View Poll Results: What game style do you like most and why?
Kill 'em all I say! Research and building is for weaklings only. 5 9.43%
Build for basic needs only, beeline for offensive units and rush! 3 5.66%
Do it like the snake. Get out of your skin, grow, then build filling the new skin. 21 39.62%
Build a prosper empire, avoid attacks, but always keep your military strong. 20 37.74%
Give peace a chance I say! No armies. I rather will pay for peace. 0 0%
Once invade a banana plantation, then keep eating till the game ends. 4 7.55%
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools
Old March 25, 2002, 06:38   #1
Harovan
staff
PtWDG Gathering StormPtWDG2 Monty PythonC4DG Gathering Storm
Civ4: Colonization Content Editor
 
Local Time: 23:10
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,117
What game style do you like most and why?
I tried several play styles in the past. Full games mostly Monarch level, test games up to Deity. Here are my experiences (numbers in parenthesises are warmongering/building):

- Ultra warmonger style (100/0): From beginning, attack with all units at hand, and be it warriors. Catch up in research making harsh peace treaties. I didn't very well in this style, because my enemies researched very fast and fighting with Horsies against Pikemen and Knights is certainly not fun.

- Warmonger style (75/25): Beeline for offensive techs (Horseback riding, Chivalry etc.), build barracks, temples and lots of units and rush! Works good, but is more work than fun for me. Getting even in research is possible with peace treaties, but hard to keep.

- Snake style (50/50): Do an early rush with Chariots/Swordsmen/Horsemen or derived UU's, wipe out 1-2 civ's completely. Or make them puny vassals, but wiping out works better for me. Switch to builder style, settle and build infrastructure in the new terrain, go kill the next civ (the puny ones first, go for more luxuries), build up again and so on. Reminds a snake, skinning and growing in the new skin. Avoid to sell techs, but sell luxuries. Works best for me (my vote), only with this style I was able to make a huge (12 techs) lead in the early modern era even with 1.17f.

- Builder style (25/75): REX in the ancient era, grab land, resources and luxuries, occasionally fight for resources, then settle down and build. Don't attack, but keep a strong (at least "average") military and crush an enemy only if he attacked first (as we all know, he will). Occasionally fight limited wars for new resources. Works good for me, but the growth of the empire is limited. You can keep up in tech, but since you have at most 3-4 luxuries (in average, you may be lucky) to sell and there are a lot of trade concurrents, you are enforced to trade techs and can't get a big lead.

- Pacifist style (0/100): Build city defenders, a small mobile militia and concentrate building the perfect infrastructure. Never attack, be the good boy, trade for resources and give in on bullies and extorts. Works not so good, you can so-so keep up in research, but have only a small country (won't call it an Empire), are fragile and very vulterable to AI sneak attacks and allied AI rushes.

And what style works best for you?

Last edited by Harovan; March 25, 2002 at 06:49.
Harovan is offline  
Old March 25, 2002, 09:31   #2
Cookie Monster
King
 
Cookie Monster's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:10
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 1,310
Well I voted for kill 'em all.

Unfortunately my experiences have taught me that even if you have a large army you have to go to war more often than not. The AI may leave you alone because you have a large army but you are likely to end up with land that has no resources. If you don't strike early and hard you will be denied these resources. It seems that no matter what one does, war is a big part of Civ3.
Cookie Monster is offline  
Old March 25, 2002, 11:06   #3
AJ Corp. The FAIR
Prince
 
AJ Corp. The FAIR's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:10
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Antwerp (the pearl of Flanders) Belgium
Posts: 444


The snake thing!

AJ
AJ Corp. The FAIR is offline  
Old March 25, 2002, 11:16   #4
Arrian
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering StormPtWDG2 Cake or Death?
Deity
 
Arrian's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:10
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kneel before Grog!
Posts: 17,978
I voted for builder, because that's my natural inclination, but I also like to play with snakes Warmongering without a break gets dull, as does peaceful building. I require a bit of both. I also require luxuries for my people, and I'm more than willing to break empires to get them.

