Thread Tools
Old July 27, 2000, 07:08   #1
Dr.Oogkloot
King
 
Dr.Oogkloot's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,005
Civ 2 Standard Changes
Hello everyone,

There are a few simple changes I think everyone should make in Civ 2.
Firstly, replacing the Sioux Civ with the Incas. I think this is a real no-brainer: the Incas were historically more advanced and important, and in my opinion more interesting too. Furthermore this is better for geographical balance. I'm also thinking about replacing the Carthaginians with something else, maybe the Dutch.
I also replace the SETI Program wonder with the Internet (which should also require computers and is more important, and if it's not a wonder it at least deserves its own tech). A disadvantage here is that the icon would be wrong but that can be edited too.
I also replace that ghastly purple shield color (seventh civ) in city.gif with a nice dark grey. After all, how could I ever respect a purple civ?
I've also changed all rulers in rules.txt to male rulers and replaced "she" with "he" etc. in labels.txt. This solves the problem of having to think of a female leader for each (new) civ; I also think it's much nicer to play against Augustus than Livia, for example (I don't know of any civ where I would choose a female leader as one of the two most important/interesting ones).
Since it's ridiculous to have alpine troops defending cities, I changed their defense value to 4 and their attack value to 6. I also added a "Heavy Infantry" unit for city defense (ADM 7/5/1) (Heavy Weapons tech requires conscription and machine tools).

Actually I've made much more extensive changes than these but I think these ones are quite simple changes and I really don't think there's a reason not to make them.
Anyway, if anyone has comments or other ideas, please reply.

Emperor Oogkloot the Somewhat Acceptable
Dr.Oogkloot is offline  
Old July 27, 2000, 07:58   #2
Hasdrubal
Prince
 
Hasdrubal's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Carthage.
Posts: 362
quote:

Originally posted by Dr.Oogkloot on 07-27-2000 07:08 AM
I'm also thinking about replacing the Carthaginians with something else, maybe the Dutch.


What !?
----- --- ---
-- --- --- ---
- - --- --- ---
-- --- --- ----
----- --- ---

quote:

I don't know of any civ where I would choose a female leader as one of the two most important/interesting ones.


Victoria, Catherine the Great, Cleopatra, Boadicea, Gunnhild and Dido spring to mind...

------------------
Hasdrubal's Home.
Ceterum censeo Romam esse delendam.
[This message has been edited by Hasdrubal (edited July 27, 2000).]
Hasdrubal is offline  
Old July 27, 2000, 20:41   #3
tonic
King
 
tonic's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,597
In modern times, Thatcher (however much one may hate her conservative politics), Cori Aquino of the Philippines, Bandaranaike of Sri Lanka (formerly Ceylon), "Ang San Su Chi" (phonetically transcribed, check spelling later) of Burma, Mary Robinson of Ireland and NZ has one currently (Janet something?)

AFAIK the US never had a female President or they may already be having a de facto one in Hillary?
tonic is offline  
Old July 28, 2000, 01:17   #4
Ken Hinds
Prince
 
Local Time: 17:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 464
And Golda Mier, Indira Ghandi, Pakistan had one for a while also.

Tonic, Legend, and maybe fact also, has it that during President Wilson's stroke that his wife was actually making the decision in his name. The general public just wasn't informed of his condition.

Ken
Ken Hinds is offline  
Old July 28, 2000, 05:02   #5
Oldman
Prince
 
Local Time: 22:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Livingstone, Lord Protector of London
Posts: 433
Hasdrubal, Chill man!!!!! you're starting to sound like a bleedin' feminist!!!!!

But i have to say that you should have the female world leaders, especially Boadicia!! Have you seen her daughters? Woof!!! Now, anyone who can produce children looking like that, should definitely have their own nation!!!!
Oldman is offline  
Old July 28, 2000, 06:03   #6
Hasdrubal
Prince
 
Hasdrubal's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Carthage.
Posts: 362
Oldman, yeah, welsh girls are great. Well, all one of them that I know personally are.
Oh, and I don't really care what anybody says about former woman-rulers. But don't nobody dare take Carthage out of the game! Grrr!

OK, let's give Oogkloot's post the serious reply that it deserves:

quote:

Firstly, replacing the Sioux Civ with the Incas.


I've done that also! I agree.

quote:

I'm also thinking about replacing the Carthaginians.


