Thread Tools
Old October 16, 2003, 09:53   #1
TheStinger
Civilization III Democracy Game
King
 
TheStinger's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: International crime fighting playboy
Posts: 1,063
How do you stop a new EU treaty?
Answer

Give the UK people a vote on it.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3195016.stm

This could be interesting.

ONTOH it may just be a ploy so the UK doesn't have to concede to much. If the govt get what they want- no referndum if they don't the whole thing will be put to the vote, which will be lost and the whole treaty will be scuppered
__________________
Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.
Douglas Adams (Influential author)
TheStinger is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 09:57   #2
Az
Emperor
 
Local Time: 13:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: A pub.
Posts: 3,161
Why would you like to stop a new EU treaty?
__________________
urgh.NSFW
Az is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 10:04   #3
laurentius
Civilization II MultiplayerApolyton Storywriters' GuildACDG The Cybernetic ConsciousnessDiplomacyAlpha Centauri PBEMAlpha Centauri Democracy GameACDG Planet University of TechnologyNever Ending StoriesACDG PeaceACDG3 GaiansMacC4DG Team Alpha Centaurians
King
 
laurentius's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: of genial epicuri
Posts: 1,570
Get 10 000000 people to sign a petition, curse and later assassinate all pro new constitution campainers and politicians, nuke France and Belgium, throw salt to the ruins of EU parliament, convert to islam, burn yourself, contact aliens to destroy the earth....

Nah just kidding theres no way anyone can stop it

have a nice day
__________________
Que l’Univers n’est qu’un défaut dans la pureté de Non-être.

- Paul Valery
laurentius is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 10:05   #4
TheStinger
Civilization III Democracy Game
King
 
TheStinger's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: International crime fighting playboy
Posts: 1,063
Well I didn't say I did.
__________________
Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.
Douglas Adams (Influential author)
TheStinger is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 10:08   #5
Az
Emperor
 
Local Time: 13:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: A pub.
Posts: 3,161
Go EU.
__________________
urgh.NSFW
Az is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 10:08   #6
TheStinger
Civilization III Democracy Game
King
 
TheStinger's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: International crime fighting playboy
Posts: 1,063
Quote:
Originally posted by laurentius
Get 10 000000 people to sign a petition, curse and later assassinate all pro new constitution campainers and politicians, nuke France and Belgium, throw salt to the ruins of EU parliament, convert to islam, burn yourself, contact aliens to destroy the earth....

Nah just kidding theres no way anyone can stop it

have a nice day
It would stop it, because these things have to be unanimously agreed. If it is not agreed by every member no treaty.
__________________
Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.
Douglas Adams (Influential author)
TheStinger is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 13:02   #7
Spiffor
Civilization III Democracy GamePtWDG LegolandApolytoners Hall of Fame
 
Spiffor's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: jihadding against Danish Feta
Posts: 6,182
New EU treaties have the bad habit not to be 'stopped', because the politician-in-chief of each state is the one who decides. If the politician-in-chief is against (or his population is against), he'll get some concessions on other matters as a price of his agreement.

When the people is considered too hostile, the politician-in-chief may either stall the agreement (like what the UK is doing with the Euro - but you too will put your queen's face on Euro coins eventually), or it may simply disregard the public opinion: just see how many referendums there were for the Amsterdam treaty
__________________
"I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
"I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
"I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis
Spiffor is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 13:09   #8
DanS
Apolytoners Hall of FameApolyCon 06 Participants
Deity
 
DanS's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Not your daddy's Benjamins
Posts: 10,737
Why not put it up to a vote no matter what happens? Is there something wrong with people voting or something?
__________________
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
DanS is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 13:14   #9
Spiffor
Civilization III Democracy GamePtWDG LegolandApolytoners Hall of Fame
 
Spiffor's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: jihadding against Danish Feta
Posts: 6,182
Quote:
Originally posted by DanS
Why not put it up to a vote no matter what happens? Is there something wrong with people voting or something?
In the EU, yes.

There is a joke running: "if the EU applied to be a member of the EU, it would be rejected because of its lacking democracy"
__________________
"I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
"I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
"I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis
Spiffor is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 14:40   #10
VetLegion
Civilization II MultiplayerDiploGames
Emperor
 
VetLegion's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 4,037
Quote:
There is a joke running: "if the EU applied to be a member of the EU, it would be rejected because of its lacking democracy"
Ha! I knew it!

