Thread Tools
Old January 19, 2003, 08:39   #1
zulu9812
King
 
zulu9812's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: of Scotland
Posts: 1,383
Weapon evidence not needed says Hoon
(as in Geoff Hoon, British Defence Secretary)

quote from AOL:

Quote:
UN WEAPONS inspectors do not need to find a "smoking gun" proving Iraq still has weapons of mass destruction in order to trigger war, says the Defence Secretary.

Geoff Hoon says it could be enough for the inspection teams led simply to obtain "persuasive evidence" that Saddam Hussein still has nuclear, biological or chemicals weapons to warrant military strikes by Britain and the US.

Mr Hoon's comments will further alarm Labour backbenchers already unhappy at the momentum building behind military action.

"Clearly we believe there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq," he said in an interview with The Sunday Telegraph.

"We would expect Hans Blix and his team to discover indications of them - a shell or a missile or something clearly prohibited, or documentary evidence," he said.

"They may interview someone who has been working on these programmes who may explain what has been going on.

"It's not literally a smoking gun. It is persuasive evidence that confirms what we believe to be the case - that there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq."

The paper said Mr Hoon made clear that he would be mobilising elements of the 7th Armoured Brigade this week for operations in the Gulf.

It is expected that an announcement will be made - possibly as early as Monday - that up to 14,000 troops, with around 150 Challenger 2 battle tanks, are being placed on standby ready to move.

He acknowledged the "anxieties" in the country, and said that Britain would try to gain a fresh resolution of the United Nations Security Council before military strikes were launched.
Hah! Knew it! We'll go to war regardless of any evidence of WoMDs!
__________________
Up the Irons!
Rogue CivIII FAQ!
Odysseus and the March of Time
I think holding hands can be more erotic than 'slamming it in the ass' - Pekka, thinking that he's messed up
zulu9812 is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 08:49   #2
Az
Emperor
 
Local Time: 17:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: A pub.
Posts: 3,161
wow, you've caught them red-handed.

__________________
urgh.NSFW
Az is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 09:51   #3
Dauphin
Civilization IV PBEMPolyCast Team
Deity
 
Dauphin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Seouenaca, Cantium
Posts: 12,426
If they attack, and after the invasion no weapons are found, then I hope the whole world kicks up a big stink over the US and UK actions. If however weapons are found, we give them a pat on the back and say "Sorry we didn't trust you".

Neither of these things will happen, but they should.
__________________
"Everybody knows you never go full retard. You went full retard man. Never go full retard"
Dauphin is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 09:53   #4
Az
Emperor
 
Local Time: 17:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: A pub.
Posts: 3,161
Big Crunch the uncurable romantic.
__________________
urgh.NSFW
Az is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 14:33   #5
Sandman
King
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Just one more thing
Posts: 1,733
If there's no evidence, then that just proves he's hiding something!
Sandman is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 14:46   #6
Proteus_MST
King
 
Proteus_MST's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Yuggoth
Posts: 1,987
And thats also the difference to North Korea.

With North Korea we already know that it (very propably) has already some Nuclear Warheads and that it can produce up to 6 new Bombs every half year, if the Nuclear Plant is reopened.

So there is no reason to invade North Korea to check if it has Weapons of Mass Destruction, because we already know it has them.

As for Saddam we donīt know if he has WoMDs, he says no, but we canīt trust him, so it is inevitable that we have to invade the country to allow the UN-Inspectors to check evrery inch of the country without Saddam having a chance to hide anything from view.