Uhm, like I said in my previous post...


quote:

I also replace the SETI Program wonder with the Internet


Makes a lot of sense. I think that Civ is showing it's age here. We can probably expect the internet making an appearance in Civ III.

quote:

I also replace that ghastly purple shield color.


That's a matter of taste. I like purple, it's the colour of kings and Prince. (the artist formerly known as 'symbol')

quote:

I've also changed all rulers in rules.txt to male rulers


Everybody's been over this one already. Some female rules that appear in the game seem a bit forced indeed, and are really only there to provide players with the option of playing as a woman. (Livia, and, uh... oh well, they're not important anyway).

quote:

Since it's ridiculous to have alpine troops defending cities, I changed their defense value to 4 and their attack value to 6.


Alpine troops suck! When you make use of their one redeeming factor, moving through heavy terrain, they hardly have any attack value left. Maybe their movement factor should be changed to two. Then you can still attack after you're done skiing through the countryside.

------------------
Hasdrubal's Home.
Ceterum censeo Romam esse delendam.
Hasdrubal is offline  
Old July 28, 2000, 19:14   #7
tonic
King
 
tonic's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,597
quote:

Originally posted by Ken Hinds on 07-28-2000 01:17 AM
Tonic, Legend, and maybe fact also, has it that during President Wilson's stroke that his wife was actually making the decision in his name. The general public just wasn't informed of his condition.



Yes, they say behind every successful man there is a woman on whose shoulders he could relieve the burdens of the outside world. The converse seems to apply too - where would Margaret Thatcher be without supportive, homely hubby?
tonic is offline  
Old July 29, 2000, 08:13   #8
Allard HS
Prince
 
Allard HS's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:41
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: NL
Posts: 747
quote:

I'm also thinking about replacing the Carthaginians with something else, maybe the Dutch.


A very wise thought. Male should be "William III" I think, female should be "Wilhelmina", or if you choose a second male instead of female "William the Silent" (Willem de Zwijger). And make their titles under republic "Stadtholder" (Stadhouder), under Democracy "Minister-President". Under fundy it should be "Bisschop" (Bischop), under Despotism "Duke" (Graaf).

And the colour is already good, orange. Just take some cities from an atlas and add them in the cities.txt too.

and then the game múst be perfect.
Allard HS is offline  
Old July 29, 2000, 08:17   #9
Allard HS
Prince
 
Allard HS's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:41
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: NL
Posts: 747
droogkloot, nu begrijp ik je naam trouwens pas.


cool
Allard HS is offline  
Old July 29, 2000, 09:22   #10
The Mad Monk
Emperor
 
The Mad Monk's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Flyover Country
Posts: 4,659
I think the Carthaginians should stay, but the Americans should go, replaced by Arabs, or possibly Turks, though the Babylonians and Persians arguably have that covered. Maybe Bantus, or the previouly mentioned Incas.

Anything but Americans. Why? It offends my sense of history. Americans (of which I am one) are an offshoot of the English, and (in game terms) a late offshoot at that. The starting tribes should represent cultures that have at least several thousand years of history behind them.

Of course, that's just my opinion...
The Mad Monk is offline  
Old July 29, 2000, 18:31   #11
Dr.Oogkloot
King
 
Dr.Oogkloot's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,005
quote:

Originally posted by Hasdrubal on 07-27-2000 07:58 AM
Victoria, Catherine the Great, Cleopatra, Boadicea, Gunnhild and Dido spring to mind...




I use Churchill instead of Victoria, Lenin instead of C. the Great, Vercingetorix instead of Boadicea, Leif Eriksson instead of Gunnhild (not a very good one I admit), and Hasdrubal (the ancient leader, not you) instead of Dido (isn't Dido completely fictional anyway? I could be wrong there though)

Some counter-examples (reasons to change labels.txt and rules.txt)
Ishtari, Amaterasu and Nazca are goddesses not leaders IIRC (I use Nebukhadnezar, Hirohito and Cuauhtemoc respectively), and therefore not at all appropriate for Civ2. I already mentioned Livia (there are about two hundred leaders I'd put there before her). IIRC Hippolyta wasn't even Greek.

And I'll give you my reasons for changing the Carthaginians to the Dutch: firstly, as Allard said, the orange color fits them better; secondly, I'm Dutch myself; thirdly, the Carthaginians tend to behave like bastards in Civ 2; fourthly: nothing personal Hasdrubal but I just don't like Carthaginians.

