Thread Tools
Old May 22, 2003, 21:47   #91
loinburger
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
Local Time: 22:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,605
But how do you determine which axioms to apply, and which to reject? Where's your starting point?
__________________
"For just twenty cents a day, we'll moisten your dreams with man urine." -Space Ghost
loinburger is offline  
Old May 22, 2003, 22:38   #92
Kuciwalker
Deity
 
Kuciwalker's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
There is only one axiom: if I repeatedly and consistantly observe a certain result from a certain action, then I can state that that result is caused by that action. This axiom can be applied recursively.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
Kuciwalker is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 00:19   #93
Soul Survivor
Settler
 
Local Time: 02:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UChicago
Posts: 4
You can say faith is illogical or impossible or just a way from people to live in ignorance, but faith in religion is no different than faith in anything else.

Take someone from 2000 years ago and try explaining to them our entire existence is derived from millions of units of repeating molecules which are reproduced billions of times to make a human body, they will claim you are crazy and your arguement is illogical and impossible. If you really think about it, this explanation is just as absurd as any other. Perhaps in another 2000 years they will look back on us and laugh - how could they have possibly believed that?

Faith is an essential part of life, we simply draw lines between what kind of faith is acceptable and what kind of faith is not acceptable. We believe in atoms and galaxies millions of light years away, even though none of us have seen them - only because we have faith in science. To take it even further, we have faith in our own existence - but it is very possible that all this is all just a figment of my imagination, or that I am simply a figment of your imagination. But this is not a "practical" way to think because it accomplishes nothing - just like believing in god/religion entirely and abandoning science accomplishes nothing.

Nevertheless, throwing religion out the window, on the grounds it is "illogical", is being hypocritical. You have faith that time passes by, you have faith that the universe exists, you have faith that what you see with your eyes is really there, you have faith that your thoughts are your own, you have faith that you have free will. Religion is not a very big step from there, renouncing one kind of faith while embracing another is absurd. And in response to the invisible rhinoceros in Nukapai's post, there is a slight difference between a rhino and an omnipotent being.

Now the question remains, is it even possible for god to prove his own existence to us?
Soul Survivor is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 00:40   #94
Edan
Warlord
 
Edan's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally posted by Soul Survivor
Now the question remains, is it even possible for god to prove his own existence to us?
No. Or at least probably not. (Of course, god could fundamentally change the logic of the universe, so that it could be proveable...)
Edan is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 00:43   #95
Imran Siddiqui
staff
Apolytoners Hall of FameAge of Nations TeamPolyCast Team
 
Imran Siddiqui's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: on the corner of Peachtree and Peachtree
Posts: 30,698
Soul Survivor: Very good post, very good!

I agree with it entirely. We all have faith in our lives of different things, things that we ourselves have not logically proved.
__________________
“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Imran Siddiqui is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 01:17   #96
Lorizael
lifer
NationStates
Emperor
 
Local Time: 22:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Detached
Posts: 6,995
The problem with the "faith in science" thing is that we constantly change our ideas about science. We look for new data, test old theories, change things when it looks like they're different.

Science has faith in only those things that have been tested over and over again. And "seeing" something means nothing. There are methods of observation other than sight.

Yes, us regular people have faith that the scientists aren't all lying to us, but if we truly wanted to, we could go to university, learn what they have learned, and repeat the process for ourselves, thereby getting rid of the requirement for faith. With religion, even if you're a priest, you still gotta have faith.

God being omnipotent, he should be able to prove his existence.
Lorizael is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 01:24   #97
Edan
Warlord
 
Edan's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 234
Quote:

God being omnipotent, he should be able to prove his existence.
Hmm? How could God prove his existence? What would satisfy you? Flashy Lights? A loud booming voice? Seeing a miracle? Cause all those aren't proof of God's existence.

Last edited by Edan; May 23, 2003 at 01:31.
Edan is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 01:53   #98
Lorizael
lifer
NationStates
Emperor
 
Local Time: 22:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Detached
Posts: 6,995
Your thinking is too mundane. Omnipotent is all powerful. He can do anything he wants. Therefore, if he wants to prove his existence, he can. It doesn't matter how he does it, he just does, because there is nothing that he cannot do.
Lorizael is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 02:05   #99
Jon Miller
staff
ApolyCon 06 ParticipantsCivilization III MultiplayerCivilization II MultiplayerRise of Nations MultiplayerPtWDG Vox ControliC4DG Vox
OTF Moderator
 
Jon Miller's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 13,063
sure

he can prove his existence

but why would he want to?

