Thread Tools
Old May 15, 2003, 13:01   #1
BeBro
Emperor
 
BeBro's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:35
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,278
Damn scepticism...
...or "How can you possibly be a scepticist?"

Philosophers, for what is scepticism good? Some people seem to think it is the best excuse to avoid knowledge. I sometimes experience this kind of people when I give arguments in a debate, and they canīt counter them. So their last refuge is to say something like "But we canīt know anything for sure!". Great!

As a philosophical amateur I think scepticism is a good way to avoid "totalitarian" POVs (esp. in political or ethical discussions), and in that way I think it is very useful. I think it is good to have in mind that one *could* be wrong, but in real life thereīs always a point when you have to make decisions or judgements. But how do you get these decisions or judgements when youīre always in doubt about them? Or at which point (philosophical) do you/can you leave the doubts behind you?

What sense does it make to refer always to the problem that there is a possibility that the world out side doesnīt exist? Isnīt it enough that most of us would think it exists (as long as we still have in mind that it is possible to question that reality)?

As said the biggest problem for me is not scepticism in natural science, but when it comes to ethical stuff, because I think it is somehow annoying when one counters arguments against the most stupid (yeah, I know it is all subjective ) positions with a general attack on what can we know at all...

Thanks
__________________
Banana
BeBro is offline  
Old May 15, 2003, 13:08   #2
loinburger
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
Local Time: 21:35
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,605
At some point extreme skepticism will begin to interfere with your ability to function in everyday society. At that point (if not a bit sooner) you've taken it too far, unless, of course, you become a hermit, in which case ethics really don't matter anymore (who're you going to harm if you're living in a cave somewhere?).
__________________
"For just twenty cents a day, we'll moisten your dreams with man urine." -Space Ghost
loinburger is offline  
Old May 15, 2003, 13:33   #3
DaShi
Emperor
 
DaShi's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:35
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Taste of Japan
Posts: 9,611
I doubt that this is a problem.
__________________
“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
Civ V Civilization V Civ5 CivV Civilization 5 Civ 5 - Do your part!
DaShi is offline  
Old May 15, 2003, 13:38   #4
loinburger
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
Local Time: 21:35
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,605
It really isn't, in my experience most extreme skeptics are just hypocrites -- they'll express beliefs that would prevent their functioning in society if they actually held said beliefs, but they're still able to function because they say one thing and do another. It's annoying, but (from what I've seen) not particularly dangerous or whatever.
__________________
"For just twenty cents a day, we'll moisten your dreams with man urine." -Space Ghost
loinburger is offline  
Old May 15, 2003, 13:40   #5
Nubclear
NationStatesCall to Power II Democracy GameInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamRise of Nations MultiplayerACDG The Human HiveNever Ending StoriesACDG The Free DronesACDG The Cybernetic ConsciousnessGalCiv Apolyton EmpireACDG3 SpartansC4DG Team Alpha CentauriansCiv4 SP Democracy GameDiplomacyAlpha Centauri PBEMCivilization IV PBEMAlpha Centauri Democracy GameACDG Peace
PolyCast Thread Necromancer
 
Nubclear's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:35
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: We are all Asher now.
Posts: 1,437
Quote:
Originally posted by DaShi
I doubt that this is a problem.
Nubclear is offline  
Old May 15, 2003, 13:47   #6
Oerdin
Deity
 
Oerdin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:35
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: In a bamboo forest hiding from Dale.
Posts: 17,436
DaShi does come up with some good puns doesn't he?
__________________
Christianity is the belief in a cosmic Jewish zombie who can give us eternal life if we symbolically eat his flesh and blood and telepathically tell him that we accept him as our lord and master so he can remove an evil force present in all humanity because a woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from an apple tree.
Oerdin is offline  
Old May 15, 2003, 13:52   #7
loinburger
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
Local Time: 21:35
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,605
Is that what it was? I thought it was something else, like a "pistillate" or something. Somebody bring me a grammar nazi!
__________________
"For just twenty cents a day, we'll moisten your dreams with man urine." -Space Ghost
loinburger is offline  
Old May 15, 2003, 14:05   #8
Oerdin
Deity
 
