Thread Tools
Old December 28, 2001, 08:40   #121
Dauphin
Civilization IV PBEMPolyCast Team
Deity
 
Dauphin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Seouenaca, Cantium
Posts: 12,426
Quote:
They--40 million strong--would have fought to the death otherwise, and this even after the devastations wrought upon Nagasaki and Hiroshima
The Japanese population is about 125 million IIRC. So 60 years ago the population would still have been well in excess of 40 million. I would guess 80 million.

Are you refering to the male population being 40 million by any chance?
__________________
"Everybody knows you never go full retard. You went full retard man. Never go full retard"
Dauphin is offline  
Old December 29, 2001, 01:21   #122
Giovanni August
Warlord
 
Giovanni August's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Torino (Turin) Piemonte ITALY / Augusta Taurinorum - Sub Alpes Italia
Posts: 179
"Napolitano Bonaparte"???? !
Who's that guy? I know Napoleone !!!
Anyway!
The story of Napoleone is much more related to Italy then the one of Leatitia!
As you already said Napoleno was born in the island of Corsica in the city of Ajaccio!
That island was sold by the Republic of Genova to France in the years 1769 and Napoleone was born in August of the same year!
So as you can see he was very near to be an Italian and not a French (but i don't think that with the Genovese Army he would conquer nearly all Europe like he did with the French Army)(Probably he would be conquer only few othe Italian cities!)
BTW
Napoleone was feeling very much his Italian origin and that is why when he conquered the boot he decided to give a big autonomy to us and the part of his Army that was recruited in Italy was using as a flag instead of the French flag a green-white-red flag that later became our flag!

PS
Sorry if I was boring
PPS
Do you know the Italian showgirl Elenoire Casalegno? well! If you see Elenoire looks really like a French name (the last name instead is really Italian)
PPPS
When I stopped at NY I ate a pizza in Sbarro inside the WTC! It wasn't very good but still much better than Seattle's Pizza!
Giovanni August is offline  
Old January 12, 2002, 19:56   #123
siredgar
Prince
 
siredgar's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 543
The U.S. does not "rule" Japan. A decision to amend the constitution to change the nature of Japanese military forces is up to Japanese legislators, not the U.S. government. However, I believe that these forces are under joint U.S.-Japanese command requiring approval by both sides for any sigificant military moves, just like for South Korea. Correct me, if I'm wrong.

Nevertheless, the U.S. does have strong influence on the military policies of countries like Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and even Britain. Generally, these are made through military arrangements such as joint command agreements or treaties like ANZUS.
__________________
"I've spent more time posting than playing."
siredgar is offline  
Old January 13, 2002, 04:26   #124
satyajedi
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 17:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 34
"We had to look aside as the imperial family fell blameless because the Japanese people held the emperor as somewhat of a deity and incapable of wrongdoing"

The United States has done many terrible things in our time, but the pardoning of anyone in the Japanese military with royal connections is one of the worst things we did in the 20th century. Idle complaining, and perhaps only tangentally related, but when you hear about Nanking and realize that the architects get let off when we could have prosecuted them, it pisses me off. It's ramifications can still be seen in a Japanese society that refuses to acknowledge any of the atrocities committed by the Japanese in World War II, with history books that merely repeat the Japanese war propaganda that Japan was liberating Korea, China and Southeast asia from European colonization.

By the way, I suspect that Koizumi will not be able to amend/remove the pacifist clause in the Japanese constitution. Many Japanese people support this clause, both inside and outside the government, and it appeals to a post-WWII sense that the Japanese have "outgrown" militarism (as opposed to barbaric American gajin).

Still, there should be little doubt that even without a military, Japan is amoung the most powerful nations in the world. In these days of interconnected economies, the importance of military power is so severely diminished that I don't think Japan loses anything, power-wise, by not having an army.

-Satya
satyajedi is offline  
Old January 13, 2002, 04:45   #125
satyajedi
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 17:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 34
By the way, to all you anti-American Europeans, I have to say...

Man, what a relief to hear you guys diss America! To be an American right now is to be constantly bombarded with America uber alles images from every media outlet. I'd almost forgotten there were people in the world -- that is, other than psychotic Islamic terrorists -- who were willing to kick our arrogant, self-centered, militaristic, Kyoto-defying, ABM-treaty-trashing ass.

I gotta renew my subscription to the Guardian...