Emperor Oogkloot the Somewhat Acceptable, One-Man Civilization and Bouncing Corpse (not really but I think it sounds nice)

PS If anyone reading this has not replaced Sioux with Incas please post here, I'd like to know why not.
PPS The Celts are another candidate to be edited out IMO
Dr.Oogkloot is offline  
Old July 29, 2000, 18:51   #12
Dr.Oogkloot
King
 
Dr.Oogkloot's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,005
D'oh Double-Posted again
[This message has been edited by Dr.Oogkloot (edited July 29, 2000).]
Dr.Oogkloot is offline  
Old July 29, 2000, 18:52   #13
Dr.Oogkloot
King
 
Dr.Oogkloot's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,005
quote:

Originally posted by tonic on 07-27-2000 08:41 PM
In modern times, Thatcher (however much one may hate her conservative politics), Cori Aquino of the Philippines, Bandaranaike of Sri Lanka (formerly Ceylon), "Ang San Su Chi" (phonetically transcribed, check spelling later) of Burma, Mary Robinson of Ireland and NZ has one currently (Janet something?)



I never use any of these civilizations except for the English, and for the English I use Henry/Churchill/Cromwell (don't remember which two of the three)

Dr.Oogkloot
Look I'm a NONE Settler!



------------------
"Mijn diepste gevoelens zitten zo diep dat ik ze niet eens voel"
- Bert Vanderslagmulders
Dr.Oogkloot is offline  
Old July 29, 2000, 19:35   #14
Hasdrubal
Prince
 
Hasdrubal's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Carthage.
Posts: 362
quote:

Originally posted by Dr.Oogkloot on 07-29-2000 06:31 PM
isn't Dido completely fictional anyway?


Dido is a true historical character. Even though most stories surrounding her are myth or fiction (Virgil), there is no doubt that she did indeed exist and founded Carthage.

quote:

the Carthaginians tend to behave like bastards


Go Carthage! There used to be a lot of sayings about Cartaginians in Ancient times. One of them made it into English: A Carthaginian Peace -> a peace with particular harsh conditions on the defeated party.

quote:

I just don't like Carthaginians.





As for great female rulers: again, history is up to its 'eyeballs' with fine examples.

------------------
Hasdrubal's Home.
Ceterum censeo Romam esse delendam.
[This message has been edited by Hasdrubal (edited July 29, 2000).]
Hasdrubal is offline  
Old July 29, 2000, 23:10   #15
Gatekeeper
Mac
King
 
Gatekeeper's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: United States of America
Posts: 2,306
quote:

Originally posted by Dr.Oogkloot on 07-29-2000 06:31 PM
PS If anyone reading this has not replaced Sioux with Incas please post here, I'd like to know why not.
PPS The Celts are another candidate to be edited out IMO


***

Dr. Oogkloot:

Well, I haven't replaced the Sioux with the Incas. Why? Because I really don't feel like it. Besides, IMHO, the Sioux are supposed to representative of the North American tribes in general. Also, I think the Aztecs are supposed to represent Central and South American cultures in general.

**shrug** Whatever floats your boat, though. That's what makes Civ II such a joy to play — its accessibility and ability to alter things is amazing (unlike C:CTP).

CYBERAmazon

Gatekeeper is offline  
Old July 30, 2000, 06:43   #16
Thue
Freeciv Developer
 
Local Time: 00:41
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 2,580
Get a decent civ game that supports more than 14 nations. Freeciv currently have 36, including Carthaginians, Dutch, Sioux and Inca.
Thue is offline  
Old July 30, 2000, 14:48   #17
Gatekeeper
Mac
King
 
Gatekeeper's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: United States of America
Posts: 2,306
Thue:

Get FreeCiv ported over to the Macintosh platform! Until then, I stuck with a measly 14 nations .

BTW, what engine is FreeCiv based on? Civ I or Civ II?

CYBERAmazon
Gatekeeper is offline  
Old July 30, 2000, 17:11   #18
Az
Emperor
 
Local Time: 01:41
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: A pub.
Posts: 3,161
"Who can respect a purple civ"

well I kinda respect the mongols . anyway , why aren't gray and purple two different colours ?

P.S.

americans out . ( sorry )
Incas in .
celts out
zulus in but please get another civ to southern and central civ .... like ethiopians.

arabs in , of course . ( could be implimented with that nomadic idea , as well as mongols, coz their starting point is mekka , in the desert , an oasis .

russians as always
atzeks as always
romans as always , but they never grow up to be an empire in civ , actually .