Jon Miller
__________________
Jon Miller-
I AM.CANADIAN
Jon Miller is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 02:11   #100
ranskaldan
Prince
 
ranskaldan's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 300
Quote:
Originally posted by Soul Survivor
You can say faith is illogical or impossible or just a way from people to live in ignorance, but faith in religion is no different than faith in anything else.

Take someone from 2000 years ago and try explaining to them our entire existence is derived from millions of units of repeating molecules which are reproduced billions of times to make a human body, they will claim you are crazy and your arguement is illogical and impossible. If you really think about it, this explanation is just as absurd as any other. Perhaps in another 2000 years they will look back on us and laugh - how could they have possibly believed that?...
Once again - let me re-emphasize the point of the "best guess". Science is based on the best guess based on what we can see and perceive. Of course these may all be false. But the very point of science is to try to narrow it down, to get theories as close to the truth as possible. Perhaps our eyes are lying to us. Illusions exist. Science tries, at the same time, to tear through as many of these illusions as possible. We try with the best possible capability that humanity can muster to tear through illusions and false theories. I do not have "absolute faith" in science, but I do believe that it is the best bet we have in finding out about the world.

"Faith", on the other hand, has none of that. Faith is pointing randomly at theories, and with no basis at all, declaring "belief". That is utterly ridiculous and is an insult to human civilization.
__________________
Poor silly humans. A temporarily stable pattern of matter and energy stumbles upon self-cognizance for a moment, and suddenly it thinks the whole universe was created for its benefit. -- mbelleroff
ranskaldan is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 02:11   #101
Lorizael
lifer
NationStates
Emperor
 
Local Time: 22:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Detached
Posts: 6,995
Might bring him more followers.

Some people "know" that another religion is right. Now they would know they were wrong.

Some people aren't sure which one is right, so believe none. Now they would know which one is right.

Some people have no belief in a god, not seeing any evidence, now they would see the evidence, and would believe.

Why wouldn't God prove his existence, if he wants people to worship and pray to him?
Lorizael is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 02:19   #102
Kidicious
Deity
 
Kidicious's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,628
Quote:
Originally posted by Lorizael
Why wouldn't God prove his existence, if he wants people to worship and pray to him?
You're assuming that he wants people to follow him.
Kidicious is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 02:21   #103
Lorizael
lifer
NationStates
Emperor
 
Local Time: 22:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Detached
Posts: 6,995
Well if Christianity or Islam is correct then yes, he does.
Lorizael is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 02:47   #104
Giant_Squid
Emperor
 
Giant_Squid's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 3,046
Science isn't about faith. The scientists know that it's true (or at least suspect that it's true) because they've done the experiments. The rest of us believe the scientists not because we take them on faith but for very logical reasons - the fact that scientists are generally smart people, scientists who lied would be out of a job, and, most importantly, the fact that every so often science leads to something like a car or a nuclear bomb so that we know they're doing *something* right over there.
What a Christian friend tells me about faith in religion is that it is not intended as a substitute for logic but rather as a sort of complement. Once you have developed belief in the existence of God logically, either through something like Biblical scholarship, scientific means, or personal experience, then you entrust yourself to Him rather than constantly being wishy-washy about it. An analogy is how a soldier is supposed to trust that his commander knows what he's doing rather than second-guessing every order and causing general chaos.
Which brings me to how I just intentionally killed eight battalions of Knights against a massively fortified enemy city in my last game of Civ3 because they were obsolete and it was too expensive to do something else with them and, on a related note, why I am not a theist
Giant_Squid is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 03:15   #105
Edan
Warlord
 
Edan's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally posted by Lorizael
Your thinking is too mundane. Omnipotent is all powerful. He can do anything he wants. Therefore, if he wants to prove his existence, he can. It doesn't matter how he does it, he just does, because there is nothing that he cannot do.
Well, he could make me believe in him (or think he's true) but then free will goes out the door. OTOH, if I keep free will, I'm free to think thatr anything he uses to prove himself is an illusion or a problem with my eyes or whatever. Unless, as I said ealier, he changes the very nature of logic.
Edan is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 03:16   #106
Edan
Warlord
 
Edan's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally posted by Lorizael

Why wouldn't God prove his existence, if he wants people to worship and pray to him?
Cause he wants people to have free will? If people know that there is a god, there's a lot less free will in the world.
Edan is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 09:23   #107
loinburger
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
Local Time: 22:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,605
Quote:
Originally posted by skywalker
There is only one axiom: if I repeatedly and consistantly observe a certain result from a certain action, then I can state that that result is caused by that action. This axiom can be applied recursively.
How do you determine whether or not there is a causal relation, though? Or do you just assume that repetition denotes causality?