So we don´t get away without war. If he say he doesn´t have WoMDs, we would have to invade his country to prove the contrary and if he says he has em, we also have to invade the country to punish him
__________________
Applications programming is a race between software engineers, who strive to produce idiot-proof programs, and the Universe which strives to produce bigger idiots. - software engineers' saying
So far, the Universe is winning.
- applications programmers' saying
Proteus_MST is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 17:38   #7
Nubclear
NationStatesCall to Power II Democracy GameInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamRise of Nations MultiplayerACDG The Human HiveNever Ending StoriesACDG The Free DronesACDG The Cybernetic ConsciousnessGalCiv Apolyton EmpireACDG3 SpartansC4DG Team Alpha CentauriansCiv4 SP Democracy GameDiplomacyAlpha Centauri PBEMCivilization IV PBEMAlpha Centauri Democracy GameACDG Peace
PolyCast Thread Necromancer
 
Nubclear's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: We are all Asher now.
Posts: 1,437
Quote:
Originally posted by Sagacious Dolphin
If they attack, and after the invasion no weapons are found, then I hope the whole world kicks up a big stink over the US and UK actions. If however weapons are found, we give them a pat on the back and say "Sorry we didn't trust you".

Neither of these things will happen, but they should.
Um, if they invade and weapons are found, its likely because the US planted them there ot say "I told you so".

Nubclear is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 17:56   #8
mrmitchell
Civilization III Democracy GamePtWDG RoleplayCall to Power Democracy GameInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamNationStatesPtWDG2 Tabemono
King
 
mrmitchell's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,394
Tass, I don't know if the Evil Powers of the US range that far, but it's not to be ruled out.

Then again, supposing that there are no weapons found, we can just say we got rid of them ourselves, not wanting such a menace on the world.
__________________
meet the new boss, same as the old boss
mrmitchell is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 18:14   #9
Xian
Warlord
 
Local Time: 14:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 264
So what if SAddam has wepaons?

Keep in mind that the Us has the biggest store of weapons of mass destruction in the world, and in fact ahs sold them and used them to/in Turkey and Isreal to name just 2 out of many.

What right do they have to stab a former us client in the back? Furhtermore, if we have the right to wage war on them, then dont Vietnam, Panama, Iraq, Palestinians, East Timorians etc. all have the right to wage war on us?
Xian is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 18:23   #10
Lawrence of Arabia
PtWDG Gathering StormMac
King
 
Lawrence of Arabia's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: California Republic
Posts: 1,240
If Saddam has them, he will use them. On US troops.
__________________
"Everything for the State, nothing against the State, nothing outside the State" - Benito Mussolini
Lawrence of Arabia is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 19:03   #11
Hueij
Emperor
 
Hueij's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Kokonino Kounty
Posts: 4,263
Quote:
Originally posted by Lawrence of Arabia
If Saddam has them, he will use them. On US troops.
Well, just keep the US troops at home then...
__________________
Within weeks they'll be re-opening the shipyards
And notifying the next of kin
Once again...
Hueij is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 19:22   #12
Kontiki
King
 
Local Time: 10:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,920
Quote:
UN WEAPONS inspectors do not need to find a "smoking gun" proving Iraq still has weapons of mass destruction in order to trigger war, says the Defence Secretary.

Geoff Hoon says it could be enough for the inspection teams led simply to obtain "persuasive evidence" that Saddam Hussein still has nuclear, biological or chemicals weapons to warrant military strikes by Britain and the US.

Mr Hoon's comments will further alarm Labour backbenchers already unhappy at the momentum building behind military action.

"Clearly we believe there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq," he said in an interview with The Sunday Telegraph.

"We would expect Hans Blix and his team to discover indications of them - a shell or a missile or something clearly prohibited, or documentary evidence," he said.
What's the difference? How much more of a smoking gun can you find? It's not like the inspectors are going to stumble across a massive ongoing chemical weapons attack or a nuclear test detonation.
__________________
"The French caused the war [Persian Gulf war, 1991]" - Ned
"you people who bash Bush have no appreciation for one of the great presidents in our history." - Ned
"I wish I had gay sex in the boy scouts" - Dissident
Kontiki is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 19:37   #13
cinch
Warlord
 
Local Time: 07:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 131
Here's what I don't get:

How is it possible for Saddam to have nukes? Chemical weapons, sure, but nuclear weapons, that's a stretch...

I mean, we'd have noticed and have evidence of a test if he ever tried out one of his warheads. That has never happened. You can't use a nuke without testing one first. And that's assuming that he even has the capability to attempt to construct a nuclear weapon.