-Satya
satyajedi is offline  
Old January 13, 2002, 20:04   #126
Giovanni August
Warlord
 
Giovanni August's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Torino (Turin) Piemonte ITALY / Augusta Taurinorum - Sub Alpes Italia
Posts: 179
Quote:
Originally posted by satyajedi
By the way, to all you anti-American Europeans, I have to say...

Man, what a relief to hear you guys diss America! To be an American right now is to be constantly bombarded with America uber alles images from every media outlet. I'd almost forgotten there were people in the world -- that is, other than psychotic Islamic terrorists -- who were willing to kick our arrogant, self-centered, militaristic, Kyoto-defying, ABM-treaty-trashing ass.

I gotta renew my subscription to the Guardian...

-Satya

With all the respect.
But I didn't really understand what you mean by this!
Can you explain please?
Giovanni August is offline  
Old January 13, 2002, 20:55   #127
siredgar
Prince
 
siredgar's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 543
I realize the fallout that will come from this, however...
I have to ask the following question:

"Isn't it a bit self-righteous and hypocritical for Europeans to admonish U.S. foreign policy for destructive behavior, especially when it is the Europeans who have started so many wars, colonized and enslaved so many peoples, and destroyed much of Earth's ecosystem?"

After a series of endless regional warfare, the Europeans had developed advanced weaponry and ocean-faring vessels. They took this knowledge to begin colonizing and enslaving the peoples of Africa, Asia, and the Americas. The ramifications of this are still felt throughout the world today, including in the U.S.

Some may argue that this is inevitable. Human nature they say. Man shall always seek power.

Well, compare this to the Chinese. They developed gunpowder and ocean-faring junks hundreds of years before the Europeans took full advantage of these technologies. Expeditions by Cheng Ho led to voyages to Southeast Asia, India, the Middle East, and even the coasts of East Africa.

So, did they go ahead and then take over the inhabitants? No, they traded with them. Even with the ones that were considered relatively "primitive" to their civilization.

The European superiority complex led to many tragedies in human civilization, not to mention two World Wars. Many European states are only now moving towards better cooperation, more aid for developing countries, and environmental protection. This is after hundreds of years of devastating wars, the colonization/enslavement of other peoples, and environmental degradation.

Look at your own history before criticizing others.

The U.S. is still a "young" country. Give it a break!
__________________
"I've spent more time posting than playing."
siredgar is offline  
Old January 14, 2002, 01:02   #128
Giovanni August
Warlord
 
Giovanni August's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Torino (Turin) Piemonte ITALY / Augusta Taurinorum - Sub Alpes Italia
Posts: 179
So what you are basicly saying is:

"Because Europeans have an horrible History and are bad and arrogants people, Americans have right to do the same things"

Really great philosophy: Congratulations!
Fortunately very few Americans think like you, and very few Europeans are like you described!!!
Giovanni August is offline  
Old January 14, 2002, 07:30   #129
Harovan
staff
PtWDG Gathering StormPtWDG2 Monty PythonC4DG Gathering Storm
Civ4: Colonization Content Editor
 
Local Time: 18:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,117
Re: I realize the fallout that will come from this, however...
Please don't count this an anti-american issue (it's not meant to be one), but:

Quote:
Originally posted by siredgar
After a series of endless regional warfare, the Europeans had developed advanced weaponry and ocean-faring vessels. They took this knowledge to begin colonizing and enslaving the peoples of Africa, Asia, and the Americas. The ramifications of this are still felt throughout the world today, including in the U.S.
Sitting on the soil the European conquerors gained bloodily from the native American population and saying "That was evil!" sounds funny. If it would not have happened, most of you (assumed they were really born) would still be - Europeans.

Quote:
Originally posted by siredgar
Well, compare this to the Chinese. They developed gunpowder and ocean-faring junks hundreds of years before the Europeans took full advantage of these technologies. Expeditions by Cheng Ho led to voyages to Southeast Asia, India, the Middle East, and even the coasts of East Africa.
Right, the Chinese did not attack. They were safe and happy behind their Great Wall. But the Mongols did. And the Turks too. And a big part of Europe was occupied for centuries. Half of the population of former Yugoslavia are still Moslems. So don't tell stories of the peaceful Asians and the evil Europeans. All civilizations (including European, Asian, African and yes - American) have light and dark spots in their history.

