Thread Tools
Old August 27, 2002, 03:45   #31
Case
Civilization II PBEMCivilization II Democracy Game: Red FrontScenario League / Civ2-Creation
Emperor
 
Case's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,057
Quote:
Originally posted by techumseh
Re: the bushwhacking of the American Fleet, I read an article somewhere that suggested that if Pearl Harbour had not occurred, the American defeat may have been WORSE. The theory is that if the Japanese had only attacked the Philippines, the American fleet would have sortied out into the Pacific to defend it. Somewhere it would have been intercepted by the Japanese carriers. The old and slow American battleships and the obsolete American carrier aircraft would have been no match for the Japanese planes, resulting in the TOTAL destruction of the American Pacific Fleet, carriers and all. I dunno if that's what would have happened, but it's an interesting speculation.
Yeah, I've read that as well. Basically, the American strategy was to form the entire Pacific Fleet up into one huge convoy and then crawl across the Pacific to relieve the Philipines. IMO the Japanese would have had a field day against such a target.
__________________
'Arguing with anonymous strangers on the internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be - or to be indistinguishable from - self-righteous sixteen year olds possessing infinite amounts of free time.'
- Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon
Case is offline  
Old August 27, 2002, 08:38   #32
Mao
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
Deity
 
Local Time: 02:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Apolyton
Posts: 12,351
Of course, that only now means the American player won't be dumb enough to do that...
__________________
Who wants DVDs? Good prices! I swear! :)
Mao is offline  
Old August 27, 2002, 09:12   #33
Heresson
Scenario League / Civ2-CreationNationStates
Emperor
 
Heresson's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: of syrian frogs
Posts: 6,772
A forg is a frog on a fork of a Frenchman, You ignorants!
Heresson is offline  
Old August 27, 2002, 14:51   #34
St Leo
Scenario League / Civ2-CreationApolytoners Hall of Fame
 
St Leo's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In search of pants
Posts: 5,085
Please stop making fun of the Frogs.
__________________
Blog | Civ2 Scenario League | leo.petr at gmail.com
St Leo is offline  
Old August 27, 2002, 16:33   #35
techumseh
Civilization II PBEMScenario League / Civ2-Creation
Emperor
 
techumseh's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: of the frozen North.
Posts: 4,197
Enough of that.

I found some background on Japanese scientific research before and during the war. The RIKEN Foundation was established to promote research into the physical sciences in the 1920s. Its' work no doubt had significant military application, since McArthur shut it down after the war.

I'm going with Pavlov's idea for the British trade wonder. I think I'll call it "East-India Docks" for the London docks where Imperial trade came and went.

Thoddy's right about the triggers for wonders. You can toggle them off and on merely by giving and taking the tech which renders them obsolete. To get the benefits of Imperial trade, Britain must maintain a link to India.
techumseh is offline  
Old August 27, 2002, 19:37   #36
Boco
Scenario League / Civ2-Creation
King
 
Boco's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: of underdogs
Posts: 1,774
Among other things, RIKEN is a now big name in current genomics research. I think the name was resurrected in the 50's.

The main aim of the Japanese military was to establish a hard shell for their Asian empire, then negotiate for peace. Although they underestimated US production potential, they knew it was much greater than their own. So, even if the 1941 US fleet ended up at the bottom of the ocean after a doomed plan Orange sortie, eventually, US production would force the Japanese to go on the defensive. Question is, can the Japanese player make it too costly for the US player to retake the Pacific?

I like that you're aiming for that kind of tension using the Civ2 engine. Might almost make me try MP!