Oerdin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:35
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: In a bamboo forest hiding from Dale.
Posts: 17,436
I guess it really wasn't a pun but it was still funny.
__________________
Christianity is the belief in a cosmic Jewish zombie who can give us eternal life if we symbolically eat his flesh and blood and telepathically tell him that we accept him as our lord and master so he can remove an evil force present in all humanity because a woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from an apple tree.
Oerdin is offline  
Old May 15, 2003, 14:17   #9
BeBro
Emperor
 
BeBro's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:35
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,278
Quote:
Originally posted by loinburger
It really isn't, in my experience most extreme skeptics are just hypocrites -- they'll express beliefs that would prevent their functioning in society if they actually held said beliefs, but they're still able to function because they say one thing and do another.
I recently discussed with a conspiracy theorist. When I left his "theory" in ruins his answer was something like "of course criticism is ok, but please be tolerant, because you canīt have knowledge of the ultimate truth". At this point I was in danger to forget my humanist education, because this translates to me as: "It is ok to doubt anything except that what Iīm saying!"

But this case was pretty easy because this guy was in fact just stepping into dogmatism. It can be damn hard to argue with more intelligent people. Of course then it is also more interesting, but it is extremely dissatisfying when they always end in the great "thereīs nothing for sure" argument. Then why discuss at all?

Hm, but maybe Iīm just whining a bit about people who donīt accept my superior arguments

Oh and I doubt DaShi does exist.
__________________
Banana
BeBro is offline  
Old May 15, 2003, 14:33   #10
Adalbertus
Prince
 
Adalbertus's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:35
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Augusta Vindelicorum
Posts: 655
Quote:
But this case was pretty easy because this guy was in fact just stepping into dogmatism. It can be damn hard to argue with more intelligent people. Of course then it is also more interesting, but it is extremely dissatisfying when they always end in the great "thereīs nothing for sure" argument. Then why discuss at all?
Sometimes, reality is dissatisfying. Discussion still makes sense if it opens other ways to look at things or you get more information. -- I've seen both cases where people hid behind scepticism and where a bunch of rumours and wild theories was presented as facts and defended by "you can't doubt everything".

Oh, and I'm super-scepticist: I doubt scepticism exists
__________________
Why doing it the easy way if it is possible to do it complicated?
Adalbertus is offline  
Old May 15, 2003, 14:39   #11
loinburger
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
Local Time: 21:35
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,605
Quote:
Originally posted by BeBro
Then why discuss at all?
That's why an appeal to extreme skepticism is usually hypocrisy -- if we can't really know anything, then the skeptic shouldn't have been arguing for his/her position in the first place. An appeal to skepticism after the fact essentially means "You can't really know anything, but I can know everything."
__________________
"For just twenty cents a day, we'll moisten your dreams with man urine." -Space Ghost
loinburger is offline  
Old May 15, 2003, 15:20   #12
DaShi
Emperor
 
DaShi's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:35
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Taste of Japan
Posts: 9,611
Quote:
Originally posted by BeBro


Oh and I doubt DaShi does exist.
You're not the only one.
__________________
“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
Civ V Civilization V Civ5 CivV Civilization 5 Civ 5 - Do your part!
DaShi is offline  
Old May 15, 2003, 21:40   #13
St Leo
Scenario League / Civ2-CreationApolytoners Hall of Fame
 