There is no way Saddam has a missile that is capable of hitting the U.S. Could chemicals or a nuke be brought over covertly, in a terrorist-y way? Yes, but that's irrelevant, as the point here is whether or not the nation of Iraq is posing a threat to America. Which it isn't.
cinch is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 19:42   #14
Edan
Warlord
 
Edan's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally posted by Xian
Keep in mind that the Us has the biggest store of weapons of mass destruction in the world, and in fact ahs sold them and used them to/in Turkey and Isreal to name just 2 out of many.
When did Turkey or Israel use WoMD?
Edan is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 19:44   #15
Edan
Warlord
 
Edan's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally posted by cinch
Here's what I don't get:

How is it possible for Saddam to have nukes?
Well, he was within 6 months of having one before the Gulf War.

Quote:
You can't use a nuke without testing one first.
So Israel doesn't have any nukes, then?

Most likely, Saddam will get 3 nuclear weapons before he ttests them. One to use defensively as a last resort. One to use if he needs/wants to (ie offensively or defensively) and one to test to tell the world "Watch out, we're some badass MFs"
Edan is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 20:03   #16
cinch
Warlord
 
Local Time: 07:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 131
Quote:
So Israel doesn't have any nukes, then?
It's slightly different when you have American nuclear scientists at your disposal. Iraq would basically be going into the endeavour solo, which would make creating a successful nuclear weapon much more challenging.

I still say that if the Iraqis had WMDs, we'd have seen them at one point. Not by inspectors, but by satellite. JFK used satellite imagery to convincingly show missiles in Cuba 40 years ago, why can't this administration (or the last) do the same now? Or a few years ago?

Any imagery they've shown us lately has been weak, at best.

Blah.
cinch is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 20:10   #17
Spiffor
Civilization III Democracy GamePtWDG LegolandApolytoners Hall of Fame
 
Spiffor's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: jihadding against Danish Feta
Posts: 6,182
I wonder why US/UK authorities still lie as blatantly on Iraqi WMD. We all know WMD have nothing to do in this war. Why don't they just admit it is clearly realpolitik which will cause the bloodbath ?
__________________
"I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
"I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
"I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis
Spiffor is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 20:10   #18
Edan
Warlord
 
Edan's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 234
Quote:
Iraq would basically be going into the endeavour solo, which would make creating a successful nuclear weapon much more challenging.
How hard is it to build a nuclear weapon, once you have the radioactive material? Not very.

Quote:
I still say that if the Iraqis had WMDs, we'd have seen them at one point. Not by inspectors, but by satellite. JFK used satellite imagery to convincingly show missiles in Cuba 40 years ago,
You misspelled reconnocense flights. Those images weren't taken by satellites.

Quote:
why can't this administration (or the last) do the same now? Or a few years ago?
Satellites aren't very good at taking pictures underground or of people concentrating on hiding the weapons from prying eyes. Besides, what makes you think that *we* would/should have access to the intelligence reports, anyway?

Last edited by Edan; January 19, 2003 at 20:21.
Edan is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 20:12   #19
Edan
Warlord
 
Edan's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally posted by Spiffor
We all know WMD have nothing to do in this war.
We do?
Edan is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 20:18   #20
Tripledoc
ACDG The Human Hive
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 14:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 55
The lamest casus belli in the history of mankind?
Tripledoc is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 20:26   #21
Spiffor
Civilization III Democracy GamePtWDG LegolandApolytoners Hall of Fame
 
Spiffor's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: jihadding against Danish Feta
Posts: 6,182
Quote:
Originally posted by Edan
We do?
Erm, at least those of us who aren't only exposed to CNN or FoxNews
I'll change my mind when the US/UK will be kind enough to give their super duper proofs to the UN (after all, it will save much time, since the UN is clearly looking for what the US and UK know for suuuuuch a long time)
__________________
"I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
"I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
"I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis
Spiffor is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 20:55   #22
cinch
Warlord
 
Local Time: 07:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 131
Quote:
You misspelled reconnocense flights. Those images weren't taken by satellites.
I take full responsibility for being an idiot here.


