Thread Tools
Old September 3, 2002, 03:14   #31
Asher
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
President of the OT
 
Asher's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 40,843
I find it completely amazing the supporters of Kyoto continually fall back on the trite "you don't care, you just don't care" while ignoring the realities that while the individual country's pollution will decrease, it's only because the production has been moved out of that country to developing nations or other industrialized nations not under Kyoto's scope.

I thought it was such a simple concept, but it appears most people here never looked at it from a business's point of view.
__________________
"I'll never doubt you again when it comes to hockey, [Prince] Asher." - Guynemer
Asher is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 03:18   #32
chequita guevara
ACDG The Human HiveDiplomacyApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
chequita guevara's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Fort LOLderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Posts: 9,091
It would require a second industrial revolution to raise the Third World to the level of the 1st world emissions.
__________________
Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...
chequita guevara is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 03:19   #33
Asher
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
President of the OT
 
Asher's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 40,843
Not the production though.
Think about it, che...
__________________
"I'll never doubt you again when it comes to hockey, [Prince] Asher." - Guynemer
Asher is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 03:20   #34
notyoueither
Civilization III MultiplayerCivilization III PBEMInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamApolytoners Hall of FameCiv4 InterSite DG: Apolyton TeamPolyCast TeamPtWDG Gathering StormC4DG Gathering Storm
Deity
 
notyoueither's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: of naught
Posts: 21,300
chegitz, the fear is that the burden of Kyoto will fall most heavily on the energy producing provinces and Ontario.

I am unclear as to how exactly they plan on reaching the goals. I'm not against it until I know how they plan on skinning that cat.

However, if implementation means throttling the two parts of the Canadian economy that are going well, Ontario and Alberta, I can't agree with it.

If Alberta is severely effected, I can guess how most people around here will react. We don't consume the products of our petrochemical industry, we produce it. Any plan based on throttling production will place an inordinate burden on a few industries in a few regions.
__________________
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
notyoueither is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 03:21   #35
notyoueither
Civilization III MultiplayerCivilization III PBEMInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamApolytoners Hall of FameCiv4 InterSite DG: Apolyton TeamPolyCast TeamPtWDG Gathering StormC4DG Gathering Storm
Deity
 
notyoueither's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: of naught
Posts: 21,300
Quote:
Originally posted by chegitz guevara
It would require a second industrial revolution to raise the Third World to the level of the 1st world emissions.
You mean like the one that's been going on in S and SE Asia for 30 years now?
__________________
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
notyoueither is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 03:23   #36
Asher
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
President of the OT
 
Asher's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 40,843
I think that's the problem, nye. The federal government hasn't told everyone how they plan to implement it, but they're going to ratify it and think about it later...

I can't think of any way for them to implement it without screwing over Alberta and to a lesser extent Ontario. But Tingkai apparently thinks there's a very cheap magic device that will drastically cut emissions down to 1990 levels while not affecting production...
__________________
"I'll never doubt you again when it comes to hockey, [Prince] Asher." - Guynemer
Asher is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 03:28   #37
notyoueither
Civilization III MultiplayerCivilization III PBEMInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamApolytoners Hall of FameCiv4 InterSite DG: Apolyton TeamPolyCast TeamPtWDG Gathering StormC4DG Gathering Storm
Deity
 
notyoueither's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: of naught
Posts: 21,300
Actually Asher, I doubt Chretien will get this past the Ontario caucus without outlining exactly how the goals will be achieved. If he does, I'm more than a bit worried for this democracy.
__________________
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
notyoueither is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 03:29   #38
Asher
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
President of the OT
 
Asher's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 40,843
If he does get it past the Ontario caucus, guess whose expense it will be at?

Hint: Probably the region that doesn't vote Liberal.

Someone's got to front the economic damage of the treaty, there's no way around it.
__________________
"I'll never doubt you again when it comes to hockey, [Prince] Asher." - Guynemer
Asher is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 03:39   #39
notyoueither
Civilization III MultiplayerCivilization III PBEMInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamApolytoners Hall of FameCiv4 InterSite DG: Apolyton TeamPolyCast TeamPtWDG Gathering StormC4DG Gathering Storm
Deity
 
notyoueither's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: of naught
Posts: 21,300
Then start the clock.
__________________
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
notyoueither is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 03:47   #40
Tingkai
Prince
 
Local Time: 15:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 888
Quote:
Originally posted by Asher
Do tell, Tingkai. How will all of these modern plants built after 1990 drastically reduce pollution? Alberta's production levels have more than doubled since 1990.
So the Albertan oil industry is not using any machinery older than 1990? Sure.

