City limits

watorrey · March 13, 2002, 08:32

Since Regent level is suppose to be the standard that other levels are judged against, wouldn't it seem appropriate for the city limits to be set at 100% for regent?

As it is, chieftain is the only level that gets 100%. Then it is all downhill from there. Regent gets 90%. Wouldn't it make more sense if it went 120, 110, 100, 90, 80, 70? Deity and emperor would still be the same.

I believe this to be *part* of the reason ppl have so much difficulty when they increase the level of play. And yes, i know i can change it myself, but shouldn't it come that way or similar?

Also... what is the new city limits? I have 12, 14, 16, 24, 32. Tiny use to be 8 if i remember right. But then i might not remember right

Gramphos · March 13, 2002, 12:16

They affect corruption, and you can build FP once you have reacghed half the optimal cities.

watorrey · March 13, 2002, 16:19

Yes, i believe i understand what the limits are for. My point is that Regent level is suppose to be even with the AI in all things. No bonuses for anything. With the % of optimal cities set to <100%, the AI is getting a corruption bonus at all but chieftain level.

Gramphos · March 13, 2002, 17:07

I think it doesn't matter really, as the value for the map sizes are made for that level, and the AI will have the same level.