Anyway, what is the solution? Strengthening the Eropean Parliament?
VetLegion is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 14:42   #11
Az
Emperor
 
Local Time: 13:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: A pub.
Posts: 3,161
Yay EU
Boo Democracy


__________________
urgh.NSFW
Az is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 14:43   #12
The Andy-Man
Prince
 
The Andy-Man's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tory Party of 'Poly
Posts: 523
Tell the americans that there are weapons of mass destruction in spain. When they conquered spain, tell em they moved em into france....
__________________
eimi men anthropos pollon logon, mikras de sophias
The Andy-Man is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 14:48   #13
el freako
Prince
 
el freako's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Bristol, European Union
Posts: 573
But there are already WMD's in France, specifically nuclear weapons
el freako is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 14:50   #14
VetLegion
Civilization II MultiplayerDiploGames
Emperor
 
VetLegion's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 4,037
But the WMD's never were the reason for action anyway.

I suggest mining the north sea, that's where the battleground is going to be
VetLegion is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 14:59   #15
The Andy-Man
Prince
 
The Andy-Man's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tory Party of 'Poly
Posts: 523
Quote:
Originally posted by el freako
But there are already WMD's in France, specifically nuclear weapons
though true, it dosn't matter much. Bush is a silly person, the WMD line shoudl work to make him get rid of eurpe.
__________________
eimi men anthropos pollon logon, mikras de sophias
The Andy-Man is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 15:08   #16
Drogue
staff
Alpha Centauri PBEMNationStatesACDG Planet University of TechnologyACDG3 GaiansACDG The Human HiveACDG PeaceACDG3 SpartansACDG3 MorganACDG3 Data AngelsPolyCast TeamC4DG Team Alpha CentauriansCiv4 SP Democracy GameAlpha Centauri Democracy GameACDG3 CMNsACDG The Cybernetic Consciousness
Apolyton Knight (Off-Topic Co-Moderator)
 
Drogue's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Oxford or Northampton, England
Posts: 8,116
I agree with Azazel. Most people look at the debates on the Euro and the new constitution and would vote against purely because they think the EU is trying to stop them from being 'British', not thinking about the issues, such as the effect the Euro will have on business, on jobs and on the UK economy, and the fact that this constitution will change so little to the common person. Letting the public have a referendum on things like an EU defence force, or voting measures in the EU parliament, things that 95% of the population have no idea what the effects will be and cannot make an informed decision, seems like a bad idea to me.

There are reasons for and against both the Constitution and the Euro. When more than 5% of the population can understand them, then maybe a referendum will be a good idea. Until then, leave it up to the people we elected to understand them.
__________________
Smile
For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
But he would think of something

"Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker
Drogue is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 15:13   #17
The Andy-Man
Prince
 
The Andy-Man's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tory Party of 'Poly
Posts: 523
Quote:
Originally posted by Drogue
I agree with Azazel. Most people look at the debates on the Euro and the new constitution and would vote against purely because they think the EU is trying to stop them from being 'British', not thinking about the issues, such as the effect the Euro will have on business, on jobs and on the UK economy, and the fact that this constitution will change so little to the common person. Letting the public have a referendum on things like an EU defence force, or voting measures in the EU parliament, things that 95% of the population have no idea what the effects will be and cannot make an informed decision, seems like a bad idea to me.

There are reasons for and against both the Constitution and the Euro. When more than 5% of the population can understand them, then maybe a referendum will be a good idea. Until then, leave it up to the people we elected to understand them.


even if they are making the wrong decision
__________________
eimi men anthropos pollon logon, mikras de sophias
The Andy-Man is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 15:27   #18
Az
Emperor
 
Local Time: 13:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: A pub.
Posts: 3,161
Quote:
There are reasons for and against both the Constitution and the Euro. When more than 5% of the population can understand them, then maybe a referendum will be a good idea. Until then, leave it up to the people we elected to understand them.
Yep, sadly.

I think you should start by actually making the European Parliament more important than national Parliaments. It saddens me to see Britain being the biggest hurdle on the way to a european superstate.
__________________
urgh.NSFW
Az is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 15:35   #19
Spiffor
Civilization III Democracy GamePtWDG LegolandApolytoners Hall of Fame
 
Spiffor's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: jihadding against Danish Feta
Posts: 6,182
Quote:
Originally posted by VetLegion
Anyway, what is the solution? Strengthening the Eropean Parliament?
The only way to strengthen democracy in the EU is to reduce as much as possible the weight of individual states, to have the general EU representing body having actual power.

