Thread Tools
Old December 20, 2001, 04:02   #1
Dis
ACDG3 SpartansC4DG Vox
Deity
 
Dis's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:45
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 17,354
How different would civ3 have been had Brian Reynolds stayed and developed it?
just curious what people think

better? worse? what features would be gone or included?
__________________
Focus, discipline
Barack Obama- the antichrist
Dis is offline  
Old December 20, 2001, 04:09   #2
yin26
inmate
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
Born Again Optimist
 
yin26's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:45
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: This space reserved for Darkstar.
Posts: 5,667
This one's easy:

It would have been a Big Huge Improvement!
__________________
I've been on these boards for a long time and I still don't know what to think when it comes to you -- FrantzX, December 21, 2001

"Yin": Your friendly, neighborhood negative cosmic force.
yin26 is offline  
Old December 20, 2001, 04:45   #3
Jamison
Settler
 
Local Time: 12:45
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 21
Agreed, Civ3 would have been ALOT more better if Brian stayed.
Jamison is offline  
Old December 20, 2001, 06:08   #4
ColdFever
Chieftain
 
ColdFever's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:45
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Luebeck, Germany
Posts: 94
Re: How different would civ3 have been had Brian Reynolds stayed and developed it?
I think the computer controlled rulers would behave a little more "civilized" and would (as in SMAC) distinguish themselves by more attributes (ethics, morale, belief) than just aggressiveness.

I also think that people would have more options to tune their society and industry, following important human motives and values (philosophy/religion, political belief, ecology etc.)

Altogether I believe Brian would have given us a more "human" approach to build a civilization. Civ would have been less "chess-like", where you can predict and play the game purely by physical means. The gameplay would probably have been more surprising and demanding because IMHO Brian likes the " unpredictability" of the human nature.
ColdFever is offline  
Old December 20, 2001, 06:30   #5
Libertarian
King
 
Local Time: 13:45
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,267
I don't think he would have punished empire builders in the modern age by designing the game to place burdens and obstacles on them that are impossible to overcome. Yes, you can win as an empire builder, but it is about as much fun as sliding down a razor blade into a vat of alchohol.
__________________
"Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatum." — William of Ockham
Libertarian is offline  
Old December 20, 2001, 06:49   #6
Skanky Burns
Alpha Centauri Democracy GameACDG The Cybernetic ConsciousnessC4DG Team Alpha CentauriansApolytoners Hall of FameACDG3 Spartans
 
Skanky Burns's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:45
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Skanky Father
Posts: 16,530
He would have made it that once your empire reached a critical mass, every other AI would become hostile to you, refuse to trade, and declare war even if that move was suicidal for them.

Or to put it another way, Civ 3 would have been more like Civ 2 than Civ 1
__________________
I'm building a wagon! On some other part of the internets, obviously (but not that other site).

Last edited by Skanky Burns; December 20, 2001 at 07:06.
Skanky Burns is offline  
Old December 20, 2001, 09:26   #7
Ixander
Settler
 
Local Time: 19:45
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 6
This question is not very constructive. Firaxis will have to find their own way now. When a driving force and visionary like BrianR leaves a company, filling the hiatus is bound to take time. You cannot blame Firaxis for that, it's just one of those things.
Ixander is offline  
Old December 20, 2001, 10:13   #8
WarpStorm
King
 
WarpStorm's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:45
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Right down the road
Posts: 2,321
It would have been real time. This was one of the issues that caused Sid Meier's Brian Reynolds to leave. The Civ3 team of the time (now BHG) really thought Civ should be real time so that they could do multi-player. This is kind of what they (BHG) are building. (They told me over lunch one day)
WarpStorm is offline  
Old December 20, 2001, 10:48   #9
Moraelin
Warlord
 