And the technology for pollution control suddenly stopped developing in 1990? Sure.



Quote:
Originally posted by Asher
There is a definite and obvious lack of consumption needed, and what's more for Alberta -- a lack of production.
This is classic oil industry propaganda. The problem now is there is no enough oil being produced because there is not enough demand for oil.

Quote:
Originally posted by Asher
Chretien fired Paul Martin (who had enormous approval ratings) because he was talking about running against him, and Chretien's "friends" own the largest newspaper chain in Canada who fired columnists who criticized him.
And Chretien has no plans to step down.

Quote:
Originally posted by Asher
Having a bunch of low level ministers meeting...
Why am I not surprised that an oil industry boy thinks that environment ministers are low level.
__________________
Golfing since 67
Tingkai is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 03:50   #41
Asher
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
President of the OT
 
Asher's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 40,843
Quote:
Originally posted by Tingkai
So the Albertan oil industry is not using any machinery older than 1990? Sure.

And the technology for pollution control suddenly stopped developing in 1990? Sure.

It has, but you seem to think it works so REMARKABLY well that it'll reduce emissions substantially.

Let me be the first to tell you you really do have no clue what you're talking about, and I'd also like for you to stop even trying to use this argument until you link to some reputable sites saying we can implement Kyoto without affecting production.

Perhaps some blueprints on this magical device you keep talking about to reduce emissions would be good too. You could make trillions of dollars off of this magical thing.

Quote:
And Chretien has no plans to step down.
The only reason he announced his plan to step down was so he could stay in another year...

Quote:
Why am I not surprised that an oil industry boy thinks that environment ministers are low level.
Why am I not surprised that you can't read anything right?
ALL ministers are low level. I don't even know WHY you said that comment, because the meeting also involved ENERGY ministers.

Do go on and tell us all about this magical technology which will reduce emissions drastically without touching Alberta's economy. Do go on an tell us why a business would not just develop production in other countries not under Kyoto since there's an abundance of oil there as well?
Do go on and tell us where you get your information that even the old plants in Alberta haven't been upgraded.

These are all interesting assertions you've made and you've yet to substantiate a single one of them.

There are benefits for oil producers too for increasing efficiency. The more efficient your plants are, the less energy you use to make the new energy, the less it costs to produce this energy, and you've also got newer machinery which is less likely to fail altogether. Most plants (at least for a few companies that I know about) do continually upgrade their machinery and plants...
__________________
"I'll never doubt you again when it comes to hockey, [Prince] Asher." - Guynemer
Asher is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 03:55   #42
Tingkai
Prince
 
Local Time: 15:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 888
Quote:
Originally posted by Asher
You seriously insist we can reduce pollution to 1990 levels without affecting consumption (and thereby production).
Sometimes I do get tired of explain basic economics to Asher.

Try to understand this simple concept. If governments strengthen pollution control laws then this will lead to the increased consumption of pollution control devices, whether for businesses or for personal use. As a result, more jobs are created because a new market has developed. Simple really.

Quote:
Originally posted by Asher
If you don't reduce consumption, how would you reduce pollution? By making engines more EFFICIENT? If you make them more efficient, don't they require less fuel? Wouldn't this not lower consumption?
The obvious answer would be devices that decrease the amount of pollution emitted. Or how about switching to natural gas. Hong Kong, for example, now requires all of its taxis to be powered by LPG. This has helped reduced pollution caused by diesel-powered vehicles.

