Thread Tools
Old October 30, 2002, 19:55   #1
monkspider
Civilization IV: MultiplayerCivilization IV CreatorsGalCiv Apolyton Empire
King
 
monkspider's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wichita
Posts: 1,352
Tips for people having trouble with MP
Here are a few pointers I have found to ensure optimal performance, at least until the netcode gets polished a bit.

-Make sure you download 1.04f, this is a must!
-Don't play games with anyone whose ping is greater than 200, if there are some high ping players in your room, politely tell them what the situation is, and then boot them.
-Be wary of trying to play behind a router or a firewall. Some players are having success with this, others are not.
-Don't play games with any more than 4 players or so. Too many players right now will cause the game to hang in the transition from the staging window to the setup window. One day we will have likely have 24 player matches without hiccup, but for now, keep things at 3-4 players. In fact, I have found that 1 vs 1 with a bunch of AIs is probably your best bet, but if you have to have more people, keep them at 3-4.
-Play on smaller maps, to ensure optimal performance and more lively games with fewer people.
-Make sure you're not playing with anyone with a warez/pirate version of PTW.
-Disabling Virus Protection programs while playing online may be useful as well.
-I have heard from some players that turning off auto-save as well as various unit animations can help reduce some of the lag that you may encounter once you are actually in game.
- Don't try to launch PTW through any kind of external Gamespy software, always launch through PTW directly.
-If al else fails, try finding someone close to your geographic region to play.

If you do all these things, you should look forward to some extremely fun and exciting MP games while things get polished up a bit on Firaxis' front.
__________________
http://monkspider.blogspot.com/

Last edited by monkspider; November 1, 2002 at 18:10.
monkspider is offline  
Old October 30, 2002, 20:01   #2
kittenOFchaos
Prince
 
kittenOFchaos's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Gidea Park, Essex
Posts: 678
Try to play people who are on the same OS...the best from my experience of beta-testing since June is Windows XP.

Windows ME in my opinion isn't really compatible with PTW...


I recommend using MSN or some other instant messenger device to talk to people you are playing with, crashes in the early stage could break up a game quickly.


If you try more people than 1 VS 1 make sure you all have a ping lower than 200 with all players and preferrably lower.


Also: the host player should have the most powerful computer (of the people playing), the host player suffers most slowdown and having a computer with alot of RAM can really help rectify this.



All this points to it being better to organise games outside the pathetic "lobby" and have some other means of "match-making" players.



Advise to newbies to the mp fun: defend your cities and settlers or I will attack them and you will give in

kittenOFchaos is offline  
Old October 30, 2002, 20:03   #3
kittenOFchaos
Prince
 
kittenOFchaos's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Gidea Park, Essex
Posts: 678
If you do PBEM try to play a scenario were there is alot to do each turn, or the mass regicide option (humans only for best results).

Passing a save file around when people have only pressed enter is boring...lets hope some nice fellows putout some great ww2 scenarios soon.
kittenOFchaos is offline  
Old October 30, 2002, 20:05   #4
ColdFever
Chieftain
 
ColdFever's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Luebeck, Germany
Posts: 94
I only have a minor thing to add: with few people it is more fun to play on a PANGEA world, as you do not have to play until Navigation to meet each other via oceans - one massive continent usually is more fun to play on short games with few people.
ColdFever is offline  
Old October 30, 2002, 21:02   #5
Boris Godunov
Civilization II MultiplayerApolytoners Hall of FameCivilization IV: Multiplayer
Emperor
 
Boris Godunov's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,412
Re: Tips for people having trouble with MP
Quote:
Originally posted by monkspider
One day we will have likely have 24 player matches without hiccup
I doubt it, considering MP is limited to 8 civs only.
__________________
Tutto nel mondo č burla
Boris Godunov is offline  
Old October 30, 2002, 21:04   #6
monkspider
Civilization IV: MultiplayerCivilization IV CreatorsGalCiv Apolyton Empire
King
 
monkspider's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wichita
Posts: 1,352
Kitty/Cold: Thanks for the suggestions guys.

Bory: Stop correcting me when I'm wrong, damn you.
__________________
http://monkspider.blogspot.com/
monkspider is offline  
Old October 30, 2002, 21:31   #7
Capt Dizle
ACDG3 Gaians
King
 
Local Time: 05:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,657
I used to play games at gamespy and could keep up to six players on consistently with pings twice as high as 200 so Firaxis should be able to improve this.
Capt Dizle is offline  
Old October 30, 2002, 22:00   #8
Oerdin
Deity
 
Oerdin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: In a bamboo forest hiding from Dale.
Posts: 17,436
So does the game seem to be unstable a lot of the time? If it is then it would be a sure sign of a rushed production cycle.
__________________
Christianity is the belief in a cosmic Jewish zombie who can give us eternal life if we symbolically eat his flesh and blood and telepathically tell him that we accept him as our lord and master so he can remove an evil force present in all humanity because a woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from an apple tree.

