I am Back, and "Badder" then ever...

StrategicKingMi · February 7, 2003, 11:55

I read the crude that is posted here. I read that I have not even got a vote for the hall of fame? I can run circles around your little group of would be Civers....
I have been gone far too long, playing golf and making loads of cash as Michigans #1 sportscard dealer as voted by me.
( by the by... www.ebay.com seller list topshelfsports for cool auctions)
Now it is time to regain my #1 slot as the very best Civ player in the history of this game.
Is there any brave, yet lowly indvidual out there that thinks they can stand against me? In a REAL GAME of
2 x 2 king small land 60 x 60 board duel game?
NEXT.....

ColdWizard · February 7, 2003, 11:58

but what have you contributed to Apolyton to merit Hall of Fame votes?

Cyrion · February 7, 2003, 12:02

Preparing popcorn and getting ready for HappySeanofNight apparition!

StrategicKingMi · February 7, 2003, 12:07

1) I have posted so many advanced civ2 tactics such as advanced trade routes, ship chaining, planned revolt citys, wonder benifit anaylizations and countless other posts. 9check the archives under strategicking, strategicking2 and 3 )
2) My on going battle with eyes were legendary on this forum
3) unmatched 8 time game league champion, oh its true its true

Zylka · February 7, 2003, 12:17

Holy sh*t I thought you were dead. Did the commie chain you up, or what?

...by the way, I'm pretty sure I gave first votes to most of the civ2 mp guys for the hall of fame, Kaak, Sean, and yourself

WOW!!!

War4ever · February 7, 2003, 12:39

And its on!

Ming · February 7, 2003, 12:50

Just waiting for Eyes to show up... Then they will both claim they are the best... and won't agree to play each other for "whatever" reasons... even though they both love the same settings...

So place your bets... what will be the excuse this time that keeps them from playing... Maybe they are both afraid of each other...

rah · February 7, 2003, 13:15

Of course, we must remember that the two of them are probably the only people that consider those settings a real game.

So let's see which of the two of them is BEST IN THE WORLD, for those settings.

RAH
Different strokes for different strokes.

War4ever · February 7, 2003, 14:51

would be a good fight actually, my money is on Strat

StrategicKingMi · February 7, 2003, 20:54

ZYLKA!!! My old bud, hows it going?
No, the commie gave me the boot,...
(Dumb broad)
and Eyes and I choose radically different settings
he-small board all 1 land mass (luck game)
me- med board, small land mass with lots of islands and conts. (a skillfull display of all civ has to offer)
And as to where I have been, I meet a knew mistress, called Raisin River, must have played 50 rounds on that god&*&^^* course last year......
And have been traveling in search of the "great whale"
a deal so monsterous Ill be "phat" for a while...
(found it in Brooklyn New York.... Thanks Al!
So now, as the money flows in, and I watch my new hero George W. Bush launch an all out assult against the godless Iraq terrosit network, I can take out some of you so called civers....

War4ever · February 7, 2003, 21:22

welcome back, nothings changed

trev · February 7, 2003, 23:31

" In a REAL GAME of
2 x 2 king small land 60 x 60 board duel game?
NEXT....."

This is NOT REAL CIV2, This is a warmongers mongrel version of a great game

Go to 1x1x game on Deity level, normal or large map for
THE REAL GAME

StrategicKingMi · February 7, 2003, 23:57

1 x 1 deity , once again, for thoose impaired minds that need re-education, restricts human skill by implacing so many restrictions on play that everyone becomes the same. Further more, huts virtually determine the winner every time. If you get an empty, and I a city, game is over. Not only will you not be able to find more huts fast enough, but since its also 1 production you will fall to far behind to catch up. Games that are not decided this way, will most assuredly be by land..since u can not move fast enough out of a bad spot to a better one...
end of story........

Ming · February 8, 2003, 01:46

blah blah blah... another "master" who claims that only his settings are worth playing... typical... yawn...

deity · February 8, 2003, 01:50

Quote:

Originally posted by StrategicKingMi
1 x 1 deity , once again, for thoose impaired minds that need re-education, restricts human skill by implacing so many restrictions on play that everyone becomes the same. Further more, huts virtually determine the winner every time. If you get an empty, and I a city, game is over. Not only will you not be able to find more huts fast enough, but since its also 1 production you will fall to far behind to catch up. Games that are not decided this way, will most assuredly be by land..since u can not move fast enough out of a bad spot to a better one...
end of story........

