since June. Some suggest that they are the creation of a single individual, with a little testimonial to Civ2, but there's only an email or ICQ address to identify them. Not all sites listed fit the above description, however.

i'm not sure which sites you refer too, but lets see

CivCenter: been there for a long time now
CivMedia: hardly describbed as "professional looking"
Civworld: there used to be a civworld site in the past, dont know if there is a connection
Civ2000 : made by Bebro, who also does civ2 scenarios
Civ III: GeO : has been around for a while, i should have mailed for some time now cause he is linking to our civ2 files
The Civ III Site : falls in the unprofessional category
civ3.de : opened this month
Civ3.prv.pl : never seen it before.
Civ III Group @ Yahoo Groups : havent visited it before
The Civilization III Arsenal : done by someone from civfanatics
Civilization III @ Fuerst-rabe.de : opened in may, again hardly called "proffessional"
Civilization 3 Info und Fanpage : opened this month
Civilization Fanatic's Center : been there a really long time of course...
Civilization Nation : opened in late july, again hardly called "proffessional" (am i geting boring? )
Crousto's Civ Site : started from ctp i think
Das Civilization Universum : over a year old
Eltaranna : been there for some time now
Europa Eyn's World : same as above
Gothia Global : never seen it before
The Guardians Clan : never seen it before
The Grenouille.com Civ III Site : never seen it before
Voyager's Site : never seen it before
Zoso's Civilization III : started a really long time ago, but barely updated


hope i have somehow helped you....



Dan, you read the OT!!!!
__________________
Co-Founder, Apolyton Civilization Site
Co-Owner/Webmaster, Top40-Charts.com | CTO, Apogee Information Systems
giannopoulos.info: my non-mobile non-photo news & articles blog
MarkG is offline  
Old August 22, 2001, 18:26   #18
- Groucho -
Diplomacy
Prince
 
- Groucho -'s Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 577
Of course Dan would say that - he's one of ... them. Haven't you noticed his title? "Webmaster" - you think it refers to the world-wide-web of computers, but it is really a world wide web of deceit. He lurks in the centre of his web pulling on his strings, enticing poor unsuspecting souls to read his websites and ....

That's it. I'm stuck. I can't think of even an insane crackpot reason for Dan to spend his time making fake sites.
__________________
What's so funny 'bout peace, love and understanding?
- Groucho - is offline  
Old August 22, 2001, 22:38   #19
techumseh
Civilization II PBEMScenario League / Civ2-Creation
Emperor
 
techumseh's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: of the frozen North.
Posts: 4,197
j'mange de la crow
Well, I figured out how to prove my point. I checked all the domain registrations of the sites, assuming that if they were all registered at the same time, to the same people, then I would be right. Unfortunately, they were registered at different times to different people - and not to Firaxis. So I'm wrong. And a bit paranoid too, I guess.

So my sincere apologies to Dan and Firaxis. I'll definitely do more research before jumping to conclusions next time. This website gives the recipie for my next meal: http://www.crowbusters.com/recipes.htm I knew I shouldn't stay up late watching X-files reruns!

Now back to that Jim Morrison forum....
techumseh is offline  
Old August 22, 2001, 23:07   #20
Skanky Burns
Alpha Centauri Democracy GameACDG The Cybernetic ConsciousnessC4DG Team Alpha CentauriansApolytoners Hall of FameACDG3 Spartans
 
Skanky Burns's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Skanky Father
Posts: 16,530
Well Techumseh, just look on the bright side... This was a very amusing and entertaining thread

I especially like Dans footnote

Quote:
(just as soon as I finish laying down my nightly crop circles)
LOL
__________________
I'm building a wagon! On some other part of the internets, obviously (but not that other site).
Skanky Burns is offline  
Old August 25, 2001, 04:08   #21
Harlan
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
 
Local Time: 04:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA, USA
Posts: 1,053
I hate to bring this thread back up, since it doesn't seem relevant to Firaxis's case and is a dead story. But to answer the question would companies really fake fan websites? The answer is yes. I knew I read an article about this somewhere, and today I recalled where- www.salon.com. Some people might find this article interesting - I know I did.


Did "The Blair Witch Project" fake its online fan base?
Glowing reviews and fan sites raise suspicions
that Hollywood is planting ready-made buzz on the Net.


- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Patrizia DiLucchio


July 16, 1999 | One of the hottest topics on the Net this summer is "The Blair Witch Project," a low-budget horror film that's generated more buzz than the chainsaw used in that Texas massacre. Before it even opened, the indie had inspired over 20 fan sites, a mailing list, a Web ring, a Usenet group -- and more than its fair share of glowing reports on the influential movie site Ain't It Cool News. But was all the excitement genuine?

"Internet marketing," notes Gordon Paddison, director of interactive marketing at New Line Cinema, "is the most inexpensive and efficient mode of marketing around. And it's available to those with limited resources. Online is all about word of mouth."

"'The Blair Witch Project' filmmakers are using their friends to generate their fan sites," says another industry executive point-blank. "That was an organized effort. What happened is that they tricked the press."

Filmmakers Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sánchez declined to be interviewed for this story. But whether or not people involved with "The Blair Witch Project" have been seeding the Net with faux-amateurish fan sites or writing pseudonymous reviews of the movie, such practices seem to be increasingly popular in Hollywood. Many believe that deceptive cyberspace marketing is the movie industry's latest secret weapon in the campaign to take that opening weekend by storm.

A fan site for American Pie boasts an electronic counter labeled "Days UNIVERSAL Hasn't Shut Us Down" as well as a disclaimer that "I scammed some stuff of this movie off friends that work for a movie company in CA and posted some clips up on the net." OK. But wouldn't those purchase order numbers -- clearly visible on the purloined files -- give Universal a good idea of which employee had leaked it? And would a fan really create a scrolling credits area, playing up the film's writer, director and producers -- and pausing to add "In theaters July 9th"?

"You never quite know who the hand is -- the filmmaker, the studio. But I don't have any doubt that ["American Pie"] site was put up by somebody from Universal," says David Poland. Poland's insider column for TNT's Rough Cut, The Hot Button, frequently serves as a reality check for the Hollywood hype machine. "Can I substantiate that? No. And in fairness, when I asked, Universal denied any involvement."

The "Blair Witch Project" fan sites deploy similarly suspicious language. The creators of The Blair Witch Project Fanatic's Guide, for example, tell site visitors, "We're just very dedicated fans," and until recently offered suggestions on how other fans might help promote the movie: "Buy TBWP Stock at the Hollywood Stock Exchange! Rank TBWP at the Internet Movie Database! Rank TBWP at Ain't It Cool News!"

But the creators of the site, Abigail Marceluk and Eric Alan Ivins, seem to be more than average fans. They appeared in the Sci-Fi Channel special "Curse of the Blair Witch," and the Rough Cut site links them to the film's back story: "A bit of trivia: Abigail and Eric are the two anthropology students who discover the three film students' 'lost' footage."

Fan sites, of course, are one of those cyberspace metrics beloved by the traditional media, which uses them as a kind of compass to determine the sources of the pop culture Nile. Nearly two months before the film's release, for example, MTV News ran a story on the proliferation of "Blair Witch" fan sites -- thereby giving the film cachet with that all-important 13- to 25-year-old moviegoing demographic.

The big studios have been aware of this phenomenon for quite some time and are sometimes heavy-handed in their attempts to manipulate it. According to industry insiders, it is not uncommon at the time a movie project is announced for a studio to buy up every domain name that has the slightest connection to the project, use them to set up amateurish sites and then, when the official Internet marketing gets under way, "affiliate" with those fan sites.

"The more a film shows up on different places throughout the Net, the more traditional media decides to cover it," says Poland. "The Internet doesn't have that much of a direct promotional effect on getting people to see a movie, but when traditional media starts picking up on it, that's when a movie gets the buzz."

Harry Knowles, the self-styled film fanatic behind Ain't It Cool News, may have more to do with enticing filmmakers and producers into the gray area of anonymous self-promotion than anyone.

Knowles was a 25-year-old college dropout and dealer in movie memorabilia in 1997 when his movie review site broke ahead of the pack of other underground entertainment sites like Corona's Coming Attractions, Zentertainment Buzzstation and CyberSleaze.

His M.O.? Reviews of test screenings from anonymous moles who claimed to have infiltrated the impenetrable studio labyrinth. These reviews were coupled with message boards where other users could "Talk Back." Quentin Tarantino called him "the Wolf Blitzer of the Internet," and rumor had it that Hollywood studios circulated his photograph to make sure he didn't slip into any test screenings.