As it stands, the EU is managed by a directorate of 15 (soon 25) countries. For every major issue such as the EU expansion, each country must agree, i.e everybody has a veto power. Only once we get rid of the power of individual states (such as the vote of one Luxemburger has the same weight as the vote of a German), we can have a serious democracy.
The EU constitution goes in that direction: so far, all fundamental texts are treaties between member states, i.e each State has the authority to agree on entering the treaty or not. With a one constitution in the EU, it makes it possible, that changes in the constitution become a thing of the EU.

It reads: it makes it possible in the future for the EU to move on, even if the majority inside one country is against it (if the majority of the whole EU population is in favor).

Only once the power in the EU stops to be in the hands of individual states, the descisions won't be taken by haggling between states anymore, but hopefully by an elected representative body, or by direct, europe-wide referendums
__________________
"I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
"I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
"I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis
Spiffor is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 15:46   #20
Az
Emperor
 
Local Time: 13:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: A pub.
Posts: 3,161
Quote:
The only way to strengthen democracy in the EU is to reduce as much as possible the weight of individual states, to have the general EU representing body having actual power.
__________________
urgh.NSFW
Az is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 16:06   #21
Odin
DiplomacyNever Ending StoriesApolyton UniversityRise of Nations MultiplayerCiv4 SP Democracy Game
King
 
Odin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Liberal Socialist Party of Apolyton. Fargo Chapter
Posts: 1,649
Nationalism sickens me.
__________________
Nothing to see here, move along: http://selzlab.blogspot.com

The attempt to produce Heaven on Earth often produces Hell. -Karl Popper
Odin is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 16:35   #22
Giovanni Wine
NationStatesNever Ending Stories
King
 
Giovanni Wine's Avatar
 
Local Time: 11:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Location: of Italian Red Wine
Posts: 1,296
Quote:
Originally posted by Spiffor

The only way to strengthen democracy in the EU is to reduce as much as possible the weight of individual states, to have the general EU representing body having actual power.

As it stands, the EU is managed by a directorate of 15 (soon 25) countries. For every major issue such as the EU expansion, each country must agree, i.e everybody has a veto power. Only once we get rid of the power of individual states (such as the vote of one Luxemburger has the same weight as the vote of a German), we can have a serious democracy.
The EU constitution goes in that direction: so far, all fundamental texts are treaties between member states, i.e each State has the authority to agree on entering the treaty or not. With a one constitution in the EU, it makes it possible, that changes in the constitution become a thing of the EU.

It reads: it makes it possible in the future for the EU to move on, even if the majority inside one country is against it (if the majority of the whole EU population is in favor).

Only once the power in the EU stops to be in the hands of individual states, the descisions won't be taken by haggling between states anymore, but hopefully by an elected representative body, or by direct, europe-wide referendums
I think Spiffor said it all

Plus with a working EU body we would finally get rid of the stupid Italian politics and politicians (well unless the EU will keep electing Italian politicians as EU leader )

Saluti
__________________
"Life is pretty simple: You do some stuff. Most fails. Some works. You do more of what works. If it works big, others quickly copy it. Then you do something else.
The trick is the doing something else."
— Leonardo da Vinci
"If God forbade drinking, would He have made wine so good?" - Cardinal Richelieu
"In vino veritas" - Plinio il vecchio
Giovanni Wine is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 16:41   #23
lord of the mark
Deity
 
lord of the mark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,160
Quote:
Originally posted by Drogue
I agree with Azazel. Most people look at the debates on the Euro and the new constitution and would vote against purely because they think the EU is trying to stop them from being 'British', not thinking about the issues, such as the effect the Euro will have on business, on jobs and on the UK economy, and the fact that this constitution will change so little to the common person. Letting the public have a referendum on things like an EU defence force, or voting measures in the EU parliament, things that 95% of the population have no idea what the effects will be and cannot make an informed decision, seems like a bad idea to me.

There are reasons for and against both the Constitution and the Euro. When more than 5% of the population can understand them, then maybe a referendum will be a good idea. Until then, leave it up to the people we elected to understand them.
it would seem that if youre making anything like a permanent concession of sovereignty, it would make sense to put it to a referendum. If you dont trust the people to vote on it, dont do it.
__________________
"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
lord of the mark is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 16:42   #24
lord of the mark
Deity
 
lord of the mark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,160
Quote:
Originally posted by Giovanni Wine


I think Spiffor said it all

Plus with a working EU body we would finally get rid of the stupid Italian politics and politicians (well unless the EU will keep electing Italian politicians as EU leader )

Saluti
Presumably the majority if Italians who elect those politicians disagree.
__________________
"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
lord of the mark is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 16:43   #25
Az
Emperor
 
Local Time: 13:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: A pub.
Posts: 3,161
Quote:
it would seem that if youre making anything like a permanent concession of sovereignty, it would make sense to put it to a referendum. If you dont trust the people to vote on it, dont do it.
When the founding fathers formed the Federation which is called the USofA, did they make a referendum?
__________________
urgh.NSFW
Az is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 16:43   #26
lord of the mark
Deity
 
lord of the mark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,160
Quote:
Originally posted by Azazel
Quote:
There are reasons for and against both the Constitution and the Euro. When more than 5% of the population can understand them, then maybe a referendum will be a good idea. Until then, leave it up to the people we elected to understand them.
Yep, sadly.

