View Poll Results: What should a civilization be like?
A culture. 53 61.63%
A nation. 26 30.23%
I don't know. 7 8.14%
Voters: 86. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools
Old January 6, 2002, 14:56   #1
Fresno
Warlord
 
Fresno's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Europa
Posts: 247
Civilization: cultures or nations?
What do you think: what should the definition of a civilization be?
Personally, I think a civilization is more as a nation; the Greek city-states were one culture, and so are probably Germany and Austria today.
Fresno is offline  
Old January 6, 2002, 15:36   #2
Prince
Chieftain
 
Prince's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 76
Hmmm... I think civilization goes beyond these choices, but... I voted nation, only if it was meant in the way of 'A Civ...'
Prince is offline  
Old January 6, 2002, 16:33   #3
Wernazuma III
Spanish CiversCivilization III PBEMNationStates
Emperor
 
Wernazuma III's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,512
Nations come and fall, cultures do (partially) persist, at least longer. I mean, even the most continuous civ, the chinese were not always ONE nation, often several at a time. Another good example is exactly the greeks you mentioned. Lots of city states but ONE civilization that was very important. The only large greek empire didn't last too long, its culture spread from Spain to the Indus valley...
__________________
"The world is too small in Vorarlberg". Austrian ex-vice-chancellor Hubert Gorbach in a letter to Alistar [sic] Darling, looking for a job...
"Let me break this down for you, fresh from algebra II. A 95% chance to win 5 times means a (95*5) chance to win = 475% chance to win." Wiglaf, Court jester or hayseed, you judge.
Wernazuma III is offline  
Old January 6, 2002, 17:18   #4
Fresno
Warlord
 
Fresno's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Europa
Posts: 247
And that's exactly what I meant!
Fresno is offline  
Old January 6, 2002, 17:33   #5
ranskaldan
Prince
 
ranskaldan's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 300
mmm.... this is exactly why there is so much dispute over whether the Byzantines are a civ. No one can agree on what a civ is in the first place.
__________________
Poor silly humans. A temporarily stable pattern of matter and energy stumbles upon self-cognizance for a moment, and suddenly it thinks the whole universe was created for its benefit. -- mbelleroff
ranskaldan is offline  
Old January 7, 2002, 14:57   #6
Fresno
Warlord
 
Fresno's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Europa
Posts: 247
Well, the Byzantines had a nation AND a culture of their own.
So I don't see the problem.
Fresno is offline  
Old January 7, 2002, 23:05   #7
GeneralTacticus
Alpha Centauri Democracy GameAlpha Centauri PBEMPtWDG RoleplayNationStatesInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamCivilization III PBEMApolyton Storywriters' GuildACDG3 Spartans
Emperor
 
GeneralTacticus's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:59
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,851
You run into a problem here because the Romans, for example, were never really a nation. Rome was a city that ruled an empire, so you'd have to define them really as a culture. Wernazuma was dead on about the Chinese. Even America was divided in the Civil War. The Iroquois were known as the 'Five Nation'. Egypt was divided many times during it's ancient history. and many nations aren't really what they used to be, e.g. the people of France now aren't the same as the Gauls in Roman times.

I think the trouble with having all these ancient civs is that they weren't set up the way the modern ones are. They generally seemed to be empires set up by a specific leader who built a foundation for their one, and then followed by others who built on it. And they all fell apart in the end.
GeneralTacticus is offline  
Old January 10, 2002, 14:58   #8
Ecthy
Civilization II MultiplayerApolytoners Hall of FameSpanish Civers
Emperor
 
Local Time: 20:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,491
Cultures. Without any doubt
Ecthy is offline  
Old January 10, 2002, 16:11   #9
Fresno
Warlord
 
Fresno's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Europa
Posts: 247
The poll results show that most people agree with me that civs should be seen as cultures.