Quote:
Originally posted by siredgar
The U.S. is still a "young" country. Give it a break!
Agreed, though with a smile . Read the thread "Are the Americans old enough..." and see how "old" the American civ is in the opinion of so many .
Harovan is offline  
Old January 14, 2002, 09:20   #130
jasev
staff
Spanish CiversScenario League / Civ2-CreationPtWDG2 Latin LoversApolytoners Hall of FamePSPB Team Español
Moderator
 
jasev's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: at the Spanish Forum
Posts: 9,946
Re: I realize the fallout that will come from this, however...
Quote:
Originally posted by siredgar
I have to ask the following question:

"Isn't it a bit self-righteous and hypocritical for Europeans to admonish U.S. foreign policy for destructive behavior, especially when it is the Europeans who have started so many wars, colonized and enslaved so many peoples, and destroyed much of Earth's ecosystem?"
Nice question. So you say:
1) The Europeans commited atrocities.
2) So, the Americans are allowed to commit atrocities.
3) The Americans can criticize the Europeans for their past atrocities.
4) But the Europeans can't criticize the Americans for their current Atrocities.

Who is hypocritical here? We know our history, and we can regret it. But we weren't born when it happened and we can't avoid it. Meanwhile, Americans are responsible of the current activities of their government because they ellected it. They can avoid it.
__________________
"Son españoles... los que no pueden ser otra cosa" (Cánovas del Castillo)
"España es un problema, Europa su solución" (Ortega y Gasset)
The Spanish Civilization Site
"Déjate llevar por la complejidad y cabalga sobre ella" - Niessuh, sabio cívico
jasev is offline  
Old January 14, 2002, 22:04   #131
siredgar
Prince
 
siredgar's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 543
I am not saying that Americans should not be held responsible for their actions, but it is interesting to me to see such vehement criticism of U.S. foreign policy from those that helped create many of problems that Americans are now dealing with.

For example, many of the root causes of turbulence in the Middle East originates with British policy there. Now, it is chiefly the U.S. that must handle the consequences of this turbulence.

By the way, I brought up the example of the Chinese during the 15th century, not to say that Asians are "peaceful" and Europeans are "evil", but to demonstrate that not all civilizations need to resort to violence in interactions with other peoples just because they are more advanced. I hope that the U.S. follows this example.

Anyhow, I don't think there is much that the U.S. does now that even compares with past European actions.
__________________
"I've spent more time posting than playing."
siredgar is offline  
Old January 14, 2002, 23:48   #132
muppet
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 09:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Igloo
Posts: 59
Re: Re: I realize the fallout that will come from this, however...
Quote:
Originally posted by jasev


Nice question. So you say:
1) The Europeans commited atrocities.
2) So, the Americans are allowed to commit atrocities.
3) The Americans can criticize the Europeans for their past atrocities.
4) But the Europeans can't criticize the Americans for their current Atrocities.

Who is hypocritical here? We know our history, and we can regret it. But we weren't born when it happened and we can't avoid it. Meanwhile, Americans are responsible of the current activities of their government because they ellected it. They can avoid it.
Isn't that kind of like... twisting what was actually said?

As to current activities...

I realize that, in North America, our news reports are uhm... tainted -- I try not to call reporters, liars (it's a job). However, I am curious as to what current activities America engages in that are so bad?
muppet is offline  
Old January 15, 2002, 09:11   #133
Dry
Prince
 
Dry's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Brussels
Posts: 854
Sons will not be ounished for the sins of their father
Quote:
Originally posted by siredgar
I have to ask the following question:

"Isn't it a bit self-righteous and hypocritical for Europeans to admonish U.S. foreign policy for destructive behavior, especially when it is the Europeans who have started so many wars, colonized and enslaved so many peoples, and destroyed much of Earth's ecosystem?"
I had people of my family killed by the nazis, but I will never held German people of today responsible for it.
It is their grand-parents who put Hitler to power, not them.
But, OTOH, if they say:"What our grand-parents did was no mistake, what they did was right", then, I think that they share responsability.

The same way, I will never accuse an American of today for the massacre of the American Natives of yesterday, except if he states that it was 'the right thing to do' (we all know the excuse of "they didn't do anything usefull of their land, so we took it". With this mentality, I guess there is no backyard in the US with simply grass. "Cultivate your garden, or I have the right to take it" !?! ).

So yes, even as European, I will 'admonish' American (or whoever) for what they do, not for what their ancestors did.