Last edited by Oerdin; October 30, 2002 at 22:10.
Oerdin is offline  
Old October 30, 2002, 22:05   #9
monkspider
Civilization IV: MultiplayerCivilization IV CreatorsGalCiv Apolyton Empire
King
 
monkspider's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wichita
Posts: 1,352
UPDATE-
The only games that seem to be working on a reliable basis are two player games, that is only two human players, but with a few AI civs.
So don't try any games with more than two human players. Try a small pangea map with another human and two or three AI civs.
__________________
http://monkspider.blogspot.com/
monkspider is offline  
Old October 30, 2002, 22:12   #10
Oerdin
Deity
 
Oerdin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: In a bamboo forest hiding from Dale.
Posts: 17,436
Does it seem to be a problem with the server or with the software itself?
__________________
Christianity is the belief in a cosmic Jewish zombie who can give us eternal life if we symbolically eat his flesh and blood and telepathically tell him that we accept him as our lord and master so he can remove an evil force present in all humanity because a woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from an apple tree.
Oerdin is offline  
Old October 30, 2002, 22:20   #11
Boris Godunov
Civilization II MultiplayerApolytoners Hall of FameCivilization IV: Multiplayer
Emperor
 
Boris Godunov's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,412
Quote:
Originally posted by monkspider
Bory: Stop correcting me when I'm wrong, damn you.
Like on the evolution debate?



Alright, I need to test out MP...
__________________
Tutto nel mondo č burla
Boris Godunov is offline  
Old October 30, 2002, 22:49   #12
Tuberski
 
Tuberski's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: ACK!! PPHHHHTTBBBTTTT!!!
Posts: 7,022
Sounds like MP is a bust at the moment.
__________________
"I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry, and that's extra scary to me. There's a large out of focus monster roaming the countryside. Look out, he's fuzzy, let's get out of here."
Tuberski is offline  
Old October 30, 2002, 22:59   #13
Boris Godunov
Civilization II MultiplayerApolytoners Hall of FameCivilization IV: Multiplayer
Emperor
 
Boris Godunov's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,412
Did you get PTW yet, Tube?
__________________
Tutto nel mondo č burla
Boris Godunov is offline  
Old October 30, 2002, 23:09   #14
monkspider
Civilization IV: MultiplayerCivilization IV CreatorsGalCiv Apolyton Empire
King
 
monkspider's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wichita
Posts: 1,352
It's not a total bust, there's still quite a bit of fun to be had in games with 1 on 1 and AI civs.
The various single player features are impeccable, with no bugs to speak of.
__________________
http://monkspider.blogspot.com/
monkspider is offline  
Old October 30, 2002, 23:14   #15
Boris Godunov
Civilization II MultiplayerApolytoners Hall of FameCivilization IV: Multiplayer
Emperor
 
Boris Godunov's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,412
monkie, let's play.
__________________
Tutto nel mondo č burla
Boris Godunov is offline  
Old October 30, 2002, 23:42   #16
Tuberski
 
Tuberski's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: ACK!! PPHHHHTTBBBTTTT!!!
Posts: 7,022
Quote:
Originally posted by Boris Godunov
Did you get PTW yet, Tube?
Nope, didn't even realize it had been released until today, and to think, I was at Wal Mart last night, and didn't mosey over to the electronics section......

ACK!
__________________
"I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry, and that's extra scary to me. There's a large out of focus monster roaming the countryside. Look out, he's fuzzy, let's get out of here."
Tuberski is offline  
Old October 31, 2002, 01:33   #17
monkspider
Civilization IV: MultiplayerCivilization IV CreatorsGalCiv Apolyton Empire
King
 
monkspider's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wichita
Posts: 1,352
Hey Bory, do you have MSN or any other of the various chatting aparatuses?
__________________
http://monkspider.blogspot.com/
monkspider is offline  
Old October 31, 2002, 03:31   #18
ColdFever
Chieftain
 
ColdFever's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Luebeck, Germany
Posts: 94
one more thing: if you have disconnection problems try to disable any antivirus-software. On my machine I had to disable "F-Secure Antivirus" to play without frequent ingame disconnections.
ColdFever is offline  
Old October 31, 2002, 07:44   #19
Turambar
Call to Power II Democracy GameCivilization II PBEMCall to Power Democracy GameCTP2 Source Code Project
Prince
 
Local Time: 10:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: England
Posts: 310
Does anyone know if I'll be able to play multiplayer from behind my university firewall?
Turambar is offline  
Old October 31, 2002, 08:04   #20
notyoueither
Civilization III MultiplayerCivilization III PBEMInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamApolytoners Hall of FameCiv4 InterSite DG: Apolyton TeamPolyCast TeamPtWDG Gathering StormC4DG Gathering Storm
Deity
 
notyoueither's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: of naught
Posts: 21,300
The rumors of only 1 on 1 are false.

