Thread Tools
Old December 18, 2002, 00:25   #1
DanS
Apolytoners Hall of FameApolyCon 06 Participants
Deity
 
DanS's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Not your daddy's Benjamins
Posts: 10,737
60% of Americans Support Nuking Iraq
...if Iraq uses chemical or biological weapons against our troops.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2002Dec17.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv...data121802.htm

OUR WORDS ARE BACKED WITH NUCLEAR WEAPONS!!!
__________________
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

Last edited by DanS; December 18, 2002 at 00:35.
DanS is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 01:08   #2
Kontiki
King
 
Local Time: 08:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,920
I'm actually surprised it's that low.

I think it's more intersting that only 26% of Americans support attacking Iraq unilaterally, and that support for war in general is dropping.
__________________
"The French caused the war [Persian Gulf war, 1991]" - Ned
"you people who bash Bush have no appreciation for one of the great presidents in our history." - Ned
"I wish I had gay sex in the boy scouts" - Dissident
Kontiki is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 01:18   #3
TCO
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
TCO's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 8,057
There were a lot of cold feet last time. 90% of Democratic senators voted against supporting the war and for forbidding the war (last time round). It was only popular once we won so dramatically.
TCO is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 01:25   #4
Capt Dizle
ACDG3 Gaians
King
 
Local Time: 07:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,657
Very interesting polling data. 4 out of 5 believe that Iraq poses a "big" threat to America but about half feel that its not an immediate threat.

I would hate to see the use of nukes. In my mind its a threshold we should not cross. Maybe if it were a small tactical used against only a military target. Nuking Bagdad is beyond the pale.

Also interesting is that the polling data shows a lot of dissatisfaction with the costs of heath care and prescription drugs. Shades of Hillary, does anyone think one of the Democratic candidates will have the balls to run on national health care?
Capt Dizle is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 01:39   #5
Pekka
Emperor
 
Pekka's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Xrr ZRRRRRRR!!
Posts: 6,484
I support full attack on Iraq, the sooner the better. I will NOT support any kind of nuking, except if Saddam really uses chemical and biological weapons big time, not just little testing. And that time I want Dubya to clearly give the evidence of that happening, I don't want to see any nuking and then 'yeah we have evidence, but it's secret' crap. Just fight like men. Not like wussies.
But I believe that nuking is so much out of US interests, that it's not likely to happen.

If nuking happens, it can start something we can only guess. Terrorism does NOT stop, it fuels its fire ^1000.
Let's hope it doesn't come to that.
__________________
In da butt.
"Do not worry if others do not understand you. Instead worry if you do not understand others." - Confucius
THE UNDEFEATED SUPERCITIZEN w:4 t:2 l:1 (DON'T ASK!)
"God is dead" - Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" - God.
Pekka is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 01:54   #6
DanS
Apolytoners Hall of FameApolyCon 06 Participants
Deity
 
DanS's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Not your daddy's Benjamins
Posts: 10,737
Personally, before reading the poll, I put at least chemical WMD in a much lower class than nukes. But apparently the majority of my fellow Americans see little difference among the three. This is surprising to me.
__________________
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
DanS is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 01:57   #7
Urban Ranger
NationStatesApolyton Storywriters' GuildNever Ending Stories
Deity
 
Urban Ranger's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
Posts: 14,606
You seriously don't want to use nuclear weapons. Otherwise all hell breaks loose.
__________________
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
Urban Ranger is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 01:58   #8
DanS
Apolytoners Hall of FameApolyCon 06 Participants
Deity
 
DanS's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Not your daddy's Benjamins
Posts: 10,737
Apparently, the majority of Americans believe that if chemical or biological weapons are used, then hell has already broken loose.
__________________
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
DanS is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 02:08   #9
Bereta_Eder
Settler
 
Bereta_Eder's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 65,535
The only difference is that chemicals will be used on your invading soldiers

whereas nukes will be used in inocent civilians


get it?
Bereta_Eder is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 02:12   #10
TCO
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
TCO's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 8,057
Wiser heads are looking at these options at the CINC and NCA levels. Decisions like that won't be done by poll. Although the strong support gives Bush some more freedom to act and to threaten.

(But isn't it all academic anyway? I thought all our faithful pacifists beleive the Iraqi claims of no WMD and claims that US is full of it for saying there are any.)
TCO is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 02:13   #11
DanS
Apolytoners Hall of FameApolyCon 06 Participants
Deity
 
DanS's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Not your daddy's Benjamins
Posts: 10,737
The law of war precludes use of chemical weapons. In this sense, our soldiers are just as "innocent" as civilians.