Moraelin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:45
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 284
Quote:
Originally posted by Skanky Burns
He would have made it that once your empire reached a critical mass, every other AI would become hostile to you, refuse to trade, and declare war even if that move was suicidal for them.
As opposed to Civ 3, where as soon as I have half a dozen cities everyone starts being "annoyed" with me, and will demand only trades that are totally unreasonable. And they get insulted if I refuse to give them Gems AND 100 gold per turn AND the secret of Gunpowder in exchange for their Furs. And they attack me without any unltimatum or explanation why, even if they're 90 squares away from my border and it takes half the game for their spearmen to even reach me. (Roughly the equivalent of Northern Khorea declaring war on Spain. On land, not by sea. With non-motorized infantry.) And even if they still had space for expansion closer to home. And even if as a result of previous wars declared on me, I now have 3 times the cities they have, and mine are size 12, while theirs are at most size 4. Is that suicidal, or what?

Either way, truth be told, we'll never know what it would have looked like. I could venture a few ideas, but then he'd probably have better ideas than me any time. As I've said, guess we'll never know.
Moraelin is offline  
Old December 20, 2001, 12:47   #10
Comrade Tribune
Prince
 
Comrade Tribune's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:45
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 988
Good question, Dissident! (Much better than whining about the whiners. )

Judging by CivII, I believe that Brianīs sequel would have been even more conservative, but way more solid. My guess:

-He would have fixed ICS this time.

-He would have added more buildings, techs, units and wonders, because itīs his style to throw the kitchen sink at us, and most -me included- like it.

-He would have improved the AI without making the game more simplistic.

The result wouldnīt have been revolutionary, but way better than the CivIII debacle.
__________________
Now, if I ask myself: Who profits from a War against Iraq?, the answer is: Israel. -Prof. Rudolf Burger, Austrian Academy of Arts

Free Slobo, lock up George, learn from Kim-Jong-Il.
Comrade Tribune is offline  
Old December 20, 2001, 17:42   #11
Skanky Burns
Alpha Centauri Democracy GameACDG The Cybernetic ConsciousnessC4DG Team Alpha CentauriansApolytoners Hall of FameACDG3 Spartans
 
Skanky Burns's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:45
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Skanky Father
Posts: 16,530
Quote:
Originally posted by Moraelin
As opposed to Civ 3, where as soon as I have half a dozen cities everyone starts being "annoyed" with me, and will demand only trades that are totally unreasonable...
Generally if you have a large military compared to the number of cities, the enemy wont declare war, will accept trades that benefit you more, and will generally lick your feet.

Although i have had a 2 city civ declare war on me 1000 years after i took their capital and another city.


My main reason for being pissed at Brian is because he wasted 7 months of development time. If he was going to leave, at the beginning of the project would have been a good idea. Imagine just how much more could have been done to Civ 3 if it was in development for another 7 months!!
That IMO is why Civ 3 was released as rough as it was.
__________________
I'm building a wagon! On some other part of the internets, obviously (but not that other site).
Skanky Burns is offline  
Old December 20, 2001, 18:07   #12
EnochF
Prince
 
EnochF's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:45
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 610
Quote:
-He would have added more buildings, techs, units and wonders, because it's his style to throw the kitchen sink at us, and most -me included- like it.
Probably, yeah. I bought this game expecting the kitchen sink, and what I got was a toilet.
__________________
"Harel didn't replay. He just stood there, with his friend, transfixed by the brown balls."
EnochF is offline  
Old December 20, 2001, 18:43   #13
David Murray
Prince
 
Local Time: 18:45
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 525
But lots of the features he pioneered are already in Civilization 3. Trading communications, loaning gold, unique personalities, security council (UN) votes etc all came first in SMAC.

If Brian Reynolds had designed Civ3 he would have been proud and rightly so! (Although replacing social engineering with a simplistic five government model was a big mistake.)
David Murray is offline  
Old December 20, 2001, 19:11   #14
Smash
Emperor
 
Smash's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:45
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Civ2 Diehard
Posts: 3,838
no one can say for sure but I think it would not have been dumbed down the way it has.