We learned the hard way that humilating an ennemy was to feed the extremist part of it.
Our grand parents humiliated the Germans with the treaty of Versailles, and the consequences were Hitler and nazism.
Our parents, learned from the bad experience of out grand-parents and although Hitler was real evil (much more than Saddam Hussein), they tried not to humiliate Germany.
Yes, (as an example) today we say: what US make Iraqi (or Israel in Gaza), is the same mistake as our grand-parents. They humiliates Iraqi. We all know the consequences of humiliation: extremism. It will not be nazism, but it will be integrism (each one its extremism).
Notice that I am *not* saying that Saddam (or the hesbola(?)) are nice guys, no, what I say is that your policy *helps* those evil people.

What bugs us, as european, is that the same way nazism did not only affect Europe, the extremism you are feeding today, will not only affects you, but the whole world.
The same way I say: our grand parents made a mistake, the same way I say: you are making a mistake.

What I say here is: we (europeans) made mistakes, but we learned. You, you seem to forget: your grand-parents were wise enough not to humiliate Germany or Japan, and you lost this wisdom in middle-east.

BTW1: I know some US-haters who say: "No, the US (same for Israel) are not THAT stupid, they perfectly know what they are doing. They are doing this purposely, nobody can be *that* innocent. They *want* extremism. They do NOT want any rich country (arabic, muslim) in this region, so they feed extremism by all possible means. Humiliation is the best, because on one hand you feed the problem and as soon as humiliated people react, you may say: see, I was right, they *are* evil".

BTW2: there are other points (nationalism, morality/hypocrisy, religion,...) on which you really makes me think to our grand-parents (1900-1950). Technologically you are ahead of us, but by values/morality, you are at the level of our grand parents and it bugs me when your so-called values comes back to Europe, I have the feeling that history is going backward.
Our grand parents values brought the world to great misfortune, what will *you*, with same values, but better technology bring to the world?
Please, learn from the past, even the past of other countries.
__________________
The books that the world calls immoral are the books that show the world its own shame. Oscar Wilde.
Dry is offline  
Old January 15, 2002, 09:43   #134
jasev
staff
Spanish CiversScenario League / Civ2-CreationPtWDG2 Latin LoversApolytoners Hall of FamePSPB Team Español
Moderator
 
jasev's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: at the Spanish Forum
Posts: 9,946
Re: Re: Re: I realize the fallout that will come from this, however...
Quote:
Originally posted by muppet
However, I am curious as to what current activities America engages in that are so bad?
Sorry if I didn't express myself correctly, but I was just speaking hypothetically.
__________________
"Son españoles... los que no pueden ser otra cosa" (Cánovas del Castillo)
"España es un problema, Europa su solución" (Ortega y Gasset)
The Spanish Civilization Site
"Déjate llevar por la complejidad y cabalga sobre ella" - Niessuh, sabio cívico

Last edited by jasev; January 15, 2002 at 12:49.
jasev is offline  
Old January 15, 2002, 10:18   #135
Harovan
staff
PtWDG Gathering StormPtWDG2 Monty PythonC4DG Gathering Storm
Civ4: Colonization Content Editor
 
Local Time: 18:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,117
I don't wish to start a bean counting, that would be wrong. As a German I know, that it's a short way from "Hooray"-patriotism through nationalism to fascism, I (as well as most other Germans today) know what my ancestors have done and don't expect anybody to love me. Just take me as I am.

What I don't like in America's current policy is, that they try to play "Civilization" with the real World. How do most of us play? The World is our playground, all resources belong to us no matter where they are located, we have no friends but only vassals, we use our financial superiority to finally ruin the poor, our military is omnipresent, global warming doesn't matter for the sake of our production, and if we bomb cities back to stone age it's their own fault, because they started to attack our tank army with a knight.

Unfortunately, the present European policy is not a bit better. I think our children will suffer badly for the mistakes our parents and we are responsible for, no matter if they live in America or Europe.
Harovan is offline  
Old January 15, 2002, 13:28   #136
satyajedi
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 17:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 34
Well said Dry.

(for the record, it is Hizb'allah, and no they are not nice guys).

I would even go so far as to say that the dismantling of the Palestinian authority can only be because Sharon knows that a Palestinian leadership vacuum will be filled by Islamic Jihad and Hamas, and once that happens it will give him the justification to remove the entire Palestinian population. I seriously doubt he's stupid enough to dismantle the PLO without knowing that Jihad will be the result.

