Thread Tools
Old November 16, 2001, 02:05   #1
Leonid
Chieftain
 
Leonid's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 61
Warmonger: Despotism vs Monarchy
As Rome I have been in constant war for entire game and it is now 200 ad. I cleared continent of Egypt and greece on regent. Whats best for someone who is fighting a constant war like rome? I am in middle ages thinking of staying in despotism and invading russian continent. Wonder if benifits outweigh costs..hmm. What government to choose , I have republic and monarchy but tempted to just stay as a despot. I liek idea of rushing things and losing pop in my captured cities.

Last edited by Leonid; November 16, 2001 at 02:12.
Leonid is offline  
Old November 16, 2001, 03:17   #2
Dis
ACDG3 SpartansC4DG Vox
Deity
 
Dis's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 17,354
good question

not enough analysis has been done on monarchy and despotism. But I would think communism is better on all aspects. You can still rush build with population and corruption is slightly better- so your science rate should be better.

I can never get a good science rate with despotism. but if I'm in the middle of a war I don't change out. I'll usually change to monarchy before attacking my next enemy though.
__________________
Focus, discipline
Barack Obama- the antichrist
Dis is offline  
Old November 16, 2001, 03:57   #3
player1
Emperor
 
player1's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 3,218
Monarchy gives extra food & prduction (ignores despotisam penality).
Also unit upkeep won't be to much bigger.

So only question is:
Will you sacrifice gold or people.

I personaly choose gold (monarchy), but if I am in war & have taken hostile cities I'll stay in Despotism (to sacrifice some enemy popultion for units).


Better question is:

Monarchy vs Communism (pretty similar)

or:

Forced Labor vs Paid Labor (while waging war)
player1 is offline  
Old November 16, 2001, 23:58   #4
Fistleaf
Prince
 
Fistleaf's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Singapore
Posts: 654
Monarchy vs Communism:
I noticed that if you build a courthouse in a city near the capital in Monarchy, there may not be a decrease in corruption.
In Communism, courthouses work in every city because corruption is spread out.
And if the improved espionage ability in Communism works, then Communism may be a better choice for war.
Fistleaf is offline  
Old November 17, 2001, 01:02   #5
smellymummy
King
 
Local Time: 08:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,079
communism is probably the closest thing we have to fundamentilism from civ2, for the end game conquer all gov.

as i wrote in another thread, rush building requires pop points with communism, but if you own the longevity wonder your population grows 2 points instead of 1! That's very powerful with plenty of food, which is the type of city you would be rushing stuff anyway (more food less shields)
smellymummy is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:54.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team