Thread Tools
Old November 17, 2000, 10:32   #1
MarkG
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
new poll?
any suggestions???
 
Old November 17, 2000, 10:39   #2
Andz83
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
"Why shouldn't MarkG be the forum's administrator any longer?"

Seriously, I don't know any sensible topics. but perhaps I can think of some later.
 
Old November 17, 2000, 11:16   #3
Nikolai
Apolyton UniversityC4DG The Mercenary TeamCiv4 SP Democracy Game
Deity
 
Nikolai's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:34
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 13,800
quote:

Originally posted by Andz83 on 11-17-2000 09:39 AM
"Why shouldn't MarkG be the forum's administrator any longer?"




Andz!!! You evil, EVIL man!!!!


------------------
Who am I? What am I? Do we need Civ? Yes!!
birteaw@online.no
Nikolai is offline  
Old November 17, 2000, 20:57   #4
DarkCloud
staff
NationStatesAlpha Centauri Democracy GameCivilization II Democracy GameInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamSpanish CiversCiv4 InterSite DG: Apolyton TeamPolyCast TeamApolyton Storywriters' GuildAge of Nations TeamApolytoners Hall of Fame
 
DarkCloud's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:34
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Deity of Lists
Posts: 11,873
-RTS or TBS? (Already taken)
-Best ICS solutionmodel (Already resolved)
-There just isn't much to poll on except:

-How many wonders
DarkCloud is offline  
Old November 18, 2000, 01:39   #5
airdrik
Prince
 
airdrik's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:34
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nampa, ID, USA
Posts: 401
Here's an idea recently spurred from a recent post on the Massively Multiplayer CIV3 thread:
How many people would be interested in playing a multiplayer Civ 3 over the internet against/with other humans?
airdrik is offline  
Old November 18, 2000, 08:57   #6
UltraSonix
King
 
Local Time: 10:34
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,728
"Should Civ3 have 3d graphics"
*yes
*not a new engine but new grphx
*no
Or something to this effect.

In my opinion this is one of the mahor issues with Civ3. Even though sid's already said the game will have a new engine the question remains - should it be all 3d?

Refer to Civ III Engine Proposal.

BTW is this a poll on a poll?


------------------
No, in Australia we don't live with kangaroos and koalas in our backyards... Despite any stupid advertisments you may see to the contrary... (And no, koalas don't usually speak!)
UltraSonix is offline  
Old November 18, 2000, 11:46   #7
MarkG
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
we already had a poll on graphics
http://apolyton.net/cgi-bin/poll/civ3d/results.pl
 
Old November 18, 2000, 12:37   #8
Shadowstrike
Emperor
 
Shadowstrike's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:34
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The Glorious Land of Canada
Posts: 3,234
"Radical leap or small steps (of pogress)?"

"Would you wait an extra year for more quality?"

"Should Shadowstrike become a mod?"

Not including the last one, these are serious sugestions...
Shadowstrike is offline  
Old November 19, 2000, 22:44   #9
S. Kroeze
Prince
 
S. Kroeze's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:34
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: the Hague, the Netherlands, Old Europe
Posts: 370
Dear MarkG,

I would like to suggest a poll about the historical period we would prefer for CivIII. Something like:
  • At what historical date should CivIII start?
    My answer: at 8000BC
  • At what historical date should CivIII end?
    My answer: at 2000AD
  • What year should turn-wise be the middle of the game?
    My answer: at 3000BC

Sincere regards!
S. Kroeze is offline  
Old November 19, 2000, 23:20   #10
Zer0_T0lerance
Warlord
 
Zer0_T0lerance's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:34
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: for Eternity
Posts: 229
Perhaps we should have a poll on how much money players would be willing to pay for the game?

------------------
Zero
Zer0_T0lerance is offline  
Old November 20, 2000, 08:30   #11
UltraSonix
King
 
Local Time: 10:34
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,728
quote:

we already had a poll on graphics
Doh! Don't think I was around then... do it again!

------------------
No, in Australia we don't live with kangaroos and koalas in our backyards... Despite any stupid advertisments you may see to the contrary... (And no, koalas don't usually speak!)
UltraSonix is offline  
Old November 20, 2000, 09:24   #12
Adm.Naismith
King
 
Adm.Naismith's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:34
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Milano - Italy
Posts: 1,674
A poll about the endgame:

How do you want the game end?