Native americans , not sioux , and they should be that kinda nomadic civ. and they could resist the upcoming atzecs from the north .

turks : I dunno .


Hebrews : oh I am tempted but between babilonians , egyptians , arabs and Persians?

well I guess they'll have to raise the map resolution , if you know what do I mean.

coz it's kinda hard to place 280 million ppl ( I bet there is more )in the middle east on 21 tiles . I barely get size 35 city .




------------------
Prepare to Land !
Az is offline  
Old July 30, 2000, 17:41   #19
Thue
Freeciv Developer
 
Local Time: 00:41
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 2,580
quote:

Originally posted by CYBERAmazon on 07-30-2000 02:48 PM
Thue:

Get FreeCiv ported over to the Macintosh platform! Until then, I stuck with a measly 14 nations .

BTW, what engine is FreeCiv based on? Civ I or Civ II?

CYBERAmazon

Actually someone is working on a MAC port.
Freeciv has it's own engine, which is custimizable via rulesets to play like civ I or II.
Thue is offline  
Old July 30, 2000, 19:34   #20
Dr.Oogkloot
King
 
Dr.Oogkloot's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,005
quote:

Originally posted by Hasdrubal on 07-29-2000 07:35 PM



As for great female rulers: again, history is up to its 'eyeballs' with fine examples.




Name just one. (And note that not every leader is a great leader)
As for the eyeball thing: apparently you speak Dutch?

Dr.Oogkloot

Dr.Oogkloot is offline  
Old July 30, 2000, 19:40   #21
Dr.Oogkloot
King
 
Dr.Oogkloot's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,005
quote:

Originally posted by CYBERAmazon on 07-29-2000 11:10 PM
***

Dr. Oogkloot:

Well, I haven't replaced the Sioux with the Incas. Why? Because I really don't feel like it.


It only takes a few minutes to change it...

quote:

Besides, IMHO, the Sioux are supposed to representative of the North American tribes in general. Also, I think the Aztecs are supposed to represent Central and South American cultures in general.



Well, I tend to see every civ only as that civ itself instead of as representing multiple civs; and even if you look at it that way, I still think the Middle/South-American tribes deserve two representatives and the North-American tribes zero.
By the way did I mention that the Sioux city names are silly?

Emperor Oogkloot the Somewhat Acceptable



------------------
"Mijn diepste gevoelens zitten zo diep dat ik ze niet eens voel"
- Bert Vanderslagmulders
Dr.Oogkloot is offline  
Old July 31, 2000, 04:58   #22
Scouse Gits
lifer
Civilization II PBEMTrade Wars / BlackNova TradersGalCiv Apolyton EmpireApolytoners Hall of FameCivilization II Succession Games
Emperor
 
Scouse Gits's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Liverpool, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,344
My threeha'p'orth - Carthaginians STAY - I couldn't play them if they weren't there - Americans OUT - for the valid historical reasons rather than simple xenophobia.
Replacement is more problematical - Incas are good candidates; the Dutch as a late offspring of the Spanish fail by the same yard-stick as the US - How about melonesians or some such - my history/geography isn't much good , but surely there were some early civs in that neck of the woods??

Good civin'

------------------
____________
Scouse Git[1]

"CARTAGO DELENDA EST" - Cato the Censor
Scouse Gits is offline  
Old July 31, 2000, 20:35   #23
Gatekeeper
Mac
King
 
Gatekeeper's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: United States of America
Posts: 2,306
Dr. Oogkloot:

I've already customized my RULES.TXT file to suit my needs. Suffice to say, many things have been changed to enhance realism. I decided to keep the tribes as is because it was geographically balanced (although something in Australia and South America would've been nice ... could have been accomplished by adding three more nation choices ... Incas, Aborigines, and Barbarian).

I beg to differ about no representation in North America. There were many great Indian nations — the Sioux, Cherokee, Anasazi, Mohawk and others. Sioux names were derived from place names, mainly. Not actual settlements since they were a nomadic people after being driven from the woodlands of Wisconsin and eastern Minnesota.

About them Carthaginians ... gee, they were conquered over 2000 years ago. Do they *really* count after so long?

CYBERAmazon
Gatekeeper is offline  
Old July 31, 2000, 23:21   #24
Dr.Oogkloot
King
 
Dr.Oogkloot's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,005
quote:

Originally posted by CYBERAmazon on 07-31-2000 08:35 PM
Dr. Oogkloot:

I've already customized my RULES.TXT file to suit my needs.


