February 15, 2001, 11:31
|
#1
|
|
Settler
Local Time: 23:52
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Keele, Staffs, England
Posts: 2
|
Does CivII reflect Business Strategy?
I'm currently studying Business Strategy at degree level, and am battling with the concept of whether or not Civ II reflects the strategies adopted by today's corporations. There are obvious historical links with ancient militia and the process with which organisations form their stategies, but to what extent are the business strategies adopted connected to those of CII? Any thoughts on the topic, or relevant databases etc. would be absolutely brilliant. Cheersxx
|
|
|
|
|
February 15, 2001, 12:44
|
#2
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 23:52
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Liverpool, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,344
|
...it certainly has its share of hostile takeovers!
-------------
SG(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 15, 2001, 15:42
|
#3
|
|
Retired
Local Time: 18:52
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Mingapulco - CST
Posts: 30,317
|
When looking at building city improvements, you have to take a look at the possible return on your investment 
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 15, 2001, 18:00
|
#4
|
|
Deity
Local Time: 19:52
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,160
|
to follow up on ming, you have to choose the best ROI investment(IE deal with opportunity cost of capital), taking into account benefits net of operating costs.
and JUST LIKE IN BUSINESS, a truly accurate ROI must reflect the role of the investment in the chosen strategy. Thus the ROI on a marketplace is far higher if i expect to get Adams fairly soon. OTOH, i cant count on getting Adams if Im going to have another WOW needing shields at around the same time. Similarly, libraries are much less valuable if im planning on going fundie and stealing all the techs i need.
so take our example of the marketplace above, its much like the tussle between finance/accounting types and marketing/strategy types. the finance guy says the ROI is no good. The marketing guy shows how under certain strategic assumptions, the benefits are greater/ the op costs lower than the finance guy says. The finance guy, if he is smart, explores more fully the assumptions and questions whether the strat will really be implemented - in Civ terms, your marketplace makes sense IF you build Adams, but will you really build Adams? Given everything else likely to be happening at the time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 17, 2001, 10:20
|
#5
|
|
King
Local Time: 23:52
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Posts: 1,292
|
Every form of strategy mimics another in one way or another.
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 18, 2001, 09:50
|
#6
|
|
Settler
Local Time: 23:52
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Keele, Staffs, England
Posts: 2
|
Thanks everybody, much appreciated. I've just gotta write 3000 words on it now!
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 18, 2001, 18:45
|
#7
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 18:52
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Posts: 3,815
|
The ROI is affect by the "you can't take it with you" factor. Gold, while very useful durring the game, does not add to victory points at the end.
------------------
Gaius Mucius Scaevola Sinistra
Pontificator Pendanticus
older richer & wiser than you
Did I mention that I like spellcheckers?
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:52.
|
|
