View Poll Results: Should we upgrade to Version 1.29?
Yes upgrade 39 75.00%
No don't 13 25.00%
Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools
Old September 18, 2002, 09:02   #31
BigFurryMonster
PtWDG2 SunshineC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamC3CDG Team BabylonInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton Team
Emperor
 
BigFurryMonster's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: EMPEROR of Cats
Posts: 3,229
It strikes me that everyone is asking questions like "how many users will not be able to play the game under 1.29" but nobody ever gives an answer...
__________________
Greatest moments in cat:
__________________
"Miaooow..!"
BigFurryMonster is offline  
Old September 18, 2002, 10:20   #32
GodKing
Civilization III Democracy GamePtWDG RoleplayInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamPtWDG2 TabemonoC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC3CDG The Lost BoysCiv4 SP Democracy GameC4DG SarantiumC4WDG CalysiumC4BtSDG Templars
Emperor
 
GodKing's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Detroit
Posts: 4,551
Epi

They can load the game now, and are involved in the game.

They do not have an option yet for 1.29, nor is Firaxis going to release a 1.29 patch for them as Firaxis plans on using PtW to do it for them.
__________________
Try peace first. If that does not work, then killing them is often a good solution. :evil:

As long as I could figure a way to hump myself, I would be OK with that
--Con
GodKing is offline  
Old September 18, 2002, 10:51   #33
UnOrthOdOx
PtWDG2 TabemonoPtWDG Glory of WarApolyton Storywriters' GuildIron CiversApolytoners Hall of FameC4BtSDG Rabbits of CaerbannogCiv4 SP Democracy GamePolyCast TeamC4DG The Mercenary TeamC4WDG The Goonies
Emperor
 
UnOrthOdOx's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: As cuddly as a cactus, as charming as an eel.
Posts: 8,196
OK, I voted no.

I did so because it will alienate players, however few, from the game. 1.21 is universal, everyone can use it. 1.29 will NOT load on a 1.21 version.

I am against anything that has the potential of deminishing our population. We live off the nimber of active members online. If changing to 1.29 removes even ONE of those members, if it discourages someone from joining, it will not be worth it.

STAY 1.21! We are a global community, let our game be able to be shared globally.
__________________
One who has a surplus of the unorthodox shall attain surpassing victories. - Sun Pin
You're wierd. - Krill

An UnOrthOdOx Hobby
UnOrthOdOx is offline  
Old September 18, 2002, 10:54   #34
Hagbart
InterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamC3C IDG: Apolyton Team
Prince
 
Hagbart's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 835
If the mac users cant use 1.29 we should stay at 1.21 at least till this game is finished..
__________________
Try my Lord of the Rings MAP out: Lands of Middle Earth v2 NEWS: Now It's a flat map, optimized for Conquests

The new iPod nano: nano
Hagbart is offline  
Old September 18, 2002, 15:04   #35
adaMada
Civilization III Democracy GameTrade Wars / BlackNova TradersPtWDG RoleplayRise of Nations MultiplayerInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton Team
King
 
adaMada's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: "The Iron" Stadium, Ubergorsk, Apolytonia (C3DG)
Posts: 1,848
Voted don't for the sake of the Mac/Foreign Users -- if they can't upgrade, then it isn't worth it.

Will also polish my instructions for the dual install and try to find Shiber's method of quickly changing between patches sometime soon.

-- adaMada
__________________
Civ 3 Democracy Game:
PTW Game: Proud member of the Roleplay Team, and Ambassador to Glory of War
Intersite PTW Game: Member of Apolyton
adaMada is offline  
Old September 18, 2002, 15:27   #36
Aro
lifer
PtWDG Glory of WarC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamC4DG Gathering StormCiv4 SP Democracy Game
Emperor
 
Aro's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Botanic Garden, Rio
Posts: 5,124
The reasons to no upgrade are enough for me. Please, change my vote to “no, don't”.
__________________
RIAA sucks
The Optimistas
I'm a political cartoonist
Aro is offline  
Old September 19, 2002, 17:27   #37
E_T
C3C IDG: Apolyton TeamCivilization III PBEMInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamC3CDG Team BabylonC4DG SarantiumCiv4 SP Democracy Game
Emperor
 
E_T's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 8,807
This should be along the line of an admendment. But if we get 2/3rds vote, will we have to accept it as one, even though it's not worded as one? I voted Yes, because of the healing of Armies for starters. I like the way that the AI is a bit better tactically, more challenging.

