Thread Tools
Old September 23, 2001, 07:04   #1
Jason Beaudoin
Prince
 
Local Time: 08:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 478
Smart Weapons! Cool! Carpet Bombing?


So... if Firaxis thought to put smart weapons in... then is it logical to assume that they may have thrown carpet bombing in? ... a la B-17 flying fortress?

...a bomber unit that can lower the population points of cities and randomly destroy city improvements?
__________________
Of the Holy Roman Empire, this was once said:
"It is neither holy or roman, nor is it an empire."
Jason Beaudoin is offline  
Old September 23, 2001, 07:20   #2
Earthling7
Mac
Prince
 
Earthling7's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: of pop
Posts: 735
As in bombing Civ2 style?
__________________
To be one with the Universe is to be very lonely - John Doe - Datalinks
Earthling7 is offline  
Old September 23, 2001, 08:52   #3
d_dudy
Prince
 
d_dudy's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: MO
Posts: 543
kinda what i thought
d_dudy is offline  
Old September 23, 2001, 09:21   #4
jdd2007
NationStates
King
 
jdd2007's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,015
well carpet bombing would, IIRC not attack military units, just buildings and civilians...
(IIRC)
jdd2007 is offline  
Old September 23, 2001, 09:27   #5
dainbramaged13
Trade Wars / BlackNova Traders
King
 
Local Time: 09:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Dumbass
Posts: 1,096
smart weapons ??
__________________
And God said "let there be light." And there was dark. And God said "Damn, I hate it when that happens." - Admiral
dainbramaged13 is offline  
Old September 23, 2001, 10:08   #6
Inverse Icarus
Emperor
 
Inverse Icarus's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: flying too low to the ground
Posts: 4,625
Quote:
Originally posted by jdd2007
well carpet bombing would, IIRC not attack military units, just buildings and civilians...
(IIRC)
maybe we could have 757s that people could steal and ram into buildings...

whores...

Q33
__________________
"I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
- Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card
Inverse Icarus is offline  
Old September 23, 2001, 15:20   #7
Jason Beaudoin
Prince
 
Local Time: 08:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 478
Easy everyone. Remember this is just a game, ok.
__________________
Of the Holy Roman Empire, this was once said:
"It is neither holy or roman, nor is it an empire."
Jason Beaudoin is offline  
Old September 23, 2001, 16:00   #8
HisMajestyBOB
Warlord
 
HisMajestyBOB's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Drinking the blood of the Proletariat
Posts: 200
Bombers should only attack cities's population and/or improvements, NOT military units, thats what CAS w/ fighters is for.
__________________
A proud citizen of the only convicted terrorist harboring nation!

.13 posts per day, and proud of it!
HisMajestyBOB is offline  
Old September 23, 2001, 16:26   #9
Jason Beaudoin
Prince
 
Local Time: 08:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 478
Exactly.... that's what has gotten me interested in this bombing thing. I wonder if carpet bombing will be in.

Oh Danny boy? ... where are you?
__________________
Of the Holy Roman Empire, this was once said:
"It is neither holy or roman, nor is it an empire."
Jason Beaudoin is offline  
Old September 23, 2001, 17:07   #10
jdd2007
NationStates
King
 
jdd2007's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,015
i concur
jdd2007 is offline  
Old September 24, 2001, 01:51   #11
Earthling7
Mac
Prince
 
Earthling7's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: of pop
Posts: 735
Killing civilians is an ugly fact of life, but it is a fact of life.

I wonder how extensive carpet bombing campaign would affect your cultue rating...
__________________
To be one with the Universe is to be very lonely - John Doe - Datalinks
Earthling7 is offline  
Old September 24, 2001, 03:39   #12
jdd2007
NationStates
King
 
jdd2007's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,015
howzabout -50
jdd2007 is offline  
Old September 24, 2001, 04:50   #13
dainbramaged13
Trade Wars / BlackNova Traders
King
 
Local Time: 09:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Dumbass
Posts: 1,096
it would be cool, but i doubt its in
__________________
And God said "let there be light." And there was dark. And God said "Damn, I hate it when that happens." - Admiral
dainbramaged13 is offline  
Old September 24, 2001, 07:03   #14
Jason Beaudoin
Prince
 
Local Time: 08:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 478
Well, does that mean that when you attack a city with a bomber that it will only kill units?
__________________
Of the Holy Roman Empire, this was once said:
"It is neither holy or roman, nor is it an empire."
Jason Beaudoin is offline  
Old September 24, 2001, 07:07   #15
KrazyHorse
Deity
 
KrazyHorse's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 138% of your RDA of Irony
Posts: 18,577
That's the way it worked in Civ2, Mr. Manitoban (I hope that I'm right on the flag; it's been a while since 8th grade geography). Plus, every successful attack lowered the pop. points of the target city by 1.
__________________
04-06-04 Killdozer NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
In Memoriam Adam Smith: a brilliant man, taken too soon
Get Rich or Die Tryin'

Last edited by KrazyHorse; September 24, 2001 at 07:19.
KrazyHorse is offline  
Old September 24, 2001, 10:29   #16
Jason Beaudoin
Prince
 
Local Time: 08:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 478
Nope... that's the Ontario flag. Manitoba has a buffalo on theirs.
__________________
Of the Holy Roman Empire, this was once said:
"It is neither holy or roman, nor is it an empire."
Jason Beaudoin is offline  
Old September 24, 2001, 11:48   #17
Tjoepie
Chieftain
 
Tjoepie's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Belgium
Posts: 75
Carpet bombing enemy cities to destroy improvements or even wonders and a few civilians would make it much more realistic compared to killing units only. I'd use more bombers if they could destroy production capability of an enemy as in WWII.
Having defending fighters would become essential.

And most of all an airwar would finally get more attention and realism in this game where a phalanx used to be able to hit a plane with "spears" !?!?!?!
I hope firaxis see's it this way ...

Being a professional pilot myself I'm frustrated that so little is known about how aircraft are used in civ3 , I hope they answer my askcivteam question about it.
Does anyone know how they move ( movementpoints/fuel?)
__________________
Live long and prosper !

Last edited by Tjoepie; September 24, 2001 at 11:56.
Tjoepie is offline  
Old September 24, 2001, 14:49   #18
jdd2007
NationStates
King
 
jdd2007's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,015
Quote:
Does anyone know how they move ( movementpoints/fuel?)
i dont know, but it will be a new system
IIRC, "they will no longer be like superfast ground units"
jdd2007 is offline  
Old September 24, 2001, 16:31   #19
GaryGuanine
Warlord
 
Local Time: 13:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 118
Apparently area bombing doesn't really affect your culture rating, since we did it in WWII. History is culture, and the winners write it. It may affect the culture ratings of the bombees though, since lots of stuff is destroyed.

The only way that strategic bombing would be an option is if they could figure out a way to have a real "front". Too often you can just run the bombers over the terrain, bomb a city and then move in armor or howitzers. If there was an effective front, you would have to hurt their production by bombing, and of course a percentage chance of destroying improvements. Also, if there was a front, you wouldn't be able to get to cities far from it, and you could continue bombing the city to destroy improvements after the units were destroyed.

Of course then fighters are much more important, and they'd have to get together some kind of escort system together, or just beef up the bombers defense and say it's implied.

Then again, this could be too much thinking over one point.

Gary
GaryGuanine is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:43.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team