2nd Democractic game: Which type of game to play and what settings!

James Adams · July 4, 2002, 06:14

Please suggest and discuss!

H Tower · July 4, 2002, 11:32

we already have a thread about this, CREATED BY YOU BY THE WAY. And couldn't we wait until we finish this game?

mrboo123 · July 4, 2002, 15:21

Quote:

Originally posted by H Tower
we already have a thread about this, CREATED BY YOU BY THE WAY. And couldn't we wait until we finish this game?

H Tower right, AND shouldn't this be a poll? Should we start the poll now? Or later? WAY too much questions now......

H Tower · July 4, 2002, 16:56

i say later only so that we won't be distracted finishing this game. We should then review everything we did and examine what works and what doesn't

cavebear · July 4, 2002, 17:09

James Adams is obviously dedicated to increasing his post-count. Can a custom avatar *really* be that important to anyone? Or is it that he wants to get to "Deity" in one year?

This is hardly the first new thread he has opened up that duplicates existing ones. And all those "great" or "get going" posts are getting more than merely annoying. I'm tired of it, and I suggest he stop doing it!

Hydey · July 4, 2002, 19:04

I fairly certain that Ming the frogman will be getting tired of it as well, he may put an end to it hopefully.

Mr. President · July 4, 2002, 21:49

Does the setting-up of the next game really need this much posting? And does it have to be right now?

James Adams · July 5, 2002, 08:25

I mean this thread to help people choice and make up their mind about which settings and which map to use. I made the first thread as a place for people to suggest changes about how to improve from this game to the next!

JCP · July 5, 2002, 08:47

As JA would say

Great !

More seriously : one thread of pre-discussion is sufficient today.
Let's wait the end of the present game to continue with serious polls about the new game configuration !

Marquis de Sodaq · July 5, 2002, 13:16

I agree - let's keep it in ONE thread. Otherwise, there will be duplication, or ideas might get overlooked because they were not read by others in one discussion.

Caesar the Great · July 6, 2002, 19:58

OCC?

Hydey · July 6, 2002, 22:02

how about we play a normal game of civ.

cavebear · July 7, 2002, 10:53

I agree about playing a "normal game" of Civ. We have a lot of Citizens who only found this game toward the end, no particular scenario is going to have widespread support (plus they tend to be merely military campaigns), and those special challenges (like the OCC) have a limited number of highly structured successful strategies. Only a normal game will have group support and participation.

JCP · July 8, 2002, 06:57

Quote:

Originally posted by Caesar the Great
OCC?

Too linear strategy for involving a large participation of citizens.