The 1.29f patch is one of the reasons that I've started to play Civ again.

E_T
__________________
Worship the Comic here!
Term IV Deputy Foreign Minister for Trade of Apolytonia, Term V CP & Term VI DM of Apolytonia, Term VII SMC of Apolytonia - SPDGI
Minister of the Interior of the PTW InterSite Demo Game
E_T is offline  
Old September 19, 2002, 17:50   #38
Panag
MacCivilization II Democracy Game: ExodusC4BtSDG Rabbits of Caerbannog
Emperor
 
Panag's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Posts: 8,117
hi ,

so , we should not upgrade , because a small group says so , .......



WHAIT JUST A MINUTE


1 we are a democrazy
2 why on earth should we get behind and face some bugs
3 there is not a single good justified reason from anyone as to why the upgrade would be "bad" , .......
4 because its about time
5 no lame excuse as "i cant get it" , if you are on this site , you can have it !
6 because the banana says so

have a nice day
Panag is offline  
Old September 19, 2002, 18:35   #39
adaMada
Civilization III Democracy GameTrade Wars / BlackNova TradersPtWDG RoleplayRise of Nations MultiplayerInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton Team
King
 
adaMada's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: "The Iron" Stadium, Ubergorsk, Apolytonia (C3DG)
Posts: 1,848
Panag,

We shouldn't upgrade for one reason and only one reason.

We are a democracy.

Democracy isn't about the majority having a say. It's about everyone having a say. It'd be unfair to 'remove' certian players from playing, assuming that there are good reasons they haven't upgraded (Which I'm willing to trust GodKing on). To upgrade if it can be shown that this would prevent some players from playing would be Unconstitutional, and I'd be fully in support of going to the court to stop such an upgrade, assuming that the court can also find proof that it'll stop people from playing.

I will be posting more complete instructions for switching between versions/dual installing shortly. I wish we could play in 1.29f too -- for a month, I didn't play civ 3 at all because of the Demogame, which is a shame. Having said that, it it's not fair to stop anyone from playing.

Once 1.29f is out for everyone (if it ever is, which sounds like no) then my vote will be a yes. Once we start the next game, my vote will be a yes. Once we can do one of these polls and have no good reasons for not upgrading, then yes. Until then, no. Sorry .

-- adaMada
__________________
Civ 3 Democracy Game:
PTW Game: Proud member of the Roleplay Team, and Ambassador to Glory of War
Intersite PTW Game: Member of Apolyton
adaMada is offline  
Old September 19, 2002, 18:41   #40
Panag
MacCivilization II Democracy Game: ExodusC4BtSDG Rabbits of Caerbannog
Emperor
 
Panag's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Posts: 8,117
Quote:
Originally posted by adaMada
Panag,

We shouldn't upgrade for one reason and only one reason.

We are a democracy.

Democracy isn't about the majority having a say. It's about everyone having a say. It'd be unfair to 'remove' certian players from playing, assuming that there are good reasons they haven't upgraded (Which I'm willing to trust GodKing on). To upgrade if it can be shown that this would prevent some players from playing would be Unconstitutional, and I'd be fully in support of going to the court to stop such an upgrade, assuming that the court can also find proof that it'll stop people from playing.

I will be posting more complete instructions for switching between versions/dual installing shortly. I wish we could play in 1.29f too -- for a month, I didn't play civ 3 at all because of the Demogame, which is a shame. Having said that, it it's not fair to stop anyone from playing.

Once 1.29f is out for everyone (if it ever is, which sounds like no) then my vote will be a yes. Once we start the next game, my vote will be a yes. Once we can do one of these polls and have no good reasons for not upgrading, then yes. Until then, no. Sorry .