-Arrian
__________________
grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.
Arrian is offline  
Old March 25, 2002, 11:21   #5
rpodos
Warlord
 
Local Time: 17:10
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 180
Using Sir Ralph's system, I am about 60/40.

Do we have to call it the "snake strategy"?

R
__________________
"Verily, thou art not paid for thy methods, but for thy results, by which meaneth thou shalt kill thine enemy by any means available before he killeth you." - Richard Marcinko
rpodos is offline  
Old March 25, 2002, 14:18   #6
civman2000
Civilization III Democracy GameCivilization II Democracy GameNationStatesNever Ending StoriesDiplomacyInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamPtWDG RoleplayC3C IDG: Apolyton Team
Emperor
 
civman2000's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:10
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: of the Martian Empire
Posts: 4,969
i'm 35/65, a bit closer to builder than snake, but pretty much in the middle.
__________________
Ham grass chocolate.

"This should be the question they ask you before you get to vote. If you answer 'no', then they brand you with a giant red 'I' on your forehead and you are forever barred from taking part in the electoral process again."--KrazyHorse
"I'm so very glad KH is Canadian."--Donegeal
civman2000 is offline  
Old March 25, 2002, 16:12   #7
fezick31
Warlord
 
fezick31's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:10
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cliffs of Insanity
Posts: 160
Quote:
Originally posted by civman2000
i'm 35/65, a bit closer to builder than snake, but pretty much in the middle.
ditto
__________________
"Government isn't the solution to our problems; Government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan

No, I don't have Civ4 yet...
fezick31 is offline  
Old March 25, 2002, 22:49   #8
punkbass2000
Civilization III MultiplayerCivilization III Democracy GameApolyton UniversityCivilization III PBEM
King
 
punkbass2000's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:10
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waterloo, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,500
ditto
__________________
"I used to be a Scotialist, and spent a brief period as a Royalist, but now I'm PC"
-me, discussing my banking history.
punkbass2000 is offline  
Old March 25, 2002, 23:19   #9
Aeson
Emperor
 
Local Time: 16:10
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: orangesoda
Posts: 8,643
How about peaceful core and barbaric perimeter? I am constantly at war in one part of the map or another, but at the same time building up productive cities. It takes a lot of juggling, but the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. Say 75/75
__________________
"tout comprendre, c'est tout pardonner"
Aeson is offline  
Old March 26, 2002, 09:15   #10
Thrawn05
King
 
Local Time: 17:10
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Constantly giggling as I type my posts.
Posts: 1,735
They don't call my civ Banana-Hala for nothing.


It depends who is against me, France, England, Russia and China are the four civ I mostly go to war with, since they are such pains in the neck!

Other then that, I hold my own. I play defensivly. I usually have ten units defending each city and in forts all around my territory. I wonder how many people are going hate me if I do that in multiplayer (assuming my 14K connections on my 56K modem can handle it).
__________________
I drink to one other, and may that other be he, to drink to another, and may that other be me!
Thrawn05 is offline  
Old March 26, 2002, 15:57   #11
Cookie Monster
King
 
Cookie Monster's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:10
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 1,310
I'm gonna have to repeat what I said earlier.

The more I play Civ3 the more I'm convinced. There are others who agree with my assessment as well.

To play peacefully in Civ3 (meaning be nice to everybody and build stuff) means losing the game every time. You'll never make it to the space race or diplo victory because the AI want's you dead, period. Unless you restart the game > 1000x to get a decent start don't waste time playing. You'll end up with a teeny empire that has no resources. You'll be ripe for the AI's picking!

In other words the game does not follow the Clauswitzian theory of war being an extension of the state when diplomacy has failed. It instead follows the theory of kick everybody's booty until you win.