At least that's apparently what the majority thinks.
__________________
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
DanS is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 02:13   #12
TCO
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
TCO's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 8,057
You look good in that picture, fooker. Kind of crying game cute. Just don't show me your wee wee.
TCO is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 02:16   #13
TCO
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
TCO's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 8,057
DanS, I doubt nukes will be used. 1. We are not targeting civilians. All the individual strikes get vetted for collateral damage likelihood. 2. I doubt there will be formations where a battlefield nuke will be necessary.
TCO is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 02:17   #14
TCO
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
TCO's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 8,057
Plus of course there is the global warming danger. Unless we can ship some engineers over there fast.
TCO is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 02:19   #15
chequita guevara
ACDG The Human HiveDiplomacyApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
chequita guevara's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Fort LOLderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Posts: 9,091
They might use some of those bunker nukes they've been talking about (don't know if they've actually been developed).
__________________
Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...
chequita guevara is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 02:21   #16
DanS
Apolytoners Hall of FameApolyCon 06 Participants
Deity
 
DanS's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Not your daddy's Benjamins
Posts: 10,737
Of course, GP. But if presented with that question, what would you say?

I'm interested in the perception of the different WMD. Without much thought, I doubted the linkage among the various WMD, and even the WMD verbal conglomeration. But apparently, the argument for such strong linkage hardly needs to be made--it must be self-evident to the majority.
__________________
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
DanS is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 02:22   #17
Urban Ranger
NationStatesApolyton Storywriters' GuildNever Ending Stories
Deity
 
Urban Ranger's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
Posts: 14,606
Quote:
Originally posted by DanS
Apparently, the majority of Americans believe that if chemical or biological weapons are used, then hell has already broken loose.
Is that why GWB wants to deploy the Missile Shield in '04, when even Rumsfeld admits its crapolarity?
__________________
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
Urban Ranger is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 02:28   #18
Pekka
Emperor
 
Pekka's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Xrr ZRRRRRRR!!
Posts: 6,484
If Saddam clearly uses these weapons against large amounts of troops and perhaps Israel too, then maybe nuking could come into consideration.. but even then it shouldn't be obvious choice. If he uses them against few hundrer man.. then I can't see the point of keeping principals and nuking anyway. Threat is not enough, even if he does so it might not be enough.. if large amounts of people are subjected to it, then maybe.

If Saddam is going to use them, he's also keeping his military targets inside Baghdad or so, that nuking comes more difficult because of civilian casualties. If it happens however, and nuking is response.. it will tear the world apart in opinions and bad image which won't go away in long long long time, and shouldn't be even expected.
I still believe reason and rationality wins.
__________________
In da butt.
"Do not worry if others do not understand you. Instead worry if you do not understand others." - Confucius
THE UNDEFEATED SUPERCITIZEN w:4 t:2 l:1 (DON'T ASK!)
"God is dead" - Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" - God.
Pekka is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 02:30   #19
Bereta_Eder
Settler
 
Bereta_Eder's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 65,535
Good to have you back navy
Quote:
Originally posted by GP
You look good in that picture, fooker. Kind of crying game cute. Just don't show me your wee wee.
I'm gonna show it to you.
Bereta_Eder is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 02:33   #20
DanS
Apolytoners Hall of FameApolyCon 06 Participants
Deity
 
DanS's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Not your daddy's Benjamins
Posts: 10,737
"Is that why GWB wants to deploy the Missile Shield in '04, when even Rumsfeld admits its crapolarity?"

Am I GWB's spokesperson?

Yes? Oh, OK then. I've said all I have to say about it. I refer you to the defense department.
__________________
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
DanS is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 03:03   #21
TCO
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
TCO's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 8,057
Quote:
Originally posted by DanS
Of course, GP. But if presented with that question, what would you say?

I'm interested in the perception of the different WMD. Without much thought, I doubted the linkage among the various WMD, and even the WMD verbal conglomeration. But apparently, the argument for such strong linkage hardly needs to be made--it must be self-evident to the majority.
I'm not an expert on the use of chem or nuclear weapons. But I would be very hesitant to use nuclear weapons in retaliation for chemical ones. What would you accomplish? Of course, I love letting Saddam (and his French/Euro sympahtizers) sweat about it. But I doubt i would use them. I might consider using chemical weapons back if I really needed to. (and there was some advantage for instance in our protective equipment or some agent that we filter that they don't. But I doubt that is necessary anyway.)
TCO is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 03:22   #22
alva
Civilization III PBEMPtWDG2 Cake or Death?PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamC4DG Gathering Storm
Deity
 
alva's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Republic of Flanders
Posts: 10,747
Are people actually considering nukes ???
Even IF chemical weapons are used.

That would set the world back a couple of decenia, and slow down the next ones aswell.....
(This isn't a Worldwar (yet)!!! )
__________________
#There’s a city in my mind
Come along and take that ride
And it’s all right, baby, it’s all right #
alva is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 04:43   #23
Robert Plomp
admin
DiploGamesBtS Tri-LeaguePolyCast TeamC4WDG Team Apolyton
Administrator
 
Robert Plomp's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Delft, The Netherlands
Posts: 11,635
Iraq should not be nuked,
unless Iraq starts to use ABC weapons on a large scale against ie. israel. In that case it shouldn't be used as wrath, but to stop them. (like against Japan in WWII)

but I really hope things won't get that far, because hell will break out after that. (but if Iraq starts to use ABC to israel things will go crazy anyway)

In that case I would say, nuke the entire ME entirely,
and solve all those problems the dirty way
(yes I am kidding, always save to say that)
__________________
Formerly known as "CyberShy"
Carpe Diem tamen Memento Mori
Robert Plomp is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 04:47   #24
TheStinger
Civilization III Democracy Game
King
 
TheStinger's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: International crime fighting playboy
Posts: 1,063
America I don't think would nuke back, they would know that a concentional win was only a few days away.

