 |
View Poll Results: 3 days, multichoice
|
|
|
SW: Red
|
   
|
2 |
5.13% |
|
SW: Yellow
|
  
|
2 |
5.13% |
|
SW: green
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
|
SW: blue
|
  
|
3 |
7.69% |
|
SW: pink
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
|
SW: light blue
|
  
|
1 |
2.56% |
|
SW: Write-In
|
|
1 |
2.56% |
|
East of New Suez: Red
|
|
6 |
15.38% |
|
East of New Suez: Blue
|
|
0 |
0% |
|
East of New Suez: Green
|
|
1 |
2.56% |
|
East of New Suez: Write-In
|
|
0 |
0% |
|
East of New Suez: Don't Build There!
|
|
2 |
5.13% |
|
East of TBIBTU: Blue
|
|
0 |
0% |
|
East of TBIBTU: Red
|
|
3 |
7.69% |
|
East of TBIBTU: Yellow
|
|
2 |
5.13% |
|
East of TBIBTU: Green
|
|
1 |
2.56% |
|
East of TBIBTU: White (will require removal of fungus)
|
|
0 |
0% |
|
East of TBIBTU: Pink
|
|
1 |
2.56% |
|
East of TBIBTU: light blue (will require fungus removal)
|
|
1 |
2.56% |
|
East of TBIBTU: Don't Build There!
|
|
3 |
7.69% |
|
East of Concordia: Yes
|
|
8 |
20.51% |
|
East of Concordia: No!
|
|
2 |
5.13% |
|
Xenobanana
|
|
0 |
0% |
Xenobanana (from the other poll  )
|
|
0 |
0% |
|
December 19, 2002, 21:12
|
#1
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 09:57
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,783
|
Official: Base Locations Pt 2
this is part 2 of a very large cp-moving poll.
the bases south of new tassagrad. the CP for this base has not yet been built
South-West
East of New Suez. you may vote not to go there at all.
East of TBIBTU? you may vote not to go there at all.
East of Concordia? yes or no.
i don't know if any pods are in production in any of these bases, but the F7 screen said we had several in production, so this must mean queues, as i didn't see any in the F4 screen. and i...just won't go through every single base's build queues
Last edited by Method; December 19, 2002 at 21:25.
|
|
|
|
|
December 19, 2002, 23:38
|
#2
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 23:57
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,851
|
SW Write-in: 2 tiles NE of red.
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 20, 2002, 10:45
|
#3
|
|
Prince
Local Time: 07:57
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Washington, DC, USA
Posts: 565
|
SW: red gives us access to the southern seas, and untold possibilities for exploration and contact.
E. of New Suez is essential to stem further Morganic expansion. Red gives us the least overlap, a seacoast, and proximity to Morgan's nearest base.
E. of TBIBTU still have too much black. There might be enough land for two bases, or sunseen specials. I think there should be a base there (write-in wasn't an option for that one), but not until we've seen more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 20, 2002, 13:39
|
#4
|
Local Time: 14:57
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Gent, Belgium
Posts: 10,712
|
As it seems there's a large majority for building a base east of Concordia, I'd like to propose considering bulding such a base one tile more into the NW. That way more land (and the energy special) will be included in the base radius, at the cost of a mere overlap of one tile (which will probaby be crawled anyway).
__________________
Contraria sunt Complementa. -- Niels Bohr
Mods: SMAniaC (SMAC) & Planetfall (Civ4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 20, 2002, 13:46
|
#5
|
Local Time: 12:57
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Oxford or Northampton, England
Posts: 8,116
|
I'd say crawl the energy to a base built as an energy powerhousee, to have the TOE and Supercolider.
__________________
Smile
For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
But he would think of something
"Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 20, 2002, 19:55
|
#6
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 09:57
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,783
|
GT and maniac: AFAIK, both the tiles you suggested are fungus. we *could* remove it i suppose....
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 20, 2002, 20:24
|
#7
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 23:57
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,851
|
|
Quote:
|
|
GT and maniac: AFAIK, both the tiles you suggested are fungus. we *could* remove it i suppose....
|
The tile I suggested is forest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 20, 2002, 21:03
|
#8
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 09:57
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,783
|
no it's not. look closer. 2 NE of red is fungus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 20, 2002, 21:14
|
#9
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 23:57
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,851
|
Oh, I see. I was thinking of the end of the red line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 20, 2002, 21:30
|
#10
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 09:57
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,783
|
ah, i see. that was put in to show where there would be a base.
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 21, 2002, 11:17
|
#11
|
|
Prince
Local Time: 14:57
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 910
|
Voted. I agree with Maniac about that base near Concordia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 21, 2002, 12:13
|
#12
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 09:57
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,783
|
FYI, i'd have to be 2 tile NW to get the energy 
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:57.
|
|