-- adaMada
hi ,

well according to the first lines the , we should stop to play then , .......

have a nice day
Panag is offline  
Old September 19, 2002, 19:20   #41
Aggie
Civilization III PBEMPtWDG Glory of WarCivilization III Democracy GameC4DG SarantiumPtWDG2 TabemonoInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton Team
King
 
Aggie's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Of GOW's half of BOB
Posts: 1,847
Chage my vote to no, too. We either ALL have to upgrade or NONE and I for one do not want to deny people the enjoyment of the game. Imagine if you were on of the few who couldn't, It would be horrible to be unable to participate in a game you enjoy.
Aggie
__________________
The 5th President, 2nd SMC and 8th VP in the Civ3 Demogame. Also proud member of the GOW team in the PTW game. Peace through superior firepower.
Aggie is offline  
Old September 19, 2002, 19:36   #42
adaMada
Civilization III Democracy GameTrade Wars / BlackNova TradersPtWDG RoleplayRise of Nations MultiplayerInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton Team
King
 
adaMada's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: "The Iron" Stadium, Ubergorsk, Apolytonia (C3DG)
Posts: 1,848
Quote:
Originally posted by panag


hi ,

well according to the first lines the , we should stop to play then , .......

have a nice day
Panag,

Sorry, I'm a tad confused. Which lines are do you mean? When you say "stop to play", do you mean that we should shut down the game overall? Sorry, as soon as I understand what you mean I'll happily respond, but I'm a bit confused right now .

-- adaMada
__________________
Civ 3 Democracy Game:
PTW Game: Proud member of the Roleplay Team, and Ambassador to Glory of War
Intersite PTW Game: Member of Apolyton
adaMada is offline  
Old September 19, 2002, 20:48   #43
Trevman
Warlord
 
Trevman's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: California
Posts: 194
We decided at the start of the game which rules we would play by including playing by 1.21. I don't believe we should change any of them including the version. However, if a significant number will be alienated from the game with the old version, then we should probably upgrade.
__________________
Est-ce que tu as vu une baleine avec un queue taché?
If you don't feel the slightist bit joyful seeing the Iraqis dancing in the street, then you are lost to the radical left. If you don't feel the slightest bit bad that we had to use force to do this, then you are lost to the radical right.
Trevman is offline  
Old September 19, 2002, 21:11   #44
adaMada
Civilization III Democracy GameTrade Wars / BlackNova TradersPtWDG RoleplayRise of Nations MultiplayerInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton Team
King
 
adaMada's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: "The Iron" Stadium, Ubergorsk, Apolytonia (C3DG)
Posts: 1,848
Oh yea, almost forgot to ask, OPD, is this an official thread?

If it is, I'll add it to the directory's official thread archive when it comes online. If not, then I won't .

-- adaMada
__________________
Civ 3 Democracy Game:
PTW Game: Proud member of the Roleplay Team, and Ambassador to Glory of War
Intersite PTW Game: Member of Apolyton
adaMada is offline  
Old September 19, 2002, 22:25   #45
wervdon
InterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamC3C IDG: Apolyton Team
Prince
 
Local Time: 02:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 812
I voted to go ahead and upgrade, but really it only matters what those who are in office/might be in office want to do. The rest of us don't have to load the save (and in fact it crashes my civ3 to load it anyways).

A better and more informative poll might be to divide people who might be willing to run for office someday up according to who can upgrade to 1.29 and who can't upgrade to 1.29

Something like this:
[ ] I do not see myself running for office in the foreseeable future
[ ] I might run for office and I want to upgrade to 1.29f
[ ] I might run for office and I do not want to upgrade to 1.29f
[ ] Bananna
wervdon is offline  
Old September 20, 2002, 03:49   #46
Harovan
staff
PtWDG Gathering StormPtWDG2 Monty PythonC4DG Gathering Storm
Civ4: Colonization Content Editor
 
Local Time: 09:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,117
There are other circumstances limiting people to run for an office. If we care for those who can't upgrade (sorry Mac users, but in return you've got a better computer), we could also care for those who have an old PC and can't load up huge crowded maps. Following this logic, why didn't we start a standard map game then, to allow the Pentium 90/32 MB players to run for an office?

Yay for upgrading.
Harovan is offline  
Old September 20, 2002, 05:26   #47
mtgillespie
Civilization III Democracy Game
Warlord
 
Local Time: 08:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 136
Sir Ralph: That argument is nonsense. To follow your logic to it's conclusion, we shouldn't play the game at all as not everyone has a PC. The difference is, we are excluding people who are already involved in the game if we upgrade. We set the conditions at the start, we should stick to them until everyone can upgrade. There is also the issue of wierd effects in trades of save games started in 1.21 which are then upgraded.
mtgillespie is offline  
Old September 20, 2002, 05:30   #48
mtgillespie
Civilization III Democracy Game
Warlord
 