Israel however with Sharon in charge could nuke em if attacked by chemical or bio weapons.
__________________
Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.
Douglas Adams (Influential author)
TheStinger is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 05:02   #25
MichaeltheGreat
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
Apolyton Grand Executioner
 
MichaeltheGreat's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Fenway Pahk
Posts: 1,755
Chemical weapons can be dispersed by either ballistic missiles, OR by conventional artillery.

CW munitions were captured last time in and around knocked out Soviet made 2S1 and 2S3 SP arty.

MOPP suits (especially depending on weather conditions) and NBC procedures have a huge effect on combat efficiency, and the mass casualty potential from a coordinated attack is pretty huge.

There wouldn't necessarily be much to nuke though, because Iraqi forces would be dispersed to hell, and I would be surprised in the extreme if a retaliatory strike was ordered against a civilian population center.

You could be that the Iraqi military would be ****ed, though - and if any prisoners managed to be taken, there would be an effort to determine if they were involved in use of CW or BW agents. If that were the case, I'd expect a quick trip to a post and an appointment with Allah.
__________________
Bush-Cheney 2008. What's another amendment between friends?
*******
When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all.
MichaeltheGreat is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 05:03   #26
Gatekeeper
Mac
King
 
Gatekeeper's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: United States of America
Posts: 2,306
I'd like to think it'd take a helluva lot of U.S. soldiers dying in in a chemical or biological attack before we'd even consider retaliating in kind, let alone using nuclear weaponry.

But, as others have said, Israel is a wildcard. If Saddam knows he's going down, he'd do everything in his power to smite Israel. If that smiting included chemical or biological agents ... well, let's just say that Israel would be like a bull in a china shop.

Personally, I think North Korea is a more deadly threat right now than Iraq ...

And, Paiktis, I really do think that if the U.S. used nuclear weapons, it'd be the tactical stuff on a military target, not civilian. Of course, that might not keep Saddam from piling on the civilians on his important targets, like he did in 1990-91.

Gatekeeper
__________________
"I may not agree with what you have to say, but I'll die defending your right to say it." — Voltaire

"Wheresoever you go, go with all your heart." — Confucius
Gatekeeper is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 05:48   #27
Kepler
Settler
 
Kepler's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lovely Oregon
Posts: 5
The public is, let's put it gently, easily led. The Bushies have been banging the war gongs now for quite a while, and obviously big numbers will fall into line.

"Wanna nuke somebody? No?! You don't HATE America... do you?"

War fever is ginned up about as high as it can go right now, and it wouldn't be a bad time to do some leaking in order to get the racists off the front page. I'd still like to believe these clowns are just playing at 60's-style brinksmanship, but since there's not a brain cell among them, they may just launch in the name of Jesus, and 6000 years of human progress be damned.
__________________
It is much easier to be critical than to be correct. Benjamin Disraeli
Kepler is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 05:57   #28
Chris 62
Spanish CiversCivilization II MultiplayerApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
Chris 62's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the memmories of the past
Posts: 4,487
Looks like Sloww's prediction about Iraq being turned to glass if heated properly may come to pass.
__________________
I believe Saddam because his position is backed up by logic and reason...David Floyd
i'm an ignorant greek...MarkG
Chris 62 is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 06:01   #29
monkspider
Civilization IV: MultiplayerCivilization IV CreatorsGalCiv Apolyton Empire
King
 
monkspider's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wichita
Posts: 1,352
This is very saddening, since it is essentially saying in no uncertain terms that the majority of Americans support the killing of millions of people, no matter what, and damn the consequences. Lo, what bleak times await this country.
We have fallen to despicable levels of greed, materialism, and a thirst for blood. The only way this country is going to find lasting peace, is by learning the doctrine of peace itself.
__________________
http://monkspider.blogspot.com/
monkspider is offline  
Old December 18, 2002, 06:08   #30
Kepler
Settler
 
Kepler's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lovely Oregon
Posts: 5
Myths about Americans aside, we are not a peaceful people. We expanded like cholera until we filled the continent (along with two vassal states in the parts we didn't want), and ever since we've been shaking our MIRV-headed cocks around like Rammstein in heat.

We are the big, dumb jock who starts all the bar fights. Don't mess with us, and don't bother trying to reason with us. Just give us your best looking women and shut the ef up.
__________________
It is much easier to be critical than to be correct. Benjamin Disraeli
Kepler is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team