Has Belgium gone mad? - Page 11

DinoDoc · February 15, 2003, 22:25

Quote:

Originally posted by Frogger
I can't believe he's still here.

He's done the samething each time Ming let's him out of the asylum.

KrazyHorse · February 15, 2003, 22:27

I should probably just put him on ignore. I hate the feeling that I constantly need to distance myself from him.

I'm feeling generous. Maybe I'll take panag off ignore. I actually responded to one of his comments the other day.

have a nice day

Az · February 15, 2003, 22:30

Quote:

It´s like the "We are the poor (pretty rich, actually), powerless (very influential, actually), disadvantaged (given special treatment, actually) minority, therefore we must be right."

You see? all those are nationality based generalizations you make.

EDIT: fixed the quote abit.

Comrade Tribune · February 15, 2003, 22:33

Quote:

Originally posted by DinoDoc
He's done the samething each time Ming let's him out of the asylum.

Running out of arguments, again?

I have been banned only once, ever, and even that one time was not really justified in my eyes, but this is not the place to discuss it.

Not even you could allege I am breaking any forum rule. In fact, this slanderous antisemitism nonsense gets old, and is a personal insult, so *I* could claim that Azazel is breaking a forum rule, but I won´t hide behind the Mods.

Particularly because I am right, after all.

Comrade Tribune · February 15, 2003, 22:37

Quote:

Originally posted by Azazel

You see? all those are nationality based generalizations you make.

Man, I even want to believe you are speaking in good faith, but can´t you see that generalizations are only racist if untrue?

Otherwise it would be racist to say that Whites were privileged in the Confederacy.

After all, it´s a generalization!

Think a little!

DinoDoc · February 15, 2003, 22:37

Quote:

Originally posted by Comrade Tribune
Running out of arguments, again?

I'm trashing you and your nationalist zeal in the other thread not this one.

Comrade Tribune · February 15, 2003, 22:41

Quote:

Originally posted by Frogger
I should probably just put him on ignore. I hate the feeling that I constantly need to distance myself from him.

You confuse me no end. Did I ever claim you agree with me? Why should you need to distance yourself from me, given the fact that I have no intent to pretend you agree with my position? What must I do to assure you I do *not* agree with what you say?

Az · February 15, 2003, 22:45

Quote:

Man, I even want to believe you are speaking in good faith, but can´t you see that generalizations are only racist if untrue?

In order for a generalization to be true, you'll have to have each and everyone of the members of the group you're making the object of generalization, answering all of the criteria you've stated. Do you believe that all jews are fairly rich, influential and given special treatment? That's what you've said. Is this true? NO. Therefore, your generalization is not true. And since it was a generalization on a enthonational basis, you're generalization is a racist one. And since you obviously believe in what you've said, you're a racist.

Comrade Tribune · February 15, 2003, 22:55

Quote:

Originally posted by Azazel
In order for a generalization to be true, you'll have to have each and everyone of the members of the group you're making the object of generalization, answering all of the criteria you've stated.

Nonsense. You could find a few individual Whites in the Confederacy that were worse off than some Blacks. Does that mean, Whites, *as a group*, were not privileged, compared to Blacks *as a group*?

If you don´t understand that concept, you can´t be a collectivist, so I assume your avatar is some sort of weird joke, right?

Az · February 15, 2003, 23:03

It seems that you're failing to understand the basics of debate and formal logic. Therefore, I recommend you to some reading on the subject.

Comrade Tribune · February 15, 2003, 23:05

Quote:

Originally posted by Azazel
It seems that you're failing to understand the basics of debate and formal logic. Therefore, I recommend you to some reading on the subject.

Sounds like a copout, Einstein.

Az · February 15, 2003, 23:14

http://gncurtis.home.texas.net/hastygen.html

Spiffor · February 15, 2003, 23:19

Wow, 312 posts in a thread with "Belgium" in its title. Impressive

Az · February 15, 2003, 23:22

Comrade Tribune · February 15, 2003, 23:23

Quote:

Originally posted by Azazel
http://gncurtis.home.texas.net/hastygen.html

How about this?
http://www.cwru.edu/cgi-bin/edocs/fetch.pl?item=3927

Comrade Tribune · February 15, 2003, 23:27

Quote:

Originally posted by Spiffor
Wow, 312 posts in a thread with "Belgium" in its title. Impressive

You are a racist!

You are alleging that Belgium is not important enough to warrant 312 posts. This implies a negative generalization about Belgians, and whatnot. Beware! The Office of Thought Security will soon be on your tracks!

Oerdin · February 15, 2003, 23:36

*crickets chirping*

Panag · February 16, 2003, 09:00

Top 10
1. Mohamed, 172
2. Alexandre, 85
3. Ayoub, 82
4. Thomas, 81
5. Bilal, 72
6. Mehdi, 69
7. Nicolas, 69
8. Maxime, 65
9. Nathan, 56
10. Hamza, 52

hi ,

Eli , some more for your list , ......

"oussama" passed from number 48 to number 21 , from 2000 to 2001 , .... no numbers yet from after 9/11 , .....

have a nice day

SpencerH · February 16, 2003, 09:52

312 posts on Belgium where very few actually address the topic (the futility of the Belgium courts unilateral action and its ramifications), some take a sideways shot at it, quite a number address a different topic, and the rest are childish trolls that are not worthy of a response).