Thread Tools
Old December 11, 2001, 07:43   #1
Risky
Settler
 
Local Time: 18:19
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London
Posts: 21
Too much destruction
When playing Civ2/SMAC, I would tend to be measured in the amount of bombardment against a city as I wanted there to something left to conquer. Nov in Civ3 you are doubly encouraged to flatten cities as all the city buidings are destroyed when you march in and the population are stragely ungrateful for their 'liberation'

Now this is fine to an extent, as it was a bit too easy to conquor huge swathes of teritory before, but in the interests of balance, shouldn't there be some benefit from not approaching every city like Ghengis Khan. Wouldn't one expect a city that was spared a couple of years od cannon fire to be less resisting than one that has been guven a pasting. And is is fair for every improvement to be destroyed every time?

I think we need some more rewards for 'enlightened' empire builders.
Risky is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:19.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team