-Satya
satyajedi is offline  
Old January 15, 2002, 21:40   #137
Manstein3
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 18:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 34
Giovanni August:
Charle Magne was not a French. I could argue he belonged to a German tribe, the Franken, who conquered large parts of Roman Gallia and became the new upper class, but the truth is that his Franconian Empire was neither French nor German. The split between France and Germany was after his death. And France was never called Roman Empire like Germany, but was a kingdom (which was a huge advantage in forming a united nation, which Germany did not acchieve BECAUSE of the supernational role of its Kaiser)

The USA is the leading power. you can verify this
-on the people who get most nobel prizes (before the first World War: Germans, between the Wars: British, now: US-Americans or people working there)
- because of the fact that we write in English (In 1900 a - at least - scientific discussion would have been in German, in 1800 it would have been in French. As time goes by...)
-on the supremacy of the Hollywood-entertainment-industry. This is a strategic device unknown to former ages. Maybe the Roman culture had the same strategic effects to its neighbours: to influence and and adapt them ...
-on the fact that most big companys in the world are part of the Dow Jones. The US-economy and the high-tech-industry even more is predominant in an astounding way...
-on the fact that only military interventing power is the USA. The others don't have the prestige or the guts, or both. And they dont have the money to spend...
Manstein3 is offline  
Old January 15, 2002, 22:16   #138
Giovanni August
Warlord
 
Giovanni August's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Torino (Turin) Piemonte ITALY / Augusta Taurinorum - Sub Alpes Italia
Posts: 179
Thanks for correcting me about Charle Magne!

Anyway!
I NEVER SAID that the US are NOT the leading power!
I just said that they are not the only super power left according to my opinion and my standards!
Than you said:
Quote:
- because of the fact that we write in English (In 1900 a - at least - scientific discussion would have been in German, in 1800 it would have been in French. As time goes by...)
That's also because of the English that colonized almost half of the world!!

Quote:
-on the fact that only military interventing power is the USA. The others don't have the prestige or the guts, or both. And they dont have the money to spend...
Or maybe they don't want to go between other nations business??

Quote:
-on the people who get most nobel prizes (before the first World War: Germans, between the Wars: British, now: US-Americans or people working there)
-on the supremacy of the Hollywood-entertainment-industry. This is a strategic device unknown to former ages. Maybe the Roman culture had the same strategic effects to its neighbours: to influence and and adapt them ...
-on the fact that most big companys in the world are part of the Dow Jones. The US-economy and the high-tech-industry even more is predominant in an astounding way...
I can agree with that!

Now i would like to sa something!
The US is the most powerfull nation in the world right now! So it's normal that people would criticize it more! Because:
A mistake in international policy by another country (Italy i.e.) has not the same consequences than a mistake of International policy of the US!
If Italy reduce the pollution emission that is not the same impact on the enviroment than if the US do the same thing!
and so on...
Every your mistake is bigger compared to mistake of other nations and that's why the US are more criticized for their errors and mistakes!
Giovanni August is offline  
Old January 15, 2002, 23:08   #139
molly bloom
King
 
molly bloom's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:49
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lundenwic
Posts: 2,719
Re: I realize the fallout that will come from this, however...
Quote:
Originally posted by siredgar


Well, compare this to the Chinese. They developed gunpowder and ocean-faring junks hundreds of years before the Europeans took full advantage of these technologies. Expeditions by Cheng Ho led to voyages to Southeast Asia, India, the Middle East, and even the coasts of East Africa.

So, did they go ahead and then take over the inhabitants? No, they traded with them. Even with the ones that were considered relatively "primitive" to their civilization.
I believe my Vietnamese neighbours have a rather differing, more sanguine notion of a 'peaceful' China.

For instance: in 1410, after leading five large expeditions in person, the Emperor Yung-le won a victory on the River Onon to the north east of Ulan Bator over the Mongols. Manchuria was occupied up to the mouth of the Amur.

5000 kilometres to the south, a Chinese army numbering some 200, 000 men intervened in 1406 in Dai Viet, in northern Viet Nam, putting an end to the kingdom of the Tran. Military occupation and de facto annexation of the Red River basin followed- leading to the establishment of the new Vietnamese dynasty of the Le, under the legendary Le Loi, in 1427.

Cheng Ho intervened in an affair of the succession to the throne in the Javanese kingdom of Majapahit, and in Palembang in a conflict between the local government and the Chinese colony.

In Calicut, Cochin and Sri Lanka he erected stelae proclaiming that these kingdoms were vassals of the Ming Empire.