Yes, it works better if you are all close. However, I have hosted 7 other players.

High ping times will kill you. For instance, if I hosted someone from Europe, that would drag things.

Then if I hosted someone from SE Asia, that would make things worse.

Bottom line, keep the ping times down, and it will work.
__________________
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
notyoueither is offline  
Old October 31, 2002, 09:40   #21
metalhead
Warlord
 
metalhead's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 158
notyoueither, I wouldn't say they are false. I tried entering 4 different games, and crashed every time. Now, it is possible that after I went to bed, less traffic or server maintenance or some other factor allowed it to function properly, but even with low pings, everyone that was trying to play the same time as me (9-11 PM EST) was not able to play.
__________________
Wadsworth: Professor Plum, you were once a professor of psychiatry specializing in helping paranoid and homicidal lunatics suffering from delusions of grandeur.
Professor Plum: Yes, but now I work for the United Nations.
Wadsworth: Well your work has not changed.
metalhead is offline  
Old October 31, 2002, 10:56   #22
SpencerH
Civilization III PBEMCivilization III MultiplayerBtS Tri-League
Emperor
 
SpencerH's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Back in BAMA full time.
Posts: 4,502
So whats the problem with WIN ME?
__________________
We need seperate human-only games for MP/PBEM that dont include the over-simplifications required to have a good AI
If any man be thirsty, let him come unto me and drink. Vampire 7:37
Just one old soldiers opinion. E Tenebris Lux. Pax quaeritur bello.
SpencerH is offline  
Old October 31, 2002, 11:58   #23
Boris Godunov
Civilization II MultiplayerApolytoners Hall of FameCivilization IV: Multiplayer
Emperor
 
Boris Godunov's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,412
Quote:
Originally posted by monkspider
Hey Bory, do you have MSN or any other of the various chatting aparatuses?
yeah, I have msn... dosifei@hotmail.com
__________________
Tutto nel mondo č burla
Boris Godunov is offline  
Old October 31, 2002, 14:15   #24
monkspider
Civilization IV: MultiplayerCivilization IV CreatorsGalCiv Apolyton Empire
King
 
monkspider's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wichita
Posts: 1,352
Thanks Boris
I'm monkspider@hotmail.com

Now on the topic of more than one on one matches, I have been getting some PMs asking if there is any way whatsoever to play in games that have more than 2 humans. It *is* possible, but I can only advice that the most masochistic of souls try it.
If you follow the advice outlined in this thread, make sure no one is behind a router or firewall, running an out of date or pirated copy, no one has a ping below 200, possibly make sure no one is running Windows ME (I'm not sure on that one personally) and take time out before hand to hope for the best, you can maybe get a game going with four people. However, even if you do get it going, you can expect to be playing for an hour and only be at 3200 BC. It's really, really, really, laggy.
I have never heard of any games getting started with more than four people, but they may be theoretically possible.
__________________
http://monkspider.blogspot.com/
monkspider is offline  
Old October 31, 2002, 16:25   #25
ggerrietts
Settler
 
ggerrietts's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 15
routers? firewalls?
Is the router/firewall issue a simple matter of port discovery at this point, or do we think the networking code is doing something stupid, like use externally-perceived IP addresses in addressing game-level packets?

Is the NAT/routers/firewalls problem only with hosting, and not with playing? I tried to get into the only available game I saw last night, and found that it had disappeared by the time I managed to get in -- or it crashed, or whatever.

Has anyone done work to identify whether it's the NAT or the firewall that causes the problem? I have some spare routable IPs but I don't really have anyone I know, that I can test with (and it'll be well into the evening, PDT, before I can be available to put a couple hours into it, anyway).

Do we think the problems have to do with the way the networking code was written, or is it just buggy code? In the latter case, there's very little that we can do to ease the pain; it's all about bugfixes. But in the former case, whole network topologies may be excluded from play.