How are you going to handle nukes?
Boco is offline  
Old August 27, 2002, 19:53   #37
MagyarCrusader
Civilization II PBEM
Emperor
 
MagyarCrusader's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:52
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Fascist
Posts: 3,161
Quote:
How are you going to handle nukes?
Leave nukes out of this one.
__________________
Re-elect Bush!
MagyarCrusader is offline  
Old August 27, 2002, 20:59   #38
techumseh
Civilization II PBEMScenario League / Civ2-Creation
Emperor
 
techumseh's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: of the frozen North.
Posts: 4,197
Quote:
Originally posted by MagyarCrusader

Leave nukes out of this one.
Sorry, MJ. They were a big part of this war, or rather, the ending of it. So I can't just leave them out. I think I'll limit nuclear bomb research to just the US and Germany, however. And place it FAR down the tech tree, so that someone will have to do very well indeed just to get the research done. Then the Manhattan Project, and so on. Delivery will be by a one way bomber (missile) unit that looks like a B-29.
techumseh is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 02:01   #39
Case
Civilization II PBEMCivilization II Democracy Game: Red FrontScenario League / Civ2-Creation
Emperor
 
Case's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,057
*mutters about Britain, Japan and the USSR all having nuclear weapons programs in WW2*
__________________
'Arguing with anonymous strangers on the internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be - or to be indistinguishable from - self-righteous sixteen year olds possessing infinite amounts of free time.'
- Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon
Case is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 03:26   #40
MagyarCrusader
Civilization II PBEM
Emperor
 
MagyarCrusader's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:52
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Fascist
Posts: 3,161
Just keep in mind that when someone can build a unit with 99 attack, the game is over.
__________________
Re-elect Bush!
MagyarCrusader is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 03:55   #41
techumseh
Civilization II PBEMScenario League / Civ2-Creation
Emperor
 
techumseh's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: of the frozen North.
Posts: 4,197
Quote:
Originally posted by MagyarCrusader
Just keep in mind that when someone can build a unit with 99 attack, the game is over.
Exactly. Pretty historical, oui?
techumseh is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 03:56   #42
techumseh
Civilization II PBEMScenario League / Civ2-Creation
Emperor
 
techumseh's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: of the frozen North.
Posts: 4,197
Quote:
Originally posted by Case
*mutters about Britain, Japan and the USSR all having nuclear weapons programs in WW2*
How far advanced were the various programs?
techumseh is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 06:27   #43
Case
Civilization II PBEMCivilization II Democracy Game: Red FrontScenario League / Civ2-Creation
Emperor
 
Case's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,057
Quote:
How far advanced were the various programs?
The Brits had gotten a long way before they ran out of money and handed their experts and expertise over to the Americans

The Japanese were muddling along towards a bomb, but weren't really close to getting it in 1945.

The Soviets were also making fair progress and had lots of good scientists, but the nuclear program had to be put on the backburner due to the more pressing need to produce conventional military equipment.

As a result, I think that all nations should have access to nuclear weapons.
__________________
'Arguing with anonymous strangers on the internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be - or to be indistinguishable from - self-righteous sixteen year olds possessing infinite amounts of free time.'
- Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon
Case is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 06:36   #44
Heresson
Scenario League / Civ2-CreationNationStates
Emperor
 
Heresson's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: of syrian frogs
Posts: 6,772
"Soviet scientists" = spies.
Heresson is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 10:03   #45
The ANZAC
Civilization II PBEMCivilization II Democracy Game: Red FrontScenario League / Civ2-Creation
King
 
The ANZAC's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: The Rodina!
Posts: 2,334
Quote:
Originally posted by Heresson
"Soviet scientists" = spies.
Yeah that is true!
__________________
Georgi Nikolai Anzyakov, Commander Grand Northern Front, Red Front Democracy Game
The ANZAC is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 10:30   #46
Heresson
Scenario League / Civ2-CreationNationStates
Emperor
 
Heresson's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: of syrian frogs
Posts: 6,772
I'm always right
When it comes to ww2 wonders, perhaps You could use
Enigma's sollution and Anti-fog machines for the Brits...
(don't forget that Poles stood behind it, though )
Heresson is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 12:00   #47
techumseh
Civilization II PBEMScenario League / Civ2-Creation
Emperor
 
techumseh's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: of the frozen North.
Posts: 4,197
What do people think about including spies in a multiplayer scenario? It's possible to edit the Game text to eliminate problem commands such as 'bribe'. I was considering including a spy unit that was limited to 'investigate city' and 'industrial sabotage'.

