WLTCD but no city growth?? - Page 2

DrSpike · May 7, 2003, 16:34

You two must be uber-competitive to go through that more than once.........in fact once would be bad enough.

rah · May 7, 2003, 17:01

Actually the first few times weren't bad because we really didn't understand how anal to be. But then once you figure how to easily max all the points outside of pop, the only way to do better was pop. Then the food caravan groups were theorized and ANAL took on a whole new meaning. After that, Ming set a new record based on it. I beat it, then he beat me. AND I GAVE UP

So I only played the SUPER SUPER ANAL game once. Ming did it twice. But don't worry, he won that exchange

RAH

War4ever · May 7, 2003, 17:43

ouch

Alinestra Covelia · May 10, 2003, 15:26

It distresses me that the moderators at this fine forum are playing anal games with each other... multiplayer.

Somehow that just sounds fundamentally wrong.

DrSpike · May 10, 2003, 16:05

Quote:

Originally posted by Alinestra Covelia
It distresses me that the moderators at this fine forum are playing anal games with each other... multiplayer.

Somehow that just sounds fundamentally wrong.

Now come one, that's not what they said and you know it.

It was super super anal games.

War4ever · May 10, 2003, 17:07

its all good if they bring lube :P

rah · May 10, 2003, 18:45

You people are sick.

DrSpike · May 10, 2003, 19:36

Quote:

Originally posted by rah
You people are sick.

Well you did kinda ask for it.

I would have made a similar crack (crack, hur hur) myself but I dismissed it as too uncouth, until someone else started it, of course.

Perhaps surprising that such a unladylike joke should come from where it did.

Straybow · May 11, 2003, 22:27

Quote:

Originally posted by rah
You people are sick.

Most of these kids are too young to remember Paul Lynde

rah · May 12, 2003, 08:32

I wish I was that young.

monolith94 · May 13, 2003, 04:45

"growth can put you in a -1 situation"
I hate it when that happens! One of the more annoying aspects of the game in my opinion!!!

Scouse Gits · May 13, 2003, 06:28

You can utilise the -1 situation -- in a current game I have a stable 4 city with an Ein - by dint of celebrating it to five, putting in the Eins and letting it starve back to 4!

SG[1]

DrSpike · May 13, 2003, 07:06

Lol are you going to use the smiley I suggested on every post now?

rah · May 13, 2003, 08:26

Quote:

Originally posted by Scouse Gits
You can utilise the -1 situation -- in a current game I have a stable 4 city with an Ein - by dint of celebrating it to five, putting in the Eins and letting it starve back to 4!

SG[1]

Hmmm, didn't know you could do that. Not sure why I would, but there's always a need for everything eventually.

RAH

War4ever · May 13, 2003, 21:43

many times i will build a set out of a size five that is maxed with scientists, only to keep them that way unless i know i can wltcd it back up again...

great way to use scientists on a city less than five