I'm a little disappointed that the primary selling feature of this $30 add-on (namely, the multiplayer support) seems to be the piece that received the least amount of attention, in favor of inventing new game modes. I would have happily avoided turnless or regicide or whatever, if I could at least play the game against real people with distinct personalities.
__________________
--G.
ggerrietts is offline  
Old October 31, 2002, 16:39   #26
SpencerH
Civilization III PBEMCivilization III MultiplayerBtS Tri-League
Emperor
 
SpencerH's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Back in BAMA full time.
Posts: 4,502
Quote:
Originally posted by monkspider
Thanks Boris
I'm monkspider@hotmail.com

Now on the topic of more than one on one matches, I have been getting some PMs asking if there is any way whatsoever to play in games that have more than 2 humans. It *is* possible, but I can only advice that the most masochistic of souls try it.
If you follow the advice outlined in this thread, make sure no one is behind a router or firewall, running an out of date or pirated copy, no one has a ping below 200, possibly make sure no one is running Windows ME (I'm not sure on that one personally) and take time out before hand to hope for the best, you can maybe get a game going with four people. However, even if you do get it going, you can expect to be playing for an hour and only be at 3200 BC. It's really, really, really, laggy.
I have never heard of any games getting started with more than four people, but they may be theoretically possible.
I just dont get this. 8 people playing PBEM with broadband could have a faster game than what you're describing. Surely multiplayer doesnt require the same amount of data movement as sending bics everywhere. How can it be so slow ?
__________________
We need seperate human-only games for MP/PBEM that dont include the over-simplifications required to have a good AI
If any man be thirsty, let him come unto me and drink. Vampire 7:37
Just one old soldiers opinion. E Tenebris Lux. Pax quaeritur bello.
SpencerH is offline  
Old October 31, 2002, 18:01   #27
NeOmega
Prince
 
NeOmega's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Play Pentagenesis Beta!
Posts: 351
Quote:
Originally posted by SpencerH


I just dont get this. 8 people playing PBEM with broadband could have a faster game than what you're describing. Surely multiplayer doesnt require the same amount of data movement as sending bics everywhere. How can it be so slow ?
I think a lot of it has to do with the customizabiltiy of the game.

Alsio, I played 2 games with four people. The first was turn based, and slow. The second was simultaneous, and no that bad, except for the very beginning.
NeOmega is offline  
Old October 31, 2002, 19:48   #28
notyoueither
Civilization III MultiplayerCivilization III PBEMInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamApolytoners Hall of FameCiv4 InterSite DG: Apolyton TeamPolyCast TeamPtWDG Gathering StormC4DG Gathering Storm
Deity
 
notyoueither's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: of naught
Posts: 21,300
Quote:
Originally posted by metalhead
notyoueither, I wouldn't say they are false. I tried entering 4 different games, and crashed every time. Now, it is possible that after I went to bed, less traffic or server maintenance or some other factor allowed it to function properly, but even with low pings, everyone that was trying to play the same time as me (9-11 PM EST) was not able to play.
You may have a point about server load at GameSpy. I am not too familiar with how that works.

I can say that I responded to say that it is possible to play with 3 or 4, or more, players.

I have hosted 7. That game was very slow, due to the number of players and geography, but it can be done if all the players have figured out what they need to do to be successful.
__________________
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
notyoueither is offline  
Old October 31, 2002, 23:42   #29
Zamphyr
Settler
 
Zamphyr's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 16
Quote:
Is the NAT/routers/firewalls problem only with hosting, and not with playing? I tried to get into the only available game I saw last night, and found that it had disappeared by the time I managed to get in -- or it crashed, or whatever.

Games are only up while the are being formed, you snooze you lose.


Quote:
Is the router/firewall issue a simple matter of port discovery at this point, or do we think the networking code is doing something stupid, like use externally-perceived IP addresses in addressing game-level packets?
the readme has all the port forwarding info in it. As for your offer to test, please do. I have the game on 3 machines on my LAN. All can join games(or host for that matter) but they cannot join the same game. This means my roomates and I can't get into a war with our buds in MD. I've heard there are programs to mask/adjust external and internal IP's but don't know that much about them.
Again any help is welcome.
__________________
-Over 20 million albums sold worldwide
Zamphyr is offline  
Old November 1, 2002, 02:43   #30
ggerrietts
Settler
 
ggerrietts's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 15
well, that SOUNDS like using externally-visible IPs to address packets. It's possible that they simply built something in to disallow multiple clients from a single IP, but I don't think that's a decision most developers would actually make; too much NAT in the world.

I haven't tried to do any protocol analysis (and won't) but that strategy suggests that everyone gets the network traffic for all endpoints, which in turn can be exploited to gain unfair information about an opponent's activities. Hopefully I'm wrong on both counts; if I'm not, the network code isn't going to be as good as your average FPS or RTS game's network code without a major rewrite.

Thanks for the pointer to the README. I should have checked first, but I was at work and wondering, and the game was at home (and beckoning).
__________________
--G.
ggerrietts is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:05.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright Š The Apolyton Team