Quote:
Originally posted by Asher
It's just a large wealth transfer. But instead of being a West->East wealth transfer, this time it's North->South.
Again, you fail to look at the big picture. An initial wealth transfer from the developed world to the under-developed world is actually beneficial to the entire global economy. As economies grow in the under-developed world, new markets are created for goods from the developed world. This creates a virtuous circle where economic growth in the economically developing world leads to economic growth in economically developed world, which in turn leads to more investment going from "north>south" as you put it.
__________________
Golfing since 67
Tingkai is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 03:57   #43
Tingkai
Prince
 
Local Time: 15:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 888
Quote:
Originally posted by Asher
I find it completely amazing the supporters of Kyoto continually fall back on the trite "you don't care, you just don't care" while ignoring the realities that while the individual country's pollution will decrease, it's only because the production has been moved out of that country to developing nations or other industrialized nations not under Kyoto's scope.

I thought it was such a simple concept, but it appears most people here never looked at it from a business's point of view.
Again, you don't know what you are talking about.

Economic growth in places like China has not resulted in the impoverishment of developed countries nor has it led to an increase in pollution from countries like China.
__________________
Golfing since 67
Tingkai is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 04:02   #44
notyoueither
Civilization III MultiplayerCivilization III PBEMInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamApolytoners Hall of FameCiv4 InterSite DG: Apolyton TeamPolyCast TeamPtWDG Gathering StormC4DG Gathering Storm
Deity
 
notyoueither's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: of naught
Posts: 21,300
Quote:
Originally posted by Tingkai


Sometimes I do get tired of explain basic economics to Asher.

Try to understand this simple concept. If governments strengthen pollution control laws then this will lead to the increased consumption of pollution control devices, whether for businesses or for personal use. As a result, more jobs are created because a new market has developed. Simple really.
That's great! Then we can expect no taxes on production then.
__________________
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
notyoueither is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 04:04   #45
Tingkai
Prince
 
Local Time: 15:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 888
Quote:
Originally posted by Asher
It has, but you seem to think it works so REMARKABLY well that it'll reduce emissions substantially.
The Kyoto agreement is designed as an initial, small first step that will begin a voyage of a thousand miles. Whether it requires substantiall reductions is subjective.

Since you claim that Kyoto will destroy the Albertan economy, how about posting some proof from an unbaised source.

Quote:
Originally posted by Asher
ALL ministers are low level. I don't even know WHY you said that comment, because the meeting also involved ENERGY ministers.
You really don't know anything about parliamentary government. Backbenchers have low levels of influence. The opposition has a low level of influence. Cabinet ministers have a lot of influence.

Quote:
Originally posted by Asher
Do go on and tell us all about this magical technology which will reduce emissions drastically without touching Alberta's economy. Do go on an tell us why a business would not just develop production in other countries not under Kyoto since there's an abundance of oil there as well?
Jesus, now I have to explain the oil industry to Asher.

There is a simple thing called transportation costs. Enough said.

Quote:
Originally posted by Asher
Do go on and tell us where you get your information that even the old plants in Alberta haven't been upgraded.
You're the one making the claim that Albertan oil industry only uses the most up-to-date equipment and that none of the plants are older than 1990. It is up to you to provide proof of the claim. I am merely doubting your propaganda.
__________________
Golfing since 67
Tingkai is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 04:04   #46
notyoueither
Civilization III MultiplayerCivilization III PBEMInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamApolytoners Hall of FameCiv4 InterSite DG: Apolyton TeamPolyCast TeamPtWDG Gathering StormC4DG Gathering Storm
Deity
 
notyoueither's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: of naught
Posts: 21,300
Quote:
Originally posted by Tingkai
Economic growth in places like China has not resulted in the impoverishment of developed countries nor has it led to an increase in pollution from countries like China.
Are you sure about this?

I've heard of cities in China where the air is very thick.
__________________
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
notyoueither is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 04:06   #47
Tingkai
Prince
 
Local Time: 15:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 888
Quote:
Originally posted by notyoueither


That's great! Then we can expect no taxes on production then.



No, please god, no. Don't even suggest anything to do with that three-lettered abbreviation.
__________________
Golfing since 67
Tingkai is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 04:08   #48
Tingkai
Prince
 
Local Time: 15:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 888
Quote:
Originally posted by notyoueither
Are you sure about this?

I've heard of cities in China where the air is very thick.
A 1997 report by the UN, IIRC (it might have been the World Bank) found that overall pollution levels had not changed between 1980-1995.