St Leo's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:35
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In search of pants
Posts: 5,085
Quote:
I don't accept the currently fashionable assertion that any view is automatically as worthy of respect as any equal and opposite view. My view is that the moon is made of rock. If someone says to me, "Well, you haven't been there, have you? You haven't seen it for yourself, so my view that it is made of Norwegian beaver cheese is equally valid" – then I can't even be bothered to argue. There is such a thing as the burden of proof, and in the case of god, as in the case of the composition of the moon, this has shifted radically. God used to be the best explanation we'd got, and we've now got vastly better ones. God is no longer an explanation of anything, but has instead become something that would itself need an insurmountable amount of explaining. So I don't think that being convinced that there is no god is as irrational or arrogant a point of view as belief that there is. I don't think the matter calls for evenhandedness at all.
- Douglas Adams, interview, American Atheist
__________________
Blog | Civ2 Scenario League | leo.petr at gmail.com
St Leo is offline  
Old May 15, 2003, 22:05   #14
Agathon
Mac
Emperor
 
Agathon's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:35
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wal supports the CPA
Posts: 3,948
Re: Damn scepticism...
Quote:
Originally posted by BeBro
...or "How can you possibly be a scepticist?"

Philosophers, for what is scepticism good?
Look, I'm a philosopher, so I'll have a go.

Philosophical scepticism isn't a practical thesis. It doesn't even always take the form you are talking about (scepticism about the external world).

If we don't have certain knowledge it doesn't mean that all our beliefs are of equal weight. That's why many philosophers have argued that "knowledge" should be understood as warranted assertion or the best explanation or something like that. There's also a school of thought that blames everything on Plato who argued in the Theaetetus that knowledge had to be both true and infallible. If we look at the way the word is actually used there doesn't seem to be that good a case for infallibility.

I've thought about scepticism a great deal, as a theoretical issue. I think that when a theory turns up ridiculously sceptical conclusions it is time to look at the premises and see if it they are as solid as we thought they were. Scepticism should be treated as a reason to reject a theory rather than a reason for endorsing it: since any philosophical theory is supposed to based on ordinary practice.

For example, many philosophers have argued that we cannot infer from our private sense data to the existence of an external world. But what are these sense data? I've never seen one and I can't quite think what they are. We could perhaps reinterpret them as physical states of a brain or sense organs, but then they are part of some larger theory instead of the epistemic fundamentals they were supposed to be.

I think the best way to get around scepticism is to examine the roots of the sceptical arguments to see if they make sense - or indeed if it makes sense to look for some ultimate foundation of human knowledge. The later philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein is a good start.

The only practical sceptic I can think of is the Ancient Sceptic, Pyrrho, who according to Diogenes Laertius had people following him around to make sure he didn't walk off cliffs and suchlike.
__________________
Only feebs vote.
Agathon is offline  
Old May 15, 2003, 22:42   #15
Zero
PtWDG Glory of WarInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamACDG The Human HiveC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamACDG3 SpartansPtWDG2 Monkey
King
 
Zero's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:35
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Halloween town
Posts: 2,969
Quote:
Originally posted by loinburger

That's why an appeal to extreme skepticism is usually hypocrisy -- if we can't really know anything, then the skeptic shouldn't have been arguing for his/her position in the first place. An appeal to skepticism after the fact essentially means "You can't really know anything, but I can know everything."
However, if ur just looking for an argument/trolling, being a skeptic is practical. Cause no matter what position your opponent takes, you can always argue with him
__________________
:-p
Zero is offline  
Old May 15, 2003, 23:39   #16
Urban Ranger
NationStatesApolyton Storywriters' GuildNever Ending Stories
Deity
 
Urban Ranger's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:35
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
Posts: 14,606
Re: Damn scepticism...
Quote:
Originally posted by BeBro
Philosophers, for what is scepticism good? Some people seem to think it is the best excuse to avoid knowledge. I sometimes experience this kind of people when I give arguments in a debate, and they canīt counter them. So their last refuge is to say something like "But we canīt know anything for sure!". Great!
Looks like you are talking about Hume's extreme skepticism, which is not a defensible position, because you can always apply it on itself:
"So how can we be sure that we can't know anything for sure?"


A moderate form of skepticism is good, though, because it allows you to shrug off all forms of wackos.
__________________
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
Urban Ranger is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:35.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright Đ The Apolyton Team