What about 'steal technology'? Will that screw up the whole game? BTW, it is also possible to force the spy to specify which technology is being sought, by dropping the 'no, any will do' line from the Game text file. It should prevent "trolling" for any unowned technology.

(edit) After actually testing this idea, I find it doesn't work after all. Also, I thought civ specific techs in ToT were protected from being stolen, but they're not. So stealing techs is out. Is it worth it to have a spy that can only recon a city or do industrial sabotage?

Last edited by techumseh; August 28, 2002 at 13:18.
techumseh is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 14:43   #48
Grothgar
Prince
 
Grothgar's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: of Cartographers
Posts: 752
Industrial Sabotage could be useful, City walls, which i assume are making Anti Tank defenses with infantry able to get past them, well if you got rid of them the city would be ripe for plunder, and also getting rid of scientific building could be useful.

And i think everyone should be able to build atomic bombs.

The British atomic program, although still quite classified to this day was by all reports rather far along but its like the soviets program, the fact that money had to be made available for the building of tanks, aeroplanes etc so they eventually packed it in and as case said shipped them over to the Yanks.

The Japanese were very soild on the theory on the bomb but they just couldnt really figure out the practical problems, but if they had they might have progressed quite quickly towards their goal.

The Soviets were about the same as the brits and the japs, very good theory but they didnt know how to procede with actually making a pile and stopping it from going critical, their spies stole that method from the americans And yes they didnt have enough funding.

Also one of the reasons why the Germans didnt make the Bomb first was that the british kept bombing them and their commandos kept sabotaging as many of their research centers as they possibly could, of course the other reason why is because they shot or deported a lot of their best scientists because they were jews, or other "undesiribles" But still they had Heissenburg, and he was pretty good
__________________
Maps, Maps, MORE MAPS!!!!

"You can't make an omelette without breaking eggs but it's amazing how many eggs you can break without making a decent omelette"
Grothgar is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 14:47   #49
Heresson
Scenario League / Civ2-CreationNationStates
Emperor
 
Heresson's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: of syrian frogs
Posts: 6,772
It is. Always some more possibilities, and it's more correct.
Heresson is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 14:52   #50
Heresson
Scenario League / Civ2-CreationNationStates
Emperor
 
Heresson's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: of syrian frogs
Posts: 6,772
Even if Germans or Japaneese should have a possibility of building nukes, they should be a few techs behind at least
or whatever that would make it much harder for them to obtain the discussed ability.
Heresson is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 15:00   #51
Boco
Scenario League / Civ2-Creation
King
 
Boco's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: of underdogs
Posts: 1,774
$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Nukes oughta be very pricey. I'm pretty sure that the US was hardpressed to make just a few. Anyone know if there was a third one ready after Nagasaki? IIRC, there was some fear that Japan wouldn't surrender quickly even after two.
Boco is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 15:09   #52
Grothgar
Prince
 
Grothgar's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: of Cartographers
Posts: 752
While i agree that the Japanese should start a few techs behind on the nuclear path i dont think the germans should, at the start of the war they were at the same point as everyone else, just starting to see if they could turn the atom into a really big weapon

Also maybe the Soviets should start a few techs behind but not as bad as the japs.
__________________
Maps, Maps, MORE MAPS!!!!

"You can't make an omelette without breaking eggs but it's amazing how many eggs you can break without making a decent omelette"
Grothgar is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 15:43   #53
Heresson
Scenario League / Civ2-CreationNationStates
Emperor
 
Heresson's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: of syrian frogs
Posts: 6,772
I think that that would ruin the game. Germans, as having a war on both sides, would have to be extremly strong anyway, now that they could get nukes they would smash
everyone.
Heresson is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 16:26   #54
The ANZAC
Civilization II PBEMCivilization II Democracy Game: Red FrontScenario League / Civ2-Creation
King
 
The ANZAC's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: The Rodina!
Posts: 2,334
Quote:
Originally posted by Grothgar
But still they had Heissenburg, and he was pretty good
I actually heard somewhere that Heisenberg might have sabotaged the German projewct himself to prevent them from ever developing the Bomb
__________________
Georgi Nikolai Anzyakov, Commander Grand Northern Front, Red Front Democracy Game
The ANZAC is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 16:57   #55
St Leo
Scenario League / Civ2-CreationApolytoners Hall of Fame
 