Some of CIV 2/SMAC ending (e.g. Sending Starship to Alpha Centauri or Cornering the global market) are kind of an open end to the game, IMHO.

At that point do you prefer that you are checked against a "very big crisis" just to test how good your empire truly is?

1. No, let game go on as usual (CIV 2) until the starship arrival

2. Coming of aliens (same as in SMACX, but as a "very powerful" sort of barbarians), that you must survive to

3. Asteroids suddendly discovered approaching Earth, you must save enough people to the disasterous hitting

4. Global Climate major change, you must move cities population or improve them with specials enhancements to cope with changes

5. Main disease striking earth, you must save enough people, helping with research and special building, cutting trades, travels etc.

You can put things as long as the Unity Space Ships' survivors came back from Chiron, to help you (e.g. 400 years?)

Ok, some others "Armageddon" can be added. Your turn.


------------------
Admiral Naismith AKA mcostant
Adm.Naismith is offline  
Old November 22, 2000, 19:55   #13
Zer0_T0lerance
Warlord
 
Zer0_T0lerance's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:34
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: for Eternity
Posts: 229
How about a poll on whether or not players will want the game to be released on time, or will be willing to wait, if neccessary, for a much better game. Say, for example:

Would you be willing to wait, if necessary, until Xmas 2001 for a much better game?

In my opinion, the answer to this question is YES!! YES!! YES!! I just think that August 2001 is really pushing it, and I'd be willing to wait 'till Xmas for a better game than to be impatient and end up with something very crumby and not worth my money!! Plus, it'd make a nice gift under the Xmas tree.

------------------
Zero
[This message has been edited by Zero_Tolerance (edited November 22, 2000).]
Zer0_T0lerance is offline  
Old November 22, 2000, 22:16   #14
UltraSonix
King
 
Local Time: 10:34
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,728
I think right about the time I came there was a poll on when do you think the game would be released...

------------------
No, in Australia we don't live with kangaroos and koalas in our backyards... Despite any stupid advertisments you may see to the contrary... (And no, koalas don't usually speak!)
UltraSonix is offline  
Old November 22, 2000, 22:42   #15
Zer0_T0lerance
Warlord
 
Zer0_T0lerance's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:34
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: for Eternity
Posts: 229
quote:

Originally posted by UltraSonix on 11-22-2000 09:16 PM
I think right about the time I came there was a poll on when do you think the game would be released...



Maybe so, though I can't seem to locate such a poll in the archives. But the poll's focus would be specifically on delaying the game to wait on a better game, if necessary.



------------------
Zero (formerly jrhughes98)
Zer0_T0lerance is offline  
Old November 30, 2000, 00:53   #16
UltraSonix
King
 
Local Time: 10:34
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,728
OK, maybe this has been on before, but I haven't seen it:

Scenarios vs Scenario Editor
Should Civ3 have:
*A very good scenario editor, but very few scenarios
*An accepatable scenario editor (like in Civ2), but a moderate amount of scenarios
*No scenario editor out of the box, but a large number of high quality scenarios.

------------------
No, in Australia we don't live with kangaroos and koalas in our backyards... Despite any stupid advertisments you may see to the contrary... (And no, koalas don't usually speak!)
UltraSonix is offline  
Old November 30, 2000, 09:02   #17
Zealot
King
 
Zealot's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:34
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,267
Hey, I'm expecting about 5 scenarios with the game beside a pretty damn good scenario editor (with documentation! )! Civ2 only came with two (Rome & WW2).

Heck, I'm already giving my opinion!
Yeah, let's make a poll out of this one!
Zealot is offline  
Old December 4, 2000, 20:06   #18
Zer0_T0lerance
Warlord
 
Zer0_T0lerance's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:34
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: for Eternity
Posts: 229
Ok, here's a good poll:

Which strategy game will you be playing while waiting on Civ3?

*** Name Some Popular Ones Here ***



I asked this question in the What Game will you be playing while waiting for Civ3? thread and got lots of interesting responses!

Does this one seem broad enough for ya MarkG?

------------------
Zero (formerly jrhughes98)
[This message has been edited by Zero_Tolerance (edited December 04, 2000).]
Zer0_T0lerance is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:34.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team