I think you should start by actually making the European Parliament more important than national Parliaments. It saddens me to see Britain being the biggest hurdle on the way to a european superstate.
why? maybe they like being an independent state. National sovereignty hasnt been quite the disaster for Britain that it has been for most of the continental states.
__________________
"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
lord of the mark is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 16:44   #27
Pekka
Emperor
 
Pekka's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Xrr ZRRRRRRR!!
Posts: 6,484
Spit on it like you mean it. Spit on it, so that every human being from this planet knows you despice it.
Spit on it, and then stomp it. Stomp it like you wanted to get to the other side of the world, through Earth.
Stomp on it, stomp it with fury. But with elegant fury, not in rage like 6 year old kids. Show your anger, get angry.

Make fun of every person who disagrees with you. Give them subtle hints you'll kick their butts if they start making fun of you. Keep making fun of them. Make everyone next to you laugh nervously. Give subtle hint, that if they don't laugh with you, they'll all be going to hospital.

THAT'S how you deal with problems in life IN general.
__________________
In da butt.
"Do not worry if others do not understand you. Instead worry if you do not understand others." - Confucius
THE UNDEFEATED SUPERCITIZEN w:4 t:2 l:1 (DON'T ASK!)
"God is dead" - Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" - God.
Pekka is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 16:48   #28
lord of the mark
Deity
 
lord of the mark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,160
Quote:
Originally posted by Azazel
Quote:
it would seem that if youre making anything like a permanent concession of sovereignty, it would make sense to put it to a referendum. If you dont trust the people to vote on it, dont do it.
When the founding fathers formed the Federation which is called the USofA, did they make a referendum?
I'll speak to the adoption of the Constitution, the most analogous moment.

They allowed each state to determine the means of ratification. Most (all) chose ratification conventions, elected for the sole purpose of voting on ratification. Effectively the elections for these conventions were ratification referendums. The Federalist Papers, considered some of the most important political documents in US history, were written to influence the public debate on ratification.

NOw Im not saying the ratification conventions were fully democratic - most states had property qualifications for voting, only white males (and in many states christians) could vote. But then that was also true of the state legislatures. America wasnt quite democratic in 1789. Presumably in 2003 expectations are somewhat different?
__________________
"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
lord of the mark is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 16:49   #29
Spiffor
Civilization III Democracy GamePtWDG LegolandApolytoners Hall of Fame
 
Spiffor's Avatar
 
Local Time: 12:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: jihadding against Danish Feta
Posts: 6,182
We should create two things: we should have, on the one hand, the "EEC", with all the nationalistic countries belonging to it (Britain, Denmark, and maybe even Norway or Switzerland).
And on the other hand, we should have somthing called the "real EU", where countries actually mature enough to transfer part of their sovereignity accept that the rules are defined by a superstatish body, rather than by unelected hagglers. The members of the "real EU" could have their own voice within the EEC, or they could speak as one voice. Needless to say, the nationalistic countries would quickly be vassalized if such was done.
__________________
"I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
"I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
"I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis
Spiffor is offline  
Old October 16, 2003, 16:51   #30
lord of the mark
Deity
 
lord of the mark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:39
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,160
Quote:
Originally posted by Azazel
Quote:
it would seem that if youre making anything like a permanent concession of sovereignty, it would make sense to put it to a referendum. If you dont trust the people to vote on it, dont do it.
When the founding fathers formed the Federation which is called the USofA, did they make a referendum?
also I would point out that at the time of the adoption of the constitution (1789) the states had only been independent of Great Britain for 13 years (since 1776) giving up such a shortlived sovereignty was presumably a lighter matter than giving up a sovereinty going back at least to 1066 (depending on your point of view) in the case of Britain. (valuing sovereignty more lightly makes more sense for states like Italy and Germany - late to be formed, and with largely negative consequences for their respective peoples)
__________________
"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
lord of the mark is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:39.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team