Unfortunately, no-one of those who voted 'nation' has explained this view. SO FOR ALL NATION-VOTERS: PLEASE TELL US WHY YOU VOTED THE WAY YOU DID! Otherwise a discussion might be difficult.
Fresno is offline  
Old January 11, 2002, 05:01   #10
muppet
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 10:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Igloo
Posts: 59
Fresno:

You come up with some very interesting threads. Maybe it is the fact the English is my second written language, and third spoken language that I have such a hard time understanding what is being said or asked here.

Definitions:
(from Cambridge International Dictionary of English)

CULTURE (WAY OF LIFE)
noun
the way of life, esp. the general customs and beliefs, of a particular group of people at a particular time youth/working-class/Russian/Roman/mass culture

NATION
noun [C]
a country, esp. when thought of as a large group of people living in one area with their own government, language, traditions, etc.

CIVILIZATION, British and Australian usually -isation noun
human society with its highly developed social organizations, or the culture and way of life of a society or country at a particular period in time

Nationality, CIVILIZATION III, P. 132:
One Concept that has been touched on but not really explained is the nationality of citizens and units. It's pretty much what it sounds like; your citizens and units (and those of other nations) know and remember what civilization they were born into. Let's explain this by example:...


Sounds to me like culture describes the "way of life", the beliefs and values of a group of people at a particular time. Looks like nation refers to a political entity.

Civilization looks like it describes the culture (way of life and/or social organization) of a nation (political entity).

So, I would hazard a guess that a civilization, by definition, must be a nation -- it must be a political entity. Culture alone can not define a civilization. It only labels the behaviors and values of a group of people; whereas, civilization defines the culture of a political entity.
muppet is offline  
Old January 23, 2002, 15:41   #11
Fresno
Warlord
 
Fresno's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Europa
Posts: 247
Quote:
Originally posted by muppet
You come up with some very interesting threads. Maybe it is the fact the English is my second written language, and third spoken language that I have such a hard time understanding what is being said or asked here.
I'm very interested in what your first and second languages are then... You are from Canada, right? I thought they only spoke English and French there.

Quote:
Sounds to me like culture describes the "way of life", the beliefs and values of a group of people at a particular time. Looks like nation refers to a political entity.

Civilization looks like it describes the culture (way of life and/or social organization) of a nation (political entity).

So, I would hazard a guess that a civilization, by definition, must be a nation -- it must be a political entity. Culture alone can not define a civilization. It only labels the behaviors and values of a group of people; whereas, civilization defines the culture of a political entity.
Yes, but what about the Greek example then?
Fresno is offline  
Old January 23, 2002, 16:40   #12
Arrian
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering StormPtWDG2 Cake or Death?
Deity
 
Arrian's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kneel before Grog!
Posts: 17,978
In the world, a civilization is cultural more than it is national - "Western Civilization" for example. Usually a group that is connected by race, language, common history or a combination thereof.

In Civ III (or any of the Civ games) a civilization is a nation, at least in terms of gameplay.

-Arrian
__________________
grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.
Arrian is offline  
Old January 23, 2002, 23:23   #13
muppet
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 10:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Igloo
Posts: 59
Quote:
Originally posted by Fresno
I'm very interested in what your first and second languages are then... You are from Canada, right? I thought they only spoke English and French there.

Yes, but what about the Greek example then?
I'm not from Canada. I'm actually American. Visibly Chinese, but born American and immigrant to Canada.

My first two languages are both chinese (cantonese and fukien). I know most refer to the distinction as 'dialects' of chinese, but that assumes too much. EX., Hong Kong cantonese speakers can not verbally communicate with Shanghai Mandaring speakers. The spoken language is completely different, though the written language very similar. But even written language is undergoing some serious change though. EX., I can not read modern mainland Chinese, but I can read any Hong Kong Chinese and mainland chinese if it is written by someone over the age of say 40.

The difference between chinese dialects is closer to the difference between French and German than it is to the difference between the so-called British English and American English or the Quebec-French to Parisian-French (at least that's what my french-speaking friends tell me).