St Leo's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In search of pants
Posts: 5,085
Did the Germans have all the raw materials required for the manufacture of a nuke? You need more than just spare Plutonium/Uranium to make a nuke.
__________________
Blog | Civ2 Scenario League | leo.petr at gmail.com
St Leo is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 17:09   #56
Grothgar
Prince
 
Grothgar's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: of Cartographers
Posts: 752
Yes i think the germans did actually have access to all the materials needed, maybe not the best materials needed but enough you jerry rig it together, although it probably wouldnt have been able to be delivered by air, it would have been too big for any german bombers to deliver.

And ANZAC, while i havent heard that Heissenburg sabotaged the research etc i actually heard that he didnt think that an atomic bomb was a feasable possibility which is why he sandbagged in his research, he didnt do it because he didnt want germany to have the bomb, he did it because he didnt think a bomb could be built and thus it was a waste of money.

Heresson, while what you say makes sense, it does so only in the context of a Single Player game, in a multiplayer game its, obviously , humans which are playing and thus it will be harder for germany to reach the position it was in real life, i mean check out the TSFE PBEM thread to see what human players can do to a timeline.
__________________
Maps, Maps, MORE MAPS!!!!

"You can't make an omelette without breaking eggs but it's amazing how many eggs you can break without making a decent omelette"
Grothgar is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 17:50   #57
Heresson
Scenario League / Civ2-CreationNationStates
Emperor
 
Heresson's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: of syrian frogs
Posts: 6,772
You should force people by scn rules to go about the path of true history unless they really try.
Heresson is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 18:35   #58
techumseh
Civilization II PBEMScenario League / Civ2-Creation
Emperor
 
techumseh's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: of the frozen North.
Posts: 4,197
Heisenberg wasn't sure a bomb could be built? Was he uncertain on principle?

OK, nuclear reseach will be open to all, but unlikely to be reached by all but he most advanced nation before the end of the game. I'm thinking about ways to make it very difficult and expensive. One idea is to require each nation to build a very expensive improvement (say a Recycling Centre with a huge price tag) before getting the final tech allowing construction of nukes. This would be in addition to someone first building the Manhattan Project. I could use the CityProduction trigger and provide the tech by events, perhaps with a built in delay. Comments?
techumseh is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 19:08   #59
Mao
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
Deity
 
Local Time: 02:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Apolyton
Posts: 12,351
hmmm...I might just try to get ToT for this...

Boco, IIRC the US had one more bomb after Nagasaki. They had three originally, and then made another one. One was tested, two were sent to Japan, and one was left in the US. Of course, this is all going by what I remember from the forums so don't quote me verbatim...
__________________
Who wants DVDs? Good prices! I swear! :)
Mao is offline  
Old August 28, 2002, 19:16   #60
Case
Civilization II PBEMCivilization II Democracy Game: Red FrontScenario League / Civ2-Creation
Emperor
 
Case's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:52
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,057
Quote:
"Soviet scientists" = spies.
Not true. The soviets had some excelent physicists working for them. Of course, the Soviet government's method of motivating them (locking them up in a gulag and threatening to shoot them) left a lot to be desired.

Quote:
Nukes oughta be very pricey. I'm pretty sure that the US was hardpressed to make just a few. Anyone know if there was a third one ready after Nagasaki? IIRC, there was some fear that Japan wouldn't surrender quickly even after two.
I agree. From memory, the US didn't have, and couldn't have produced, another nuke for 6 months after Nagasaki.

Quote:
although it probably wouldnt have been able to be delivered by air, it would have been too big for any german bombers to deliver.
The Germans specially modified some of their He-177/277 bombers to carry atomic weapons.
__________________
'Arguing with anonymous strangers on the internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be - or to be indistinguishable from - self-righteous sixteen year olds possessing infinite amounts of free time.'
- Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon
Case is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:52.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team