But those days are long gone. Today AICN is a full-time operation, using reports from 35 to 40 freelance movie spies, and Knowles, taking a cue from onetime mentor Matt Drudge, is reportedly trying to launch his own weekly TV show. When Premiere magazine named him to its power list of the top 100 Hollywood players last month, it raved, "His aint-it-cool-news.com Web site and its film-geek spy network have become the source of early test-screening reviews untainted by spin control."

Untainted by spin control? Not according to Poland, who views Knowles as spin central: "Studios know if you bring him on a set, you'll get good buzz out of him -- and that will translate into other media attention. Studios also send in negative things about their competitors' movies in order to torpedo them. Journalists who cover the film business look to sites like his for scoops."

Poland cites the case of "Iron Giant," an upcoming animated feature from Warner Brothers. The film has been written up on AICN 61 times, beginning back when it was in its earliest developmental stage as pre-production art. Gushed one recent anonymous reviewer, "It was one of the best movies I have seen all year. I am a 27 year old guy. This movie brought a tear to my eye ... I am a big supporter of any studio that wants to run the animation [gantlet] with those ****** at Disney."

When the Los Angeles Times wrote up "Iron Giant" in April, it made note of the movie's "hot Internet buzz."

"Warner Brothers knew they'd get positive stuff out of [Harry Knowles]," says Poland. "There were clearly people involved with the movie saying good things about it on AICN." Poland is appalled that the newspaper took what it found online at face value, treating it as honest and legitimate adoration. "When the L.A. Times goes into a Web site, gets an unverifiable review and says this is what people are saying about this movie -- that's scary."

Of course, not all the spin that movies get online is positive. In a recent interview, Wild Wild West director Barry Sonnenfeld fumed, "You can ruin a movie through anonymous reviews on the Internet. And don't for a minute think that studios themselves aren't anonymously writing good reviews for their own movies and bad reviews for other movies."

"Barry uses the test screening process to help tweak his films," explains Ira Rubenstein, vice-president of marketing at Columbia Tristar Interactive. "This is particularly critical for comedies. Now he can't, because people [who attended the test screening] are writing, 'It's awful, its special effects are bad, the music sucks, the timing's off.' Etc. Listen -- I find it difficult to watch films that aren't finished -- they're missing all sorts of subtle cues. And I'm in the industry. When a regular moviegoer sees a test screening, chances are he won't get it. And then if he goes off and writes about it in a way that ultimately hurts the finished movie, it undermines the whole process."

Poland says that the Net has changed the landscape so much that Hollywood execs are now talking of doing away with test screenings all together.

"Look at the monsters we've created," mused another industry executive, who asked that his name not be used. "People think they can co-opt Harry Knowles -- and sure, you can co-opt him for one film. But every time the dog turns around and bites you."

Knowles declined to be interviewed for this story. But word has it that he hadn't actually seen "The Blair Witch Project" when he first wrote this about it on AICN: "As for movies coming up at SUNDANCE the one to see it 'THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT'!!! The most creepy ****in mockumentary made ... ever." Figuring AICN as the best way to get the word out to an obsessive fan base, Myrick and Sánchez had apparently slipped Knowles the blurb. In the next six months, the indie film was reviewed 12 more times -- and each review was more positive than the last.

At least some AICN frequent flyers suspect that one of "The Blair Witch Project" reviewers setting the buzz-generator on high was ... someone directly involved with the film. Whoever was doing it, the reviews were working. How else to account for the increasing number of rabid fans whose postings began, "I've seen a tape of 'The Blair Witch Project ...'"? Particularly when the film's distributor, Artisan Entertainment, was enforcing a strict no-tapes policy?

"We haven't created screeners for this film," says Artisan spokeswoman Jessica Rovello. "Piracy is a big issue."

John Pierson, the independent film guru who put up part of the seed money for the film, suspects that when the hype reaches a certain level, people start confabulating. "What happens in the more buzzy world is that people end up posting about a film that they haven't seen at all -- thousands and thousands are already on board talking about a movie that they haven't seen."

You couldn't ask for a better way to promote a movie.