Cheng Ho opposed the claims of the Majapahit to Malacca- erecting another stelae there. He also inflicted a defeat on the royal army in Sri Lanka.

1413-1415, Chinese troops under Cheng Ho intervened in the internal affairs of the Sultanate of Samudra-Pasai in north-western Sumatra.

The voyages of Cheng Ho were not simply exploration and mercantilism- they were designed to impress upon lesser kingdoms the power and prestige of the Ming, and in doing so, to extract trading rights and tribute. The use of a Muslim commander being especially judicious, given the nature of the trade routes between China and South East Asia and the east of Africa and Arabia.

You might call it junk diplomacy, as opposed to gunboat diplomacy...

There were further Ming offensives in Mongolia, and under the Manchu, Sinkiang/Chinese Turkestan, the Ili valley, the oases of the Tarim Basin, and Sino-Manchu occupation of Tibet, in 1751.

Indeed, the Ch'ing Empire reached its greatest extent in 1759- controlling territories covering approx. 13 000 000 sq. km. , including Taiwan, Outer Mongolia, other areas since occupied by Russia, and exacted tribute with/without threats, from Nepal, Burma, Siam, Vietnam, Ryukyu, Korea, the Philippines and Bhutan.

Not quite so stay at home as people might think....
__________________
Cherish your youth. Mark Foley, 2002

I don't know what you're talking about by international law. G.W. Bush, 12/03
molly bloom is offline  
Old January 16, 2002, 13:31   #140
siredgar
Prince
 
siredgar's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 543
Molly,

You always seem to be able to dig up these obscure facts that are quite fascinating. I applaud you for standing up for the underdogs, as usual.

Anyhow, if you look back at my previous postings, you will see that I never described the Chinese during the 15th century as "peaceful". Instead, my point focused on the fact that the Chinese did not go out and enslave and colonize other peoples considered "inferior" in cultural advancement.

The Chinese did wage many wars against the Vietnamese, but I believe this was primarily because they refused to pay tribute to the emperor. Counter to popular opinion, loyal vassal states like Korea were largely left alone and were not ruled by or were "colonies" of China. In fact, they often received more back than what they gave in tributes to the emperor.

Anyhow, the Chinese wanted to secure their borders with friendly states and often used force to preserve its interests in the immediate areas. They were not "peaceful", but they did not colonize other peoples in the same way Europeans later did.

Perhaps the Chinese were not that aggressive overseas because they did not possess the capability. I do not believe this is true, however, because Cheng Ho often had about 30,000 men travel with him on some of the largest wooden boats constructed in human history. They definitely had the capability to colonize other peoples.

In at least one of the cases of Chinese aggression abroad you brought up, namely the Sri Lankan intervention, I know it was recorded that the local chief was "acting aggressively" and so they were forced to attack. The primary mission of these voyages was repeatedly trade and exploration time after time.

The point is is that the Chinese had developed the technologies to go overseas and use force to subjugate others, but they did not.

Edgar
__________________
"I've spent more time posting than playing."
siredgar is offline  
Old January 16, 2002, 15:30   #141
Dauphin
Civilization IV PBEMPolyCast Team
Deity
 
Dauphin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Seouenaca, Cantium
Posts: 12,426
Quote:
The point is is that the Chinese had developed the technologies to go overseas and use force to subjugate others, but they did not.
Europe is made of many small countries and so competition between states was strong. The need to expand and gain power was necessary. The easiest way of doing this was through global colonisation - and once one nation colonized the others felt compelled to do the same.

I don't know that much about Chinese history, but would it be fair to say that without the inter-states competition the perceived need to colonise to survive was not there?
__________________
"Everybody knows you never go full retard. You went full retard man. Never go full retard"
Dauphin is offline  
Old January 16, 2002, 16:26   #142
jasev
staff
Spanish CiversScenario League / Civ2-CreationPtWDG2 Latin LoversApolytoners Hall of FamePSPB Team Español
Moderator
 
jasev's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: at the Spanish Forum
Posts: 9,946
I've got a question about Chinese...
How do you think they achieved such an empire? It's a really big country. "Assimilating lower life forms", like borgs? They fighted against their neighbours, like everybody. And they builded an empire with fire and sword, not with arts and polite words.
__________________
"Son españoles... los que no pueden ser otra cosa" (Cánovas del Castillo)
"España es un problema, Europa su solución" (Ortega y Gasset)
The Spanish Civilization Site
"Déjate llevar por la complejidad y cabalga sobre ella" - Niessuh, sabio cívico
jasev is offline  
Old January 16, 2002, 20:38   #143
molly bloom
King
 
molly bloom's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:49
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lundenwic
Posts: 2,719
Quote:
Originally posted by siredgar
Molly,

You always seem to be able to dig up these obscure facts that are quite fascinating. I applaud you for standing up for the underdogs, as usual.