There's no reason you can't customize it even further.
quote:


I decided to keep the tribes as is because it was geographically balanced.


Having one civ in North America, one in middle and one in South is more geographically balanced than two in North, one in middle and none in South

quote:


I beg to differ about no representation in North America. There were many great Indian nations — the Sioux, Cherokee, Anasazi, Mohawk and others.


The Incas were much greater than any of those IMO, probably greater than all of them combined too.

Emperor Oogkloot the Somewhat Acceptable


------------------
"Mijn diepste gevoelens zitten zo diep dat ik ze niet eens voel"
- Bert Vanderslagmulders
Dr.Oogkloot is offline  
Old July 31, 2000, 23:25   #25
Dr.Oogkloot
King
 
Dr.Oogkloot's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,005
By the way, a few more counter-examples (for editing labels.txt)

Bortei (who?) vs Timur Lenk
Jeanne d'Arc vs Napoleon
Maria Theresa vs Bismarck or Hitler

Dr.Oogkloot
Dr.Oogkloot is offline  
Old August 1, 2000, 01:34   #26
Gatekeeper
Mac
King
 
Gatekeeper's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: United States of America
Posts: 2,306
Dr. Oogkloot:

***
Having one civ in North America, one in middle and one in South is more geographically balanced than two in North, one in middle and none in South
***

That depends. In my case, I am using a different Earth map than the one supplied with the game and, secondly, I've done some slight relocating to reflect a more "genuine" appearance.

Good luck convincing others to make your recommended changes .

CYBERAmazon
Gatekeeper is offline  
Old August 1, 2000, 22:42   #27
Jim W
Warlord
 
Local Time: 22:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 245
Is this the place to bring in my pet peeve, such as Romans and Babylonians running around on the same map, when in actual fact the Babylonians were long gone Charlie when the Romans got started?

And it gets worse if you throw in some Americans, under the magnificent Despot, Abe Lincoln.

So I've been using Random maps, and progressively changing the names of the Civs, along with the names of thie cities. that way, I get Civs on the board who have no connection to known history, something I find a bit easier to work with.

Jim W
Jim W is offline  
Old August 2, 2000, 06:59   #28
SCG
Civilization II Democracy GameCivilization II Succession GamesCivilization II Democracy Game: Red Front
King
 
SCG's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: of less than all that I see
Posts: 1,055
quote:

Originally posted by Jim W on 08-01-2000 10:42 PM
Is this the place to bring in my pet peeve, such as Romans and Babylonians running around on the same map, when in actual fact the Babylonians were long gone Charlie when the Romans got started?



kind of makes you wonder if the producers of shows like "Xena, Warrior Princess" have been playing too much Civ II, doesn't it. I mean with Xena leading the Amazon Greeks up against Ghengis Khan of the Mongols and then next episode against Livia of the Romans

------------------
April Cantor: Sire, in order to expand further we must first gain favor of the King

SCG: darn, I've never really got the hang of that tribute thing, guess it will be a long time until i make prince

*goes off and starts gifting gold and techs*
SCG is offline  
Old August 2, 2000, 23:10   #29
Dr.Oogkloot
King
 
Dr.Oogkloot's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,005
quote:

Originally posted by Jim W on 08-01-2000 10:42 PM
Is this the place to bring in my pet peeve, such as Romans and Babylonians running around on the same map, when in actual fact the Babylonians were long gone Charlie when the Romans got started?


I don't see this as a problem. Civ 2 is not supposed to represent history exactly; think of it as a nice what-if.

Dr.Oogkloot

Dr.Oogkloot is offline  
Old August 3, 2000, 18:49   #30
cavebear
Civilization II Democracy Game
Emperor
 
cavebear's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: of the Pleistocene
Posts: 4,788
First, I don't alter my rules.txt. I occasionally host, and I think it is unfair to present players with unfamiliar civs/units/battle factors.

Second, I like having the American civ. I have enough trouble remembering where my cities *are* without having to learn entirely weird city names.

Third, "purple": Purple is OK, navy is OK, just not both of them. They are too similar. I've injured more than one ally (or allowed an enemy to wander around) that way. Change one of them to pink or magenta.

Fourth, I don't have any problem with female leaders. I even use one myself sometimes. Heck, I'd use Marvin the Martian sometimes, if the graphic was available.



------------------
Proud participant in GameLeague...

Proud Warrior of the O.W.L. Alliance...
cavebear is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:41.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team