The reason is that as the Chinese economy developed, industry switched to newer, less polluting equipment. Natural gas is replacing coal-fired stoves in kitchens which is also reducing pollution.

However, you are right. Pollution is still a significant problem.
__________________
Golfing since 67
Tingkai is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 12:54   #49
blackice
Emperor
 
blackice's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Canada where else...
Posts: 4,178
Quote:
The same poll said 65% didn't know what Kyoto entails.
Actually it said 64% have read or heard of Kyoto. In that Ipso/Ried poll I can find no referance to what you said here, how about a link? Maybe we are viewing two different polls.

Quote:
Leave it to the wonderful Chretien-funded CBC to leave that little detail out.
Read above.

In that same poll it appears most Albertans agree with some of what you have said here but most believe it is worth it.

Quote:
I don't see how Ottawa can force Alberta to abide by it, and Alberta has vowed never to implement it.

Article 2
Section 1 clause (v) (v) Progressive reduction or phasing out of market imperfections, fiscal incentives, tax and duty exemptions and subsidies in all greenhouse gas emitting sectors that run counter to the objective of the Convention and application of market instruments;
When the British North America Act, Canada's original constitution, was enacted in 1867, the concept of environment did not exist as we know it today. The constitution did not stipulate who, between the provincial and the federal governments, was responsible for maintaining a healthy environment for Canadians. Rather, both levels of government were given powers that permitted them to pass legislation to deal with environmental issues.

Quote:
Kyoto is strictly about resource control
Actually yes but it has several different components, interesting enough some of the components are similar in nature to parts of the NEP. Had those parts of the NEP been kept Canada would not be ranked so high today in pollution. Kyoto then would be a no show, you have to love some of them Albertans, always thinking of the rest of the world.

Quote:
Kyoto is about restricting the use of these resources to the point of reducing pollution.
Part of the problem would you not agree, but that too is only part of the agreement.

Quote:
it's only because the production has been moved out of that country to developing nations or other industrialized nations not under Kyoto's scope.
Well under Kyoto all nations must share the pollution cutting technologies "especially" with developing nations. So wrong again, they are also implimenting an agreement similar to the Montreal Accords that sees the IMF or the world bank fund these changes to developing countries. I think Asher is in that 20% that do not know what Kyoto is and what it does, must be that Klein government information he reads.

Quote:
I can't think of any way for them to implement it without screwing over Alberta and to a lesser extent Ontario.
Interesting to point out here Ontario has the second lowest GHG, s and is predicted to continue that trend.

Other information Canada ranks 8th in the world for GHG's that include two developing countries btw China and India without them Canada would be 6th.

Canada ranks an increable 4th in per capita GHG emissions.

Industries in canada will have increased GHG's by 2010 by 10% 1990.

Transportation 34%

Fossil fuel industries an increadable 64% it appears Klein is doing lots.

Commercial 34%

Electricity generation 25%

GHG's by province Atlantic 23%, Quebec 11%, Ontario 17%, Manatoba 24%, Saskatchewan 40%, Alberta 40%, B.C. 36% these are projected forcast's from1990 to 2010.

It appears the province with the most cash could do more to enhance the energy based economy and reduce pollution. Maybe rather than putting money into the haritage fund for future use. Thye could put money into use today, a small percentage is all it would take.
__________________
“The Communist Manifesto was correct…but…we see the privileges of the capitalist bourgeoisie yielding…to democratic organizations…In my judgment…success lies in a steady [peaceful] advance…[rather]…than in…a catastrophic crash."Eduard Bernstein
Or do we?
blackice is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 13:01   #50
Boris Godunov
Civilization II MultiplayerApolytoners Hall of FameCivilization IV: Multiplayer
Emperor
 
Boris Godunov's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,412


Asher vs. Tingkai, Episode XXXVIII...

*makes popcorn*
__________________
Tutto nel mondo è burla
Boris Godunov is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 13:22   #51
Urban Ranger
NationStatesApolyton Storywriters' GuildNever Ending Stories
Deity
 
Urban Ranger's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
Posts: 14,606
Quote:
Originally posted by notyoueither
You mean like the one that's been going on in S and SE Asia for 30 years now?
Per capita? Highly doubtful.
__________________
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
Urban Ranger is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 14:05   #52
November Adam
Prince
 
November Adam's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 364
Quote:
Originally posted by Tingkai

Economic growth in places like China has not resulted in the impoverishment of developed countries nor has it led to an increase in pollution from countries like China.
Tingkai, you do realize there is a large cloud of pollution over Asia due to its growth. China doesn't have the most effecient pollution control, and it has a very large population of polluters.