I can't explain the Greeks, I know nothing about Greek history. I don't even know how you can compare America and Japan. One is rather, i think, Uniform or Consistent; the other a complete mix and match of everyone else. So I don't know in game terms how this works, only that those greater than I sought to include both America and Japan.

I guess that Greeks can be like Americans or vice versa. In Canada, Parliament dictates criminal law and most other laws and provinces get the residual legal authorities. In America states dictate criminal law and other main bodies of law, and congress get the residual legal authorities, so the 'states' are like mini-nations within a larger culture/nation (more autonomy than in Canadian system). I am assuming that by the phrase "Greek City-State" that each Greek city also acted as an entire state that fit within Greek civilization. Kind of like how American states fit within America.
muppet is offline  
Old January 24, 2002, 11:07   #14
Fresno
Warlord
 
Fresno's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Europa
Posts: 247
Thanks for telling me about your languages. Maybe the similarity between Chinese dialects could be compared with the similarity between German and another Teutonic languages, like Dutch or Norse.

About the Greeks: your answer shows what I meant in the first post of this thread. I mean, although the Greek city states were different nations, they definately belonged to the same culture, and therefore, to the same civ.

By the way, the Greek city states were much more autonomous as the American states are. For example, there were countless Greek wars in which city states fought against eachother.
Fresno is offline  
Old January 24, 2002, 17:26   #15
Dauphin
Civilization IV PBEMPolyCast Team
Deity
 
Dauphin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Seouenaca, Cantium
Posts: 12,426
In antiquity "culture" is the defining aspect of a civilization. I say this as the concept of nation didn't even exist.

In the modern era, even with the concept of nationality, nations are more united on their cultural basis. Look at any country with a civil war based on ethnicity. Even in the UK, Scots are Scottish first then British, ditto English and Welsh.

I think the problems for Americans, as a civilization, is that they proove the exception to the rule. The nation is the unifying force, not the culture. A different rule has to be applied, as they don't fit into what I wrote above.
__________________
"Everybody knows you never go full retard. You went full retard man. Never go full retard"
Dauphin is offline  
Old January 24, 2002, 23:11   #16
molly bloom
King
 
molly bloom's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:59
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lundenwic
Posts: 2,719
Consider also if you will, the Celts- a distinct culture, or cultures, La Tene, Hallstatt, and the fusion of Norse/Celt cultures in Ireland and Scotland, different languages, different ways of worship and differing gods, even, and yet spoken of as one civilization, one people, but hardly ever forming distinct 'nations' in ancient times.

The idea of the 'nation', distinct in ethnic and cultural terms, really kicks off in Europe post the Thirty Years' War, with rulers and ruled forming more distinctive ethnic and religious blocs.
Obviously, there were exceptions, such as the Ottoman Empire and the Austro-Hungarian Empire, but the seeds of nationalism were sprouting.

I plump for civs being cultures and nations- it simply depends on the grouping you want to play.
__________________
Cherish your youth. Mark Foley, 2002

I don't know what you're talking about by international law. G.W. Bush, 12/03
molly bloom is offline  
Old January 25, 2002, 00:27   #17
siredgar
Prince
 
siredgar's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 543
Well, if you went by "cultures" then you'd have to rename nearly all of them. For example, Germany/Germans would probably have to change to "the Germanic culture" and encompass cities in Austria, parts of Switzerland, and elsewhere. It's also very possible that many cities in Canada, New Zealand, Australia, and even the U.S. would fall under "the Anglo-Saxon culture". If you go simply by "civilizations", nearly all of Europe and some parts of the Middle East could be grouped into a single "Western civilization".
__________________
"I've spent more time posting than playing."
siredgar is offline  
Old January 25, 2002, 10:17   #18
Fresno
Warlord
 
Fresno's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Europa
Posts: 247
Siredgar: one of the things I hate about the English language, is that it has only one word for German. I mean, English and Dutch and Norse are Germanic peoples too, not only the Germans. We all have Germanic languages, but we don't speak German.