This version has more stuff taken away than new stuff put in.Gotta feeling BR would have done the opposite for the most part.
Smash is offline  
Old December 20, 2001, 19:18   #15
VetLegion
Civilization II MultiplayerDiploGames
Emperor
 
VetLegion's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:45
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 4,037
yeah, right, mr. Brian Reynolds is a genous who would make civ3 appeal to all people.

Anyone knows the guy in person? I like his games, but he did not do one of them alone.

I think there is too much wild guessing going on here. What if he left because he wanted to make civ3 RTS? How good would he have done it in that case?
VetLegion is offline  
Old December 20, 2001, 20:28   #16
Janus1978
Settler
 
Local Time: 18:45
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by WarpStorm
It would have been real time. This was one of the issues that caused Sid Meier's Brian Reynolds to leave. The Civ3 team of the time (now BHG) really thought Civ should be real time so that they could do multi-player. This is kind of what they (BHG) are building. (They told me over lunch one day)
Do you mean in a Empire Earth kind of way? Or do you mean in a Europa Universalis kind of way?
Janus1978 is offline  
Old December 20, 2001, 21:00   #17
sophist
Prince
 
sophist's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:45
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 532
Quote:
Originally posted by David Murray
But lots of the features he pioneered are already in Civilization 3. Trading communications, loaning gold, unique personalities, security council (UN) votes etc all came first in SMAC.

If Brian Reynolds had designed Civ3 he would have been proud and rightly so! (Although replacing social engineering with a simplistic five government model was a big mistake.)
There was way more in SMAC that could have been put into Civ3 to make it better. For starters, the prototyping model is pretty cool and was pretty workable. Plus the unique map features were neat, though a bit predictable. And the government types were cooler. Atmospherically it was light years ahead.

SMAC was limited by the technology of its time (AI). If the same concepts were put together with civ3 today, we would have a much better game.
sophist is offline  
Old December 20, 2001, 21:10   #18
Jaybe
Mac
Emperor
 
Jaybe's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:45
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Henderson, NV USA
Posts: 4,168
With Brian, the strengths of the game would have been different. Many people who are complaining about the game now would have loved it.

OTH, many people who love the game now would be MAD, UPSET & COMPLAINING!!

It's not the GAME people -- it's the PEOPLE! We all have different tastes ....
__________________
JB
I play BtS (3.19) -- Noble or Prince, Rome, marathon speed, huge hemispheres (2 of them), aggressive AI, no tech brokering. I enjoy the Hephmod Beyond mod. For all non-civ computer uses, including internet, I use a Mac.
Jaybe is offline  
Old December 20, 2001, 23:50   #19
John Paul Jones
Prince
 
John Paul Jones's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:45
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 738
Ok then, simple answer: whats in SMAC/X thats missing in CIV ?

1. Stacked and grouped unit movement.
I really miss that highly configurable Assemble Group command.
And the AI can and does use it too.

2. Pseudo-3d landscape
I cant believe this progression wasn't made. It would have made the same revoloutionary leap that the isometric view made from civ1 to civ2. If someone could combine the landscape of say - Railroad Tycoon2 with Civ they'd be on to a winner.

3. Diplomacy
Options missing like co-ordinating battle plans , asking a warring party to make peace with another party, the U.N. council, etc.

4. The Design Workshop
It would be cool if i could build maybe horse-drawn settlers (Move:2) or a transport aeroplane , or how about a Privateer with the ability to capture other ships.

...and on and on ad nauseum

I'm not saying BR was responsible for all of these features Maybe he was right to make the move when he did. I think the major fault lies with outside publishers who see artists as some kind of widgets on their factory lines. There is one hell of a game waiting to be made - it will just take more time and effort , but "if you build it they will come"
__________________
Every positive value has it's price in negative terms - the genius of Einstein leads to Hiroshima.
---Pablo Picasso.
John Paul Jones is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:45.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright Đ The Apolyton Team