Edit. nevermind I see this has been addressed.
__________________
What if your words could be judged like a crime? "Creed, What If?"
November Adam is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 16:17   #53
Giancarlo
King
 
Giancarlo's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,886
I thought I was alone in being against the illogical and fatally flawed Kyoto agreement here? Guess not. Really what does the agreement accomplish besides cutting back on future development?

The problem with China is they don't want to spend squat on energy development and are sticking to the use of coal. Can kyoto accomplish anything there? Absolutely not. Infact it will allow some countries to pollute more.
__________________
Lets face it. We flamiing queers have more appeal then Pat Robertson and other religious wackos. We have shows that are really growing in popularity. We have more channels (Q TV, Logo Channel). And we help people in their style issues (Queer Eye for the Straight Guy). The last thing I saw a religious preacher did was ask for $5 in a "generous pledge" to help his bank account in Zurich, erhm, some starving kids in Zimbabwe.
Giancarlo is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 16:48   #54
blackice
Emperor
 
blackice's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Canada where else...
Posts: 4,178
Quote:
Really what does the agreement accomplish besides cutting back on future development?
Create future industries, a less polluted world just for starters. What future developement are you refering to?

Quote:
The problem with China is they don't want to spend squat on energy development and are sticking to the use of coal. Can kyoto accomplish anything there? Absolutely not. Infact it will allow some countries to pollute more.
Seems to me they are spending lots on energy developement, cando reactors for one example. Nice counter balance while some pollute more the others are reducing. Somewhere down the pipe they will have to bow to international pressure and follow the logical course of action. Stop polluting the planet or there will be no planet.
__________________
“The Communist Manifesto was correct…but…we see the privileges of the capitalist bourgeoisie yielding…to democratic organizations…In my judgment…success lies in a steady [peaceful] advance…[rather]…than in…a catastrophic crash."Eduard Bernstein
Or do we?
blackice is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 17:02   #55
Giancarlo
King
 
Giancarlo's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,886
Quote:
Originally posted by blackice
Create future industries, a less polluted world just for starters. What future developement are you refering to?
Kyoto doesn't create anything but creates on hell of a mess.

Quote:
Seems to me they are spending lots on energy developement, cando reactors for one example. Nice counter balance while some pollute more the others are reducing. Somewhere down the pipe they will have to bow to international pressure and follow the logical course of action. Stop polluting the planet or there will be no planet.
Therefore countries like China can pollute more. International pressure... phseeh... look at reality. Stop polluting the planet or there will be no planet? There was probably more CO2 in the atmosphere before humans were around.
__________________
Lets face it. We flamiing queers have more appeal then Pat Robertson and other religious wackos. We have shows that are really growing in popularity. We have more channels (Q TV, Logo Channel). And we help people in their style issues (Queer Eye for the Straight Guy). The last thing I saw a religious preacher did was ask for $5 in a "generous pledge" to help his bank account in Zurich, erhm, some starving kids in Zimbabwe.
Giancarlo is offline  
Old September 3, 2002, 22:26   #56
Tingkai
Prince
 
Local Time: 15:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 888
Quote:
Originally posted by Fez
The problem with China is they don't want to spend squat on energy development and are sticking to the use of coal.
Fez has obviously never heard about a very tiny energy project called the Three Gorge Dam.
__________________
Golfing since 67
Tingkai is offline  
Old September 4, 2002, 01:50   #57
Urban Ranger
NationStatesApolyton Storywriters' GuildNever Ending Stories
Deity
 
Urban Ranger's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
Posts: 14,606
Quote:
Originally posted by November Adam
Tingkai, you do realize there is a large cloud of pollution over Asia due to its growth. China doesn't have the most effecient pollution control, and it has a very large population of polluters.