Thank you drive through.....................
Cookie Monster is offline  
Old March 27, 2002, 00:07   #12
hitchikingalaxy
Settler
 
Local Time: 18:10
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 17
i follow the snake thing. expand, build, expand, build, subvert the weaker, take what is theres.

what was it conan said...

to drive all my enemies before me and hear the weaping of their women... yeah that's how i play

i usually keep two or three vassals so i can get rid of those crappy luxuries that nobody else wants. when i want them dead, i kill them in one turn so no war weariness occurs.
__________________
so long and thanks for all the fish
hitchikingalaxy is offline  
Old March 27, 2002, 09:53   #13
civman2000
Civilization III Democracy GameCivilization II Democracy GameNationStatesNever Ending StoriesDiplomacyInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamPtWDG RoleplayC3C IDG: Apolyton Team
Emperor
 
civman2000's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:10
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: of the Martian Empire
Posts: 4,969
I usuallyy take out/vassalize 1-2 civs at the beginning for resources and space, and then I go into domestic mode. I end up in a few wars because they attack me and I might start one or two myself. I go for domination/cultural victory, and often I go into a lot of wars late-middle ages...
__________________
Ham grass chocolate.

"This should be the question they ask you before you get to vote. If you answer 'no', then they brand you with a giant red 'I' on your forehead and you are forever barred from taking part in the electoral process again."--KrazyHorse
"I'm so very glad KH is Canadian."--Donegeal
civman2000 is offline  
Old March 27, 2002, 09:56   #14
civman2000
Civilization III Democracy GameCivilization II Democracy GameNationStatesNever Ending StoriesDiplomacyInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamPtWDG RoleplayC3C IDG: Apolyton Team
Emperor
 
civman2000's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:10
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: of the Martian Empire
Posts: 4,969
Quote:
Originally posted by hitchikingalaxy
i kill them in one turn so no war weariness occurs.
I love doing this...did it in a recent game to the 1-city egyptians that attacked me early on...2 reg cavalry take out 1 elite hoplite, and, voila!
__________________
Ham grass chocolate.

"This should be the question they ask you before you get to vote. If you answer 'no', then they brand you with a giant red 'I' on your forehead and you are forever barred from taking part in the electoral process again."--KrazyHorse
"I'm so very glad KH is Canadian."--Donegeal
civman2000 is offline  
Old March 27, 2002, 16:46   #15
bogatir
Settler
 
bogatir's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:10
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: and reputed Aztec capo
Posts: 27
Even though I usually play the Aztecs, my play style is still pretty much a snake-like 50/50 mix. Azteckia does more butt-kicking before the industrial age than after (usually), but there are always one or two whopper wars to fight after the factories are built (especially if the Germans are in the game).

I guess my basic theory is to grow a productive, defended core group of cities early on, taking out any rival civs that will constrict my growth. An early war or two is also good for the Aztecs, in order to generate a GL to rush the Forbidden Palace and grab a bunch of slave workers. (Of course, in my current game, I didn’t get a GL until something like 1560 AD or that neighborhood. Grrr.)

After that, I knock heads when needed to expand my civ to a reasonably productive limit – if a city loses more than 60 percent of its production to corruption, it’s probably too far away. Luxury/resource producing cities are an exception, of course. Pump up city sizes, increase commerce and research and then only crush another civ when they start hugely extorting me for luxuries or they attack first.

In my current game – depending on how you read your calendar – I almost made it out of the 20th century without a whopper war. But, despite my best peace-mongering, the Germans attacked Azteckia in the year 2000. And I was trying to be Mr. Nice Guy, too.
bogatir is offline  
Old March 27, 2002, 17:58   #16
Carver
Prince
 
Carver's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:10
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: reprocessing plutonium, Yongbyon, NK
Posts: 560
I would like to use builder stlye (25/75), but it just doesn't work. The AI will attack you if it senses any weakness. You have to have a large army, you have to have many cities to support it, and you have to have many cities for more money to do/buy research. This means you can either be on defense - always responding to attacks, or you can take the initiative and plan a proper assault against a rival civ. I thinks it's better to do the later and keep control of the game. So I'm floating in between snake and warmonger.
Carver is offline  
Old March 28, 2002, 23:01   #17
Kuciwalker
Deity
 
Kuciwalker's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:10
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
I play pacifist, I just expand expand expand while building infrastructure in your cities. By the modern ages I'm HUGE, and then I build an ENORMOUS military that goes along all of my borders, put F-15's in all of my cities, deploy carrier groups and nuke subs all over the world, and build 60+ ICBM's for the occasional complete annhilation of every single other civ.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
Kuciwalker is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:10.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team