Also, how do you determine whether or not to believe somebody else who has claimed to repeatedly and consistently observe certain result-action pairs? E.g., "My experiments prove that atoms exist," or "Good things always happen when I diligently pray"?
__________________
"For just twenty cents a day, we'll moisten your dreams with man urine." -Space Ghost
loinburger is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 09:32   #108
Lorizael
lifer
NationStates
Emperor
 
Local Time: 22:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Detached
Posts: 6,995
Quote:
Originally posted by Edan


Cause he wants people to have free will? If people know that there is a god, there's a lot less free will in the world.
Adam and Eve knew there was a god. Satan knew there was a god. The presence of an omnipotent being does not eliminate free will. That being may choose not to exercise its power. People may feel that their choices have no meaning, but they still have a choice. And God granted free will, so that even if he may not like what we do, we can still do it.

Loin: it's always odd seeing you make serious posts. Whenever I see your name I expect something humorous, but when you're really debating, you make good points.
Lorizael is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 09:35   #109
loinburger
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
Local Time: 22:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,605
Yeah, too bad they don't allow DL's here, I could just avoid confusion by making a new login, like "loinburger@mentally_masturbating" for debates or whatever.
__________________
"For just twenty cents a day, we'll moisten your dreams with man urine." -Space Ghost
loinburger is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 09:39   #110
Lorizael
lifer
NationStates
Emperor
 
Local Time: 22:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Detached
Posts: 6,995
Ah... that's about more what I expect.
Lorizael is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 10:49   #111
Soul Survivor
Settler
 
Local Time: 02:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UChicago
Posts: 4
About god proving his own existence;

Its a nasty little paradox, like can god create a stone he could not lift. Because no matter what he says or does (whether it defies logic, physics anything), there is no way we could say with 100% certainty that it is not some evil genie trying to trick. But being omnipotent, he must be able to do anything, including prove his existence.

Giant Squid;

I'm not saying there is no difference between faith in science and faith in religion. Yes science uses expirements and empirical evidence to try to describe the universe around us - but it is far from absolute and even science concedes that there are certain things that it cannot hope to describe, ie what happens at less than 10^-35 cm or before 10^-43 seconds after the big bang. But in the end belief in one is just as absurd as belief in another, albiet belief in science is far more practical for human civilization.

About repitition and causality;

I like your arguement and have my own version of it. The fact that I exist right now and have existed before proves I will exist forever. Unfortunately attempting to prove causality empirically has been, problematic at best.
Soul Survivor is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 11:03   #112
Edan
Warlord
 
Edan's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally posted by Lorizael


Adam and Eve knew there was a god. Satan knew there was a god.
I don't even know that there was an Adam or Eve or Satan (indeed, I don't believe in Satan). So that means nothing to me.
Edan is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 11:06   #113
Edan
Warlord
 
Edan's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally posted by Soul Survivor
About god proving his own existence;

Its a nasty little paradox, like can god create a stone he could not lift. Because no matter what he says or does (whether it defies logic, physics anything), there is no way we could say with 100% certainty that it is not some evil genie trying to trick. But being omnipotent, he must be able to do anything, including prove his existence.
Well, I can think of several possibilities:

1. He needent be all-powerful, merely all-knowing and very very powerful.

2. He could force us to believe in him, but that would take the fun out of it.

3. And, of course, he could change the very nature of logic in the universe, so e's proveable.

Personally, I see know problem with God being "omnipotent" and not being able to do contradictory things (like make a rock to heavy to life) but maybe thats just me.
Edan is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 15:34   #114
Ben Kenobi
Civilization II Democracy GameCivilization II Succession GamesCivilization II Multiplayer
Emperor
 
Ben Kenobi's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 18,269
Sure wish I could have replied to this sooner...

As is, I'll give it a shot.

Quote:
Its a nasty little paradox, like can god create a stone he could not lift.
Soul Survivor:

Actually, your example makes no sense in this context. Making sense of God's omnipotence has nothing to do with whether God can or cannot prove that he exists.
The stone lifting problem is a seperate issue.

Quote:
there is no way we could say with 100% certainty that it is not some evil genie trying to trick.
True. This is a problem for believers as well because we are told that false prophets will come and work miracles, in order to decieve. Believers are instructed to gauge the fruits produced by the person before deciding whether they are from God.

It's not a matter so much of whether God has made his existence known, throughout the Bible there are examples of some of the ways in which he tries to convince people of his existence.

Quote:
But in the end belief in one is just as absurd as belief in another, albiet belief in science is far more practical for human civilization.
Now my question here is why. If both systems are absurd, why would science be more practical than faith? For a believer there is nothing more essential than one's relationship with God, and we see evidence when we start to stray, and cut ourselves off from his blessings.