Anyhow, if you look back at my previous postings, you will see that I never described the Chinese during the 15th century as "peaceful". Instead, my point focused on the fact that the Chinese did not go out and enslave and colonize other peoples considered "inferior" in cultural advancement.

The Chinese did wage many wars against the Vietnamese, but I believe this was primarily because they refused to pay tribute to the emperor.
Let me assure you- from a Vietnamese point of view, Vietnamese history is not obscure- the Le dynasty and Le Loi are still reverenced in modern day Vietnamese history. So the Chinese did not enslave other people- um, so if these 'vassal' states (and how did they get to be vassal states?) decide they want to keep their revenues or goods for themselves, what did the Chinese do? Use harsh words and embargo the sale of ink?

If the Chinese considered these states as equals and not inferiors, why would they demand tribute? And how could they enforce it? When the Ch'ing Empire reaches its greatest extent in 1759, did it do so through peaceful osmosis or cooption, or as a result, as I have pointed out, of aggressive militaristic occupation and subjugation?

If, as you say, the Sri Lankans were 'acting aggressively' (frankly, erecting stelae proclaiming sovereign states to be vassals of a distant empire is aggressive in my book- consider the Spaniards or the English in the Americas) is it such a surprise that Cheng Ho gets an unpleasant welcome?

Here's a relatively unbiased link, which talks about the new Ming Dynasty wishing to assert its authority and influence, and wishing to civilize other nations in the way of Confucian living:

http://members.tripod.com/khleo/chengho.htm
__________________
Cherish your youth. Mark Foley, 2002

I don't know what you're talking about by international law. G.W. Bush, 12/03
molly bloom is offline  
Old January 16, 2002, 21:08   #144
siredgar
Prince
 
siredgar's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 543
Molly,

Again, perhaps you should read what I post more carefully. I did not say that the Chinese considered other peoples "equal and not inferiors". In fact, I imply that they did not look upon most of the peoples of Southeast Asia and Africa as very developed at all.

According to the Chinese, the only civilized peoples in Asia were the Koreans and the Vietnamese. Even the Japanese at the time were often called barbaric "dwarf pirates". The difference between the Koreans and the Vietnamese is that the Koreans maintained relatively peaceful relations with their larger, more powerful neighbor for a long time, while the Vietnamese did not.

There were many wars between the Chinese and the Vietnamese that still resonates in animosity today. However, Chinese relations with the Koreans were close and friendly. In fact, Chinese scholars often described Korea as the "scholar-nation" and held high regard for its innovations in science, philosophy, and religion. Likewise, the Koreans maintained deep respect and admiration for the Chinese. They even erected a large monument to memorialize the "tragic" end of the great Ming Dynasty.

Yes, the Chinese were asserting their authority in the region and in some cases, elsewhere, as you've pointed out. But my point remains the same: they did not enslave or colonize peoples they considered "inferior" to the extent the Europeans did.

Edgar
__________________
"I've spent more time posting than playing."
siredgar is offline  
Old January 16, 2002, 21:17   #145
siredgar
Prince
 
siredgar's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 543
Quote:
Originally posted by Sagacious Dolphin
Quote:
The point is is that the Chinese had developed the technologies to go overseas and use force to subjugate others, but they did not.
Europe is made of many small countries and so competition between states was strong. The need to expand and gain power was necessary. The easiest way of doing this was through global colonisation - and once one nation colonized the others felt compelled to do the same.

I don't know that much about Chinese history, but would it be fair to say that without the inter-states competition the perceived need to colonise to survive was not there?
That is a good point and helps explain European colonization, but it does not suffice as an answer to the reasoning behind it.