Why don't English call Germans Deutschers or something like that?

Regarding the Western civilization, I would say there are a Slavic, a Latin and a Germanic civ.
Fresno is offline  
Old January 25, 2002, 14:40   #19
Dauphin
Civilization IV PBEMPolyCast Team
Deity
 
Dauphin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Seouenaca, Cantium
Posts: 12,426
Quote:
Originally posted by Fresno
Siredgar: one of the things I hate about the English language, is that it has only one word for German. I mean, English and Dutch and Norse are Germanic peoples too, not only the Germans. We all have Germanic languages, but we don't speak German.

Why don't English call Germans Deutschers or something like that?
We have lots of other names for Germans. Normally used in a derogatory sense though.
__________________
"Everybody knows you never go full retard. You went full retard man. Never go full retard"
Dauphin is offline  
Old January 25, 2002, 19:46   #20
molly bloom
King
 
molly bloom's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:59
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lundenwic
Posts: 2,719
Quote:
Originally posted by Fresno
Siredgar: one of the things I hate about the English language, is that it has only one word for German. I mean, English and Dutch and Norse are Germanic peoples too, not only the Germans. We all have Germanic languages, but we don't speak German.

Why don't English call Germans Deutschers or something like that?

Regarding the Western civilization, I would say there are a Slavic, a Latin and a Germanic civ.

http://www.folkfestival.net/

Fresno- see above: in the United States, you will find the Pennsylvania Dutch are in fact.... the Pennsylvania Deutsch... the 'e' migrated.

Although English is partly a Germanic language, 'English' or 'Anglo-Saxon' (pity about the Jutes) hardly adequately describes a culture made up of Viking, Roman, Norman French and Celtic and North German influences. Besides 'German' and 'Germanic' are not strictly interchangeable in English, and in any case, are infinitely preferable to 'hun' 'boche' and 'kraut'.

It's only the same kind of loose terminology that serves to describe Spain, Portugal and their former colonies in the Americas as Latin, or Hispanic, however distinctive say, Brazil's culture is from Cuba's or Costa Rica's.
__________________
Cherish your youth. Mark Foley, 2002

I don't know what you're talking about by international law. G.W. Bush, 12/03
molly bloom is offline  
Old January 29, 2002, 14:41   #21
siredgar
Prince
 
siredgar's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 543
Quote:
Originally posted by Fresno
Siredgar: one of the things I hate about the English language, is that it has only one word for German. I mean, English and Dutch and Norse are Germanic peoples too, not only the Germans. We all have Germanic languages, but we don't speak German.

Why don't English call Germans Deutschers or something like that?

Regarding the Western civilization, I would say there are a Slavic, a Latin and a Germanic civ.
Yes, yes, I was speaking conservatively on the term "Germanic". Regardless, when you are talking about a civilization in the strictest terms, I don't believe there would be a separate Germanic "civilization" or even Latin or Slavic for that matter.
__________________
"I've spent more time posting than playing."
siredgar is offline  
Old January 30, 2002, 07:12   #22
Fresno
Warlord
 
Fresno's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Europa
Posts: 247
Quote:
Originally posted by molly bloom
Fresno- see above: in the United States, you will find the Pennsylvania Dutch are in fact.... the Pennsylvania Deutsch... the 'e' migrated.
That brings me to another strange thing in English. Dutch call themselves 'Nederlands.' Germans call themselves 'Deutsch'. Do you see what I mean?

Quote:
Although English is partly a Germanic language, 'English' or 'Anglo-Saxon' (pity about the Jutes) hardly adequately describes a culture made up of Viking, Roman, Norman French and Celtic and North German influences.
I read there are three groups of Germanic languages:
North Germanic (Danish, Norse, Swedish)
West Germanic (German, Dutch, English, Frisian)

Others say Frisian and English are actually a seperate group: North-West Germanic.

But indeed English is a bit different from the other Germanic languages: it is much more influenced by the French language.