Such a limited strategic imagination...

I take whatever start I get at 1x1x and can always end up in the front runners of the pg and other demogs... regardless of hut luck, Wonders or anything else.

Ming · February 8, 2003, 05:40

Yeah... no matter what settings I'm playing, I deal with the start and have no problem (in most cases) doing well in the long run. It's just a matter of understanding the settings you are playing by

DrSpike · February 8, 2003, 08:38

When you say badder do you mean your skills have deteriorated?

Flatlander Fox · February 8, 2003, 14:25

But that would be poor grammar, and I won't pick on your grammar.

You could have said "More gooder" though.

If I see you on, I'll play your silly little game.

War4ever · February 8, 2003, 17:05

i wonder what strats record is

DrSpike · February 8, 2003, 17:08

I think he may have mentioned once in passing that he was 8 times gameleague champion.

War4ever · February 8, 2003, 17:10

i distinctly remember those credentials, i also remember they came when Sean was away

DrSpike · February 8, 2003, 17:14

How can you be 8 times champion anyway? Did they run a league every month?

Or perhaps it just means he was top of the ladder for eight weeks, days, or minutes.

War4ever · February 8, 2003, 17:17

lol, i think he played a few games and got to the top, refused to fight the #2 and was removed, came back ala Cassius Clay out of prison and regained the title...

wash rinse repeat

StrategicKingMi · February 8, 2003, 22:52

Strate floats like a butterfly , but stings like a bee....
And some others would just avoid playing me and beat up zoners untill they over took me in points.
But being the master that I am , I just pounded someone into submission and over took them....yet again..
"badder" then ever is a take off on Eric bishoffs entrance music.. for thoose Raw is War wrestling fans out there..
My record???? who knows.. but I can tell you this.. of games that lasted past 1000 bc, I have only lost once and that was in just a great game to Kuja.. and the only reason I lost is cause i opened about 35 huts after I built lighthouse and got 0 techs.. this delayed my turn to fundy and the construction of vet fanatics which would have turned the tide of the leos warior trick ....
oh yeah, that would be another contribution of my mine as I discovered that tactic..

StrategicKingMi · February 8, 2003, 22:56

Oh yes, I over took Eyesfraudofnight twice on my acension to the top of the mountain...
Oh its true, its damn true...

DrSpike · February 9, 2003, 09:08

Quote:

Originally posted by StrategicKingMi
My record???? who knows.. but I can tell you this.. of games that lasted past 1000 bc, I have only lost once

/me points out that many, perhaps as many as 9 out of 10 games with 2x2x king are effectively over by 1000BC, so strate's record could be a 10% win rate.

Ming · February 9, 2003, 09:36

Quote:

Originally posted by StrategicKingMi
.. of games that lasted past 1000 bc, I have only lost once and that was in just a great game to Kuja..

If you lose before 1000bc, don't you count it as a loss...

How many games have you quit because your opponent has gotten off to a fast start... and do you count those as losses as well...

War4ever · February 9, 2003, 14:10

so you lost to kuja, and when kuja came here and challenged Poly, i put the wonder lock on him and he submitted.... oh its true! its true!

big deal...to claim your loss was b/c of huts is a bit weak don't you think, if your so good, you should have won despite that

Ming · February 9, 2003, 15:52

Nahhh... typical chest beating. When he losses, it's luck... and when he wins, it's skill.

A loss is a loss... but for some reason, they don't count them...

StrategicKingMi · February 9, 2003, 23:44

Didnt I say it was a great game? Explaining why you lost is not blaming it on luck/ I am still kicking myself thinking if I could have done something different. There were well over 200 citys on that board.
And I would say, 99% of games never get to 1000 bc competitively at any settings. You may play till then, but if you anyalyize the game, you know who the winner will be. If you dont believe this, I question your opposotion.