Local Time: 08:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 136
Could i also point out, polls like this are the reason we need a discussion thread first. Some people who voted yes now wish to change their vote in the light of new information. Had there been a discussion first, their votes would have been cast correctly.
mtgillespie is offline  
Old September 20, 2002, 05:41   #49
OPD
Civilization III Democracy GameC3CDG Blood Oath HordePtWDG Gathering StormPtWDG2 Mohammed Al-SahafInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton Team
King
 
OPD's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 2,633
Ok sticking with 1.21

Quote:
Originally posted by adaMada
Oh yea, almost forgot to ask, OPD, is this an official thread? -- adaMada
No this is not official and never was.

Clause 7 of the bill of rights says I can't play a version of the game not avaliable to all players. This was just to kinda test the water to see whether an official poll or amendment was in order.

But as there is more than 1 person voting no I can't really go any further with this.

So in conclusion we won't be upgrading.
__________________
Are we having fun yet?
OPD is offline  
Old September 20, 2002, 06:03   #50
Harovan
staff
PtWDG Gathering StormPtWDG2 Monty PythonC4DG Gathering Storm
Civ4: Colonization Content Editor
 
Local Time: 09:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,117
Quote:
Originally posted by mtgillespie
Sir Ralph: That argument is nonsense. To follow your logic to it's conclusion, we shouldn't play the game at all as not everyone has a PC.
The logic was meant to be slant. As for Mac users, they knew the upsides (better computer, better OS) and downsides (less software/upgrades/etc.) of their machine before and met their own decision. Why should all others suffer from this?

Quote:
The difference is, we are excluding people who are already involved in the game if we upgrade. We set the conditions at the start, we should stick to them until everyone can upgrade.
That means never. And sticking with 1.21 will exclude me, because I never will downgrade or bother with a crappy dual installation. But I don't complain, because I don't intend to run for another office anyway.

Quote:
There is also the issue of wierd effects in trades of save games started in 1.21 which are then upgraded.
Never heard of that. Can you supply me with facts or a link?
Harovan is offline  
Old September 20, 2002, 06:41   #51
mtgillespie
Civilization III Democracy Game
Warlord
 
Local Time: 08:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 136
Quote:
Never heard of that. Can you supply me with facts or a link?
From the version 1.29 chat log :

[jimmyh] And how is it possible for the Ai to offer me 536 gold per turn for a tech?

[SorenJohnson_Firaxis] saved games that go from 1.21-]1.29 might get a little wacky concerning tech costs.

[jimmyh] I think it was yes, but 536 per turn, come on that's quiet a lot.

I haven't heard any reports of other "weird issues", so i don't know if it's a major problem, i just thought it was worth mentioning again.


Quote:
That means never. And sticking with 1.21 will exclude me, because I never will downgrade or bother with a crappy dual installation. But I don't complain, because I don't intend to run for another office anyway.
Then maybe we should have a poll purely for people who may run for office in the future. There is certainly no need to download the save unless you are in office (although it may be interesting), as it's perfectly possible to follow from the reports and maps.

And it will be a great shame if you do not run for office again, as your contribution has been invaluable so far. May i ask why you are not considering it, as i am certain you would get huge support for any position you chose?
mtgillespie is offline  
Old September 20, 2002, 07:10   #52
Harovan
staff
PtWDG Gathering StormPtWDG2 Monty PythonC4DG Gathering Storm
Civ4: Colonization Content Editor
 
Local Time: 09:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,117
Tech costs and the AI's approach to trades has been slightly changed, but there's nothing that makes the game broke. And these differences will level out very soon.

As for my running for office: I ran once because I was asked to, but in general I haven't got the time for a very active participation. Family first, then job, then AU games and the C3DG. I will keep to let my contributions and recommendations coming anyway and hope they are of use.
Harovan is offline  
Old September 20, 2002, 08:42   #53
adaMada
Civilization III Democracy GameTrade Wars / BlackNova TradersPtWDG RoleplayRise of Nations MultiplayerInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton Team
King
 
adaMada's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: "The Iron" Stadium, Ubergorsk, Apolytonia (C3DG)
Posts: 1,848
Quote:
Originally posted by OPD
Ok sticking with 1.21



No this is not official and never was.

Clause 7 of the bill of rights says I can't play a version of the game not avaliable to all players. This was just to kinda test the water to see whether an official poll or amendment was in order.