Quote:
Originally posted by siredgar
Yes, yes, I was speaking conservatively on the term "Germanic". Regardless, when you are talking about a civilization in the strictest terms, I don't believe there would be a separate Germanic "civilization" or even Latin or Slavic for that matter.
In the strictest terms, Americans, Germans, French, English, Spanish and all the other European peoples should be merged. But would such a thing improve the game?
Fresno is offline  
Old January 30, 2002, 19:22   #23
Sandman
King
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Just one more thing
Posts: 1,733
Well...

Nations: They are distinct entities, but lets face it, they are a relatively recent creation, and have a short shelf life compared to the time scale displayed in the game.

Cultures: These are totally fluid compared to nations, which at least try to have a pretence of solidity. No-one really has a clue where one culture begins and another ends, or even how to divide them up.

Plus both the above are social constructs which are IMO either random, or generated by the environment. So I suggest that it is the environment which determines a civ.

So we can have a different civ for each of the worlds biomes.
Sandman is offline  
Old February 1, 2002, 12:27   #24
Fresno
Warlord
 
Fresno's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Europa
Posts: 247
The idea of a nation isn't that new. There were already kingdoms a very long time ago, and although they are obviously different from the current countries, you can't say they weren't nations.
Fresno is offline  
Old February 1, 2002, 15:12   #25
Sandman
King
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Just one more thing
Posts: 1,733
Quote:
you can't say they weren't nations.
I can and will. Ancient and medieval kingdoms of which you speak were not nations. The people who lived in them, mostly peasants, were motivated not by patriotism, but by the fact that they were essentially owned by the aristocracy.

Furthermore, in many cases the aristocrats had a totally different language and culture from their subjects, in the case of England, for a long time the aristocrats spoke the language of the Norman invaders.

There were organisations and arrangements which confounded national sovereignty, such as the Pope, the holy roman empire, and the constant interbreeding of the various royal families.
Sandman is offline  
Old February 3, 2002, 09:34   #26
Oligarf
Warlord
 
Oligarf's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 160
I voted 'I don't know', mainly because I don't think that the other two choices are correct. A sort of middle-way, might be better.
Other important aspect is whether we talk about civilizations in real life or about civilizations as they should be seen in the Civilization series.
Oligarf is offline  
Old February 8, 2002, 16:22   #27
Quasar1011
Warlord
 
Quasar1011's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mobile AL
Posts: 191
I voted for nation. I went to Washington DC in the summer of 2000, and saw many buildings that could have passed for ancient Greek or Roman! So there is no doubt that a nation may be a conglomerate of many cultures. The British nation has Welsh, Irish, Scottish, and English to start; German kings from Hannover sat upon the British throne at times; French words abound in the English language; the Danes and Vikings left their mark in eastern England; and the Indians and Chinese now own many restaurants in Britain. My point is this: culture does not respect boundaries nearly as well as does nationhood. Just because the new Afghan government, or the old Liberian government, uses Yankee dollars as their official legal tender, does not make them culturally American. The people are influenced by foreign culture, without becoming nationals of the other country unless they choose to emigrate. A nation's culture can extend far beyond its borders, so I think nation is a better model for what comprises a civ.
Quasar1011 is offline  
Old February 9, 2002, 12:36   #28
Oligarf
Warlord
 
Oligarf's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 160
This works for the US, as it is a federation, in this view Europe would qualify for one civilization. I doubt that.
Oligarf is offline  
Old February 9, 2002, 15:04   #29
Fresno
Warlord
 
Fresno's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Europa
Posts: 247
Oligarf: I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean. Could you explain it, please?
Fresno is offline  
Old February 9, 2002, 17:25   #30
Willem
Emperor
 
Willem's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:59
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,755
Quote:
Originally posted by Fresno
I'm very interested in what your first and second languages are then... You are from Canada, right? I thought they only spoke English and French there.

Yes, but what about the Greek example then?
Languages from all around the world are spoken here. We're a "melting pot" society with a long tradition of welcoming immigrants.
Willem is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:59.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team