Edit. nevermind I see this has been addressed.
Adam,

The brown cloud has been created in India.
__________________
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
Urban Ranger is offline  
Old September 4, 2002, 01:52   #58
Urban Ranger
NationStatesApolyton Storywriters' GuildNever Ending Stories
Deity
 
Urban Ranger's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
Posts: 14,606
Quote:
Originally posted by Fez
The problem with China is they don't want to spend squat on energy development and are sticking to the use of coal. Can kyoto accomplish anything there? Absolutely not. Infact it will allow some countries to pollute more.
You clearly do not have any inkling of ideas on how much China spends on energy development. You probably haven't seen the windmill farms, the solar stoves, the hydroelectric stations, the nuclear power plants. You know, the whole works.
__________________
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
Urban Ranger is offline  
Old September 4, 2002, 05:41   #59
blackice
Emperor
 
blackice's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Canada where else...
Posts: 4,178
South China's Guangdong Spends Heavily on Air Pollution Control 5.7 billion yuan (about 687 million US dollars)
http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/20...801_76238.html
Look they are doing it without *****ing, I guess they have a real concern about thier people.
__________________
“The Communist Manifesto was correct…but…we see the privileges of the capitalist bourgeoisie yielding…to democratic organizations…In my judgment…success lies in a steady [peaceful] advance…[rather]…than in…a catastrophic crash."Eduard Bernstein
Or do we?
blackice is offline  
Old September 4, 2002, 05:56   #60
blackice
Emperor
 
blackice's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Canada where else...
Posts: 4,178
State Institutions Ordered to Conserve Energy
China Online, 7 November 2001
Government agencies, which account for 5 percent of total energy consumption in China, have been ordered to make sweeping changes to save energy. The State Economic and Trade Commission (SETC), the Ministry of Finance (MOF) and the State Council’s Departmental Affairs Administration jointly issued a proposal on November 5th telling governments at various levels and state-supported entities and institutions including the army, armed police, education entities, medical treatment institutions, and research institutions, what they must do to conserve energy.
The report said the government spends 80 billion yuan (US$9.66 billion) each year on energy, constituting a large proportion of China’s budget. Each state institution will be required to set specific energy-saving goals and lay down practical energy-saving measures. Government purchasing agents were ordered to place priority on acquiring energy-saving facilities or equipment. In addition, government institutions were ordered to dispose of facilities and products that are not energy efficient. The proposal requires an examination of all lighting, heating and cooling equipment, office equipment and vehicles.

Zero Energy Growth by 2040
China Daily, 11 November 2001
The Chinese Government vowed on Monday to speed up efforts to save energy to ensure national energy security and to maintain sustainable development during the country's 10th Five-Year Plan (2001-05). According to Li Rongrong, minister of the State Economic and Trade Commission (SETC), increasing efforts are indispensable because there is tremendous potential in saving energy. The government aims to decrease its energy consumption from 2.77 tons of standard coal per 10,000 yuan of gross domestic product in 2000 to 2.2 tons by 2005.
According to Li, zero growth in energy use should be achieved by 2040. He also noted that regulations and standards should be developed soon to fully implement the national Energy Saving Law which was launched in 1997.

Beijing Warms to Clean Energy
China Daily, 19 November 2001
Some 60 percent of the boilers in Beijing now use clean energy such as natural gas and electricity to produce heat. An official with the municipal management committee said that there are still at least 5,000 small-sized boilers using coal for heating in the city. All boilers are scheduled to switch to clean fuel by 2008. Burning coal for heating in the winter has long been a problem since it causes serious air pollution. Before 1997, Beijing consumed 28 million tons of coal each year, which produced 90 percent of the sulfur dioxide and 50 percent of the floating particles in the air, according to official statistics.

I guess the bottom line is Chinda is doing a lot, I do not see it hurting thier economy you? It could it be the powers at be see this as a warning?
Could it be they see this new industry slipping away?
Imagine if China lead the world to the clean energy industry.
__________________
“The Communist Manifesto was correct…but…we see the privileges of the capitalist bourgeoisie yielding…to democratic organizations…In my judgment…success lies in a steady [peaceful] advance…[rather]…than in…a catastrophic crash."Eduard Bernstein
Or do we?
blackice is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:24.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team