Coming out

[Solly]

"I would recommend you stay away from these kind of discussions Bodds... because you are one post away from yet another restriction."

WHAT??!! Standing up for morals gets you banned? Bloody hell, and I'd forgotten why I wasn't coming here as much. This is a disgrace.

[Solly]

Originally posted by Guynemer
Boddington's should be hidden from society. No-one wants to read your inane rantings and homophobia.

Homophobia = fear of homosexuals.

I am not afraid of them, it is they who should be afraid if they act as they wish in public.

[Guynemer]

They should be afraid?

Threatening people, Spinky? Is your life so empty, your self-confidence so low, your masculinity so threated that you feel the need to make oblique threats against homosexuals?

[Richelieu]

Glad it went well for you Asher.

[MikeH]

Originally posted by Boddington's


Homophobia = fear of homosexuals.

I am not afraid of them, it is they who should be afraid if they act as they wish in public.

Enjoy your banning.

[Ming]

Originally posted by Boddington's
WHAT??!! Standing up for morals gets you banned? Bloody hell, and I'd forgotten why I wasn't coming here as much. This is a disgrace.

No Bod's... your bigotary is what's a disgrace.

And don't worry... keep "standing up for morals" like you have, and you won't have to worry about coming here as much, because you will be restricted.

[Solly]

Stop trying to dictate policy.

[Ming]

Originally posted by Boddington's
Stop trying to dictate policy.

I'm not... your anti gay crap has NEVER been allowed, and that isn't going to change.

You want to bash on gays, do it on some other site, because it isn't allowed here.

[SpencerH]

Nobody seems to under threat of banning for the continual anti-USA, anti-Israel, anti-France, or anti-take-your-pick-of-subjects trolling that goes on here at poly.

Without defending Boddington's opinions (I think mine are clear from my earlier post), I'd like to know why those who dislike or disagree with his views cant simply ignore them or attack them as is done for every other thread.

[red_jon]

Originally posted by SpencerH
Nobody seems to under threat of banning for the continual anti-USA, anti-Israel, anti-France, or anti-take-your-pick-of-subjects trolling that goes on here at poly.

No-ones saying that American or French people should not go out in public, etc.

And Boddington's comments are entirely innapropriate for a thread on a sensitive matter - they're designed to make Asher uncomfortable (not that Asher would be bothered by something so pathetic).

Ming -

[Japher]

It is one thing to be anti-gay, and another to be pro-gay-bashing or pro-violence.

[SpencerH]

Originally posted by Japher
It is one thing to be anti-gay, and another to be pro-gay-bashing or pro-violence.

Thats true, but unless someone knows of evidence to the contrary, I dont recall Boddington usually espousing actual violence toward gays. Yes, in this thread, he said "I am not afraid of them, it is they who should be afraid if they act as they wish in public". I take that comment, however, to be a knee-jerk reaction from an inability to think cogently, rather than a true opinion.

[Guynemer]

Originally posted by SpencerH

I take that comment, however, to be a knee-jerk reaction from an inability to think cogently, rather than a true opinion.

I think you give him too much credit. Or too little. I really can't tell.

[SlowwHand]

From
I'm Coming Out
Diana Ross

I'm coming out
I want the world to know
Got to let it show
I'm coming out
I want the world to know
I got to let it show

There's a new me coming out
And I just had to live
And I wanna give
I'm completely positive
I think this time around
I am gonna do it
Like you never do it
Like you never knew it
Ooh, I'll make it through

The time has come for me
To break out of the shell
I have to shout
That I'm coming out

[Immortal Wombat]

Godwin's Law. yes.
Briefly:

Rule #4: (Godwin's Rule) Any off-topic mention of Hitler or Nazis will cause the thread it is mentioned in to an irrelevant and off-topic end very soon; every thread on UseNet has a constantly-increasing probability to contain such a mention.
Quirk's Exception: Intentional invocation of this so-called "Nazi Clause" is ineffectual.
Case's Corollary: If the subject is Heinlein or homosexuality, the
probability of a Hitler/Nazi comparison being made becomes equal to one.

Contemporary opinion is that it does not automatically follow that whoever mentions Hitler loses the debate, and drawing that conclusion is bollocks. It simply means the thread has degenerated beyond all hope. (*tick*)

Note Case's Corollary.

Note also, the use of the phrase off-topic. If Bods was genuinely Nazist, then the debate is not lost by anyone's standards.

Incidentally, a good part of 1933 Germany was not in fact a Nazi regime.

[red_jon]

Originally posted by Immortal Wombat
Godwin's Law. yes.
Briefly:


Contemporary opinion is that it does not automatically follow that whoever mentions Hitler loses the debate, and drawing that conclusion is bollocks. It simply means the thread has degenerated beyond all hope. (*tick*)

Note Case's Corollary.

Note also, the use of the phrase off-topic. If Bods was genuinely Nazist, then the debate is not lost by anyone's standards.

Incidentally, a good part of 1933 Germany was not in fact a Nazi regime.

I think you overthink these things.

[Asher]

Well this thread has served its purpose. Can a mod kindly close it, please?

Thanks to everyone sane for the support, it means a lot.

[rah]

Glad to be of assistance.

Congrats and good luck.

RAH