And "Blair Witch" fans defend the marketing campaign. As Anthony Pryor-Brown puts it: "There's a significant difference between saying, 'You liked the movie? Tell your friends,' and [studios] specifically planting people to rave about the movie." Pryor-Brown is a 38-year-old technical writer from Portland, Ore., who faithfully visits AICN once a day.

"To the extent that Ed Sánchez and Dan Myrick have been encouraging people to spread the word about 'Blair Witch,' there is indeed a publicity campaign going on," he offers, "but I'm encouraged to see that it doesn't involve huge ads in the trades, massive TV campaigns or action figures at Taco Bell. Although I probably would get 'Blair Witch' action figures if they were available."

salon.com | July 16, 1999
Harlan is offline  
Old October 7, 2001, 04:35   #22
SAC
Settler
 
SAC's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 9
...as I've been on quite a long vacation, I haven't had the time to look around this Forum - which I usually don't have at all due to other committments, although I try to keep up with things at the best of my ability.

Still, by a coincidence I found this thread about CIV-websites and the comments about them, and as being one of those webmasters pointed out I'd like to make the following statement - despite the fact that the thread itself is a bit "old"

I run the site Gothia which mainly is dedicated to MAXIS game SimCity, and along with Freeland we both can be compaired to "our communities" as Apyloton and CIV Fanatics are for the CIV-community. In August this year I decided to open a CIV-section as a result of my own interests in that game. I figured this would be a good way to "offer" some of my "own" improved graphics to the public, and at the same time prepare for the upcoming sequel CIV III.

As a webmaster of Gothia I do not claim to have a "big" CIV-site in any possible case. As mentioned earlier Gothia mainly dedicates its existence to MAXIS SimCity-series, but have the CIV-section included as of August this year. For obvious reasons that section needs a little more time to settle in the CIV-community, just as visitors need to be ensured that it's also active and will be updated on a regular basis.

Ironically I contacted both Apolyton and CIV Fanatics and suggested a link exchange - just to find out that none of these sites even bothered to reply. As being known myself as a webmaster who "take good care" of my visitors - no matter what their purpose are - I find this neglect by both Apyloton and CIV Fanatics quite disturbing. This is not the way we handle such issues within the SIM-community - at least not as far as my own experience goes. On the contrary - as being one of the largest SIM-sites I encourage new, or smaller, sites to have their link put up at Gothia. I often "highlight" these sites in order to encourage my visitors to have a look at them and hopefully bring them new visitors.

I'm not sure what possible excuses Apolyton and CIV Fanatics may have, but I do know that a thriving and a constructive community is best served with as many interesting fansites as possible. And in this matter the official gamedevelopers has an important responsibility - which I believe they also do take. By encouraging webmasters to "register" their CIV-fansites, they also secure this importance. And for that matter - if the official website wouldn't post a fansite list - who would offer the possibility to promote the CIV-community? Or is it Apolytons and CIV Fanatics meaning that their neglect of other websites in several ways are the best way to serve a community? No, growing "big" as many of our websites does eventually, doesn't mean one has to stop being humble.

Or am I missing something here?
SAC is offline  
Old October 7, 2001, 05:15   #23
MarkG
Apolytoners Hall of FameApolyCon 06 Participants
Apolyton CS Co-Founder
 
MarkG's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Macedonia, Greece
Posts: 24,480
Quote:
Originally posted by SAC
Ironically I contacted both Apolyton and CIV Fanatics and suggested a link exchange - just to find out that none of these sites even bothered to reply.

...

Or am I missing something here?
- go to the civ3 section
- click on links (it will take you to our civ3 links directory)
- tell me what you see on the first menu line, next to "home"
__________________
Co-Founder, Apolyton Civilization Site
Co-Owner/Webmaster, Top40-Charts.com | CTO, Apogee Information Systems
giannopoulos.info: my non-mobile non-photo news & articles blog
MarkG is offline  
Old October 7, 2001, 05:47   #24
Black Fluffy Lion
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mark, please put my posts back, I have sent u an e-mail about this. Please reply even if the answer is no.
 
Old October 7, 2001, 17:11   #25
SAC
Settler
 
SAC's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally posted by MarkG


- go to the civ3 section
- click on links (it will take you to our civ3 links directory)
- tell me what you see on the first menu line, next to "home"
....I think it goes without saying that the option you so ironically points out, also has been used. I might not have mentioned it precisly, but apart from sending Apolyton an e-mail about a possible link exchange, I also did use the "add a link" option.

