The Apolyton Hall of Fame: January 2003 - Page 3

The Pioneer · January 24, 2003, 09:21

Poor Dissident!

So long...

Jawa Jocky · January 24, 2003, 10:36

Quote:

Originally posted by BRC

I appreciate it Jawa, but you're gonna have to explain your logic here....

You put together AU 203 you communist b*stard

You help keep the worthwhile conversations going and..

The weakness in your gameplay when you first started posting were exactly the same one's I used to have. It brought back found memories. I enjoyed watching your cities getting a little closer and your style more violent. To make a long story short (too late) you have given us the best documented conversion to the dark side.

BRC · January 24, 2003, 19:00

Well thank you Jawa. I am playing my first full Emperor game, right now, with the Ottomans. I am almost out of the Ancient Age, and am feeling really well. Expect a full AAR based on what I have learned the past few weeks, and the differences that I found between Monarch and Emperor.

Let me tell you that I appreciated your thread on the Arab Conversion game. It was nice to know that you can win with a cultural focus, which I will probably try working into my game as I get better.

Oh. In my current game, I'm being a real d!ck too.

DarkCloud · January 24, 2003, 21:49

Dissident-

Quote:

I'll never win

I'm used to it

But you are doing Demogames now, (although I can't see why you have the intersite demo game thing on... since the intersite civ II demo game was dead last I checked

) and your MP playing should net you some votes

Theseus · January 24, 2003, 23:04

@ BRC! I agree with Jawa's comments btw... you became a very valuable member of the community very quickly. You may have noticed I like making sure newer players are getting helped around here... watching your quick evolution has been fun.

Dark Side BRC = Communist d!ck

Bugs ****ing Bunny · January 25, 2003, 05:01

Quote:

Originally posted by Dominae
Votes for on-topic posters should count for double. The disclaimer that "on-topic posters will never win" sours this whole Hall of Fame idea (for me at least). I see no point in handing out awards for what is essentially glorified chat.

If you are interesting, you'll receive votes regardless of where you post. Handicap systems are just a crutch for the dull.

Panag · January 25, 2003, 13:55

Quote:

Originally posted by Dissident
I'll never win

I'm used to it

hi ,

think positive , who knows , maybe when you least expect it , .....

have a nice day

Jon Shafer · January 25, 2003, 23:45

OT = more veterans (which means more points also), and more people who care about this sort of thing. Therefore, they will usually always win. I'm not sure how many on-topic posters there are or near the top 10...

Dominae · January 25, 2003, 23:52

Edit: Nasty post removed; not worth anyone's time.

Dominae

Dis · January 26, 2003, 04:31

well eventually I may win.

I figure after 5 years I pretty much have to win.

but will I be here in 5 years?...

.
.
well probably

Actually Trip I was going to vote for you, but I didn't hav my votes finalized. I couldn't think of 2 other people to vote for. Next time...

Bugs ****ing Bunny · January 26, 2003, 11:33

Quote:

Originally posted by Dominae
Edit: Nasty post removed; not worth anyone's time.

Dominae

Exactly. No point anyone getting their knickers in a twist, is there?

This whole on-topic/off-topic issue is crap. The predominantly off-topic posters on that list are all (almost without exception) old on-topic posters and have all provided masses of entertainment that has helped keep this place lively. Show me any on-topicer claiming greater inherent worth and I'll show you a self-deluded anal-retentive who's taking a mere ego fondling thread waaaaaay too seriously.

Cyclotron · January 26, 2003, 13:37

How does OT "entertainment" keep the site lively for the majority of posters who don't even visit the OT?

DarkCloud · January 26, 2003, 14:36

Quote:

How does OT "entertainment" keep the site lively for the majority of posters who don't even visit the OT

Because the OT people stick around in the interim between games... if they left; then there wouldn't be any community for the newbies to come to.

Quote:

I'm not sure how many on-topic posters there are or near the top 10...

Well, for current On-Topic:

3.) Sprayber - --------- (30) 22---52 (AC-Fiction)
4.) Paul- (34) 16---50 (CTP)
8.) ixnay- (15) 32---47 (etc.)
9.) Catt- (14) 32----46 (Civ III)
10.) korn469- --------- (33) 12---45 (civ II/III)
11.) Trip- (5) 40--45 (Demogames)

Bugs ****ing Bunny · January 26, 2003, 15:08

If anything, it's already weighted towards On-topic posters. You think Trip would have been 11th if all his activities had been in the OT? No disrespect to the bloke (he's fine by me) but it takes a damned sight longer to make any sort of impression when you're a small fish in the OT's Pacific.

Dis · January 28, 2003, 04:51

exactly.

You don't think I actually like civ3 do ya? I'm here for the post count

JK of course. I would not like to think I play a game I don't like.

Jon Shafer · January 28, 2003, 23:33

Bah... the OT has nothing on me.

DarkCloud · January 28, 2003, 23:52

Trip's rise is probably due to my posting this in the civ III demogames' section of the site

more than anything else

(and the fact that 2002 voters now have 2 votes rather than last years 1)

The OTers are getting old... and need to get elected while they still can... hopefully at least korn manages to get elected before any 2002ers... since he was the man who managed THE LIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

korn was a GOD to me when I first came to this site

-
not that I don't like the 2002ers, but I respect my gods

Imran, Provost, korn, SnowFire, GiantSquid, MJesczenka, etc.

CiverDan · January 29, 2003, 21:57

Hey I never post OT..and I havent got one vote yet....of course...I have only been posting since last September, so that don't really prorve anything...hehe.

BigFurryMonster · January 31, 2003, 15:23

Did you count my votes? I voted in another thread: Aro, Sn00py, Trip.

Hagbart · January 31, 2003, 16:38

Gramphos
Harlan
panag

DarkCloud · January 31, 2003, 21:52

BigFurryMonster- I am fairly sure that I counted your votes!

-
Hagbart- sorry, you are a bit too late- but feel free to vote in the April elections!

Thanks' for your input!

notyoueither · January 31, 2003, 22:07

Uh, DarkCloud? It appears as if you did not count BFMs votes.

He is not listed in your voters list. He voted for Aro and Aro shows as having 2 'points', but White Bandit voted for Aro as well (according to your voters list). So Aro should have 4 if you had counted BFM.

Also, Sn00py is listed with 8 points. Aro, Thrumble, Tuberski and White Bandit voted for him (2 points each). So again it seems that BFMs votes are not included.

btw, Sn00py is listed twice. Once with 8 points and once with 3.

I did not check Trip's.

Jon Shafer · February 1, 2003, 04:11

All this... if you take hanging chads into account, I might end up winning after all!

notyoueither · February 1, 2003, 04:33

OK, Mr. Gore.

Ming · February 1, 2003, 05:47

The Voting is over... see you in a few months.