But as there is more than 1 person voting no I can't really go any further with this.

So in conclusion we won't be upgrading.
OPD,
I totally understand where you're coming from, and agree with both of your decisions -- to post the poll, and to decide to leave it where it is.

The 'official' question was just so I could get a head start on the directory -- official polls are always filed away, others are optional.

-- adaMada
__________________
Civ 3 Democracy Game:
PTW Game: Proud member of the Roleplay Team, and Ambassador to Glory of War
Intersite PTW Game: Member of Apolyton
adaMada is offline  
Old September 20, 2002, 11:21   #54
Reddawg
Prince
 
Reddawg's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Oak Ridge, El Niño, Apolyton
Posts: 423
I should have looked into this thread earlier..

Hello, my name is Reddawg, and I am a Mac user.

I don't want to have ppl saying "oh look at him, he thinks he's all special and that we shouldnt upgrade just b/c of him" etc etc... but um, if you all do upgrade and i cant access the saves anymore, it'll be very hard for me to still do the stats/maps/ and now my job as MoE. I can get access to some PC's but when it comes to making my charts and maps, it may not be possible (until, obviously PTW comes out)... I dont think the benefits of upgrading are worth it. We've played three terms on 1.21 why not finish the game on it?
Reddawg is offline  
Old September 20, 2002, 11:40   #55
Panag
MacCivilization II Democracy Game: ExodusC4BtSDG Rabbits of Caerbannog
Emperor
 
Panag's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Posts: 8,117
hi ,

double post

have a nice day

Last edited by Panag; September 20, 2002 at 11:48.
Panag is offline  
Old September 20, 2002, 11:43   #56
Panag
MacCivilization II Democracy Game: ExodusC4BtSDG Rabbits of Caerbannog
Emperor
 
Panag's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:08
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Posts: 8,117
Quote:
Originally posted by adaMada
Panag,

We shouldn't upgrade for one reason and only one reason.

We are a democracy.

Democracy isn't about the majority having a say. It's about everyone having a say. It'd be unfair to 'remove' certian players from playing, assuming that there are good reasons they haven't upgraded (Which I'm willing to trust GodKing on). To upgrade if it can be shown that this would prevent some players from playing would be Unconstitutional, and I'd be fully in support of going to the court to stop such an upgrade, assuming that the court can also find proof that it'll stop people from playing.

I will be posting more complete instructions for switching between versions/dual installing shortly. I wish we could play in 1.29f too -- for a month, I didn't play civ 3 at all because of the Demogame, which is a shame. Having said that, it it's not fair to stop anyone from playing.

Once 1.29f is out for everyone (if it ever is, which sounds like no) then my vote will be a yes. Once we start the next game, my vote will be a yes. Once we can do one of these polls and have no good reasons for not upgrading, then yes. Until then, no. Sorry .

-- adaMada
hi ,

okay , a bit more of explanion as you requested , ....

if we are a democrazy , okay fine , they way it works we can write books about it , .....

now , if we have to take everyone in account , ... well that simply just not possible , .....

we should stay with the choice that gets the most votes , ....

example , some people are not happy because the GL was used to build sun tzu , so , what do we do then , .... and this is just one example , .....

we now that the game is far from its final state , so for those who really cant get an update , sorry , but thats the way it goes , .....

you should have either bought the us version , or waited , ....

if we have to start every single opinion into account , well we just simply cant play anymore , ....

thats why we have votes

an other thing on votes , ones you voted , you voted , point , you cant go around and say , oops sorry , actually i want this , .... in the real world it aint happening neither , you made a choice , point , if you did not like it , well you should have though about before you voted , .....

for the very small group that really cant upgrade , like the MAC users , start your own game then , .....
or switch between the two , ....

why on earth would you not want to upgrade , so actually , the most people are forced to stick with an old version , a version that has more bugs , less options , ....

only because of not even 5% , ....... thats not the way a democrazy works , ..... thats for sure , ....

if we really have to wait because there is omeone with a local version , and the distribution of the patch takes two months there , well sorry , ......

then something else , some people claim they cant get the patch , well thats nonsense , its here on this site

and will the no voters please give some good valid reasons as to why they vote no , ..... thanks , this way we can understand what ever problem that might be overlooked , ....

NYE , what do you have to say from a legal point of view , ....?

have a nice day
Panag is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:08.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team