Quote:
How hard is it to build a nuclear weapon, once you have the radioactive material? Not very.
Oh yeah, you just slap some uranium on a slab of metal and you're set! Having the technology to build a nuke (which I believe they don't) is one thing, but building one that'll work properly in action is another.


Quote:
Besides, what makes you think that *we* would/should have access to the intelligence reports, anyway?
Because the people should be the ones who decide whether a government goes to war or not?

HYPOTHETICALLY speaking: even if the Iraqis had WMDs, what gives us the right to attack them? Because they may, MAY, decide to attack us in the future (even though they would gain nothing and lose everything from doing so)? The Bush policy of pre-emptive strike would legitimize Pearl Harbor. Which is ridiculous.
cinch is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 21:16   #23
Edan
Warlord
 
Edan's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 234
Quote:
Oh yeah, you just slap some uranium on a slab of metal and you're set! Having the technology to build a nuke (which I believe they don't) is one thing, but building one that'll work properly in action is another.
No, it's not as easy as slapping a bunch of stuff together, but neither is it as hard as you make it out to be.


Quote:
Because the people should be the ones who decide whether a government goes to war or not?
So you think civilians should have access to classified documents? I wonder why I get the feeling that this is a bad idea.


Quote:
HYPOTHETICALLY speaking: even if the Iraqis had WMDs, what gives us the right to attack them?
The ceasefire treaty they signed. If they fail to follow there side of the conditions, that gives adequate reason for a resumption of hostilities. Thats why they are called "ceasefire" treaties.
Edan is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 21:16   #24
Az
Emperor
 
Local Time: 17:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: A pub.
Posts: 3,161
Saddam! Saddam! Saddam! Saddam! Saddam!

*cheers*



__________________
urgh.NSFW
Az is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 21:31   #25
cinch
Warlord
 
Local Time: 07:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 131
Quote:
So you think civilians should have access to classified documents? I wonder why I get the feeling that this is a bad idea.
The PROOF of why we're going to war shouldn't be classified.

Quote:
The ceasefire treaty they signed. If they fail to follow there side of the conditions, that gives adequate reason for a resumption of hostilities. Thats why they are called "ceasefire" treaties.
I disagree, but I'll cede the argument to you. After all that was only a 'hypothetical' situation, was it not?
cinch is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 21:35   #26
Edan
Warlord
 
Edan's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 234
Quote:
The PROOF of why we're going to war shouldn't be classified.
Classified from whom? If either the inspection team or the UN security council decide that Iraq has violated the conditions, that would be proof enough for me - would that not be enough for you?
Edan is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 22:28   #27
Dauphin
Civilization IV PBEMPolyCast Team
Deity
 
Dauphin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Seouenaca, Cantium
Posts: 12,426
Quote:
Originally posted by Edan
You misspelled reconnocense flights.
You mean reconnaissance.
__________________
"Everybody knows you never go full retard. You went full retard man. Never go full retard"
Dauphin is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 22:50   #28
Az
Emperor
 
Local Time: 17:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: A pub.
Posts: 3,161
I've noticed that too, but thought that to be some kind of private joke.
__________________
urgh.NSFW
Az is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 22:50   #29
cinch
Warlord
 
Local Time: 07:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 131
Quote:
Classified from whom?
The citizenry! If the gubment has info proving that Iraq has WMDs, why not show it to the populace, and have them all convinced? Why keep that info classified? What good would that do?



Quote:
If either the inspection team or the UN security council decide that Iraq has violated the conditions, that would be proof enough for me - would that not be enough for you?
I doubt that would happen, but if the inspectors or whomever come across something really meaningful, that would certainly affect my opinion. The UN would have to make their case just as much as I'm saying the Americans should have to.
cinch is offline  
Old January 19, 2003, 22:56   #30
Edan
Warlord
 
Edan's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally posted by Sagacious Dolphin
You mean reconnaissance.
I didn't say I didn't misspell it too.
Edan is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright Đ The Apolyton Team