However, as this was a time ago I've decided to settle with the link at the official website. It serves my needs as I believe most visitors will find the CIV-section at Gothia that way!

Still, the only thing you actually proved with your respons, is the confirmation about the statement made in my previous post. No need to continue this debate at all...
SAC is offline  
Old October 7, 2001, 17:48   #26
dainbramaged13
Trade Wars / BlackNova Traders
King
 
Local Time: 08:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Dumbass
Posts: 1,096
hey. I just wanted to say that I once made a civ site on homestead because I was interested in doing a web project and didn't have anything else i could do it about. It is possible that If i continued to improve it, it could have looked professional and I might have sent it to Firaxis. Although I didn't, I assure you there are many people who do. IN fact, I was surprised that there weren't more fansites. I guess the reason is because of the dominance of the main 2 (acs and civfanatics)
__________________
And God said "let there be light." And there was dark. And God said "Damn, I hate it when that happens." - Admiral
dainbramaged13 is offline  
Old October 7, 2001, 18:01   #27
SAC
Settler
 
SAC's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 9
...could be a possible reason. The question about dominance has been discussed from time to time within the SIM-community - mainly as a result of sites shutting down due to the effects of dominating sites within the community.

...among other reasons, this is why I promote "smaller" and/or "newer" SIM-community sites at Gothia. Basically its my believe that more fansites often results in a greater flow of ideas, materials and such. Less sites effectively puts an end to that. And by looking within the CIV-community it's not that hard to understand in what way Apolyton and CIV Fanatics have effected with their dominance.

It doesn't benefit visitors in the long run. Perhaps, dainbramaged13, you should consider to re-open your CIV-site again...
SAC is offline  
Old October 7, 2001, 18:33   #28
MarkG
Apolytoners Hall of FameApolyCon 06 Participants
Apolyton CS Co-Founder
 
MarkG's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Macedonia, Greece
Posts: 24,480
Quote:
Originally posted by SAC
....I think it goes without saying that the option you so ironically points out, also has been used.
i fail to see how i was supposed to take that as granted.....

Quote:
Still, the only thing you actually proved with your respons, is the confirmation about the statement made in my previous post.
perhaps you should look around a bit before judging us and posting things like this

Quote:
I'm not sure what possible excuses Apolyton and CIV Fanatics may have, but I do know that a thriving and a constructive community is best served with as many interesting fansites as possible.
...
Or is it Apolytons and CIV Fanatics meaning that their neglect of other websites in several ways are the best way to serve a community?
cause if you did, you would really know if we care or not about other fan sites....
__________________
Co-Founder, Apolyton Civilization Site
Co-Owner/Webmaster, Top40-Charts.com | CTO, Apogee Information Systems
giannopoulos.info: my non-mobile non-photo news & articles blog
MarkG is offline  
Old October 7, 2001, 18:37   #29
civcop
Chieftain
 
civcop's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 83
(sings) Oh Dannny boy, oh Danny boy...
Once again, Dan has killed with kindness and humor. You know, to be frank, if I were Dan I would have stopped visiting here some time ago. Goodness knows there are enough people already complaining about a game that hasn't even been released yet that it is a sure bet many of that group will search zealously for some flaw with the game once they do get their hands on it. Tecumseh ate crow on this (in French no less), but people being people, some will find something to gripe about--no matter how minor and will refuse to admit they were ever wrong in their complaints. When we've reached the point of conspiracy theories then it appears that the civilization of civvers has become uncivilized (or something like that). Those who frequent Apolyton and Civ Fanatics will amount to 1/100 of 1% of all Civ 3 sales. A conspiracy by Firaxis is hardly needed to sell this game.
__________________
Your ad here!
civcop is offline  
Old October 7, 2001, 19:05   #30
dainbramaged13
Trade Wars / BlackNova Traders
King
 
Local Time: 08:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Dumbass
Posts: 1,096
Quote:
Originally posted by SAC


It doesn't benefit visitors in the long run. Perhaps, dainbramaged13, you should consider to re-open your CIV-site again...
i dont know... it'd take a lot of updating - the last news item was "CTP2 is now OUT!"
__________________
And God said "let there be light." And there was dark. And God said "Damn, I hate it when that happens." - Admiral
dainbramaged13 is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:43.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team