Edan:

Quote:
Cause he wants people to have free will? If people know that there is a god, there's a lot less free will in the world.
The quote you are looking for is the one that Jesus uses, do not put your Lord God to the test. The reasoning behind the commandment is that God makes his presence abundently known, and to ask again for God to appear on your terms is the height of unbelief. Look at the Israelites who had very good evidence for God, yet rejected him because Jesus did not fit their expected Messiah. How can you be sure that when God makes His presence known, that He will do so in the way you expect?

Giant Squid:

Quote:
then you entrust yourself to Him rather than constantly being wishy-washy about it.
Greater understanding takes time. In my own example, my profession of faith was to ask God for help, that I could no longer do things on my own. I believed God could help, even if I did not understand everything about him.

Your friend is right, you don't need to know everything to believe in God.

Quote:
trust that his commander knows what he's doing rather than second-guessing every order and causing general chaos.
So you don't trust God, because you don't see the motives behind the commander. Fair enough. For you, where does God fall short?

ranskaldan:

Quote:
Faith is pointing randomly at theories, and with no basis at all, declaring "belief". That is utterly ridiculous and is an insult to human civilization.
Try reading some theologians, and you will see how our ideas about God, within Christianity have changed over time. Therefore, your accusation has no basis, Christianity still seeks to improve its own understanding of God.

As for the basis of faith, it is not that religion does not say the basis, but merely that you reject their theory. In the Christian example, why don't you believe that Jesus Christ rose from the dead?
__________________
Scouse Git (2) LaFayette and Adam Smith you will be missed
"All my own perception of beauty both in majesty and simplicity is founded upon Our Lady." - JRR Tolkein
Get busy living or get busy dying.
Ben Kenobi is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 15:45   #115
Lorizael
lifer
NationStates
Emperor
 
Local Time: 22:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Detached
Posts: 6,995
Quote:
Originally posted by Edan


I don't even know that there was an Adam or Eve or Satan (indeed, I don't believe in Satan). So that means nothing to me.
This is a theological debate, so whether or not the bible is true is unimportant. We must assume, for the sake of argument, that it is true. After all, I do not think that there are any gods above us, yet I want to discuss this. If I were to argue with my thoughts, no progress at all would be made.

What is important is that Adam and Eve were faced with an omnipotent god yet still had free will.

The assumptions of science, Soul Survivor, are not absurd because they have been thoroughly tested for many hundreds of years. The assumptions of religion cannot be tested, because they are based on supernatural forces, which cannot fit into a natural system of logic and reason.

While I may have faith that gravity will bring me back down every time I jump, this faith can be tested very easily, by jumping.
Lorizael is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 16:28   #116
Rogan Josh
Prince
 
Local Time: 03:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 366
I find the statement that scientists don't need faith amusing. When someone tells me that he can measure the gluino mass to within 4GeV at the LHC (the number currently quoted by the ATLAS collaboration), I need a lot of faith!
Rogan Josh is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 17:28   #117
Edan
Warlord
 
Edan's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally posted by Lorizael


What is important is that Adam and Eve were faced with an omnipotent god yet still had free will.
Only if you believe that real people will act the same way when they know there's a god and that they'll go to everlasting damnation if they don't follow him.
Edan is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 17:31   #118
Zero
PtWDG Glory of WarInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamACDG The Human HiveC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamACDG3 SpartansPtWDG2 Monkey
King
 
Zero's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Halloween town
Posts: 2,969
Quote:
Originally posted by Lorizael
Your thinking is too mundane. Omnipotent is all powerful. He can do anything he wants. Therefore, if he wants to prove his existence, he can. It doesn't matter how he does it, he just does, because there is nothing that he cannot do.
beautifully said! Although atheists/agnostics wont like it because it leaves a loop hole for religious foos to defend existence of god. but if god exists, this explanation is more than enough for why such and such is this way and that...
__________________
:-p
Zero is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 17:38   #119
GePap
Emperor
 
GePap's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: of the Big Apple
Posts: 4,109

WE NEED BUDDHISTS AND HINDUS IN THIS THREAD! I AM SICK OF THE ONLY RELIGIOUS PEOPLE BEING MONOTHEISTS!
__________________
If you don't like reality, change it! me
"Oh no! I am bested!" Drake :(
"it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
"Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw
GePap is offline  
Old May 23, 2003, 17:55   #120
Edan
Warlord
 
Edan's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:06
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 234
I'M NOT YELLING. I'M JUST DEBATING... LOUDLY.
Edan is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:06.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team