A European superiority complex, that as you can see from some of these postings still exists today, was also a powerful force in all of this. Melded into the religious zeal of the time, the impact of rising industrialization, and the advent of the pyramid-scheme known as capitalism, it played a strong role in justifying colonization.
__________________
"I've spent more time posting than playing."
siredgar is offline  
Old January 16, 2002, 22:11   #146
molly bloom
King
 
molly bloom's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:49
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lundenwic
Posts: 2,719
'By the way, I brought up the example of the Chinese during the 15th century, not to say that Asians are "peaceful" and Europeans are "evil", but to demonstrate that not all civilizations need to resort to violence in interactions with other peoples just because they are more advanced. '

Your words are they not, Edgar?

Okay let's see....1368, foundation of Ming Dynasty. 1387, China reunified. 1388, Chinese expansion begins, at the Battle of Buinor in north-eastern Mongolia, and, ah, the 'persuasion' of the Korean I dynasty, founded in 1392, to 'adhere' to Chinese rule/influence.
Yung-le's reign, 1403-1424 sees more expansion, at the expense of non-Chinese: the Oirats in the north west, the Tatars in the north east. So, we have the battle of Onon River, 1410, in Mongolia, and the invasion of Dai Viet in Viet Nam, in 1406.
The policy of conquest, and the pursuit of trade went hand in hand. What stopped further Ming expansion in the north were defeats inflicted by Mongol/steppe forces.
The land campaigns took place at the same time as Cheng Ho's voyages of trade and 'persuasion', and had much the same purpose- economic domination and political subjugation.
__________________
Cherish your youth. Mark Foley, 2002

I don't know what you're talking about by international law. G.W. Bush, 12/03
molly bloom is offline  
Old January 17, 2002, 13:30   #147
siredgar
Prince
 
siredgar's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 543
Quote:
Originally posted by molly bloom
'By the way, I brought up the example of the Chinese during the 15th century, not to say that Asians are "peaceful" and Europeans are "evil", but to demonstrate that not all civilizations need to resort to violence in interactions with other peoples just because they are more advanced. '

Your words are they not, Edgar?

Okay let's see....1368, foundation of Ming Dynasty. 1387, China reunified. 1388, Chinese expansion begins, at the Battle of Buinor in north-eastern Mongolia, and, ah, the 'persuasion' of the Korean I dynasty, founded in 1392, to 'adhere' to Chinese rule/influence.
Yung-le's reign, 1403-1424 sees more expansion, at the expense of non-Chinese: the Oirats in the north west, the Tatars in the north east. So, we have the battle of Onon River, 1410, in Mongolia, and the invasion of Dai Viet in Viet Nam, in 1406.
The policy of conquest, and the pursuit of trade went hand in hand. What stopped further Ming expansion in the north were defeats inflicted by Mongol/steppe forces.
The land campaigns took place at the same time as Cheng Ho's voyages of trade and 'persuasion', and had much the same purpose- economic domination and political subjugation.
Chinese territorial expansion is characteristically different from European colonialism, don't you think?
__________________
"I've spent more time posting than playing."
siredgar is offline  
Old January 17, 2002, 14:24   #148
satyajedi
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 17:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 34
"Chinese territorial expansion is characteristically different from European colonialism, don't you think?"

I agree. They are completely different.

Imperialism = You live in our empire now.
Colonialism = we're going to set up a puppet state created to facilitate the export of any meaningfull resources in your country.

Big difference between those two. States that are conquored aren't systematically impoverished. Colonialism is worse.

Also, not to state the obvious, but other than China, every single place in the world has been dominated by a European power. That's pretty significant.

-Satya
satyajedi is offline  
Old January 17, 2002, 14:53   #149
Manstein3
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 18:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 34
@satyajedi
You forgot Turkey, heart of the former Osmanic Empire, which was an imperialist nation on its own, and Japan!
Manstein3 is offline  
Old January 17, 2002, 15:34   #150
Dauphin
Civilization IV PBEMPolyCast Team
Deity
 
Dauphin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:49
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Seouenaca, Cantium
Posts: 12,426
Quote:
Originally posted by siredgar
A European superiority complex, that as you can see from some of these postings still exists today, was also a powerful force in all of this. Melded into the religious zeal of the time, the impact of rising industrialization, and the advent of the pyramid-scheme known as capitalism, it played a strong role in justifying colonization.
Would you not get the feeling of superiority if your nation was the richest, most powerful and technologically advanced in known history?

It is not a great leap from being superior in some fields, to believing you are inherently superior.

It is not restricted to Europeans, all leading nations and empires have the superiority "complex". It is how they act on it that is different.
__________________
"Everybody knows you never go full retard. You went full retard man. Never go full retard"
Dauphin is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:49.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team